Skip to content

Enroll in Vital Psychedelic Training, starting September 17!
Master the art of psychedelic practice

Learn More
  • Education Center
  • Vital
  • Shop
  • Navigators
Site Logo
  • Podcasts
    • Psychedelics Then and Now
  • Articles
  • Events
  • About

Subscribe to Our Podcast

Post Tag: Regulations

Posted on July 14, 2026July 14, 2026

Psychedelic Policy Briefing: Week of July 13th, 2026

FDA WNBA Brief

In this week’s Psychedelic Policy briefing, investigative reporter Jack Gorsline breaks down the latest major psychedelic policy breakthrough in Massachusetts, where last week an amendment to an economics bill that would create a multiyear psychedelic pilot program complete with major grassroots advocacy concessions related to industry ownership equity and diversity as well as financial affordability for MA residents on every level of the socioeconomic totem pole.  

At the same time the Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA) recently added multiple psychedelic compounds to the league’s banned substances list. The contrarian move by the fastest-growing professional sports league in the United States comes amidst a growing number of pro athletes publicly discussing their psychedelic use as well as advocating for expanded access to and research into psychedelics’ potential in enhancing performance, aiding recovery, and even healing Traumatic Brain Injuries (TBIs) 

Across the pond in France, a groundbreaking Phase III clinical trial exploring psilocybin to treat Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), while a once-pioneering British Chemist was arrested again last month in the U.K. and is facing extradition to United States, where he’s been charged with and is facing life in prison for allegedly widespread international distribution of LSD analog compounds and other novel synthetic psychedelics. 

Massachusetts House Advances Psychedelic Therapy Pilot Program

Massachusetts lawmakers have advanced a measure to establish a state-sanctioned psychedelic-assisted therapy pilot program. The psychedelics measure was inserted as an amendment into an economic development omnibus bill, which passed the House 148 to 2 on July 8. The move creates a narrow medical framework for legal access following the 2024 defeat of Question 4, a broader psychedelic legalization and decriminalization ballot measure.

If enacted, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health will develop a five-year pilot program authorizing up to three licensed mental health clinics to provide monitored care using naturally occurring psychedelics, such as psilocybin. The program strictly excludes commercial interests. Participating providers cannot be subsidiaries, affiliates, or members of cannabis industry organizations, psychedelic molecule development companies, or pharmaceutical corporations.

Notably, the proposed program would also establish a “Medical Psychedelics Fund” similar to New Mexico’s Medical Psilocybin Treatment Equity Fund, which MA grassroots advocates previously  called on lawmakers to include in the now-amended framework. This provision carries immediate weight given the recent economic struggles for regulated psilocybin service centers and practitioners in Oregon, who are facing hefty licensing fee increases that industry stakeholders and state regulators have acknowledged could threaten the world’s first state-regulated psychedelic treatment program.

As for what’s next in The Bay State, the Massachusetts Senate is expected to draft and pass its own version of the economic development package in the coming weeks. The Department of Public Health will dictate clinical protocols, patient assessment regulations, and data tracking for treating conditions like PTSD and depression. That rulemaking process will determine whether the pilot program prioritizes accessible care or is shaped by private capital.

Flurry of Federal Action Signals WH is Serious about Psychedelic Regulatory Reforms

On Monday, July 13, The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)  issued final guidance on clinical investigations for psychedelic drugs. The move follows President Trump’s April executive order aimed at accelerating treatments for serious mental illness. The updated framework clarifies the agency’s stance on trial populations, pre-approval and post-approval safety assessments, and long-term follow-up.

To gather further feedback, the FDA also announced on Monday that the agency will hold a historic public hearing on September 14 at the agency’s Maryland office to discuss the therapeutic use of psychedelics in supervised settings. The agency opened registration Monday for virtual and in-person oral comments. 

Just up the street in D.C., the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Health and Human Services announced and signed a memorandum of understanding Monday to collaborate on the research and potential rollout of FDA-approved psychedelic treatments for veterans.

In the private sector, Resilient Pharmaceuticals (the company formerly known as Lykos Therapeutics) is moving forward with a trademark claim for “Rysanso.” The filing, which covers pharmaceutical and psychedelic preparations, suggests the company is preparing for an FDA re-review of its MDMA compound after being initially rejected by the FDA in August 2024. 

WNBA Adds Multiple Psychedelics to Banned Substance List

As first reported by Marijuana Moment, the Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA) and its players union have added the psychedelics dimethyltryptamine (DMT), ibogaine, psilocybin, and psilocin to the prohibited substances list for the first time. The decision contrasts with the league loosening restrictions on cannabis, CBD, and hemp use and investments by players.

While the ban explicitly adds a number of psychedelic compounds to the banned substances list, drug testing for these compounds can be complicated. Many of the listed compounds do not remain in the human bloodstream for more than 24 hours, making recent use difficult to verify.

Other professional sports leagues, including the NFL, NBA, PGA Tour, NHL, and UFC, have maintained a more hands-off approach to psychedelic use. NFL quarterback Aaron Rodgers has widely discussed his use of ayahuasca, as has Miami Dolphins safety Jordan Poyer. Former Number 2 overall NFL draft pick Robert Gallery has also become an outspoken advocate for ibogaine research and expanded access – serving as an ambassador for Americans for Ibogaine and founding his own advocacy organization Athletes for Care.

On the hardcourt, two-time NBA champion Lamar Odom has spoken publicly about using ibogaine-assisted therapy to address longtime substance abuse struggles. Former NHL player Daniel Carcillo opened Experience Onward, a state-licensed psilocybin service center in Portland, Oregon most famous for playing host to Tech Investor and longevity science firebrand Bryan Johnson for his now-infamously live-streamed high dose psilocybin mushroom trip last year.

The WNBA’s ban sits in direct contrast to athletes in other leagues who are actively utilizing and building infrastructure for regulated access, mapping a clear divide in how sports governing bodies treat these compounds.

France’s First-Ever Phase III Clinical Trial for Psilocybin Launches

Researchers dosed the first participant in a groundbreaking clinic trial in France, a first-of-its-kind Phase III study evaluating psilocybin for relapse prevention in people living with alcohol use disorder and depressive symptoms.

While Germany and the Czech Republic have authorized compassionate use programs for medical psilocybin, Europe currently lacks large psychedelic therapy trials of European design and delivery to build the evidence base for regulatory approvals. ERPPAD is a Phase III trial conducted entirely in Europe and the first Phase III study globally to evaluate a classical psychedelic for addiction. A separate Phase III trial exclusively in Europe is currently evaluating ketamine, a legal anesthetic, for severe alcohol use disorder.

Alcohol use disorder remains a significant public health challenge, often accompanied by depression and a high risk of relapse. According to the World Health Organization, the European Region has the highest alcohol consumption levels globally, with adults consuming an average of 9.2 liters of pure alcohol every year. Alcohol contributes to nearly 800,000 deaths annually in the Region, mostly from noncommunicable diseases such as cardiovascular disease and cancer. In 2019, alcohol was responsible for almost one in three injury deaths, 42% of homicides, 37% of suicides, and 35% of road deaths in the WHO European Region.

Psychedelic addiction treatment has historical precedent. In the late 1950s, Alcoholics Anonymous co-founder Bill Wilson participated in LSD research and encouraged further study into whether psychedelics could help people recover from alcohol addiction.

Founder of Pioneering Analog Psychedelic Lab Arrested, Faces Extradition to  U.S.


Last month, British chemist was arrested again and is facing life in a United States federal prison after authorities accused him of importing prohibited LSD-based psychedelic compounds, 

In 2012, Alexander Stratford founded Lizard Labs and Synex Synthetics in the Netherlands to manufacture novel lysergamides, tryptamines, and phenethylamines. Both companies synthesized classical psychedelic analogues – such as 1P-LSD and 1cP-LSD. The companies’ websites labeled the chemicals strictly for laboratory research and claimed to block shipments to the US and the UK. However, US authorities now accuse Stratford of intentionally importing 1cP-LSD into the United States to circumvent federal drug laws.

A US coordinated law enforcement operation raided Lizard Labs in November 2022 and seized its domains. The company launched a replacement site in early 2023 but posted a closure notice for December 2024, citing escalating legal pressures. International authorities seized the second domain shortly after the announcement. For now, Stratford remains in the UK under strict curfew and travel bans pending a full extradition hearing.

Under the Controlled Substances Analogue Enforcement Act, the US treats compounds structurally or pharmacologically similar to Schedule I substances as fully prohibited. The chemist synthesized these compounds in a jurisdiction where they remained legally ambiguous or permitted. US enforcement does not recognize foreign scheduling status once the compounds enter the country.

The indictment forces a direct clash between international drug policies and aggressive US border enforcement. While European regulators have sometimes delayed scheduling novel LSD derivatives, the Drug Enforcement Administration maintains a rigid blockade against their importation.

A potential life sentence represents a severe penalty for an overseas manufacturer of psychedelic analogues and could set a striking legal precedent that affects the future of novel scientific compound synthesization and research. Ultimately, the coming trial will decide whether US courts can imprison foreign nationals for synthesizing compounds that are legal in their own operating jurisdictions.

This article was produced in partnership with Psychedelic State(s) of America – a nonprofit-sponsored news organization dedicated to rigorous independent psychedelic journalism. Learn more about PSA’s Media Partnerships Program and donate to the PSA Media Fund here.

FAQ from the editors of Psychedelics Today

What did the FDA announce about psychedelics in July 2026?


On July 13, 2026, the FDA issued final guidance on clinical investigations of psychedelic drugs, replacing its 2023 draft. The guidance clarifies the agency’s expectations for trial populations, pre-approval and post-approval safety assessments, and long-term follow-up. The same day, the FDA announced a September 14, 2026 public hearing on the therapeutic use of psychedelics in supervised settings.

When did the WNBA ban psychedelics?

Under the collective bargaining agreement finalized in 2026, the WNBA and its players union added DMT, ibogaine, psilocybin, and psilocin to the league’s prohibited substances list for the first time, while loosening restrictions on player use of and investment in cannabis, CBD, and hemp.

What is the ERPPAD trial?

ERPPAD is a Phase III clinical trial in France evaluating psilocybin for relapse prevention in people with alcohol use disorder and depressive symptoms. It dosed its first participant in July 2026. It is the first Phase III study of a classical psychedelic for addiction and the first conducted entirely in Europe.

What happened to Lykos Therapeutics after the FDA rejection?

After the FDA declined to approve its MDMA-assisted therapy application in August 2024, Lykos Therapeutics changed its name to Resilient Pharmaceuticals. In 2026 the company filed a trademark for “Rysanso” covering pharmaceutical and psychedelic preparations, a signal it is preparing for a renewed approval effort.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on July 5, 2026July 22, 2026

Psychedelic Policy Briefing: Week of July 6, 2026

CIA DEA Brief - July 6

In this week’s Psychedelic Policy Briefing, Jack Gorsline breaks down the newly filed federal IBOGAINE Act, which would write key provisions of President Trump’s April executive order on psychedelic research into law. In Oregon, proposed licensing fee increases could push more of the state’s psilocybin service centers toward closure. In Washington, a New York Times investigation into Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin’s financial stake in a kratom company raises questions about the administration’s recent move against 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH). And at a House hearing on government secrecy, a former CIA officer testified about Project MKUltra, saying, “I don’t believe that the research stopped.”

Newly Filed IBOGAINE Act Would Codify Trump’s Psychedelic Executive Order, Direct AG to Evaluate Moving Ibogaine From Schedule I to II

As first reported by Marijuana Moment, a bipartisan group of House lawmakers introduced H.R. 9559, the Initiating Biomedical Outcomes to Garner Advancements into Innovative Neuroplastogen Efficacy (IBOGAINE) Act, on June 30 to codify President Trump’s April 18 executive order on psychedelic therapies. Sponsored by Reps. Morgan Luttrell (R-TX), Lou Correa (D-CA), Jack Bergman (R-MI), and Michael McCaul (R-TX), the bill directs the attorney general to determine within 60 days whether to transfer ibogaine from Schedule I to Schedule II of the Controlled Substances Act. Correa had signaled in an interview with CBS News in late May that a codification bill was coming.

The legislation would establish a federal statutory definition for ibogaine that explicitly includes all parts of the plant Tabernanthe iboga, as well as similar compounds acting on neuroplasticity, opioid receptors, or serotonergic pathways. It also clarifies Right to Try exemptions for seriously ill patients, requires the Drug Enforcement Administration to revise production quotas for rescheduled compounds, and creates frameworks for federal research collaboration with state agencies and the private sector. The bill directs the attorney general and the secretary of Health and Human Services to initiate rescheduling proceedings for any other Schedule I substance that completes Phase 3 clinical trials.

The full text of the bill has not yet been posted on congress.gov. The legislation has been referred to the House Committees on Energy and Commerce, the Judiciary, and Veterans’ Affairs.

Elsewhere on Capitol Hill, Marijuana Moment also reported last week that a key congressional committee advanced an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2027 that would extend funding for a military psychedelic research program through September 30, 2033. Originally authorized under the 2024 NDAA, the program facilitates clinical trials involving substances such as psilocybin, MDMA, ibogaine, and 5-MeO-DMT for active-duty service members with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or traumatic brain injury. The amendment replaces the original three-year reporting requirement, keeping the research under Department of Defense funding through 2033.

Oregon Health Authority Proposes Fee Hikes for Psilocybin Service Centers, Drawing Objections From Industry Stakeholders

On June 26, the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) proposed fee increases for Oregon’s psilocybin therapy program and announced plans to merge the program with the state’s medical cannabis program, effective September 1. Angela Allbee, section manager of the Oregon Psilocybin Services (OPS) program, wrote in a recent email to industry stakeholders that both OPS and the Oregon Medical Marijuana Program (OMMP) are experiencing budget shortfalls.

“After taking steps to reduce costs (e.g., not filling vacant positions, reducing non-personnel costs),” Allbee wrote, “the next step in our resource-limited environment is to look for other impactful ways to increase efficiency and cost-effectiveness.”

The Healing Advocacy Fund (HAF), a key industry stakeholder organization, urged supporters in a recent email to appeal directly to Governor Tina Kotek’s office.

“The state is facing the worst budget situation in recent memory,” wrote HAF Oregon State Director Heidi Pendergast, “and policymakers are required to balance a $1B shortfall due to federal Medicaid (OHP) cuts.”

“That means cuts in almost every direction, including cuts to essential services like schools, roads and health care,” Pendergast continued.

“These increases for psilocybin service centers are far beyond anything comparable in Oregon’s health care licensing landscape,” she added, “and are damaging for a program that is still finding its footing.”

Since opening in 2023, the first legal psilocybin program in the U.S. has not generated a profit for the state, and a number of licensed service centers have already closed, citing financial difficulties. Oregon’s experience is the closest thing the country has to a preview of what state-regulated psychedelic programs cost to run, and other states building similar systems will face the same math.

Regulatory News: Amid Cannabis Rescheduling Hearings in D.C., the DEA Moves to Temporarily Schedule 7-OH and Related Compounds

During the third day of the Drug Enforcement Administration’s ongoing cannabis rescheduling hearings at DEA headquarters in Arlington, Virginia, the agency announced on July 1 its intent to temporarily place 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) and three related synthetic substances (mitragynine pseudoindoxyl, MGM-15, and MGM-16) into Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), under Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., recommended the action, citing a “high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use for the synthetic compounds” as defined under the Controlled Substances Act of 1970.

The temporary scheduling targets commercial, semi-synthetic 7-OH products, such as tablets, gummies, and dissolvable strips, that contain elevated concentrations of the compound. The rule explicitly does not apply to traditional botanical kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) products containing naturally occurring 7-OH below a threshold that has not yet been specified. DEA Administrator Terrance Cole said the move targets highly concentrated synthetics with unpredictable effects while leaving traditional plant access intact.

The crackdown on 7-OH arrives in the context of a June investigation by The New York Times that found Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin holds a financial stake worth as much as $1 million in Botanic Tonics, a kratom company whose products are sold in gas stations and smoke shops nationwide. According to the Times, Mullin played a key role in a kratom industry influence campaign, and while still a senator he endorsed proposed federal restrictions on the more potent synthetic products that compete with traditional kratom for shelf space. The Times also reported that the FDA in 2025 deleted links on its kratom webpage detailing a then-pending federal legal case against Botanic Tonics after the company’s allies pushed for the change. The Department of Homeland Security said in a statement that Mullin “follows all ethics and conflict of interest standards and has not lobbied for any individual or company.” Restrictions on synthetic 7-OH products stand to benefit sellers of traditional kratom, including Botanic Tonics.

Congressional Hearing on Project MKUltra Features Testimony From Authors and a Former CIA Officer

On June 30, the House Oversight Committee’s Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets held a public hearing on the CIA’s MKUltra program, focusing on the agency’s history of covert human experimentation and its reluctance to declassify related documents. Chaired by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), the panel examined how the intelligence community operated the Cold War-era mind control initiative, which subjected unwitting Americans to LSD and psychological abuse between 1953 and 1973.

Lawmakers heard testimony from authors Stephen Kinzer and Tom O’Neill, whose books have detailed the CIA’s efforts to conceal the program’s scope and destroy records upon its termination. A former CIA officer told the panel, “I don’t believe that the research stopped,” a claim that drew wide attention but was not accompanied by documentary evidence. Luna condemned the historical experiments as crimes against humanity and argued that the federal government’s continued secrecy surrounding the files fuels public distrust. Some national security analysts criticized the hearing’s focus, arguing that it prioritized speculation over a concrete effort to release the remaining classified archives.

Note: This article was produced in partnership with Psychedelic State(s) of America, a nonprofit-sponsored news organization dedicated to rigorous independent psychedelic journalism. Learn more about PSA’s Media Partnerships Program and donate to the PSA Media Fund here.

Sources

Bipartisan Congressional Bill Would Codify Trump’s Psychedelics Order Into Law – Marijuana Moment

Bipartisan Lawmakers Work To Codify Provisions Of Trump’s Psychedelics Order Into Law – Marijuana Moment

Congressional Committee Allows Military Psychedelics Amendment To Advance But Blocks Marijuana Testing Proposal For Recruits – Marijuana Moment

Oregon merges psychedelic mushroom, medical marijuana regulators, proposes fee hike – The Oregonian

Oregon psychedelic mushroom industry closures – The Guardian

DEA to Temporarily Schedule 7-OH and Related Substances – DEA Press Release

How Kratom, an Addictive Gas Station Drug, Found Allies in Trump’s Cabinet – The New York Times

Former CIA officer: ‘I don’t believe that the research stopped’ on MKUltra – The Hill

Updated Oregon Psilocybin Services Announcement (email PDF)

Take action today: protect Oregon’s psilocybin therapy program (email PDF)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the IBOGAINE Act?

H.R. 9559, the Initiating Biomedical Outcomes to Garner Advancements into Innovative Neuroplastogen Efficacy (IBOGAINE) Act, was introduced June 30, 2026 by Reps. Morgan Luttrell, Lou Correa, Jack Bergman, and Michael McCaul. It would codify President Trump’s April 18 executive order on psychedelic therapies and direct the attorney general to determine within 60 days whether to move ibogaine from Schedule I to Schedule II.

Does the IBOGAINE Act legalize ibogaine?

No. Ibogaine remains a Schedule I substance. The bill requires an evaluation of rescheduling, clarifies Right to Try exemptions for seriously ill patients, and creates research frameworks. Whether ibogaine actually moves to Schedule II depends on what the attorney general decides.

Why is Oregon raising fees on psilocybin service centers?

The Oregon Health Authority says both Oregon Psilocybin Services and the Oregon Medical Marijuana Program face budget shortfalls, driven in part by a statewide budget gap tied to federal Medicaid cuts. The proposed fee increases and the September 1 merger of the two programs are the agency’s response. Industry groups argue the fees exceed anything comparable in Oregon health care licensing.

Did the DEA ban kratom?

No. The DEA’s July 1 action targets semi-synthetic 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) products like tablets, gummies, and dissolvable strips, plus three related synthetic compounds. Traditional botanical kratom products containing naturally occurring 7-OH below a yet-unspecified threshold are explicitly exempt.

What is Project MKUltra?

MKUltra was a CIA program that ran from 1953 to 1973 and subjected unwitting Americans to LSD and psychological experimentation in pursuit of mind control techniques. Most of its records were destroyed in 1973. The June 30 House hearing examined the program’s history and the government’s continued refusal to declassify remaining files.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on June 23, 2026June 23, 2026

Psychedelic Policy Briefing: Week of June 22nd, 2026

June 23 Policy Brief

Three states advanced psychedelic legislation this month along very different tracks. North Carolina is pushing a $5.4 million research fund, New Hampshire is nearing approval of clinical ibogaine research while psilocybin reform stalls, and Illinois is weighing full psilocybin legalization alongside a new veterans suicide prevention program. The common thread is a widening gap between authorizing research and authorizing access.

By Jack Gorsline

In this week’s policy briefing, investigative reporter Jack Gorsline covers three regional psychedelic policy developments. A North Carolina coalition is lobbying for a $5.4 million initiative to study MDMA and psilocybin for trauma survivors. Illinois is allocating $600,000 to fund a veteran suicide prevention program, running parallel to an ongoing multi-year effort to legalize psilocybin at the state level. In New England, New Hampshire lawmakers advanced a clinical ibogaine research bill even as broader psilocybin legalization measures stalled in the state Senate.

North Carolina Coalition Brings in National Partners for Lobbying Day in Support of Psychedelic Research Bill

A coalition of military veterans, researchers and mental health advocates lobbied the North Carolina General Assembly last week, pushing for a state-funded initiative to study psychedelic-assisted therapies. Senate Bill 1018, known as the North Carolina HEAL Act, proposes a $5.4 million appropriation to establish the Breakthrough Therapies Research Grant Fund within the state Department of Health and Human Services.

The legislation would create a specialized task force to award up to five $1 million competitive grants to state-based academic or federal research institutions. These grants would fund clinical trials exploring the efficacy of FDA-designated “breakthrough therapies” (MDMA and psilocybin) and investigational compounds like ibogaine specifically for veterans, first responders, frontline healthcare workers, and survivors of domestic violence suffering from severe, trauma-related conditions.

Logan Davidson, legislative director for Veterans Exploring Treatment Solutions (VETS), pointed to North Carolina’s active duty military population in a statement to Filter Magazine.

“North Carolina is home to some of the largest military installations in the country and a veteran community that deserves better than the status quo,” Davidson told Filter. “SB 1018 represents a real opportunity to expand access to promising, innovative therapies for the men and women who’ve sacrificed the most.”

Supporters argue a state-regulated research framework will let lawmakers evaluate legal and public health pathways before integrating treatments into mainstream psychiatric care. Advocates emphasized that the initiative is built on emerging data from peer-reviewed medical journals demonstrating the clinical significance of these compounds in treating treatment-resistant post-traumatic stress disorder and addiction.

Organizers hope framing the HEAL Act as a compassionate, evidence-based response to trauma rather than a partisan battleground will secure the necessary legislative backing during the current session. Gina Giorgio, founder of Carolinas for Care, noted to Filter that behind the state’s mental health statistics are families searching for hope when existing psychiatric treatments have failed.

New Hampshire moves closer to authorizing ibogaine research after psilocybin reform efforts stall (again)

New Hampshire is nearing final approval of a bill that would allow ibogaine to be prescribed exclusively for clinical research. House Bill 1772, which recently cleared a major legislative hurdle when both chambers adopted a conference committee report, permits licensed healthcare providers to administer the substance strictly within Food and Drug Administration-approved protocols. The legislation also enacts participation in the multi-state Physician Associate Licensure Compact.

While ibogaine initiatives advance, efforts to establish access to other psychedelic compounds have faced pushback in the state Senate. Earlier this year, a bipartisan measure aimed at legalizing and regulating natural psilocybin for therapeutic use stalled after passing a full House vote. House Bill 1809 would have allowed qualifying patients with conditions such as treatment-resistant depression, post-traumatic stress disorder or substance use disorder to access the psychedelic under the oversight of the state Department of Health and Human Services. The proposal required a structured treatment protocol guided by licensed medical professionals and sought to establish an advisory board to oversee potential program expansion.

Similarly, last year the NH state Senate shelved a psilocybin-specific compromise bill without discussion. This bill proposed to lessen the penalty for first-time psilocybin possession to a misdemeanor, while concurrently introducing mandatory minimum sentences for certain fentanyl-related offenses. Notably, before undergoing changes in committee last March, the initial iteration of SB 14 aimed for the complete legalization of psilocybin for noncommercial use.

Illinois Lawmakers Explore Multiple Avenues for Psychedelic Policy Reform

Illinois lawmakers are considering the Compassionate Use and Research of Entheogens Act for the fourth consecutive year. The bill, introduced by Rep. LaShawn Ford, seeks to legalize, regulate and tax the use of psilocybin in the state. House Bill 1143, which was crafted with input and support from grassroots groups such as the Illinois Psychedelic Society, would amend the Illinois Controlled Substances Act by completely removing psilocybin and psilocin (commonly known as magic mushrooms) from the state’s list of Schedule I controlled substances.

The proposed legislation would establish the Illinois Psilocybin Advisory Board and direct multiple state agencies to create licensing frameworks for psilocybin service centers, product manufacturing, testing and guided facilitation sessions. Additionally, the bill would impose a new tax on psilocybin products to finance specialized state treasury funds while explicitly amending the vehicle code to prohibit driving under the influence of the substances. The measure also outlines strict administrative oversight, including inspections and civil penalties for noncompliance, and currently awaits further review in the House Rules Committee.

In a parallel effort to address mental health, the state is developing the Breakthrough Therapies for Veteran Suicide Prevention Program. The initiative, funded through an amendment to the state’s annual budget signed into law by Gov. J.B. Pritzker on June 16, is designed to address disproportionately high suicide rates among military veterans. It is supported by a $600,000 appropriation from the General Revenue Fund to the Illinois Department of Public Health. Administered by the department, the program will evaluate, support and eventually expand access to innovative mental health treatments for veterans experiencing post-traumatic stress disorder, severe depression, treatment-resistant mental illness and suicidal ideation. Through clinical research, provider training, data collection and program oversight, public health officials aim to establish a framework for assessing whether these emerging therapies can improve mental health outcomes and reduce suicide risks across the state.

Following a public-private psychedelic research model similar to legislation enacted in Oklahoma, Mississippi and Tennessee, a significant portion of the program’s proposed funding is directed to Sunstone Therapies, which will receive a $300,000 direct grant to administer the initiative. Sunstone Therapies will manage the program in collaboration with an Illinois-based mental health provider that has yet to be announced. Under the proposed arrangement, which is notably similar to Sunstone Therapies’ recently-inked psychedelic research partnership with the State of Maryland, the biotech group will assist in conducting clinical research on breakthrough treatments, developing protocols, training healthcare professionals and collecting outcomes data to measure effectiveness. An advisory council will also be established to guide the initiative, providing recommendations on patient safety, provider standards, care access, funding priorities and public awareness.

Note: This article was produced in partnership with Psychedelic State(s) of America – a nonprofit-sponsored news organization dedicated to rigorous independent psychedelic journalism. Learn more about PSA’s Media Partnerships Program and donate to the PSA Media Fund here.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on June 11, 2026June 11, 2026

Psychedelic Policy Briefing: June 11, 2026

Policy Roundup June 11 2026

The first half of 2026 has brought a surge of psychedelic policy activity at every level of the U.S. government. According to PoliPsy’s Psychedelic Legislation Tracker, lawmakers have filed 111 psychedelic-related bills across 41 states this legislative term, along with seven federal bills on Capitol Hill. 

Through an expanded partnership between Psychedelics Today and Psychedelic State(s) of America, I’ll be writing a weekly briefing on essential psychedelic policy developments and political happenings in the U.S. and around the world.

In this inaugural briefing: Michigan lawmakers fight over whether $50 million in opioid settlement funds should pay for ibogaine research. Connecticut expands its psychedelic-assisted therapy pilot beyond veterans and first responders. Colorado Gov. Jared Polis signs an ibogaine pilot program into law, including a national first on Indigenous benefit sharing, while the state tightens its personal use rules. Tennessee enacts the ibogaine-focused HOPE Treatment Act. New York’s Medical Psilocybin Act stalls again. And Maryland funds an MDMA trial comparing group and individual therapy for veterans with PTSD.

Michigan Considers $50 Million in Opioid Settlement Funds for Ibogaine Research

Earlier this year, Michigan state Rep. Jaime Greene (R-Richmond) introduced House Bill 6020, which would allocate $50 million to research the therapeutic potential of ibogaine, a psychoactive alkaloid derived from the root bark of the iboga shrub. The proposed clinical trials would evaluate the drug’s effectiveness in treating opioid use disorder and trauma-related conditions, particularly among military veterans with PTSD, traumatic brain injuries, and chronic pain.

The fight is over the funding source: the Michigan Opioid Healing and Recovery Fund, a restricted state account holding part of the $1.8 billion Michigan received from national opioid settlements. The bill would establish a grant program and direct the state Department of Health and Human Services to form a research consortium of universities, health facilities, and other states. Greene argues that research institutions like the University of Michigan could deliver real clinical breakthroughs for people with opioid dependence.

Democratic lawmakers have pushed back, arguing the settlement dollars should be reserved for proven recovery methods. At a June 2 hearing of the House Families and Veterans Committee, state Reps. Mai Xiong and Carrie Rheingans noted that Michigan has rarely funded experimental clinical trials and argued that expensive, multi-year studies belong with federal funders like the National Institutes of Health or the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Other lawmakers suggested the $50 million would do more good in recovery housing, clinician education, and harm reduction programs.

Connecticut Expands Psychedelic Therapy Pilot Program Beyond Veterans and First Responders

Last month, Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont signed Senate Bill 191 into law, effectively expanding the state’s psychedelic-assisted therapy pilot program, first established in 2022 to study the mental health effects of substances including psilocybin and MDMA. The program was previously limited to veterans and first responders. The new law opens participation to any adult who meets the program’s clinical requirements, a change meant to resolve recruitment problems and broaden the research base. It also repeals a clause that would have automatically terminated the pilot upon federal approval of these drugs.

The expansion appears designed to prepare Connecticut’s mental health infrastructure for possible FDA approval of a psychedelic-assisted therapy, which some advocates expect as soon as 2027. Funding remains the open question. Connecticut for Accessible Psychedelic Medicine co-founder Victor Constanza told Psychedelic State(s) of America in an interview that the original pilot program has never received an appropriation from the state budget.

Colorado Signs Ibogaine Pilot Program Into Law as Personal Use Rules Tighten

Colorado Gov. Jared Polis signed House Bill 26-1325 last week, creating an ibogaine research pilot program within the state’s Behavioral Health Administration and building on the voter-approved 2022 Natural Medicine Health Act. Sponsored by state Reps. Jarvis Caldwell and Lisa Feret and state Sens. Matt Ball and Rod Pelton, the bipartisan law authorizes up to five research sites to study ibogaine as a treatment for trauma and substance use disorders. Polis called the measure a step toward implementing the will of voters and pointed to ibogaine’s potential to help veterans and other Coloradans recover.

The law also contains a national first. HB 26-1325 requires both pilot sites and future ibogaine licensees to establish benefit-sharing plans with Indigenous communities traditionally connected to the iboga plant. Those plans can include financial sharing, collaborative research, conservation support for iboga species and habitats, and community-identified development priorities. No other state psychedelic law has made benefit sharing a condition of participation.

That provision arrives against a history of friction. In a complaint filed last year, Indigenous leaders argued they had been systematically excluded from Colorado’s policymaking process and warned that implementation of the Natural Medicine Health Act prioritized corporate interests over cultural consultation, threatening the ecological survival and cultural sanctity of traditional plant medicines. Whether the new benefit-sharing requirement answers those concerns will depend on how regulators enforce it.

Tennessee Enacts HOPE Treatment Act for Ibogaine Research

On May 22nd, Gov. Bill Lee signed the Helping Open Pathways to Effective (HOPE) Treatment Act (SB 2149/HB 2075) into law. Sponsored by Sen. Page Walley (R-Savannah) and Rep. Bryan Terry (R-Murfreesboro), the act establishes a legal framework for FDA-authorized clinical trials of ibogaine in Tennessee. It does not legalize the substance, which remains Schedule I under federal law.

The law creates a Council on Emerging Behavioral Health Treatments to authorize qualified Tennessee hospitals, academic medical centers, and research institutions to join multi-state ibogaine trials. Participating institutions must demonstrate FDA compliance, outline safety protocols including cardiac screening, provide patient aftercare plans, and submit quarterly progress and financial reports. Ibogaine may be administered only within clinical trials at hospitals or qualified research facilities, under the supervision of a Tennessee-licensed physician.

Rather than appropriating state money, the act relies on a public-private partnership model. It also creates an Emerging Behavioral Health Treatment Innovation Fund, which will receive at least half of any state revenue generated from intellectual property rights tied to treatments developed through the trials.

Passage followed a sustained advocacy campaign by TN Voices, Americans for Ibogaine, and its state affiliate Tennessee for Ibogaine, including testimony from veterans who traveled to Mexico for ibogaine treatment because none is available legally in the United States. Tennessee becomes the fifth state to formally join the multi-state research effort, following similar laws in Oklahoma, Mississippi, and Texas over the past 18 months.

New York Medical Psilocybin Act Stalls Amid Budget Delays, Despite Praise for Novel Framework

New York lawmakers proposed a highly regulated, state-funded pilot program to provide medical psilocybin to 10,000 veterans, first responders, and patients with cluster headaches. The amended Medical Psilocybin Act incorporates elements of an earlier personal license bill, a shift praised by that bill’s original author, Allison Hoots, a New York psychedelic attorney and executive director of the Sacred Plant Alliance.

“While the original bill created access for people who were not addressing serious health conditions but rather focused on the standard of whether permit holders were healthy enough, the amended bill leans into the [personal license] components that had already existed to promote the benefits of a healthcare provider’s recommendation with individualized plans for therapeutic access,” Hoots previously told DoubleBlind Magazine. That individualized structure includes provisions allowing qualifying patients to take psilocybin home for conditions such as cluster headaches and end-of-life care.

The legislation was championed by a coalition including New Yorkers for Mental Health Alternatives, the Microdosing Collective, and New Approach PAC. (New Approach faces allegations of campaign finance violations raised by former staffers in connection with the 2024 reform campaign in Massachusetts, as reported by Lucid News.) Despite that backing and bipartisan support, coalition leaders confirmed the bill will not advance this session because of time constraints surrounding passage of the annual state budget. Advocates argue the condition-dependent expanded access model could become a template for other state legislatures next year.

Maryland Funds MDMA Trial Comparing Group and Individual Therapy, Amid Local Activist Frustrations

Maryland is advancing psychedelic-assisted therapy research even as the state’s broader reform efforts stall. As first reported by Psychedelic Alpha, the state is partnering with the mental health advocacy nonprofit Reason for Hope and Sunstone Therapies on a 52-patient study of MDMA-assisted therapy for military veterans with PTSD. Backed by a $1 million grant from Maryland’s Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Traumatic Brain Injury Alternative Therapies Fund and $525,000 from Reason for Hope, the 12-month trial will directly compare group and individual therapy models, testing whether group delivery can match individual outcomes at lower cost. That question sits at the center of whether these treatments can ever scale.

Legislative progress on broader access remains contested. As Lucid News first reported, lawmakers’ decision to extend the Maryland Task Force on Responsible Use of Natural Psychedelic Substances through 2027 has frustrated local activists, who argue that indefinite advisory periods function as political stall tactics. They are urging lawmakers to model future reform on states like Colorado, Oregon, and New Mexico.

That’s all for this week’s state-level psychedelic policy briefing. Stay tuned later this week for a federal policy briefing, and subscribe to Psychedelics Today and Psychedelic State(s) of America for reporting and analysis on policy developments in the United States and abroad.

Note: This article was produced in partnership with Psychedelic State(s) of America, a nonprofit-sponsored news organization dedicated to rigorous independent psychedelic journalism. Learn more about PSA’s Media Partnerships Program and donate to PSA’s Psychedelic Writers Guild Media Fund.

Search FAQ Section

What states are funding ibogaine research in 2026? Michigan is debating a $50 million allocation for ibogaine trials. Tennessee, Colorado, Oklahoma, Mississippi, and Texas have passed legislation authorizing FDA-supervised ibogaine clinical trials through consortium models.

Does the HOPE Treatment Act legalize ibogaine? No. Tennessee’s HOPE Treatment Act (SB 2149/HB 2075) establishes a legal framework for FDA-authorized research only. Ibogaine remains Schedule I under federal law; the act allows qualified institutions to participate in multi-state trials.

What makes Colorado’s ibogaine law different? Colorado’s HB 26-1325 includes the first state requirement for Indigenous benefit sharing as a condition of participating in an ibogaine program, covering financial sharing, collaborative research, and conservation support.

Which states have expanded psychedelic pilot programs? Connecticut expanded its psychedelic-assisted therapy pilot from veterans and first responders to any adult meeting clinical requirements. Maryland is funding a novel trial comparing group and individual MDMA-assisted therapy for veterans with PTSD.

Why did New York’s Medical Psilocybin Act stall? New York’s bill will not advance this legislative session due to time constraints around the annual state budget, despite bipartisan support and praise for its condition-dependent access model.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on June 9, 2026June 10, 2026

Utah’s Quiet Revolution: Why HB 390 May Be the Most Significant Psychedelic Legislation of 2026

Utah SB 390 - State Capital - GPT Generated Image

This guest op-ed was submitted by Veterans Exploring Treatment Solutions. Psychedelics Today publishes opinion pieces to reflect a range of perspectives across the psychedelic field.

While most national headlines have focused on the latest federal psychedelic bills cycling through Congress and the growing momentum behind the Texas Ibogaine Initiative, Psychedelics Today recently covered one of the most significant but underrecognized victories of 2026. In March, Utah passed HB 390, the Veterans PTSD Clinical Research Amendments, and in doing so, quietly advanced one of the most consequential pieces of psychedelic legislation in the country this year.

HB 390 did not pass because of lobbyists or legislative maneuvering. It passed because veterans, researchers, and Utahns showed up, shared their stories, and helped lawmakers understand the urgency of the need. Veterans were the anchors of this effort – operators who had exhausted every treatment the VA had to offer, sought psychedelic-assisted therapy abroad, and then walked into the Utah State Capitol to describe what that experience meant for their lives. Their stories moved lawmakers in ways that data alone never could.

VETS supported the effort by helping veterans testify, including VETS grant recipient and Army Special Forces veteran Kyle Bingham. Alongside other veterans and advocates, they helped lawmakers understand both the urgency of treatment-resistant PTSD and the need for responsible, research-driven pathways. 

At VETS, we’ve supported over 1,300 veterans and their spouses in accessing psychedelic assisted therapy abroad because no legal pathway exists at home. That is not a sustainable solution. No veteran should have to leave the country to access care that may change their life. HB 390 is a direct response to that reality, and it is worth noting that the legislation is explicitly and specifically focused on veterans. In a field where research often targets broad clinical populations, this bill prioritizes the men and women who carried the heaviest burden and received the least adequate care.

HB 390 authorizes the Huntsman Mental Health Institute at the University of Utah to conduct a clinical study on the safety and feasibility of psychedelic-assisted therapy for veterans with treatment-resistant PTSD. The framework is rigorous: FDA investigational new drug application, DEA Schedule I research registration, IRB approval, and detailed clinical protocols covering informed consent, adverse event reporting, and therapist qualifications. This is serious science conducted within a serious structure.

And critically, this research isn’t waiting on funding. The State of Utah appropriated $1 million toward the study and the Huntsman Mental Health Institute is pursuing philanthropic matching funds. The science is authorized, the framework is in place, and the money is there. This study is happening.

The final version of HB 390 names three investigational substances: MDMA, psilocybin, and 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine, better known as 5-MeO-DMT. This is the first-in-the-nation state-funded research authorization for 5-MeO-DMT. While its therapeutic potential has been discussed in research circles for years and used ceremonially for generations, it has remained largely outside the formal U.S. health care system and policy conversation. 

Its profile is distinct from psilocybin or MDMA: the experience is shorter, often more intense, and early data suggests it may produce rapid and profound reductions in depression, anxiety, and existential distress. By naming it explicitly in legislation and backing that inclusion with real dollars and a clear research intent–Utah has introduced 5-MeO-DMT into American policy in a way that no state has done before.

HB 390 did not emerge in a vacuum. In 2024, Utah authorized psilocybin and MDMA in controlled settings, but that program stalled, held up in part by the difficulty of accessing federally scheduled compounds for research. HB 390 is the bill that makes a state-funded study operational. It also builds on Texas, which passed HB 1802 in 2021, directing research on psilocybin for veterans and showing how states could act without waiting for federal movement. Utah incorporated those lessons and pushed the frontier further. The bipartisan passage of this bill in one of the country’s most conservative legislatures signals that evidence-based psychedelic research has moved well beyond counterculture into the mainstream of American political life.

HB 390 doesn’t legalize. It doesn’t decriminalize. It does something harder and more durable: it creates the conditions for rigorous, FDA-compliant American clinical research on a compound the field has long believed deserves serious investigation, for the population that needs it most.

The bill has passed. The funding is secured. The Huntsman Mental Health Institute is ready, and for the first time in American history, a state will fund clinical research into 5-MeO-DMT.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on June 2, 2026June 11, 2026

The War on Drugs Was Never About Drugs. Psychedelic Healing Must Reckon With That.

Diversion Room in Community Center - GPT generated.

Every time a psychedelic bill fails, we hear a familiar and urgent warning that veterans are suffering. First responders are suffering. Lives are at stake. While that sense of urgency is valid, when I look at who the psychedelic drug policy movement keeps centering, I notice an absence, one that has become impossible for me to ignore. There is another population facing profound trauma, mental health challenges and nearly every imaginable barrier to healing.

That group includes people from heavily policed, low-income communities who have and continue to live with the direct consequences of the War on Drugs. People who are disproportionately Black and Brown.

When my colleagues in the psychedelic field mention the War on Drugs, the conversation typically stops at “we need to address the harms” and, even then, it starts and ends with record clearing. Don’t get me wrong, expungement matters, but if our response to decades of deliberate devastation begins and ends with paperwork, we are not talking about healing.

Nixon’s domestic policy adviser, John Ehrlichman, said the quiet part aloud in a 2016 interview. The administration knew it could not criminalize being Black or against the Vietnam War, so it associated Black communities with heroin and antiwar communities with marijuana, then criminalized both heavily. The damage has not been limited to long sentences. It has come in the form of violence. Intergenerational trauma. Families ripped apart and continued disinvestment in communities where children witness murders and grow up to understand that as normal.

The numbers reflect this. Since 1971, America has spent over a trillion dollars enforcing its drug policy, according to research from the University of Pennsylvania. The incarceration rate for drug offenses has increased tenfold since 1980. Black Americans are nearly four times more likely than white Americans to be arrested for cannabis possession, despite comparable usage rates across racial groups. These are not side effects of policy. They are the policy.

The psychedelic field has developed a deep well of compassion for veterans. It should, but there is a near-complete silence around people of color from historically oppressed and exploited communities who are dealing with the same mental health crises. 

Trauma does not exist in isolation. When violence, incarceration, instability, and loss become common features of daily life, they stop feeling exceptional. They become normalized. A 2019 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that exposure to community violence is associated with elevated rates of post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety at rates comparable to those seen in combat veterans. Yet the communities carrying that burden are barely footnotes in conversations about psychedelic healing.

When conversations about psychedelics and system-impacted people do happen, they tend to focus on reentry, offering healing after incarceration. The instinct is understandable, but why are we only talking about healing after the most traumatizing part? Why respond to trauma after someone has experienced the full punishing weight of the criminal legal system, rather than as an alternative to incarceration in the first place? The documentary The Alabama Solution illustrates this reality with painful clarity. 

Let’s imagine a different model. Picture diversion programs that combine trauma-informed care, wraparound social services, community support, and, where appropriate and legally available, an option to participate in regulated psychedelic-assisted treatment. Conversations are underway right now, involving a district attorney, community members, researchers, and national trauma experts, to build the first criminal diversion program in the country that would include voluntary, regulated psychedelic treatment as part of a wraparound support model. This is exactly the kind of work the field should be amplifying and funding.

Can you already hear the objections? Why should people who have caused harm receive these opportunities? From my vantage point, the United States is the most individualistic society in the world. There is a deeply ingrained assumption that success is entirely self-made and hardship is entirely self-inflicted. That assumption ignores how interconnected we are. When the difference between people’s access to resources is vast, harm finds its way past security systems and gated communities. Because, as my favorite African proverb says, “a child who isn’t embraced by its village will burn it down to feel its warmth.”

Surveys of survivors increasingly show that what they actually want is not retribution. They want the harm they endured to never happen again, to them or to their loved ones. The only way to get there is to give the people who have engaged in behavior we fear sustainable, transformative healing opportunities. Punishment has never healed trauma, and it has never made anyone safe.

Too often, psychedelic advocates talk to other psychedelic advocates. Criminal legal reformers talk to criminal legal reformers. Both groups are holding different pieces of the same problem and few even know the other exists. We need intentional, open dialogue and genuine collaboration between the psychedelic field and criminal legal reform spaces through shared policy development, joint pilot programs, and community-led solutions.

The most important innovation in psychedelics may not be a new molecule. It may be a new system, one that treats healing as a right rather than a privilege and urgency as something that belongs equally to combat veterans and to people whose communities have been under siege for decades, dating back to the founding of this country

Every time a psychedelic bill or initiative fails, we are reminded that veterans are suffering and lives are on the line. We should bring that same urgency to the communities devastated by the War on Drugs. For too long, this country has ignored, criminalized, and stigmatized people who are poor, system-impacted, and disproportionately Black and Brown. If psychedelics are truly about healing, that promise cannot stop at the clinic door or the prison gate. It must reach the communities that have borne the greatest harms for generations.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on May 22, 2026May 24, 2026

At the Federal Psychedelic Medicine Summit, the Mood Was Urgent, Practical, and Increasingly Coordinated

US Capital Building at Sunset - Federal Summit on Psychedelics - Psychedelic Medicine Coalition - GPT created image.

The Federal Summit on Psychedelic Medicine at the National Press Club felt like a field trying to organize itself around a reality already arriving. I attended the summit and spent the day in those conversations.

Hosted by the Psychedelic Medicine Coalition, the summit brought together policymakers, federal agency representatives, researchers, clinicians, veterans advocates, nonprofit leaders, and industry figures to work through how psychedelic medicine moves from research promise into responsible healthcare delivery.

The atmosphere was focused and practical. People kept returning to the same concern: how does this scale without the field fragmenting politically, clinically, or institutionally? Federal-state harmonization, training standards, REMS implementation, informed consent, rescheduling, and the fragility of executive branch support all fed into that question.

It felt less like a victory lap and more like an operational meeting a field trying to get serious about implementation before the political window closes.

From Symbolic Progress to Infrastructure

Shortly before the summit, President Donald Trump signed an executive order (April 18) directing federal agencies to accelerate research and treatment pathways for psychedelic compounds in serious mental illness, referencing FDA Breakthrough Therapy designations and reduced barriers to research and treatment development.

Speakers were direct about what that order cannot do alone. Administrations change, priorities shift, and bureaucracies can slow implementation regardless of political rhetoric. Representatives Lou Correa and Jack Bergman, co-chairs of the Congressional Psychedelics Advancing Therapies Caucus, argued that sustained constituent engagement and political pressure remain prerequisites for moving psychedelic medicine beyond isolated pilot programs into durable healthcare systems.

Texas drew repeated attention for its investment in ibogaine research. Other states are moving at very different speeds. This is a source of frustration and a driver of the day’s persistent focus on harmonization.

Veterans and the Ethics of Delay

Speakers returned repeatedly to suicide, trauma, addiction, and treatment-resistant mental health conditions in veteran populations. Many veterans seek treatment outside the United States because domestic pathways remain limited and illicit.

In a statement following a meeting with VA Secretary Doug Collins, Rep. Correa said: “Today’s rate of up to 20 veteran suicides a day is unacceptable one veteran suicide is unacceptable. Veterans deserve treatment that works, and the science shows that psychedelics have game-changing results.”

Rep. Bergman said in the same statement: “Our veterans didn’t hesitate to fight for us and now it’s up to us to fight for them.”

The question underneath those conversations still has no clean answer: how should policymakers balance scientific caution against the urgency of people suffering now? Participants supported rigorous science and FDA-regulated pathways. They were also frank that researchers and clinicians do not yet fully understand which compounds will work best for which conditions.

ARPA-H and the EVIDENT Initiative

ARPA-H generated some of the strongest interest of the day.

Established in 2022 and modeled after DARPA, the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health funds high-risk, high-reward biomedical research that traditional NIH pathways and private capital are not well-positioned to pursue. In April 2026, ARPA-H announced the first research teams for EVIDENT (Evidence-Based Validation and Innovation for Rapid Therapeutics in Behavioral Health) a $139.4 million initiative to develop objective, FDA-ready clinical endpoints for emerging behavioral health therapies. As part of Trump’s executive order on mental illness, EVIDENT will allocate at least $50 million to match state government investments in psychedelic research.

The framing treated mental health as a systems engineering challenge rather than a pharmaceutical pipeline. EVIDENT’s core problem statement: “there are currently no predictive, scalable, or objective standardized measures of behavioral health, which makes it impossible to know what is working, when, and for whom”. This is a particular liability for psychedelic therapies, which resist simple pharmacological models. Context, preparation, psychotherapy, patient selection, integration, therapeutic alliance, and environment all shape results.

Ketamine Clinics as Early Infrastructure

Ketamine-assisted psychotherapy clinics may already be functioning as early infrastructure for the broader field.

Ketamine differs substantially from MDMA, psilocybin, ibogaine, and 5-MeO-DMT. Legal frameworks, risk profiles, and clinical models are not interchangeable. But ketamine clinics are already forcing providers through operational questions psychedelic medicine will eventually face at scale: managing altered states, interfacing psychotherapy with controlled substances, screening patients, and building clinical systems around non-ordinary states of consciousness.

As Rep. Bergman told The Hill: “We have to have the centers set up and we have to have the therapists trained and ready to administer the protocols in this new way.” Waiting until after approval to build those competencies will be more expensive and slower.

Rescheduling Is Becoming a Practical Development Question

Schedule I status creates barriers around research, institutional participation, physician involvement, storage, funding, and drug development. At the summit, rescheduling was treated as a practical clinical and development question, not a countercultural one.

Schedule I classification makes institutions cautious and drives up research costs. Physicians and health systems remain reluctant to engage with clinical trials because of the regulatory burden. Several participants discussed the possibility that future medicinal chemistry could generate patentable compounds that skirt the schedule status problem. Suggesting that this could be an easier solution for pharma than changing the drug schedule status of these compounds. The private sector’s appetite was more measured than some advocates expected.

Daniel Goldberg of Palo Santo, a venture fund with investments in the psychedelic medicine space, told Psychedelics Today: “Virtue signaling was at an all-time low, and problem solving was the theme of the day. After seven years in this space, that gathering in D.C. was the most substantive cross-stakeholder conversation I’ve seen, with federal agency representatives, legislators, scientists, pharma executives, veterans and others engaging candidly on what it will actually take to move the field forward. I came away more optimistic than I’ve been in a long time.”

Training, Standards, and the Limits of Checklists

FDA approval for psychedelic compounds will likely come with a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) the mandatory safety program that governs prescribing, administration, monitoring, and training requirements. For therapies involving hours-long supervised sessions, those requirements will be more demanding than for conventional pharmaceuticals. How training systems prepare providers to meet them at scale was an open question throughout the day.

Psychedelic work also involves capacities that resist traditional medical training. Presence, empathy, the ability to remain grounded during destabilizing experiences these develop through experiential training, not coursework. Another speaker mentioned “some of these skills can’t be trained, but can be measured”. 

Pharmacology, documentation, and safety procedures can be standardized. How to prepare a person to sit with someone in an eight-hour psychedelic state is harder to put in a checklist.

Informed Consent Remains a Major Ethical Problem

Psychedelic experiences are unusually difficult to describe in advance. Even well-prepared patients may not fully understand what they are consenting to. Experienced clinicians acknowledge that current consent frameworks are imperfect for experiences this difficult to anticipate. This is a limitation the field recognizes and will need to work through as implementation proceeds, refining approaches as real clinical experience accumulates.

Audience questions pushed into screening and risk prediction. Some of which were, who is a good candidate, whether negative experiences can be anticipated, how clinicians should think about risk tolerance in treatment models that are still being developed.

Storytelling Still Matters

Personal narratives remain one of the primary ways legislators, regulators, clinicians, and the public understand psychedelic medicine. Speakers acknowledged that patient stories around veterans, trauma, addiction, and treatment resistance move political systems in ways that data can’t.

Melissa Lavasani and the Role of Coordination

Attendees independently praised Melissa Lavasani, for the quality of the event and the range of participants it assembled. She is the founder and executive director of the Psychedelic Medicine Coalition, who works closely with Congress to advance sensible psychedelic policy.

For years, researchers, state reform advocates, biotech firms, therapists, nonprofits, harm reduction groups, veterans organizations, and policymakers operated in parallel and sometimes at odds. 

This summit suggested harmonization and a tremendous amount of progress in the near term.

Disclosure: Joe Moore, author of this article, serves on the board of the Psychedelic Medicine Coalition.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on April 27, 2026May 9, 2026

Martha Hammel and Tasia Poinsatte: Aspen Psychedelic Symposium

PT 655 - Martha Hammel and Tasia Poinsatte

Aspen Psychedelic Symposium is the focus of this conversation with Martha Hammel of the Aspen Psychedelic Resource Center and Tasia Poinsatte of Healing Advocacy Fund. They join Joe Moore to discuss this year’s symposium, how it fits into Colorado’s evolving natural medicine landscape, and why Aspen has become a strong setting for serious public conversations about psychedelics.

Hammel explains that the symposium is now in its third year and is designed to bring major psychedelic voices to Colorado’s West Slope. She also outlines the local roots of the Aspen Psychedelic Resource Center, which grew out of education and outreach work around decriminalization and the Natural Medicine Health Act. Poinsatte describes Healing Advocacy Fund’s broader role across Oregon, Colorado, and New Mexico, where the group works on safe access, implementation, affordability, and public education.

Aspen Psychedelic Symposium Themes in Colorado

One of the strongest parts of the episode is the discussion of this year’s themes. Poinsatte points to stewardship, ecological integrity, and systems change as core ideas shaping the event. The conversation stays grounded in Colorado, but it also reaches outward into questions about healthcare, community, ecology, and the wider consequences of psychedelic policy reform.

The guests describe the symposium as intentionally multidisciplinary. It is not limited to clinical outcomes or individual healing. It also asks how psychedelic work affects larger systems and whether emerging models can hold complexity without flattening cultural or ecological context.

Topics expected at the event include:

  • Colorado’s regulated natural medicine model
  • Ecological integrity and reciprocity
  • Ibogaine policy and sourcing
  • Clinical and non-clinical applications
  • Community education and public dialogue

Hammel also says the symposium is built as a container for emergence. Speakers are not tightly boxed into preset talking points. The goal is to create strong conversations and leave people with better questions.

Aspen Psychedelic Symposium and Ibogaine Policy

The later part of the episode focuses on ibogaine and Colorado’s policy path. Poinsatte explains that Colorado is still working through what safe inclusion could look like, including legislation that would make ibogaine research and regulated access more feasible. She notes that benefit sharing and Nagoya-related questions are central to that work.

This section gets into real tension. The guests talk about ecological risk, the danger of overharvesting, the difference between plant, molecule, and tradition, and the need for reciprocity with communities in Gabon. They do not pretend the answers are simple. That restraint helps the episode. It treats ibogaine as a live policy and ethics question, not a settled story.

The conversation also makes clear that Aspen is trying to hold these issues in public, with input from local organizers, advocates, and international voices. That gives the Aspen Psychedelic Symposium a broader scope than a standard regional event.

Later Discussion and Takeaways from the Aspen Psychedelic Symposium

The episode closes with practical details and a clear sense of what kind of gathering this is. It is a single-track event, which means attendees share one common experience rather than splitting into multiple rooms. That format supports cohesion and deeper collective conversation. The speakers also note that veterans are not a central programming focus this year, though that may change in future Aspen efforts.

For listeners working in the field, the takeaways are clear:

  • Colorado remains a key state to watch
  • Policy design still shapes access and safety
  • Ecological questions cannot be treated as side issues
  • Smaller regional gatherings can influence bigger conversations

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Aspen Psychedelic Symposium?

It is a Colorado-based symposium in Aspen focused on psychedelics, policy, community education, and emerging issues in the field.

Who is featured in this Aspen Psychedelic Symposium episode?

Joe Moore speaks with Martha Hammel of Aspen Psychedelic Resource Center and Tasia Poinsatte of Healing Advocacy Fund.

What does the Aspen Psychedelic Symposium cover this year?

This year’s conversation highlights stewardship, ecological integrity, systems change, Colorado policy, and ibogaine.

Is the Aspen Psychedelic Symposium mainly about clinical psychedelics?

No. Clinical work is part of it, but the event also looks at law, ecology, culture, and community-level implementation.

Why is ibogaine part of the Aspen Psychedelic Symposium discussion?

Because Colorado is actively working through how ibogaine research, sourcing, and regulation could develop within its natural medicine framework.

The Aspen Psychedelic Symposium stands out because it brings policy, ethics, ecology, and community dialogue into the same room. In the current psychedelic resurgence, that kind of conversation is necessary.

Transcript

Transcript disclaimer: This transcript was generated by computer software and may contain errors, omissions, or minor inaccuracies. Please refer to the audio recording for the most accurate version of the conversation.

[00:00:00] Joe Moore: hi everybody. Welcome back to Psychedelics today, Joe Moore here. We’re gonna be talking about some Colorado topics today. Um, we’re joined today by Tasha with Healing Advocacy Fund and Martha Hamel from Aspen Psychedelic Resource Center. Martha, how are you today?

[00:00:18] Martha Hammel: I’m

[00:00:18] Tasia Poinsatte: doing great. How are you all?

[00:00:21] Joe Moore: Lovely. Natasha,

[00:00:25] Tasia Poinsatte: also doing pretty well. Thanks for having us on.

[00:00:28] Joe Moore: For sure. So let’s talk a little bit, um, high level why we’re here. Martha, could you introduce this, um, symposium that you’re, uh, leading the project on?

[00:00:41] Martha Hammel: Yeah. Uh, so this is our third year hosting the Aspen Psychedelic Symposium. We did one in 2023 and one in 2024, uh, hosted at the Wheeler Opera House in Aspen.

[00:00:56] Martha Hammel: Colorado, this gives an opportunity to bring in some [00:01:00] amazing speakers, uh, from around the world to, uh, uh, talk to our local West Slope, Colorado community about psychedelics.

[00:01:14] Joe Moore: Yeah, and I think this is important to note that, uh, people think Colorado is a monolith and it’s, it’s certainly not. There’s, um, a lot of different regions.

[00:01:25] Joe Moore: And, um, the identity of the western part of Colorado is super distinct from what we would call the front range being for Collins, Denver, Boulder, Colorado Springs, that kind of thing. So just wanted to point that out because there’s a lot of people that are gonna watch that, don’t know that kind of stuff.

[00:01:40] Joe Moore: Um, and, um, Tasha, are you helping coordinate this event? Helping produce it?

[00:01:48] Tasia Poinsatte: Yeah, so, um, the nonprofit I work with, healing Advocacy Fund has been involved with helping organize the symposium since its inception in 2023. And we really, we just saw it as this [00:02:00] wonderful opportunity to host a symposium in Colorado at a time when Colorado was stepping into this huge change in our laws, both decriminalization of these naturally occurring psychedelics.

[00:02:11] Tasia Poinsatte: Standing up regulated therapy model for psilocybin mushrooms. Um, in 2023 we were just getting started and so it’s exciting to come back in 2026. And we have a fully live program in Colorado and there’s just so much happening to dig into. And so I think it just seems like a natural fit. And of course, as somebody who lives in Denver, I always love the opportunity and the excuse to get out into the mountains and spend some time in Aspen in June is just a win-win from our perspective.

[00:02:38] Joe Moore: Yeah. Endlessly pretty. Um, yeah, I think I’ve been to one, or at least one, if not two, has been psychedelic symposiums. Um, and I had a lovely time last year. Um, there was even a film that was screened, I think it was a Lucy Walker, um, like an early cut of the Lucy Walker film was screened and it was [00:03:00] just mind blowing.

[00:03:01] Joe Moore: It was part of the whole festival. I wanna call it a festival. It was really a conference symposium and, um. You know, it was, it was a great event in that. Well, Martha, you and I have had these conversations about Aspen being a sort of place for ideas and being a sort of place where it’s safe to have conversations.

[00:03:24] Joe Moore: ’cause in a lot of the world, it’s kind of difficult too, right? Could you speak to that at all?

[00:03:31] Martha Hammel: Yeah. Um, Aspen’s always been a place for having discussions and really dreams for the future, um, and has a really long psychedelic history. I’m sure most of your listeners are familiar with Hunter s Thompson, the author, most famous for fear and loathing in Las Vegas, but also a really.

[00:03:59] Martha Hammel: Active [00:04:00] political advocate. Um, and he, uh, lived right outside of Aspen and Woody Creek, um, and in the seventies ran for sheriff. Uh, there was, uh, the sheriff’s department in Aspen prior to that was very conservative by the book. Uh, and were out there. Uh, charging the hippies with a cannabis possession, and they were really, um, trying to maintain a more.

[00:04:37] Martha Hammel: Traditional conservative vibe in the town. And in the early seventies, hunter Thompson ran for Sheriff. He lost by just a handful of votes, which most people know that story. But the next election in 1976, he ran the campaign for Dick Kindness, who won. Um, and we’ve had three other sheriffs since [00:05:00] then, all who have come.

[00:05:04] Martha Hammel: Um. Who have followed Hunter Thompson’s legacy in progressive drug drug policy, community policing, and uh, really supportive of these movements. So the people in Aspen are comfortable with the idea of psychedelics and have been for 50 years.

[00:05:35] Joe Moore: Right. Um, when we hear of John Denver, which I remember sand or iron rope, kind of giving props to John Denver last time, which is really fun. You think of John Denver was certainly not a, like a sober person and psychedelics like likely played a big part in that, that culture. So, yeah. And um, before we toss it back over to Tasha, could you give us a little bit of an idea of what is Aspen Psychedelic Resource Center?[00:06:00]

[00:06:00] Martha Hammel: Hmm, yeah. In, um, uh, in 2021, uh, Skippy Meau, uh, who is on the Natural Medicine Advisory Board, now, he was a city council member in Aspen and started looking into what it would look like to decriminalize plant medicines locally, and he convened a group of community members, and there were about 30 of us who got together.

[00:06:28] Martha Hammel: Over the course of the summer of 2021 to write and propose legislation to decriminalize psychedelics. Um, eventually I took over as campaign man manager as we were going to make that a ballot initiative, uh, and spent the next two years talking to business leaders and government and the school board and.

[00:06:52] Martha Hammel: Out at the farmer’s market and knocking on people’s doors and just talking to every single person in town about [00:07:00] a decriminalization of plant medicines. And as we were doing this, the Natural Medicine Health Act started gaining momentum. Um, city of Aspen ended up voting yes for the Natural Medicine Health Act by 81%, which is a lot of the advocacy and outreach that we were doing.

[00:07:20] Martha Hammel: And the moment that it passed, all of these people that I had reached out to started reaching back out to me saying, okay, now what, what are you going to do? You’ve been talking about all of this harm reduction and, uh, education that’s going to happen. Um. Are you going to do something about it? And, uh, Laura, Betty and I founded the Aspen Psychedelic Resource Center in response to those questions.

[00:07:47] Martha Hammel: Um, and that’s what we’ve been doing. We’ve been doing outreach and education in Aspen and supporting the implementation of, uh, psychedelic policy reform [00:08:00] at the community level.

[00:08:03] Joe Moore: Thank you for that. And Tasha, you’ve been working hard on this topic in Colorado for a long time now. Um, before we dig into any of that for you, could you talk to us, um, about what, what is HAF feeling?

[00:08:15] Joe Moore: Advocacy fund.

[00:08:17] Tasia Poinsatte: Yeah. Um, so Healing Advocacy Fund is a nonprofit that is active across the three, the three states that have changed their laws to enable a legal psychedelic therapy program. So that’s Oregon, Colorado, and New Mexico. And really our goal as an organization, broadly speaking, is to support.

[00:08:35] Tasia Poinsatte: Safe access to psychedelic healing for those who can benefit. And we see the state access models as the primary pathway right now to expand access, especially to people who aren’t, you know, psych knots who don’t have a lot of experience, but are starting to learn about the potential mental health or health effects that they could experience working in a structured setting with psychedelics.

[00:08:59] Tasia Poinsatte: Um, [00:09:00] but, you know, might not feel comfortable or supported to take that step. Otherwise. Um, so these licensed models in these three states, Oregon and Colorado are live, and the New Mexico is coming online within the next year or so, um, are the place where we’re seeing at scale people being able to access, um, within a licensed framework, um, with, you know, training and accountability for the facilitators, testing of the medicine itself.

[00:09:23] Tasia Poinsatte: Um, and our role as an organization is really all of the advocacy around that. So when we, when we, I say broadly, um, first kind of took a step down this path in the state of Oregon back in 2020 with the passage of their ballot initiative. There were so many open questions and a lot of people felt. Really, you know, this is unsafe.

[00:09:43] Tasia Poinsatte: People are gonna get hurt, they’re not gonna be adequately supported. And so the focus of the organization initially was how do we make sure that that’s not the case? How do we make sure that the people that are getting licensed as facilitators have really gone through the process to have the skills to be able to support people in these [00:10:00] experiences, um, leading up to during and afterwards so that we can.

[00:10:04] Tasia Poinsatte: Increase the likelihood that they really are gonna have a beneficial, transformative experience and reduce the likelihood of harm, which of course, you’re never gonna reduce it down to zero, but you know, at least hopefully mitigate it as much as possible. Um, so that was kind of how we got started in Oregon.

[00:10:21] Tasia Poinsatte: In Colorado. We got started once we passed our ballot initiative here. And the focus definitely is still fundamentally on, you know, what is the core structure of the program to support the client experience. And then around that we’re also doing a lot of advocacy to try to bring down costs, to try to make this more affordable and accessible for people, especially low income people.

[00:10:41] Tasia Poinsatte: And you know, it’s, it, it is, um, it is a challenge. And so identifying creative strategies for how to do that. And then more broadly, we also, um, are. Engaged in education, primarily focused on healthcare providers and you know, how do we integrate this and educate people that are providing mental health care, um, primary care [00:11:00] doctors, et cetera, to understand what is psychedelic therapy and how can they.

[00:11:03] Tasia Poinsatte: Support people to access this type of care, if it’s the right option for them. Um, so in that capacity of kind of the education side, we really see ourselves aligned with organizations like Aspen, psychedelic Resource Center, NOAC Society, and a whole bunch of other grassroots nonprofits that have either existed or have.

[00:11:20] Tasia Poinsatte: Sprung up in Colorado since the passage of this ballot initiative. Um, and I, I think coming back to the symposium, that is part of what is so special about the Aspen Symposium is it’s a little bit of a smaller of event and it’s an opportunity for a lot of these different groups to come together to share this beautiful space and this time together and to kind of deepen those connections because we are so much more successful and there’s so much more potential here.

[00:11:47] Tasia Poinsatte: Um. When we work together and really kind of bring up each other’s strengths. Um, so really appreciate the chance to work with Martha and also Aspen Public Radio, who I wanna give a huge shout out to. Mm-hmm. Because we haven’t mentioned ’em yet [00:12:00] so far. Um, is the third nonprofit partner on this symposium?

[00:12:03] Tasia Poinsatte: Mm-hmm.

[00:12:07] Martha Hammel: Yeah, there you go. I, uh, yeah, with Aspen Public Radio and their involvement, very serendipitous, um, connection, uh, a community member, Ron Beller, connected was. Had a conversation with the, uh, board chair of Aspen Public Radio Will Dolan at the same time that I was talking to the executive director of a PR Breeze Richardson, um, about doing something like this.

[00:12:36] Martha Hammel: And it was one of those magical. Connections where everyone had the same idea at the same time. Uh, and, uh, they’ve been, uh, we would not be able to do this without breeze. And I also want to, uh, give a shout out to Kevin Matthews, who was programming, uh, supporting us with programming for the, our two previous ones.

[00:12:59] Martha Hammel: And, [00:13:00] um, then Laura Betty, my amazing business partner at A PRC.

[00:13:06] Joe Moore: Great. Love that. So. There’s, uh, so much to say about everything we’ve said so far, but I wanna keep going to chat more about the symposium. What are, what are we looking at so far? Is there a theme? Do you have some people that are coming out?

[00:13:25] Tasia Poinsatte: Mm. Yeah. I guess I’ll jump in and then hand it to Martha. Mm-hmm. So, um, we’re really excited. The, the programming is, is final for the symposium, so we have an amazing list of speakers coming from across the US as well as internationally. And really solid representation from Colorado because so much of, you know, what’s happening in Colorado.

[00:13:43] Tasia Poinsatte: I think there’s a lot to lift up and a lot to learn from our process here. Um. Broadly speaking in terms of the theme. Um, I, I think, you know, we’ve, we’ve discussed a few orienting sort of values for this year’s symposium and words that have come up have been [00:14:00] stewardship. Um, how are we stewarding this process of change in our laws?

[00:14:05] Tasia Poinsatte: In a responsible way. Um, and how can we also, you know, steward the psychedelic experiences? So I think that plays out sort of across a number of different realms there. Um, ecological integrity, um, which is an interesting one. But, um, in June and Aspen in Colorado, in a year where we’ve had, you know, some of the hottest driest weather on record, um.

[00:14:27] Tasia Poinsatte: This question of what we’re doing in our work with psychedelics, how it ripples out into our relationship with communities in the world around us, and what does it look like and feel like to live in ecological integrity? How does psychedelics tie into that? Um, and then a systems change theme. And the systems change I think is really responsive to.

[00:14:47] Tasia Poinsatte: One of the questions or sort of comments, we get a lot about this, at least the sort of the state regulated psilocybin therapy model is like a concern that there’s maybe too much focus on the individual healing process. Um, and so with [00:15:00] this systems change piece, it is, you know, the, the individual healing process is at the core of everything, right?

[00:15:05] Tasia Poinsatte: You know, we need to be. Um, in our healing process in order to access most fully our, our capacities. Um, but we’re starting to open up a bit and also ask how are these changes that we’re making in terms of psychedelic access, rippling out into other structures that we have within our society, the way that we structure healthcare, um, looking at food systems, looking at social networks and, you know, cultural divide type of issues.

[00:15:33] Tasia Poinsatte: And so it, it is a very multidisciplinary. Conference or symposium. Um, there’s gonna be focus still on the clinical research and what’s happening at the level of the individual. What are we seeing? Um, looking at some of these in particular, these edge cases of like neurogenerative conditions, pain conditions, um, stroke recovery, some of the, the areas of the field that are just starting to take off.

[00:15:58] Tasia Poinsatte: Um. Keeping [00:16:00] the, the mental health piece at the center, um, but then also expanding into these other areas of focus. So I think it’s gonna be really ripe for fascinating conversation, learning, and, um, part of our hope is just to also inspire people to be willing to start to reimagine, um, the, the structures that.

[00:16:18] Tasia Poinsatte: Um, we are all embedded in within our daily life. I know that’s kind of a lofty goal, but it seems like it’s what’s needed right now in this moment in human history. And, um, it feels like Aspen is kind of the place to, to, to have those conversations being at the cutting edge of so much kind of innovation and, and ideas.

[00:16:36] Tasia Poinsatte: Um, so that’s sort of my, my framing. I’ll hand it to Martha though, to add to that.

[00:16:40] Martha Hammel: Mm-hmm. Yeah, I. I really see the symposium as an opportunity to create a container, um, and platform ideas that. We are interested in seeing platformed. I mean, everything that we, because of the partnership with Aspen [00:17:00] Public Radio, there’s an opportunity for all talks, not just at the symposium.

[00:17:04] Martha Hammel: Every event that we do in Aspen gets recorded and has opportunity to be rebroadcast on Aspen Public Radio. Um, and I really, uh, like to create a container for emergence. Uh, I we. Put speakers on stage and we don’t give a lot of guidelines in terms of topics or coaching. It’s not something that we,

[00:17:36] Martha Hammel: I, it’s not some, we don’t have a specific motive for what’s going to be said. Uh, we’re creating a container for conversations. And, uh, we always like to say we want people to leave with more questions than answered, answered, um, more questions than answers at, at all of our events.[00:18:00]

[00:18:06] Joe Moore: So who, who are some of the folks you’re, that are gonna be joining us on stage this year?

[00:18:19] Martha Hammel: Um, well, Zach Leary is returning as our mc to, uh, guide us through the whole experience. He’s been with us since the beginning. Uh, we’re so grateful for his input. Um. Izzy from Maps is one of our keynotes. Leonard Picard will be, uh, one of the headliners, um, Leo Roseman from Ripples and many others.

[00:18:55] Joe Moore: Great.

[00:18:56] Joe Moore: Great. Mm-hmm. I love that. Um. [00:19:00] So this idea of ecological integrity is huge. Uh, especially in the last week. Um, those of us in Colorado might have been feeling it all winter, and we’re a little nervous, maybe more nervous than most, um, given what we’re up for, uh, later this summer. But I think, um, the idea of ecological integrity, I, I like the phrasing.

[00:19:24] Joe Moore: Um. Because I think it helps us protect ourselves from greenwashing each other or ourselves. Um, it’s like, is that actually true? Um, so, and I, and I think it’s inclusive of cultural issues. So if we look at all the current debates around, um, groups in Gabon being included at the table in these really interesting iboga conversations, iboga conversations and more, you know, I think Colorado.

[00:19:55] Joe Moore: Had some inclusion of some language suggesting that we only want Nagoya [00:20:00] compliant, um, ibogaine, which is nice. Um, I, you know, I, I got to meet in Aspen actually at the Iboga, was it, what was it called? The Iboga Symposium at Aspen Institute this past summer. The,

[00:20:17] Martha Hammel: the, um, Aspen I began meetings. Uh, so the right.

[00:20:21] Martha Hammel: It, but in both April and in November, uh, a group of people coming together to discuss IGA policy.

[00:20:29] Joe Moore: Yeah. So I was lucky to make it this year. Um, but they, I got to meet some of the folks from Blessings of the Forest and, and then I had further discussions with other people about what is Nagoya compliant and this idea that there should be some sort of reciprocity to, um, under Legal United Nations Treaty.

[00:20:50] Joe Moore: Everywhere signed, but us by the way, in the United States, I think, um, and, uh, you know, to be expected. Uh, [00:21:00] and, you know, what, what does that look like? And it looks like negotiating and, uh, not a short process. So, um, a lot of us get concerned about it. How, how is this actually gonna look? How is there enough space in American capitalism to allow for something like, um, a Nagoya compliant process?

[00:21:19] Joe Moore: Which I think is really important question. Um, but I don’t, I don’t have any good answers, um, other than yeah, of course we should be discussing these things. Um, but I don’t, yeah. So do you, do you see the Nagoya compliance, kinda the reciprocity angle as part of the psychological integrity conversation and, and anything you want to add to the, what I mentioned.

[00:21:41] Joe Moore: Either of you.

[00:21:41] Tasia Poinsatte: I’ll just say a Absolutely. And I think Iboga is, um, such a fundamentally important example of why these conversations matter because we’re talking about, I bega derived from Iboga, this plant that grows in a specific climate in Central West Africa, [00:22:00] in Central Africa, and. The worst possible outcome I can imagine from this growing interest in the properties of Ibogaine is that we start to put human pressure on this plant to the point that we bring that plant to extinction.

[00:22:16] Tasia Poinsatte: I mean, what a tragedy that would be for humanity, for the world to. Some, you know, lose this gift that exists that we’re only beginning to scratch the surface of understanding its potential. Um, and I, I don’t know how familiar listeners, listeners are with Iboga, but you know, the pharmacology, um, the types of experiences people are having, it’s, there’s.

[00:22:41] Tasia Poinsatte: So much mystery and learning there. Um, and if we don’t approach this with care, there are risks, you know, and so, um, really having at the center, ecological integrity, stewardship, and a sense of responsibility and relationship with that plant is fundamental. Um, [00:23:00] and then, you know, expanding a little bit out from there.

[00:23:02] Tasia Poinsatte: That relationship being mediated through conversation, relationship, and dialogue with the people that have stewarded and have held that relationship with that plant for thousands of years. In the case of Evo a, um, in terms of what it looks like in practice, I mean, I, I, I do think the reality is that it is a dialogue.

[00:23:21] Tasia Poinsatte: It’s an ongoing conversation about how. Uh, how do we do this respectfully? Um, I think Evo is also an exciting example in that, that, you know, the understanding is that there is a desire from the bui people. Um, from the albanese to engage in these conversations. And there is kind of, you know, at least what we’re hearing, the message we’re hearing at the events that you mentioned is we recognize the potential of the healing of this plant for the broader world.

[00:23:52] Tasia Poinsatte: You know, there’s not a desire to kind of keep it specifically held and only accessible within that part of the world, but it [00:24:00] is, you know, with that comes this great responsibility for care. Um, and so, I mean, I think. The state based models are actually an amazing opportunity to pursue that and build that out.

[00:24:12] Tasia Poinsatte: And right now Colorado has a piece of legislation moving through, um, the legislature on ibogaine, which does specifically require benefit sharing. And I think having that enshrined in statute is a really important, you know, model to set. Um, when we look ahead to potential future states or federal, uh, work with ibogaine.

[00:24:34] Martha Hammel: Um, and this is one of our panels, uh, discussing international frameworks for the medicine community. Um, I had the pleasure of traveling to Gabon this past January, uh, to attend a conference put on by Reset Health that brought together a few hundred albanese individuals working with. [00:25:00] Iboga, um, and government officials, doctors, witty leaders to really discuss this and, uh, Gabon cares about Nagoya.

[00:25:11] Martha Hammel: They care deeply about. The medicine, the wisdom of the medicine and their natural resources, and want to find ways to protect the medicine, protect the people, protect each other in a way that supports, um, everyone to thrive. They, they’re open to sharing their knowledge. They know they have something really special, um, and they only want to do so in ways that would be supportive too.

[00:25:46] Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. Yeah. Thanks for that. It’s, um, it’s fascinating, right? Like people, people have been on this kind of, um, conversation on reciprocity [00:26:00] for a number of years now. Ibegain is just. The latest one, um, that people seem to be on top of, which is good. Um, I’ve been writing extensively about Sonoran Desert, toad Extinction for years and years and years to the point where I’ve lost friends and colleagues over it because people find it annoying and it’s, I think, the only topic that I’ve felt physically in danger over.

[00:26:25] Joe Moore: Um,

[00:26:25] Tasia Poinsatte: wow.

[00:26:26] Joe Moore: But. That and one other, but the other one was MDMA. So that’s different. Um, so the, the stuff this, this conversation is a through line all the way back to Maria subpoena and mushrooms. Um, I think early peyote pros, uh, prosecutions from European colonizers, um, you know, there’s, this has been a thing for a long time, um, over harvesting a peyote is.

[00:26:57] Joe Moore: Is a classic problem that is also not [00:27:00] discussed enough. Colorado thankfully took that quite seriously and made sure it was, uh, not included and popularized in this, um, an MHA Natural Medicine Health Act push. I think that was really smart. Um, but yeah, I, again, it’s, uh, it’s, it’s interesting to me because we’re we’re talking about yeah.

[00:27:18] Joe Moore: Not depleting the stores of iboga in the, in the rainforest, um, which is important. Um. We haven’t spent a lot of time talking about total synthesis and like how expensive that is versus getting it from a plant. Um, but again, that’s one molecule out of a whole plant that we don’t, we haven’t adequately studied Ibaca and Iboga to, to know how much better whole plant is or how much different it is.

[00:27:46] Joe Moore: And then we have Vol Congo, which is a totally unscheduled plant that I think some people are importing and, and doing a, a few steps. Of chemistry on to get to Iboga hydrochloride. And you know, it’s, it’s a fascinating [00:28:00] conversation because some people are saying, uh, Nagoya is, I, I know somebody who says they’re Nagoya compliant.

[00:28:07] Joe Moore: And they negotiated straight up with just people in Gambone. Um, and they showed me the treaty and contract and stuff. Um, they’ve not consulted any of the bui. They’ve not gone anywhere close to blessings of the forest and it’s, um, you know, allegedly Nagoya compliant. So it’s, you know, is Nagoya compliance with a nation a monolith?

[00:28:29] Joe Moore: Is it the, you know, this is all stuff that we can flesh out on those panels. But, you know, just wanted to throw out that this is super complicated. It’s not just like one plant, one tribal group. Um, it’s, it’s a lot of different tribal groups. Um, yeah, go ahead. If you had anything to say.

[00:28:47] Martha Hammel: Yeah. Well, and then not just the plant itself, but the wisdom, um, and the intellectual property of the wisdom and the healing and the [00:29:00] generations.

[00:29:00] Martha Hammel: Can you characterize that a little

[00:29:00] Joe Moore: bit more for me?

[00:29:03] Martha Hammel: Hmm.

[00:29:08] Martha Hammel: So the, the medicine holders, the iboga medicine holders, and this is, I mean, I’m speaking to this coming from somebody who went to Gaon for 10 days. So, uh, I hope all of your listeners, uh, understand that this is like a completely a novice perspective on this. Um, but my understanding of Iboga is that it’s generations of.

[00:29:37] Martha Hammel: Teachings, um, and teachings that exist in the, in the rivers and in the trees and in the songs of the cicadas and in the way that, ways that the fireflies are moving around and dancing around in the. There is a [00:30:00] real value to that and a real necessity. Um, as we’re exploring working with these medicines, it’s not just the medicine it comes with.

[00:30:11] Martha Hammel: You can’t fully take it out of its context. Um, and

[00:30:17] Joe Moore: well, people do.

[00:30:19] Martha Hammel: Yeah, but we, we need should, and there’s a, should be there a

[00:30:22] Joe Moore: lot of success in a lot of places. Mm-hmm.

[00:30:25] Martha Hammel: There should be exchange for the knowledge and the wisdom. I mean, even if you’re not taking the actual, if even if we’re not exporting the actual

[00:30:37] Tasia Poinsatte: mm-hmm.

[00:30:37] Martha Hammel: Plants and the Albanese government is willing to have those conversations about export. This is part of those meetings that we, uh. Had when we were over in Gabon, but the, the, the real value is the wisdom, um, and making sure that there’s structures, that there’s [00:31:00] reciprocity for the wisdom and the knowledge, uh, as much as, um, and, and reciprocity too.

[00:31:06] Martha Hammel: I mean, who owns the, the wisdom, right? The, the forest and the people, um, and making sure that that has a. An equal exchange,

[00:31:19] Joe Moore: just because I’m a pain in the ass about language. I wanna say there is extraordinary value in the traditions. There’s extraordinary value in the molecule and the plant. Mm-hmm. They can be seen together or separate.

[00:31:32] Joe Moore: And I think there’s a lot of value in analyzing all three pillars. Um

[00:31:37] Tasia Poinsatte: mm-hmm.

[00:31:37] Joe Moore: And, yeah, I don’t, I’m not trying to discount your point, just. Some people won’t follow what you’re saying and I wanna be a little clear.

[00:31:44] Tasia Poinsatte: Well, I, I think for me, this kind of comes back to one of the fundamental pieces we’re trying to get at with the symposium, which is that none of this exists within a vacuum, right?

[00:31:53] Tasia Poinsatte: Mm-hmm. And so even somebody taking the molecule that is ibogaine in a clinic in Mexico, there [00:32:00] is still a context that surrounds that regardless of that individual person’s, you know, intent or even knowledge when they go into that experience. I mean, interestingly, I’ve heard, not verified. Reports that people have had as part of their experience, you know, visual imagery of African tribal people without even necessarily consciously knowing that that’s where I a gain derives from.

[00:32:20] Tasia Poinsatte: Again, I’m not gonna comment. I don’t know. I don’t know. When that happened where? Um, but one piece of it that I think is really meaningful with the work that Blessings of the Forest does is that they’re not just focused on Ibogaine, or sorry, iboga as a plant itself. They’re focused on the community of plants, the ecosystem.

[00:32:41] Tasia Poinsatte: How do we protect the health of that ecosystem so that we can protect the health of the plant? And, um, so they’re, they’re planting, they’re supporting smallholder. Uh, farmers in Ebo in Gabon to plant Biodiverse Polycultures, where that plant iboga is actually [00:33:00] thriving within this broader community. And we don’t really know, you know, the extent to which that even might impact the properties of the plant.

[00:33:08] Tasia Poinsatte: Um, it’s not to discredit that iboga as a molecule can have benefit for people. Absolutely. And I think, you know, as we move forward in Colorado. There may be that this legislation that’s moving through would create the option for what you just described, Joe, which is the semisynthetic conversion of Bo Conga, to, um, obtain ibogaine in that way.

[00:33:30] Tasia Poinsatte: And that may well be the more ecologically sustainable path. Um, it may be the more legally viable path. Um, and I still think, you know, there, there is this. Question or this piece of this whole conversation of like, of doing the right thing because it’s the right thing. And I think when we’re thinking about societal structures that we are creating and implementing, there is this stewardship, stewardship component that perhaps comes into play in an even greater extent than when you’re [00:34:00] thinking about, you know, an individual’s choices about their own experience.

[00:34:03] Tasia Poinsatte: When it comes to an individual’s choices about their own experience though, what we really wanna. Ensures that there is this supportive framework around Ibogaine because it is not inevitable that the Ibogaine experience will be beneficial. Um, it can be very challenging, you know, and so having these pieces, pieces in place, and I think part of what Martha’s getting to is like part of how we understand how to structure that container.

[00:34:28] Tasia Poinsatte: Very often may be informed to greater or lesser degrees by the knowledge of these wisdom keepers in the BTI tradition, um, whether explicitly or not. And so recognizing that, and perhaps it needs to, you know, we, we, we don’t actually. N know exactly what’s happening with everyone who accesses iboga outside the US right now.

[00:34:50] Tasia Poinsatte: We don’t know how well supported they are, and that’s part of why we are creating this, this state model in Colorado and Oregon and New Mexico, is that we actually have a way [00:35:00] to. Follow up with people, um, and kind of see how these psychedelic experiences are playing out over time. Are they receiving the support?

[00:35:07] Tasia Poinsatte: Is that benefit sustained over time? And so all of these, you know, to Martha’s point, like a lot more questions than answers. And I think we’re really just trying to mm-hmm. Dig in on some of these more challenging questions in the field. With a group of people who have brought so much knowledge and passion and experience into the various facets of the work that they do all in one, you know, beautiful mountain town in Colorado.

[00:35:30] Tasia Poinsatte: I’m a bit of a ramble.

[00:35:33] Joe Moore: No, that was great.

[00:35:34] Tasia Poinsatte: Thank

[00:35:34] Joe Moore: you for doing that. And I think, um, I think it’s fair to say that we don’t know the optimal ways to do maybe any of this. Um, digging our way out of a trillion dollar war on drugs and, um, it being illegal to actually research this stuff for a long period of time.

[00:35:53] Joe Moore: Um, you know, we’re, we’re digging up, you know, building, [00:36:00] building something new in the face of a lot of, uh, roadblocks and fear. And, uh, I want to point out Iboga, um, how it became illegal. In the United States do, do either of, you know the story?

[00:36:16] Martha Hammel: Mm-hmm.

[00:36:18] Joe Moore: So this brings us full circle. Um, in 1972, um, there was a presidential candidate named Ed Muskie, um, and Hunter Thompson actually faked a story about Ed Muskie being addicted to ibogaine in a truly bizarre substance.

[00:36:37] Joe Moore: And, uh, there’s nobody was really using it at that point in time. People latched on to Hunter writing about it and said, we need to make that illegal. And they added it to CSA. So just really, really fascinating and terrifying. Um, just to know how the apparatus has worked historically and, um, how much work we all have ahead of [00:37:00] us to build this kind of science-based drug policy and a, um, constantly progressing psychedelic healthcare.

[00:37:11] Joe Moore: And beyond infrastructure. Yeah. And Martha, I think perhaps a thing that we’re pick, I’m picking up from you is that yes, this stuff should be integrated into healthcare in some way, but you, you don’t want to necessarily see it be totally ripped out of a, a sort of spiritual, religious framework. And I think, I think that’s a fair thing.

[00:37:36] Joe Moore: Um, maybe it did. I characterize that well enough.

[00:37:42] Martha Hammel: I mean, there’s just so much wisdom. Um, I’m always a fan of asking questions to people who have more knowledge than me.

[00:37:56] Tasia Poinsatte: Mm-hmm.

[00:37:56] Martha Hammel: And [00:38:00] you have people who have been working with this medicine for. Generations and generations and generations and who have been stewards of this land and stewards of this wisdom, and they know what they, they’re doing.

[00:38:15] Martha Hammel: Um, you know, I talk about psychedelic use all the time, like exploring the mountains. Yes. Um, if you’re in it, we in Colorado understand our mountains here and, and we’ve only been living here for not that many generations as opposed to the indigenous people who were here for so long before that. But if you’re.

[00:38:42] Martha Hammel: Navigating unfamiliar terrain. Maybe hire a guide who’s been there before and who understands the weather patterns and who understands the river currents and who knows which snakes to avoid. [00:39:00] You know, so that

[00:39:03] Joe Moore: I need to point out that there’s like a spiritual subtext here around, like in the experience there are a lot of things that can be, um, interacted with in one way or another, and.

[00:39:19] Joe Moore: A lot of the traditions have experience interacting with those things and guiding people through interacting with those things. And, you know, this is not super dissimilar from how I like to talk about breath work, LSD psychotherapy. Mm-hmm. Assorted shamonic traditions from around the world. So it’s. It’s a yes.

[00:39:36] Joe Moore: And it’s yet another, uh, robust shamanic tradition.

[00:39:41] Martha Hammel: Well, I mean, I actually don’t even mean it in a shamanic context. Um,

[00:39:48] Joe Moore: mm-hmm.

[00:39:50] Martha Hammel: Uh, even for experiences afterwards. Um, or like, say, uh, and [00:40:00] so again, I don someone if vague. Tell

[00:40:01] Joe Moore: me what you mean.

[00:40:02] Martha Hammel: Yeah. No, I, I don’t know enough about. To be able to give a really clear example, but, um,

[00:40:13] Martha Hammel: say, yeah, I, I don’t know. Yeah. I, I don’t know enough about the medicine to really, uh, give something solid, but I’m trying to think of an analogy that would.

[00:40:32] Joe Moore: Will you work on that? Martha Tasha, can you tell us where we stand in Colorado on Colorado Ibogaine policy and development of Ibogaine into Colorado’s, uh, NMHA framework?

[00:40:46] Tasia Poinsatte: Yeah. Well, as I mentioned, there’s a bill Mo moving its way through the legislature right now that, um, would do a few things. It would make some adjustments that could make the addition of. Ibogaine to the NMHA more feasible, such as the [00:41:00] allowing the SEMISYNTHETIC conversion. It would also create this pilot research, uh, opportunity in partnership with the Behavioral Health Administration, where there could be, um, sort of a sep separate avenue of FDA approved, um, or sorry, yeah.

[00:41:13] Tasia Poinsatte: FDA approved clinical research with ibogaine with support from the BHA. So that’s kind of a separate thing. Um, but really what needs to happen in Colorado to fully move forward is that the. State agencies tasked with regulating the natural medicine program, which is the Department of Revenue. The department of Re regulatory agencies need to give the full green light, which they haven’t yet.

[00:41:35] Tasia Poinsatte: What they do have is they have the recommendation from the advisory board, as you mentioned. Two, add IGA to the regulated program and do so in a way that is compliant with, uh, the Nagoya protocol. And, um, I think that what it’s gonna come down to is, you know, that they’re continuing to have these very in-depth, fascinating conversations with a whole host of different people, including, you know, [00:42:00] people from blessings of the forest, um, and others.

[00:42:03] Tasia Poinsatte: Directly working with or living in Gabon, um, as well as these clinics in, you know, in Brazil and Mexico, about how this can be safely structured. Um, so really what’s needed, you know, is that decision, green light or no? And that’s kind of the point that we’re at in Colorado.

[00:42:18] Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. Cool. Thank you. And have there been conversations about how to get it in here other than Vol Congo and a semisynthetic process?

[00:42:30] Tasia Poinsatte: There have been so many conversations about how to get it in here. Um, you know, there’s, there’s a number of different options and each one of them I think, comes kind of with its own set of challenges. At the core of it, the, the core challenge is that it’s a tropical plant that is. If it’s possible to grow in Colorado, it’s extremely hard to grow in Colorado.

[00:42:50] Tasia Poinsatte: So you’re needing to have some sort of importation opportunity, or perhaps it could be grown in other states and then transferred to Colorado. Um, but all of [00:43:00] those come with their own host of sort of challenges around them. Um, there’s a desire to, you know, pursue this. Federal exemption, um, concept. And I think that it’s an open question as to whether, um, that, that is gonna move forward, which could then allow importation either of Bo Conga or of Iboga, um, for the purposes of providing iboga at these clinics.

[00:43:22] Martha Hammel: And actually, uh, to, to speak about the agricultural and growing process. I think this, I, I can give a good example of what I was trying to say. So. If say, we’re trying to grow iboga in Colorado, we would. I, instead of just trying to do it here, it would make sense to talk to the people in Gabon who have been growing it for a really long time about what they’ve learned, uh, in their interactions with this plant for generations because they’ve been cultivating this for generations.

[00:43:56] Martha Hammel: And so that there’s, it would say a wisdom. It doesn’t

[00:43:59] Joe Moore: grow well in [00:44:00] a high alpine desert.

[00:44:02] Martha Hammel: Exactly.

I’m

[00:44:02] Tasia Poinsatte: pretty sure they would say that. I mean, if you’re gonna try to grow it here, it would be, yeah. Greenhouse,

[00:44:08] Martha Hammel: but, but there’s a, there’s a wisdom lineage to like a very distinct interaction with the plant that isn’t necessarily this like spiritual shamanic context.

[00:44:19] Joe Moore: Is it traditionally cultivated? Like, is that, is that a relationship that the Wei have with it, or is it always wild harvested? I never actually dug into that.

[00:44:29] Martha Hammel: Mm-hmm. Um. It’s definitely cultivated. There’s, um, very specific traditional, uh, processes, uh, for the cultivation. Um, and it’s wild harvested,

[00:44:47] Joe Moore: okay.

[00:44:47] Joe Moore: Both hand. And there’s a long tradition of cultivation. It’s not just like a last 20 years thing.

[00:44:54] Martha Hammel: Um.

[00:44:58] Martha Hammel: I mean, I want to [00:45:00] say yes, but uh, once again, I am

[00:45:04] Joe Moore: not an expert in this. Let’s get an answer later. Um, maybe, maybe you guys can help me find an answer on this one and we can report back. ’cause I think that’s an important thing. You know, none of us are wei initiates. Is that accurate? I’m not.

[00:45:15] Tasia Poinsatte: That is accurate.

[00:45:15] Tasia Poinsatte: I am not.

[00:45:17] Joe Moore: Yeah. Yeah. Cool. So yeah, we can report back and try to find some folks that can’t speak well to this. I’ve, uh, tried my best at the ibogaine meetings to record with some of the blessings of the forest crew and wasn’t able to pull it off, um, or some other conversations that were more pressing, I guess.

[00:45:37] Joe Moore: So, um,

[00:45:38] Martha Hammel: uh, Joe, I can connect you to some people in Gabon who are working on this process, so I’ll be sure

[00:45:47] Joe Moore: to do that.

[00:45:48] Martha Hammel: Yeah.

[00:45:50] Joe Moore: Um, alright, well, where can people find info about the symposium? I know we need to wrap here.

[00:45:56] Martha Hammel: Um, aspen [00:46:00] psychedelic.org/symposium. Um, you can buy tickets on the Wheeler Opera House website.

[00:46:07] Martha Hammel: Um, there’s a ticketing link on our website, aspen psychedelic.org.

[00:46:15] Joe Moore: Amazing. And, um. Tasha, where can we find your website?

[00:46:20] Tasia Poinsatte: We are healing advocacy fund.org. And yeah, for any listeners who are interested in following along more closely with the state regulated programs, um, definitely we recommend visiting our site, setting up for a newsletter.

[00:46:32] Tasia Poinsatte: Um, we try to keep folks updated to the best extent that we can.

[00:46:38] Joe Moore: Um, final question. Somebody out there listening asked if there are any veterans speaking this year, do we know that offhand?

[00:46:48] Tasia Poinsatte: Hmm.

[00:46:52] Martha Hammel: I don’t

[00:46:52] Joe Moore: believe so. Sounds like I’m not sure. Okay.

[00:46:54] Martha Hammel: Yeah.

[00:46:55] Joe Moore: Cool.

[00:46:56] Martha Hammel: Um, uh, certainly that’s not [00:47:00] a, a focus of this year’s, uh, symposium, but there may be somebody who is a veteran. But that’s not, we’re, we’re not specifically platforming veterans issues at this symposium. There are so many amazing topics, um, that we want to be platforming and, uh, not nearly enough stage time.

[00:47:25] Martha Hammel: Tasha and I are constantly in this conversation of, oh, but, but we wanna give this person a little extra time. And, oh, can we, can we squeeze in just a little. More space for somebody else. Um, this conference is a, it’s a single track, so we only have so much stage time. I think the total is 11 hours. Um, and it.

[00:47:54] Martha Hammel: It’s an impossible challenge not to be able to give everybody [00:48:00] the stage, but we want to,

[00:48:02] Joe Moore: I don’t envy the challenge, but thank you. The effort, so

[00:48:06] Tasia Poinsatte: we keep coming back.

[00:48:08] Joe Moore: Mm-hmm.

[00:48:09] Tasia Poinsatte: Yeah, and I will say, I do, I do also really appreciate the, the single track structure. It, it creates sort of this cohesive group experience that I think is a little different than when everybody’s sort of.

[00:48:19] Tasia Poinsatte: Siphoning off to their different rooms. And so it’s, it’s a special one for sure, in my experience.

[00:48:24] Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. Yeah, for sure. All right, well thank you both. And

[00:48:27] Martha Hammel: speaking of veterans, wait, can I, just one more thing. Speaking of veterans, there is, uh, somebody in our local Aspen community who has been, uh, really trying to get a veterans focused symposium.

[00:48:41] Martha Hammel: Up and running. And if any of your listeners are interested in seeing that happen, um, specifically the person who just asked the question, uh, reach out to me through the Aspen psychedelic website and let’s figure out how to platform [00:49:00] some veterans

[00:49:01] Joe Moore: issues. Right? I would love to support that. So yeah, reach out to me as well, friends.

[00:49:06] Joe Moore: All right, let’s, uh, hang out backstage. Thank you both for your time and, um. I’m excited about this one.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on April 20, 2026June 11, 2026

Whitehouse Directs FDA, HHS and VA to Expand Psychedelic Research Pathways

Whitehouse - TRUMP EO - Explainer

The White House moved to accelerate federal handling of psychedelic drugs, including ibogaine, while leaving core approval, scheduling and reimbursement hurdles in place.

President Donald Trump on April 18 signed an executive order directing federal agencies to speed review, research, and access pathways for psychedelic drugs, with a focus on serious mental illness and veteran care. The order does not legalize psychedelics or approve any drug for general use, but it does tell agencies to move faster on several fronts affecting drug developers, researchers, clinicians, and patients.

The order is largely procedural. It directs the FDA to provide Commissioner’s National Priority Vouchers to psychedelic therapies that have received Breakthrough Therapy designation for serious mental illness and meet the voucher program’s criteria. FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said three vouchers would be issued the following week. The FDA says the vouchers do not guarantee approval or a fixed timeline. The order also directs the FDA and DEA to establish a pathway for eligible patients to access investigational psychedelic drugs, including ibogaine compounds, under existing statutory frameworks. It directs HHS to allocate at least $50 million through ARPA-H to match investments made by state governments that have enacted or are developing psychedelic research programs for serious mental illness. It also instructs HHS, FDA, and the VA to share clinical data, and tells the attorney general to initiate rescheduling review upon successful Phase 3 trial completion so that rescheduling can proceed as quickly as practicable upon FDA approval, where appropriate.

Key Points

  • Trump’s April 18 executive order tells federal agencies to speed review, research, and limited pre-approval access pathways for psychedelic drugs, including ibogaine.
  • The order does not legalize psychedelics, approve any treatment, or guarantee insurance coverage.
  • Its practical effect now is procedural: agencies must decide how to implement faster review, research funding, data sharing, and any future rescheduling steps.

The practical shift is in the federal posture toward psychedelic drug development. The administration is treating some of these compounds less as drugs to police and more as candidates for medical development. That could help companies already in the FDA pipeline, researchers seeking clearer coordination, and states that have invested in psychedelic research. It could also matter for ibogaine, which the order names directly, as pressure has grown to create a domestic pathway instead of sending patients abroad. The brief also notes separate reporting that the FDA cleared an Investigational New Drug application for ibogaine trials in the U.S. and that the VA already has multiple psychedelic studies underway.

“This is the kind of federal signal the field has been building toward for years,” Melissa Lavasani of Psychedelic Medicine Coalition said. “It doesn’t open the floodgates overnight, but it does tell agencies to move with more intention, particularly for populations like veterans who need better options.”

What the order does not change is equally important. It does not deschedule or legalize psilocybin, MDMA, LSD, ibogaine, or other psychedelics. Those substances remain Schedule I unless the normal regulatory and scheduling process changes that status. The order does not approve any psychedelic treatment. It does not require insurers to cover these therapies. It does not create a general adult-use market. It does not address religious-use questions, including churches using ayahuasca or other controlled substances. Right to Try remains limited to eligible drugs and patients meeting existing legal requirements, and ibogaine’s known safety concerns and trial-stage status mean its fit within that pathway is not yet settled.

That gap between announcement and outcome is the point. “The extent to which an executive order can impact drug policy is variable and debatable,” Mason Marks said in this interview. Mason is a fellow at Petrie-Flom Center and the lead of Project on Psychedelics Law and Policy (POPLAR), a Petrie-Flom project. An executive order can direct agencies to prioritize and coordinate. It cannot erase statutory requirements, settle scientific questions, or force a drug through FDA review. That is especially relevant for ibogaine, which remains unapproved and carries known safety risks, including cardiac toxicity. The brief also notes reported deaths linked to ibogaine use and the absence of the large, placebo-controlled trials that would typically support approval.

The order arrives amid two pressures. One is the mental health and addiction burden cited by the White House, including millions of Americans with serious mental illness. The other is veteran advocacy around PTSD, traumatic brain injury, depression, and substance use, especially for patients who say standard treatments have failed them. Veterans are a major political driver of the order, but not the only one. For the broader psychedelic field, the order is significant because it shifts federal attention beyond veterans and toward the larger drug-development pipeline, including review speed, research coordination, and reimbursement.

That broader picture also includes a second federal track focused on delivery inside the VA. Amy Rising, a Healthcare Policy Advocate, put it this way: “The Veterans Health Administration Novel Therapeutics Preparedness Act builds the VA into a system ready to deliver psychedelic care, while the executive order turns the federal government into a machine that gets those therapies approved faster—one prepares the ground, the other makes the medicine arrive. Separately, they solve different problems; together, they form a pipeline from discovery to delivery for the veterans who need it most.” The two efforts address different parts of the same process. One aims to speed the regulatory path. The other aims to prepare a major federal health system to deliver treatment if and when those therapies arrive.

Next steps will matter more than the signing ceremony. FDA will have to decide how broadly it uses the voucher tool and how strictly it interprets eligibility. HHS and ARPA-H will have to turn the promised funding into actual programs, which may still depend on appropriations and administrative design. The VA, HHS, and FDA will need to put data-sharing processes in place. DEA and the Justice Department will have to respond if and when a psychedelic drug reaches the stage the order identifies. CMS is also reportedly considering pricing models for psychedelic therapies, a reminder that approval and payment are separate issues.

Legal and commercial questions remain. The brief cites analysis suggesting the order’s rescheduling language may have less practical effect than it first appears, because federal law already requires DEA action within 90 days of FDA approval. It also notes concern that a compressed review path could complicate payer perceptions if insurers treat speed as a proxy for thin evidence, even when agencies say standards remain unchanged.

Trump’s order creates a faster and more coordinated federal lane for psychedelic drug development, but it does not resolve the scientific, safety, regulatory, or reimbursement hurdles that will determine whether these treatments reach routine care.

Further reading:
Petrie-Flow Center – A New Executive Order on Psychedelics: Q & A with I. Glenn Cohen and Mason Marks
The White House – ACCELERATING MEDICAL TREATMENTS FOR SERIOUS MENTAL ILLNESS

FAQ

Does Trump’s executive order legalize psychedelic drugs?
No. The order does not legalize psychedelics or remove their Schedule I status.

Does the order approve ibogaine, psilocybin, or MDMA for treatment?
No. It does not approve any psychedelic drug for general medical use.

What does the order actually do?
It tells federal agencies to speed review, research coordination, and certain access pathways for qualifying psychedelic drugs.

Does the order guarantee faster FDA approval?
No. It pushes agencies to move faster, but it does not guarantee approval or a fixed review timeline.

Will this make psychedelic treatment covered by insurance?
Not by itself. Approval and reimbursement are separate issues, and insurance coverage would still depend on later policy and payer decisions.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on April 17, 2026June 11, 2026

Op-Ed: Iboga, Ibogaine & 5-MeO-DMT: What gets missed when complex medicines are reduced to standard protocols

etero iboga - gpt generated with edits in canva.

Ibogaine, the alkaloid derived from the Tabernanthe iboga plant, and often through a more sustainable option voacanga africana, is front and center, riding the third wave of the modern psychedelic movement.

We hear of miracle stories: opiate withdrawals vanishing into thin air, neurotransmitters reset, an injured brain healing, trauma stored in the body and mind fresh with new perspective. But what happens when we not only extract a single alkaloid from a master plant, but also extract context, culture and tradition? As these medicines move towards standardization, we risk confusing safety with completeness.

The lesser known full-spectrum iboga, a perennial shrub found in Gabon, Cameroon and the Congo basin of Central Africa, is a root bark with a complex profile of alkaloids working in a powerful symbiosis. Iboga is a sacrament of the Bwiti tradition, a spiritual system with many branches practiced in the villages of the forest.

One might even say that working with iboga is akin to listening to a full symphony, an orchestra of sensation and sound, while the extracted, often semi-synthetic, ibogaine is like hearing a singular, transformative note. Clinical ibogaine has an essential role in treating addiction and supporting people in critical moments of need. But when we mistake the molecule for the entirety of the medicine, something important gets lost.

The Bwiti teach about truth, strength and resilience. The tradition is rooted in animism, honoring the wisdom of all beings, plants, animals and material. It is important to name that Indigenous knowledge, like most spiritual systems, is ideally worked with through an internal knowing and connection to community, and less so when placed on a pedestal, or through guru-ification of a singular person, group or rigid ideology.

However, when iboga is removed from its cultural roots, something essential goes missing that is not easily replaced by training, intention or clinical framing. In its traditional context, iboga is not a drug or even a plant; it is a living consciousness that requires relationship much like any human being would. It is held within lineage, ritual, community and a system of meaning that shapes both the experience and what follows it. Without that living framework, the experience can become untethered. What remains is often a powerful and disorienting pharmacological event that lacks the relational and symbolic anchors that help a person metabolize what they encounter.

Some believe that iboga should not be separated from the Bwiti tradition, but what does this actually mean for both western iboga providers and ibogaine clinics? Many iboga providers travel for initiation, rites of passage, and the observation and witnessing of Bwiti elders. They make their way home to the western world, serving as bridge people. Some providers honor the tradition while also allowing for the reality of the modern mind, nervous system and experience. Others attempt to replicate an Indigenous ceremony without lineage, creating confusion and appropriating what is not theirs to carry.

Ibogaine clinics tend to focus on the properties of ibogaine, and less so its cultural roots. While the presence of medics, therapists and a contained, well-supported environment is vital, we cannot forget where the medicine comes from. The land, the elders and the tradition are integral to the medicine itself. 

It is less often we see earth-based traditions or Indigenous voices, teachings, or students of elders brought into clinical spaces. With the rise in popularity of ibogaine, we are seeing more clinics serve as revolving doors, with extended waitlists and missing context for what a participant just experienced.

Ceremonial wisdom sees each person as an individual expression of nature. Without truly honoring lineage and elders through a living bridge of connection, not just a reciprocity check or week in Gabon, we are missing an imperative aspect of the work.

In western settings there is often an attempt to compensate for this loss through structure and protocol. While structure has value, it can give a false sense of completeness—iboga and ibogaine are not self-explanatory.

Without a cultural framework that contextualizes memory, identity and potential psychological rupture, participants may leave with insights that are difficult to integrate or in some cases destabilizing. The absence of context can also shift the power dynamic in subtle ways, placing more interpretive authority in the hands of facilitators, who may not be rooted in a relationship with a lineage that has stewarded this master plant for generations.

Efforts to legalize ibogaine have accelerated in recent years. Colorado’s ibogaine bill HB26-1325 includes “benefit-sharing” language with Bwiti communities, though in practice this remains largely symbolic and difficult to quantify. Could the focus on a single alkaloid be driven less by the medicine itself and more by what can be patented and standardized? 

When medicines are reduced to their pharmacological components, it becomes easier to treat them as modular tools that can be sequenced and optimized through protocol. The rise of ibogaine and 5-MeO-DMT stacking is an example of how standardization can both support and undermine safety. 

The increasingly common sequencing of ibogaine, often delivered without traditional context, followed by 5-MeO-DMT—an extremely expansive psychedelic that produces a powerful nondual experience, warrants pause and attention.

There is a tendency to assume that because 5-MeO-DMT often produces short non-narrative experiences, it is simpler to administer. This assumption can lead to an underestimation of both the intensity and the aftermath, particularly when stacked with ibogaine or iboga. Individuals can emerge from these sessions with a profound shift in perception that requires careful support as well as community integration.

When care is overly protocol-driven there is a risk that facilitators miss key signals or move too quickly through stages that need more time and attunement. What is gained in efficiency can be lost in precision.

On one hand, the development of protocols has helped reduce certain acute risks. Clear screening processes, dosing guidelines, and medical oversight have brought a level of consistency to an otherwise unpredictable space. On the other hand, the drive toward standardization can flatten the complexity of the experience and the people undergoing it. A protocol can account for physiological and psychological variables. But can it fully account for readiness, relational dynamics, the spiritual field, or the subtle ways in which a person’s history interacts with the medicine?

Individualized care, whether in clinical or ceremonial settings, does not mean the absence of structure; it means that structure remains responsive and relational rather than rigid and extractive. It requires facilitators to develop a high level of sensitivity to each participant to understand when to follow a guideline and when to deviate from it. The benefits of this approach include a greater capacity to meet people where they are and to reduce the likelihood of adverse outcomes that arise from misalignment. The risks are that it demands more experience, more accountability, and a willingness to operate without the safety net of a one-size-fits-all model.

The alternative is not the absence of structure, but structure in service to relationship. Protocols that remain flexible, responsive and grounded in the individual rather than fixed sequences applied uniformly. When they are treated as living frameworks rather than fixed formulas, structures and systems can support both safety and depth. When they become substitutes for judgment and relationship they can blur the very complexities they are meant to manage. Do they remain in service to the person, or slowly begin to replace the very awareness that keeps the work safe?

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on March 19, 2026March 24, 2026

Gov. Spencer Cox Signs Utah’s H.B. 390 Into Law, Authorizing Psychedelic Research for Veterans With PTSD

Gov. Spencer Cox Signs Utah’s H.B. 390 Into Law, Authorizing Psychedelic Research for Veterans With PTSD

Utah’s new law does not legalize psychedelic therapy. It authorizes a tightly regulated clinical study at the Huntsman Mental Health Institute for veterans with treatment-resistant PTSD.

On March 19, Gov. Spencer Cox signed H.B. 390, the Veterans PTSD Clinical Research Amendments, into law. The measure authorizes the Huntsman Mental Health Institute at the University of Utah to conduct a clinical study on psychedelic-assisted therapy for veterans with treatment-resistant PTSD. Cox’s office included H.B. 390 in a batch of 74 bills signed that day.

That makes Utah notable for a specific reason. This is not a decriminalization bill. It does not create a statewide access model. Utah chose a narrower path: state-authorized clinical research inside a mainstream medical institution, with veterans at the center.

Utah’s approach lands somewhere between Oregon and Colorado’s broader state-level experiments and the federal setback that followed the FDA’s rejection of Lykos’ MDMA application: narrower than a public access model, but more ambitious than waiting for Washington to move first.

H.B. 390 is written as a clinical research law, not a general access law. The bill defines an eligible veteran as a veteran with treatment-resistant PTSD. It authorizes research into the safety and feasibility of psychedelic-assisted therapy for that population, and it specifically names MDMA, psilocybin, and 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine, better known as 5-MeO-DMT, as qualifying investigational psychedelic drugs. The law also defines psychedelic-assisted therapy in clinical terms: administration of the drug in a controlled setting, paired with manualized, trauma-informed preparatory and integrative psychotherapy delivered by a qualified therapist.

“This is about the state taking responsibility for a specific, well-defined study that can inform Utah’s policy decisions and benefit the local Veteran community. With the passage of H.B. 390, Utah has created a framework for that work to move forward with public accountability. This does not preclude ongoing [psychedelic] research at The University of Utah; rather, it creates a parallel lane for state-directed evaluation designed to generate clinical evidence that lawmakers can rely on.” – Benjamin R. Lewis, M.D. – Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Huntsman Mental Health Institute – Principal Investigator, The University of Utah Psychedelic Science Initiative (U-PSI)

Photo: Gov. Spencer Cox Signs Utah’s H.B. 390 Into Law
Photo: Gov. Spencer Cox Signs Utah’s H.B. 390 Into Law

That language shows how carefully Utah lawmakers framed the effort. The bill does not endorse broad consumer access. It authorizes a study. And not just any study. Before the clinical study can begin, Huntsman must operate under an FDA investigational new drug application, maintain DEA Schedule I research registration and any required state controlled-substance registration, and obtain Institutional Review Board approval.

The law also requires a detailed protocol. That includes study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, follow-up schedules, informed consent procedures, participant safeguards, data security and privacy protections, drug source and dosing details, staffing and monitoring procedures, discharge and transportation rules, chain-of-custody and disposal procedures for controlled substances, emergency response planning, adverse event reporting, therapist licensure and qualification requirements, training and supervision plans, and a participant complaint and grievance process. This is not loose policy language. It is an attempt to build a highly structured medical research container around a politically sensitive area of treatment.

There is also a practical reason this bill moved. It is focused on veterans, and that gives lawmakers a narrower and more politically defensible case for action. The bill itself does not claim that the science is settled. It creates a path to gather more evidence under state-backed institutional oversight for a population with high rates of severe PTSD and a clear need for better options.

“Veterans are often excluded from clinical trials evaluating psychedelics and mental health treatments, as strict eligibility criteria fail to capture the complex realities of military-related PTSD, including moral injury, substance use, traumatic brain injury, past suicide attempts, and elevated dropout risk. H.B. 390 creates a critical opportunity not only for Veterans to participate in research, but also for Utah to train clinicians, establish protocols, and build the infrastructure needed to implement psychedelic-assisted therapy when FDA approvals arrive.” Anya Ragnhildstveit – CEO, Center for Psychedelic Research, Pneuma Science – Lead Scientific Policy Advisor

The funding picture is more limited than the headline might suggest. The enrolled bill itself states that there is no direct appropriation in H.B. 390. Instead, it says Huntsman must begin the study if legislative appropriations plus gifts, grants, or donations reach an amount the institute determines is sufficient to launch. Separate Utah legislative budget materials show a one-time approved amount of $1 million tied to “Veterans PTSD Clinical Research Amendments (H.B. 390)” at the University of Utah. Huntsman may also continue accepting gifts, grants, and donations to fund the study.

The governor’s signature is a real milestone, but not the end of the story. The next phase is operational. Huntsman still has to finalize the protocol, satisfy federal and state regulatory requirements, secure or manage sufficient funding, and build the staffing and clinical infrastructure needed to run the study. The law says the institute must begin by January 1, 2027 if the available funding is sufficient. If it is not, Huntsman can keep raising money and launch later once the threshold is met.

The law also includes reporting requirements. Huntsman must report progress to the Health and Human Services Interim Committee upon request and submit a final written report after the study concludes. That report must include safety and feasibility outcomes, along with any secondary or exploratory clinical outcomes. The clinical study provisions sunset on July 1, 2032.

For the psychedelic field, Utah’s move is worth watching because it points to a different route than ballot campaigns or broad legalization debates. H.B. 390 is narrow, institution-based, and built to survive political scrutiny. For states unwilling to move toward broader access, that model may prove easier to replicate.

Gov. Cox’s signature does not legalize psychedelic therapy in Utah. It creates a formal clinical research pathway for veterans with treatment-resistant PTSD inside a major medical institution, under federal research rules and state reporting requirements. It is a limited step, but a meaningful one.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on March 17, 2026March 17, 2026

Psychedelic Culture 2026

Psychedelic Culture 2026 - Chacruna

Psychedelic Culture 2026 is Chacruna Institute’s annual three-day conference bringing together researchers, Indigenous leaders, healers, clinicians, activists, and community members from around the world for one of the most substantive gatherings in the field.

Held at the Brava Theater — a women-led co-op in San Francisco’s Mission District — the conference runs three simultaneous tracks across three days, covering the full breadth of where psychedelic science, culture, and advocacy intersect.

Topics include Indigenous reciprocity and biocultural conservation, law and policy reform, racial equity and access, queering psychedelics, perspectives from the Global South, ethics around touch and sexual abuse, neuroscience and shamanism dialogues, and critical reflections on psychedelic-assisted therapy. Alongside the panels and talks, attendees can participate in music and art-centered workshops and ceremonies.

Chacruna’s conferences are known for centering voices that are often missing from mainstream psychedelic conversations — and for combining intellectual rigor with heart, community, and lived experience.

Psychedelics Today community members get 20% off tickets with code PsychedelicsToday20 at checkout.

Scholarships and volunteer opportunities are also available.

Get Tickets Learn More

📍 Brava Theater, San Francisco, CA 📅 April 17–19, 2026

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on March 9, 2026March 9, 2026

Colorado’s Ibogaine Bill Could Be a Landmark — If It Respects the Plant’s Roots

Colorado Ibogaine Bill Update - March 9, 2026

HB26-1325 would create a state-supported ibogaine research program to study addiction and PTSD treatment, including for veterans. One provision stands out: a requirement that participating organizations create benefit-sharing plans with Indigenous communities connected to the medicine’s origins.

Colorado has spent the last several years building one of the most ambitious natural medicine policy frameworks in the United States. Proposition 122, passed in 2022, created a regulated system for psilocybin services and decriminalized several plant medicines.

Now lawmakers are exploring whether ibogaine could enter that broader ecosystem through a research pathway.

For advocates of psychedelic reform, the question is not only whether research should proceed, but how access can expand responsibly while reducing the harms created by prohibition.

House Bill 26-1325, introduced March 6, 2026 by Representatives Jarvis Caldwell and Lisa Feret and Senator Matt Ball, proposes a state-supported ibogaine research pilot program within the Colorado Behavioral Health Administration (BHA).

The bill would allow the state to support clinical research into ibogaine’s potential for treating substance use disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, and other mental health conditions.

It would also require participating research sites to create benefit-sharing plans with Indigenous communities historically connected to the medicine.

Those requirements raise broader questions about how ibogaine research will develop in the United States, including how the medicine is sourced and how communities connected to its cultural origins are included in the benefits of research and commercialization.


What the Bill Would Do

HB26-1325 does not legalize ibogaine. The compound remains a Schedule I controlled substance under federal law.

Instead, the bill creates a state framework to support research under federal authorization.

The Behavioral Health Administration would be allowed to approve up to five ibogaine research pilot sites. The agency would also assist those sites in navigating the FDA’s Investigational New Drug (IND) process and coordinate with federal regulators, including the Drug Enforcement Administration and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Funding would come through gifts, grants, and donations rather than direct state appropriations. Those funds would be placed into a newly created Ibogaine Research Pilot Program Cash Fund, which could provide grants to participating sites.

The bill also proposes integrating ibogaine into Colorado’s broader natural medicine regulatory structure. This includes semi-synthetic ibogaine produced from compounds derived from Tabernanthe iboga or Voacanga africana.

In addition, the legislation extends liability protections to facilitators providing natural medicine services, provided any harm was not the result of intentional misconduct or gross negligence.


Why Veterans Are Central to the Proposal

The bill’s legislative declaration places strong emphasis on veterans’ mental health.

It states that “the mental health and well-being of veterans is a priority of the general assembly,” and references emerging research suggesting ibogaine may help treat severe service-related PTSD and other mental health conditions related to combat deployments.

This framing reflects a broader trend in psychedelic policy debates. Ibogaine has drawn attention partly because of reports from veterans who traveled to clinics in Mexico seeking treatment for traumatic brain injury, PTSD, and opioid dependence.

One widely cited 2024 Stanford study reported significant reductions in disability, PTSD symptoms, depression, and suicidality among special operations veterans with predominantly mild traumatic brain injury who received ibogaine treatment in Mexico, where the compound is legal.

Positioning the policy discussion around veterans may also help build bipartisan support. Veteran health remains one of the few issues where drug policy debates sometimes cross party lines.


The Indigenous Benefit-Sharing Requirement

One section of HB26-1325 introduces a provision rarely seen in U.S. drug policy.

To qualify as an ibogaine research site, applicants must demonstrate intent to pursue federal regulatory approval and establish a plan to share benefits with Indigenous communities traditionally connected to iboga or ibogaine practices.

The bill goes further. Any future licensee seeking to cultivate, manufacture, test, distribute, or administer ibogaine in Colorado would be required to maintain such a plan developed in consultation with those communities.

The plan must also be publicly available upon request.

The provision responds to longstanding criticism in the psychedelic field. Plant medicines such as ayahuasca, peyote, and iboga remain part of living Indigenous traditions. As Western researchers and companies develop therapies and intellectual property around these substances, the communities that stewarded them often receive little direct benefit.

In the case of iboga, those traditions are most closely associated with Bwiti spiritual practice in Central Africa, particularly in Gabon and Cameroon.

HB26-1325 does not define what benefit-sharing must look like or how it will be evaluated. The requirement establishes the principle, but the details would likely emerge through rulemaking or future legislation.

One practical question sits beneath this requirement. Ibogaine originates from plants native to Central Africa, and neither Tabernanthe iboga nor Voacanga africana is cultivated commercially in the United States at scale. As Colorado explores ibogaine research, questions about sourcing, conservation, and supply chains will likely become part of the policy conversation.


The Sourcing Question Nobody’s Answering

Ibogaine does not come from Colorado. Tabernanthe iboga grows in the rainforests of Central Africa, especially in Gabon and Cameroon, where Bwiti practitioners have used it ceremonially for generations. Voacanga africana, another source plant mentioned in the bill, is also native to the region.

Neither plant is cultivated commercially in the United States at scale.

HB26-1325 authorizes research and administration of ibogaine, including semi-synthetic ibogaine derived from compounds found in those plants. The bill does not explain where Colorado’s pilot research sites would obtain the source material.

The supply chain remains an open question.

Global demand for iboga root bark has grown as interest in ibogaine therapy has risen. Conservationists and researchers have raised concerns about overharvesting of Tabernanthe iboga in Central Africa.

Gabon designated the plant a protected national resource in 2019 and has taken steps to restrict exports of raw plant material. As a result, legal sourcing of iboga-derived compounds is already difficult and tightly regulated.

The issue also intersects with the bill’s Indigenous benefit-sharing requirement. If research programs in the United States rely on plant-derived compounds originating in Gabon while those same communities are expected to participate in benefit-sharing arrangements, the supply chain itself becomes an ethical question.

How plant material is sourced, cultivated, or synthesized may determine whether benefit-sharing provisions have real impact.

HB26-1325 opens the door to ibogaine research in Colorado. How that plant material is sourced will shape the debate about sustainability, Indigenous participation, and the ethics of psychedelic medicine.


What Happens Next

The bill has been assigned to the Colorado House Health and Human Services Committee. It must pass committee review, the full House, the Senate, and receive the governor’s signature before becoming law.

Importantly, the federal constraint is narrower than it might appear. Colorado can build essentially the entire program infrastructure — the cash fund, the rulemaking, the site selection process, the advisory board reforms, the liability protections — without Washington’s permission. What the bill cannot do is authorize the actual administration of ibogaine to patients. That one step is explicitly contingent on federal approval, whether through the FDA’s Investigational New Drug process, a federal research designation under 21 U.S.C. § 872, or broader federal reform.

There’s a further nuance worth noting. The bill’s federal coordination language — seeking DEA memoranda, pursuing FDA authorization, applying for federal research program status — uses “may” throughout, not “shall.” The BHA isn’t required to actively chase federal authorization. In practice, that work would likely fall to the pilot sites themselves, navigating the IND process on their own timelines.

The more accurate picture, then, is that Colorado is building a loaded gun and waiting for federal permission to fire it. The infrastructure can be ready. The sites can be selected. The rules can be written. The only thing that can’t happen until Washington moves is the thing that actually matters clinically: giving ibogaine to patients.

That may sound like a modest distinction. But for advocates, researchers, and potential pilot sites, it means the work can start now — and that Colorado will be positioned to move quickly when the federal landscape shifts.

The full text of HB26-1325 is available through the Colorado General Assembly website.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on March 5, 2026March 5, 2026

Navigating Colorado’s Regulated Psychedelic Model: Lessons From the Front Lines

Navigating Colorado’s Regulated Psychedelic Model: Lessons From the Front Lines

Entering the legal, regulated model of psychedelic therapy was the last thing on my mind when I moved to Colorado.

I spent most of my life in rural Appalachia, bouncing from one small mountain town to the next, making a living in healthcare while pursuing creativity as a visual artist. Alongside that, I practiced as a psychedelic guide, serving individuals and small groups to share the deep healing I had experienced through psilocybin. That work existed within an unregulated ecosystem shaped by relationship, trust, and responsibility rather than formal oversight.

Like many people who find their way to psychedelics, my path was personal long before it was professional. I am a survivor of domestic violence and sexual assault, and I lived with chronic pain rooted in complex trauma. Years of processing through traditional therapy and other modalities were foundational to my healing. Yet there were deeper layers I could sense, but could not access.

Psilocybin therapy became the catalyst for a change I had no idea was coming. Through ethical, safe facilitation, I learned how to integrate parts of myself that had long been hidden, suppressed, or fragmented. I developed attunement, an ability to self-regulate, and a toolkit of modalities that actually worked for my system. These skills will serve me for the rest of my life.

During this time, I knew I was being called to guide others through this terrain. I had no plans for it to ever go beyond serving my community.

That would change.

A Legal Landscape Emerges

Within months of leaving my friends and family behind, Proposition 122 passed in November 2022, setting off a cascade of events that altered the trajectory of my life and the lives of many others in Colorado.

The Natural Medicine Health Act (NMHA) was signed into law in May 2023, kicking off the development of rules and regulations across multiple state agencies to oversee what would become the Regulated Access Program. As defined by NMHA, natural medicine includes psilocybin, psilocin, DMT, ibogaine, and mescaline (excluding peyote), with psilocybin designated as the first substance to be regulated for therapeutic use.

Far from being a seamless rollout, it was a living process. Rules were drafted, revised, clarified, and at times contradicted as agencies worked hard to build an entirely new regulatory framework.

For those of us watching closely, the question quickly became whether to wait for the dust to settle or step into the uncertainty.

Making the Leap

My roots are steeped in blue collars, bootstraps, and a healthy dose of skepticism toward authority. Opting into background checks, licensing fees, inspections, and state oversight did not come easily, especially in a practice that has long existed outside formal systems.

Those in the psychedelic world aren’t exactly known for their ability to toe the line, myself included. But the regulated model is bigger than any one person. It represents a broader attempt to increase safety, accountability, and access in a world still reckoning with the damage caused by the War on Drugs.

After sitting with the decision, my heart knew what was right. Go Within Collective came to fruition and would become the second licensed psychedelic healing center in Colorado.

I was excited. And terrified.

What I have learned along the way has been invaluable, including the art of how and when to pivot.

What Regulation Looks Like in Practice

In addition to the challenges of opening a small business, we faced obstacles we had never anticipated. In 2025 alone, we navigated:

  • Obtaining general and professional liability insurance, with most quotes being prohibitively high or had exclusion clauses that left us unprotected
  • Renting a space in a jurisdiction that allowed us to operate
  • Interpreting rules and regulations as they were being drafted
  • Finding professional support (accounting, legal, and financial) familiar with our industry
  • Being lumped in with the cannabis industry despite major differences
  • Financial planning while licensure fees and requirements were still being drafted
  • Building HIPAA-compliant systems for patient records, consent, and inventory
  • Designing and installing compliant security infrastructure

Each of these hurdles was more than an inconvenience. Together, they revealed what participation in the regulated model actually requires: infrastructure, documentation, oversight, and systems designed to protect participants, facilitators, and the public.

Every challenge we faced was overcome without outside financial investment. Bootstrapping the business placed a high personal financial burden on myself and my business partner. Creativity, adaptability, and leveraging every skill we had became essential.

Hours were spent combing through more than a hundred pages of draft regulations. To preserve our budget, we initially moved forward with legal counsel who was not deeply familiar with NMHA rules and regulations. When we were finally able to hire a legal team within the psychedelic industry, the relief was immense.

At one point, the bank we were working with closed our accounts and called our debt due to the nature of our business. We didn’t learn this until our healing center license fee check bounced. We scrambled to access our funds and submit payment before missing the deadline.

With no technical background, I built our electronic health record system to meet regulatory and operational requirements as they were being finalized, drawing on my years in healthcare to guide its structure. As regulations matured, those systems were refined to remain compliant.

The same was true for our security system. Quotes were far beyond our budget, so I rolled up my sleeves and figured it out (everything from cloud-based video storage to installing a 24/7 camera system). Fortunately, there is no photographic evidence of me sitting on the floor surrounded by cables and blinking lights, exasperated and tearful.

One final surprise purchase nearly broke me. After we were licensed and operational, we learned that our scale for measuring natural medicine was not compliant. We had to purchase a specific model, then have it certified and stamped. In isolation, it was a small expense. But to my nervous system, it felt like the waves of unexpected costs would never end.

Community in the Midst of Uncertainty

The state-regulated program did its best to keep participants informed. We had an investigator assigned to our healing center whom I could reach out to when questions arose, which helped clarify key issues. Still, as with any new government program, resources were limited.

What emerged from the confusion was a community of healing center owners, facilitators, and cultivators helping one another solve increasingly complex problems. Organizations such as the Healing Advocacy Fund became invaluable resources during this time.

One phrase showed up again and again in our conversations: “clear as mud.”

Some chose to wait on the sidelines until the dust settled. It’s a reasonable strategy, but not one that suits my nature. Had we waited, we would have avoided certain pitfalls. We also would have missed insights that can only be gained by getting a little muddy.

Safety, Accountability, and the Role of Regulation

Psilocybin therapy requires a container capable of holding vulnerability, complexity, and risk. Indigenous communities upheld this container for thousands of years through lineage, ritual, and communal accountability. In a modern world increasingly disconnected from community, the regulated model is one way we attempt to recreate accountability at scale.

In practice, that accountability shows up in ways that directly affect decision-making. Standardized screenings, informed consent, and transportation planning create clear boundaries before anyone ever enters a psychedelic state. Medical partnerships allow us to assess complex cases, seek clearance when appropriate, and deny access when it is not safe to proceed.

Liability insurance, documentation, and scope-of-practice requirements changed how responsibility was shared and how care was followed up afterward.

Some of the ways safety and accountability show up in Colorado’s model include:

  • Standardized screenings, informed consent, and transportation planning
  • Partnerships with physicians to assess complex medical cases and deny clearance when it is not safe to proceed
  • Pathways for clinical facilitators to work within their licensed scope, increasing access to those with complex cases
  • Required training standards for licensed facilitators that include safety, ethics, and cultural education
  • Liability insurance that provides financial accountability
  • Systems for investigation and consequence when harm occurs

These measures do not eliminate risk, but they help reduce preventable harm. When facilitators and participants feel supported by clear structures and accountability, conditions are more favorable for responsible, well-held psychedelic work, particularly for those with complex trauma histories or elevated vulnerability.

Criticism, Tension, and Necessary Dialogue

The regulated model is not perfect.

Some worry it will further erase Indigenous culture through Western medicalization. Others are concerned about commodification, insufficient training, or the risks of making powerful medicines widely available. Cost remains one of the most significant barriers to access.

These critiques are valid and deserve continued dialogue.

My goal is not to claim regulation as the superior path, but to engage honestly with its realities. Underground, ceremonial, clinical, and state-regulated approaches all coexist and likely will continue to.

The real question is how this model is shaped, who it serves, and whose voices are included in its evolution.

Healing centers across Colorado are experimenting with sliding scales, nonprofit structures, and collaborative networks to expand access. Long-term, broader normalization and policy reform will be necessary to reduce costs and widen availability.

The Work Itself

With all of the infrastructure, compliance, and unexpected expenses, it could be easy to forget why I stepped into this in the first place. But the work itself is deeply meaningful.

Supporting someone as they prepare to enter a psychedelic experience is not something regulation can minimize. Watching the mix of anxiety, hope, skepticism, and courage bubble to the surface is an amazing thing to witness. If anything, the added structure has clarified my role. The container is more defined, expectations are explicit, and the responsibility is shared. And within that structure, the human moments are just as real as they were before.

There are days when the administrative weight feels heavy. But it is a gift to have developed a nervous system regulated enough for someone to anchor to while they are moving through their own challenges, helping them to expand their window of tolerance within their own system.

I am privileged to be trusted in witnessing people meeting parts of themselves they have avoided for years.

I am honored to see the relief that comes when someone realizes they are not broken.

I am grateful to have the capacity to sit with grief, pain, anger, and long-held trauma surfacing in ways that are messy and profound. Unregulated or regulated, that is foundational to any ethical psychedelic work.

The regulated model hasn’t diluted the meaning for me. If anything, it has asked me to hold it with more precision, more humility, and more care.

Moving Forward Together

Colorado’s experiment will influence policy and practice far beyond state lines. Those of us participating now carry a responsibility to engage critically, transparently, and humbly. We must learn from missteps and remain open to course correction.

The regulated model is one chapter in a much longer story about how we all relate to these medicines, to healing, and to one another. As the story continues to unfold, it may offer lessons worth carrying forward when approached with care, dialogue, and accountability.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on February 19, 2026February 19, 2026

Melissa Lavasani & Jay Kopelman: Federal Psychedelic Policy, VA Pathways, and Ibogaine Safety Standards

PT 649 - Mission Within Foundation and Psychedelic Medicine Coalition - Melissa Lavasani and Jay Kopelman

Melissa Lavasani & Jay Kopelman join our podcast to discuss how psychedelic policy is actually moving in Washington, DC. Lavasani leads Psychedelic Medicine Coalition, a DC-based advocacy organization focused on educating federal officials and advancing legislation around psychedelic medicine. Kopelman is CEO of Mission Within Foundation, which provides scholarships for veterans and first responders seeking psychedelic-assisted therapy retreats, often outside the United States.

The conversation centers on veterans, the VA, and why that system may be the first realistic federal pathway for psychedelic care.

Early Episode Topics

Lavasani describes PMC’s work on Capitol Hill, including hosting events that bring lawmakers, staffers, and advocates into the same room. Her focus is steady engagement. In DC, progress often happens through repeated conversations, not headlines.

Kopelman shares his background as a Marine and how his own psychedelic-assisted therapy experience led him to Mission Within. The foundation has funded more than 250 scholarships for veterans and first responders seeking treatment for PTSD, mild traumatic brain injury, depression, and addiction.

They connect this work to pending veteran-focused legislation and explain why they are focusing efforts at the VA. As a closed health system, the VA can pilot programs, gather data, and refine protocols without the pressures of private healthcare markets.

Core Insights

A recent Capitol Hill gathering, For Veteran Society, brought together members of Congress and leaders from the psychedelic caucus. Lavasani describes candid feedback from lawmakers. The message was clear: coordinate messaging, avoid fragmentation, and move while bipartisan interest remains.

Veteran healthcare is not framed as the final goal. It is a starting point. If psychedelic therapies can demonstrate safety and effectiveness within the VA, broader adoption becomes more plausible.

Kopelman raises operational realities that must be addressed:

  • Standardized safety protocols across providers
  • Integration support, not medication alone
  • Clear training pathways for clinicians
  • Real-world data beyond tightly screened clinical trials

They also address recent negative headlines involving ibogaine treatment abroad. Kopelman emphasizes the need for shared learning across providers, especially when adverse events occur. Lavasani argues that inconsistency within the ecosystem can slow federal confidence.

Later Discussion and Takeaways

The discussion widens to federal momentum around addiction and mental health. Lavasani notes that new funding initiatives signal growing openness to innovative treatment models, even if psychedelics are not named explicitly in every announcement.

Both guests stress that policy moves slowly by design. Meetings, follow-ups, and relationship building often matter more than public statements.

For clinicians, researchers, operators, and advocates, the takeaways are direct:

  • Veterans are likely the first federal pathway
  • Public education remains essential
  • Safety standards must be shared and transparent
  • Integration and workforce development need attention now

If psychedelic medicine enters federal systems, infrastructure will determine success.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do Melissa Lavasani & Jay Kopelman say about VA psychedelic policy?
They argue that veteran-focused legislation offers a realistic first federal pathway for psychedelic-assisted care.

Is ibogaine currently available through the VA?
No. They discuss ibogaine in the context of private retreats and future possibilities, not an existing VA program.

Why do Melissa Lavasani & Jay Kopelman emphasize coordination?
Lawmakers respond more positively when advocates present aligned messaging and clear priorities.

What safety issues are discussed by Melissa Lavasani & Jay Kopelman?
They highlight the need for standardized screening, monitoring, integration support, and transparent review of adverse events.

Closing

Melissa Lavasani & Jay Kopelman provide a grounded look at how psychedelic policy develops inside federal systems. Their message is practical: veterans may be the first lane, but long-term success depends on coordination, safety standards, and sustained engagement.

Transcript

Joe Moore: [00:00:00] Hello everybody. Welcome back to Psychedelics Today. Today we have two guests, um, got Melissa Sani from Psychedelic Medicine Coalition. We got Jake Pelman from Mission Within Foundation. We’re gonna talk about I bga I became policy on a recent, uh, set of meetings in Washington, DC and, uh, all sorts of other things I’m sure.

Joe Moore: But thank you both for joining me.

Melissa Lavasani: Thanks for having us.

Jay Kopelman: Yeah, it’s a pleasure. Thanks.

Joe Moore: Yeah. Um, Melissa, I wanna have you, uh, jump in. First. Can you tell us a little bit about, uh, your work and what you do at PMC?

Melissa Lavasani: Yeah, so Psychedelic Medicine Coalition is, um, the only DC based Washington DC based advocacy organization dedicated to the advancing the issue of psychedelics, um, and making sure the federal government has the education they need, um, and understands the issue inside out so that they can generate good policy around, around psychedelic medicines.

Melissa Lavasani: [00:01:00] Uh, we. Host Hill events. We host other convenings. Our big event every year is the Federal Summit on psychedelic medicine. Um, that’s going to be May 14th this year. Um, where we talk about kinda the pressing issues that need to be talked about, uh, with government officials in the room, um, so that we can incrementally move this forward.

Melissa Lavasani: Um, our presence here in Washington DC is, is really critical for this issue’s success because, um, when we’re talking about psychedelic medicines, um, from the federal government pers perspective, you know, they are, they are the ones that are going to initiate the policies that create a healthcare system that can properly facilitate these medicines and make sure, um, patient safety is a priority.

Melissa Lavasani: And there’s guardrails on this. And, um, you know, there, it’s, it’s really important that we have. A home base for this issue in Washington DC just [00:02:00] because, uh, this is very complicated as a lot of your viewers probably understand, and, you know, this can get lost in the mix of all the other issues that, um, lawmakers in DC are focused on right now.

Melissa Lavasani: And we need to keep that consistent presence here so that this continues to be a priority for members of Congress.

Joe Moore: Mm. I love this. And Jay, can you tell us a bit about yourself and mission within Foundation?

Jay Kopelman: Yeah, sure. Joe, thanks. Uh, I, I am the CEO of Mission within Foundation. Prior to this, most of my adult life was spent in the military as a Marine.

Jay Kopelman: And I came to this. Role after having, uh, a psychedelic assisted therapy experience myself at the mission within down in Mexico, which is where pretty much we all go. Um, we are here to help [00:03:00] provide, uh, access for veterans and first responders to be able to attend psychedelic assisted therapy retreats to treat issues like mild TBI, post-traumatic stress disorder, uh, depression, sometimes addiction at, at a very low level.

Jay Kopelman: Um, and, and so we’ve, we’ve been doing this for a little more than a year now and have provided 250 plus scholarships to veterans and first responders to be able to access. These retreats and these, these lifesaving medicines. Um, we’re also partnered, uh, you may or may not know with Melissa at Psychedelic Medicine Coalition to help advance education and policy, specifically the innovative, uh, therapy Centers of Excellence Act [00:04:00] that Melissa has worked for a number of years on now to bring to both Houses of Congress.

Joe Moore: Thank you for that. Um, so let’s chat a little bit about what this event was that just, uh, went down, uh, what, what was it two weeks ago at this point?

Melissa Lavasani: Yeah. Yeah. It’s called For Veteran Society and it’s all, um, there’s a lot of dialogue on Capitol Hill about veterans healthcare and psychedelics, but where I’ve been frustrated is that, you know, it was just a lot of.

Melissa Lavasani: Talk about what the problems are and not a lot of talk about like how we actually propel things forward. Um, so it, at that event, I thought it was really important and we had three members of Congress there, um, Morgan Latrell, who has been a champion from day one and his time in Congress, um, having gone through the experience himself, um, [00:05:00] at Mission within, um, and then the two chairs of the psychedelic caucus, uh, Lou Correa and Jack Bergman.

Melissa Lavasani: And we really got down to the nitty gritty of like w like why this has taken so long and you know, what is actually happening right now? What are the possibilities and what the roadblocks are. And it was, I thought it was a great conversation. Um, we had an interesting kind of dynamic with Latres is like a very passionate about this issue in particular.

Melissa Lavasani: Um, I think it was, I think it was really. A great event. And, you know, two days later, Jack Bergman introduced his new bill for the va. Um, so it was kind of like the precursor to that bill getting introduced. And we’re just excited for more and more conversations about how the government can gently guide this issue to success.

Joe Moore: Hmm. Yeah. [00:06:00] That’s fantastic. Um, yeah, I was a little bummed I couldn’t make it, but next time, I hope. But I’ve heard a lot of good things and, um, it’s, it sounded like there was some really important messages in, in terms of like feedback from legislators. Yeah. Yeah. Could you speak to that?

Melissa Lavasani: Yeah, I mean, I think when, uh, representative Latrell was speaking, he really impressed on us a couple things.

Melissa Lavasani: Um, first is that, you know, they really kind of need the advocates to. Coordinate, collaborate and come up with like a, a strategic plan, you know, without public education. Um, talking to members of Congress about this issue is, is really difficult. You know, like PMC is just one organization. We’re very little mission within, very little, um, you know, we’re all like, kind of new in navigating, um, this not so new issue, but new to Washington DC [00:07:00] issue.

Melissa Lavasani: Um, without that public education as a baseline, uh, it’s, it’s, you have to spend a lot of time educating members of Congress. You know, that’s like one of our things is, you know, we have to, we don’t wanna tell Congress what direction to go to. We wanna provide them the information so they understand it very intimately and know how to navigate through things.

Melissa Lavasani: Um, and secondly. Um, he got pretty frank with us and said, you know, we’ve got one cha one chance at this issue. And it’s like, that’s, that’s kind of been like my talking point since I started. PMC is like, you have a very limited window, um, when these kind of issues pop up and they’re new and they’re fresh and you have a lot of the veteran community coming out and talking about it.

Melissa Lavasani: And there’s a lot of energy there. But now is the time to really move forward, um, with some real legislation that can be impactful. Um, but, you know, we’ve gotta [00:08:00] be careful. We, we forget, I think sometimes those of us who are in the ecosystem forget that our level of knowledge about these medicines and a lot of us have firsthand experience, um, with these drugs and, and our own healing journeys is, um, we forget that there is a public out there that doesn’t have the level of knowledge that we all have.

Melissa Lavasani: And, um. We gotta make sure that we’re sticking to the right elements of, of, of what needs to happen. We need to be sure that our talking points are on track and we’re not getting sideways about anything and going down roads that we don’t need to talk about. It’s why, um, you know, PMC is very focused on, um, moving forward veteran legislation right now.

Melissa Lavasani: Not because we’re a veteran organization, but because we’re, we see this long-term policy track here. Um, we know where we want to get [00:09:00] to, um. Um, and watching other healthcare issues kind of come up and then go through the VA healthcare system, I think it’s a really unique opportunity, um, to utilize the VA as this closed system, the biggest healthcare system in the country to evaluate, uh, how psychedelics operate within systems like that.

Melissa Lavasani: And, you know, before they get into, um, other healthcare systems. What do we need to fix? What do we need to pay attention to? What’s something that we’re paying too much attention to that doesn’t necessarily need that much attention? So it’s, um, it’s a real opportunity to look at psychedelic medicines within a healthcare system and obviously continue to gather the data.

Melissa Lavasani: Um, Bergman’s Bill emerging, uh, expanding veteran access to emerging treatments. Um, not only mandates the research, it gives the VA authority for this, uh, for running trials and, and creating programs around psychedelic medicines. But also, [00:10:00] one of the great things about it, I think, is it provides an on-ramp for veterans that don’t necessarily qualify for clinical trials.

Melissa Lavasani: You know, I think that’s one of the biggest criticisms of clinical trials is like you’re cre you’re creating a vacuum for people and people don’t live in a vacuum. So we don’t necessarily know what psychedelics are gonna look like in real life. Um, but with this expanding veteran access bill that Bergman introduced, it provides the VA an opportunity to provide this access under.

Melissa Lavasani: Um, in a, in a safe container with medical supervision while collecting data, um, while ensuring that the veteran that is going through this process has the support systems that it needs. So, um, you know, I think that there’s a really unique opportunity here, and like Latrell said, like, we’ve got one shot at this.

Melissa Lavasani: We have people’s attention in Congress. Um, now’s the time to start acting, and let’s be really considerate and thoughtful about what we’re doing with it.

Joe Moore: Thanks for that, Melissa and Jay, how, [00:11:00] anything to add there on kind of your takeaways from the this, uh, last visit in dc?

Jay Kopelman: Yeah, I, I think that Melissa highlighted it really well and there, there were a couple other things that I, I think, you know, you could kind of tie it all together with some other issues that we face in this country, uh, and that.

Jay Kopelman: Uh, representative Correa brought up as well, but one of the things I wanted to go back and say is that veterans have kind of led this movement already, right? So, so it’s a, it’s a good jumping off point, right? That it’s something people from both sides of the aisle, from any community in America can get behind.

Jay Kopelman: You know, if you think about it, uh, in World War ii, you know, we had a million people serving our population was like, not even 200 million, but now [00:12:00] we have a population of 330 million, and at any given time there might be a million people in uniform, including the Reserve and the National Guard. So it’s, it, it’s an easy thing to get behind this small part of the population that is willing to sign that contract.

Jay Kopelman: Where you are saying, yeah, I’m going to defend my country, possibly at the risk of my l my own life. So that’s the first thing. The other thing is that the VA being a closed health system, and they don’t have shareholders to answer to, they can take some risks, they can be innovative and be forward thinking in the ways that some other healthcare systems can’t.

Jay Kopelman: And so they have a perfect opportunity to show that they truly care for their veterans, which don’t, I’m not saying they don’t, but this would be an [00:13:00] opportunity to show that carrot at a whole different level. Uh, it would allow them to innovate and be a leader in something as, uh, as our friend Jim Hancock will say, you know.

Jay Kopelman: When he went to the Naval Academy, they had the world’s best shipbuilding program. Why doesn’t the VA have the world’s best care program for things like TBI and PTSD, which affects, you know, 40 something percent of all veterans, right? So, so there’s, there’s an opportunity here for the VA to lead from the front.

Jay Kopelman: Um, the, these medicines provide, you know, reasonably lasting care where it’s kind of a one and done. Whereas with the current systems, the, you know, and, and [00:14:00] again, not to denigrate the VA in any way, they’re doing the best job they can with the tools in their toolbox, right? But maybe it’s time for a trip to Home Depot.

Jay Kopelman: Let’s get some new tools. And have some new ways of fixing what’s broken, which is really the way of doing things. It’s not, veterans aren’t broken, we are who we are. Um, but it’s a, it’s a way to fix what isn’t working. So I, I think that, you know, given there’s tremendous veteran homelessness still, you know, addiction issues, all these things that do translate to the population at large are things that can be worked on in this one system, the va that can then be shown to have efficacy, have good data, have [00:15:00] good outcomes, and, and take it to the population at large.

Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. Brilliant. Thanks for that. And so there was another thing I wanted to pivot to, which is some of the recent press. So we’ve, um, seen a little bit of press around some, um, in one instance, some bad behavior in Mexico that a FI put out Americans thrive again, put out. And then another case there was a, a recent fatality.

Joe Moore: And I think, um, both are tragic. Like we shouldn’t be having to deal with this at this point. Um, but there’s a lot of things that got us here. Um, it’s not necessarily the operator’s fault entirely, um, or even at all, honestly, like some medical interventions just carry a lot of risk. Like think, think about like, uh, how risky bypass surgery was in the nineties, right?

Joe Moore: Like people were dying a lot from medical interventions and um, you know, this is a major intervention, uh, ibogaine [00:16:00] and also a lot of promise. To help people quite a bit. Um, but as of right now, there’s, there’s risk. And part of that risk, in my opinion, comes from the inability of organizations to necessarily collaborate.

Joe Moore: Like there’s no kind of convening body, sitting in the middle, allowing, um, for, and facilitating really good data sharing and learnings. Um, and I don’t, I don’t necessarily see an organization stepping up and being the, um, the convener for that kind of work. I’ve heard rumors that something’s gonna happen there, and I’m, I’m hopeful I’ll always wanna share my opinion on that.

Joe Moore: But yeah. I don’t know. Jay, from your perspective, is there anything you want to kind of speak to about, uh, these two recent incidents that Americans for Iboga kind of publicized recently?

Jay Kopelman: Yeah, so I, I’ll echo your sentiment, of course, that these are tragic incidents. Um, and I, [00:17:00] I think that at least in the case of the death at Ambio, AMBIO has done a very good job of talking about it, right?

Jay Kopelman: They’ve been very honest with the information that they have. And like you said, there are risks inherent to these medicines, and it’s like anything else in medicine, there are going to be risks. You know, when I went through, uh, when I, when I went through chemo, you know, there were, there are risks. You know, you don’t feel well, you get sick.

Jay Kopelman: Um, and, and it. There are processes in place to counter that when it happens. And there are processes and, and procedures and safety protocols in place when caring for somebody going through an ibogaine [00:18:00] journey. Uh, when I did it, we had EKG echocardiogram. You’re on a heart monitor the entire time they push magnesium via iv.

Jay Kopelman: You have to provide a urinalysis sample to make sure that there is nothing in your system that is going to potentially harm you. During the ibogaine, they have, uh, a cardiologist who is monitoring the heart monitors throughout the ibogaine experience. So the, the safety protocols are there. I think it’s, I think it’s just a matter of.

Jay Kopelman: Standardizing them across all, all providers, right? Like, that would be a good thing if people would talk to one another. Um, as, as in any system, right? You’ve gotta have [00:19:00] some collaboration. You’ve gotta have standardization, you know, so, you know, they’re not called standard operating procedures for nothing.

Jay Kopelman: That means that in a, you know, in a given environment, everybody does things the same way. It’s true in Navy and Marine Corps, air Force, army Aviation, they have standard operating procedures for every single aircraft. So if you fly, let’s say the F 35 now, right? Because it’s flown by the Navy, the Marine Corps, and the Air Force.

Jay Kopelman: The, the emergency procedures in that airplane are standardized across all three services, so you should have the same, or, you know, with within a couple of different words, the same procedures and processes [00:20:00] across all the providers, right? Like maybe in one document you’re gonna change, happy to glad and small dog to puppy, but it’s still pretty much the, the same thing.

Jay Kopelman: And as a service that provides scholarships to people to go access these medicines and go to these retreats, you know, my criteria is that the, this provider has to be safe. Number one, safety’s paramount. It’s always gotta be very safe. It should, it has to be effective. And you know, once you have those two things in place, then I have a comfort level saying, okay, yeah, we’ll work with this provider.

Jay Kopelman: But until those standardized processes are in place, you’ll probably see these one-off things. I mean, some providers have been doing this longer than others and have [00:21:00] really figured out, you know, they’ve, they’ve cracked the code and, you know, sharing that across the spectrum would be good. Um, but just when these things happen, having a clearing house, right, where everybody can come together and talk about it, you know, like once the facts are known because.

Jay Kopelman: To my knowledge, we still don’t know all the facts. Like as, you know, as horrible as this is, you still have to talk about like an, has an autopsy been performed? What was found in the patient’s system? You know, there, there are things there that we don’t know. So we need to, we need to know that before we can start saying, okay, well this is how we can fix that, because we just don’t know.

Jay Kopelman: And, you know, to their credit, you know, Amio has always been safe to, to the, to the best of my knowledge. You know, I, [00:22:00] I haven’t been to Ambio myself, but people that I have worked with have been there. They have observed, they have seen the process. They believe it’s safe, and I trust their opinion because they’ve seen it elsewhere as well.

Jay Kopelman: So yeah, having, having that one place where we can all come together when this happens, it, it’s almost like it should be mandatory. In the military when there’s a training accident, we, you know, we would have to have what’s called a safety standout. And you don’t do that again for a little while until you figure out, okay, how are we going to mitigate that happening again?

Jay Kopelman: Believe me, you can go overboard and we don’t want to do that. Like, we don’t wanna just stop all care, but maybe stop detox for a week and then come back to it. [00:23:00]

Joe Moore: Yeah. A dream would be, let’s get like the, I don’t know, 10, 20 most popular, uh, or well-known operators together somewhere and just do like a three day debrief.

Joe Moore: Hey, everybody, like, here’s what we see. Let’s work on this together. You know how normal medicine works. And this is, it’s hard because this is not necessarily, um, something people feel safe about in America talking about ’cause it’s illicit here. Um, I don’t understand necessarily how the operations, uh, relate to each other in Mexico, but I think that’s something to like the public should dig into.

Joe Moore: Like, what, what is this? And I, I’ll start digging into that. Um, I, I asked a question recently of somebody like, is there some sort of like back channel signal everybody’s using and there’s no clear Yes. You know? Um, I think it would be good. That’s just a [00:24:00] start, you know, that’s like, okay, we can actually kind of say hi and watch out for this to each other.

Jay Kopelman: It’s not like we don’t all know one another, right?

Joe Moore: Yes.

Jay Kopelman: Like at least three operators we’re represented. At the Aspen Ibogaine meeting. So like that could be, and I think there was a panel kind of loosely related to this during Aspen Ibogaine meeting, but

Joe Moore: mm-hmm.

Jay Kopelman: It, you know, have a breakout where the operators can go sit down and kind of compare notes.

Joe Moore: Right. Yeah. Melissa, do you have any, uh, comments on this thread here? And I, I put you on mute if you didn’t see that. Um,

Melissa Lavasani: all right, I’m off mute. Um, yeah, I think that Jay’s hits the nail on the head with the collaboration thing. Um, I think that it’s just a [00:25:00] problem across the entire ecosystem, and I think that’s just a product of us being relatively new and upcoming field.

Melissa Lavasani: Um, uh, it’s a product of, you know. Our fundraising community is really small, so organizations feel like they are competing for the same dollars, even though their, their goals are all the same, they have different functions. Um, I think with time, I mean, let’s be honest, like if we don’t start collaborating and, and the federal government’s moving forward, the federal government’s gonna coordinate for us.

Melissa Lavasani: And not, that might not necessarily be a bad thing, but, you know, we understand this issue to a whole other level that the federal government doesn’t, and they’re not required to understand it deeply. They just need to know how to really move forward with it the proper way. Um, but I think that it. It’s really essential [00:26:00] that we all have this come together moment here so we can avoid things.

Melissa Lavasani: Uh, I mean, no one’s gonna die from bad advocacy. So like I’ve, I have a bit of an easier job. Um, but it can a, a absolutely stall efforts, um, to move things forward in Washington DC when, um, one group is saying one thing, another group is saying another thing, like, we’re not quite at a point yet where we can have multiple lines of conversation and multiple things moving forward.

Melissa Lavasani: Um, you know, for PMC, it’s like, just let’s get the first thing across the finish line. And we think that is, um, veteran healthcare. And, um, I know there’s plenty of other groups out there that, that want the same thing. So, you know, I always, the reason why I put on the Federal Summit last year was I kind of hit my breaking point with a lack of collaboration and I wanted to just bring everyone in the same room and say like, all right, here are the things that we need to talk about.

Melissa Lavasani: And I think the goal for this year is, um. To bring people in the same room and say, we talked about [00:27:00] we scratched the surface last year and this is where we need to really put our efforts into. And this is where the opportunities are. Um, I think that is going to, that’s going to show the federal government if we can organize ourselves, that they need to take this issue really seriously.

Melissa Lavasani: Um, I don’t think we’ve done a great job at that thus far, but I think there’s still plenty of time for us to get it together. Um, and I’m hoping with these two, uh, VA bills that are in the house right now and Senate is, is putting together their version of these two bills, um, so that they can move in tandem with each other.

Melissa Lavasani: I think that, you know, there’s an opportunity here for. Us to show the federal government as an ecosystem, Hey, we, we are so much further ahead and you know, this is what we’ve organized and here’s how we can help you, um, that would make them buy into this issue a bit more and potentially move things forward faster.

Melissa Lavasani: Uh, at this point in time, it’s, I think that, [00:28:00] you know, psychedelics aren’t necessarily the taboo thing that they, they used to be, but there’s certainly places that need attention. Um, there’s certainly conversations that need to be had, and like I said, like PMC is just one organization that can do this. Um, we can certainly organize and drive forward collaboration, but I, like we alone, cannot cover all this ground and we need the subject matter experts to collaborate with us so we can, you know, once we get in the door, we wanna bring the experts in to talk to these officials about it.

Melissa Lavasani: So I. I, I really want listeners to really think about us as a convener of sorts when it comes to federal policy. Um, and you know, I think when, like for example, in the early eighties, a lot of people have made comparisons to the issue of psychedelics to the issue of AIDS research and how you have in a subject matter that’s like extremely taboo and a patient population that the government [00:29:00] quite honestly didn’t really care about in the early eighties.

Melissa Lavasani: But what they did as an ecosystem is really organized themselves, get very clear on what they wanted the federal government to do. And within a matter of a couple years, uh, AIDS research funding was a thing that was happening. And what that, what that did was that ripple effect turned that into basically finding new therapies for something that we thought was a death, death sentence before.

Melissa Lavasani: So I think. We just need to look at things in the past that have been really successful, um, and, and try to take the lessons from all of these issues and, and move forward with psychedelics.

Joe Moore: Love that. And yes, we always need to be figuring out efficient approaches and where it has been successful in the past is often, um, an opportunity to mimic and, and potentially improve on that.

Melissa Lavasani: Yeah.

Jay Kopelman: One, one thing I think it’s important to add to this part of the conversation is that, [00:30:00] you know, Melissa pointed out there are a number of organizations that are essentially doing the same thing.

Jay Kopelman: Um, you know, I like to think we do things a little bit differently at Mission within Foundation in that we don’t target any one specific type of service member. We, we work with all veterans. We work with first responders, but. What that leads to is that there are, as far as I’ve seen, nothing but good intentioned people in this space.

Jay Kopelman: You know, people who really care about their patient population, they care about healing, they are trying to do a good job, and more importantly, they’re trying to do good. Right? It, it, I think they all see the benefit down the road that this has, [00:31:00] pardon me, not just for veterans, but for society as a whole.

Jay Kopelman: And, and ultimately that’s where I would like to see this go. You know, I, I would love to see the VA take this. Take up this mantle and, and run with it and provide great data, great outcomes. You know, we are doing some data collection ourselves at Mission within foundation, albeit anecdotal based on surveys given before and after retreats.

Jay Kopelman: But we’re also working with, uh, Greg Fonzo down at UT Austin on a brain study he’s doing that will have 40 patients in it when it’s all said and done. And I think we have two more guys to put through that. Uh, and then we’ll hit the 40. So there, there’s a lot of good here that’s being done by some really, really good people who’ve been doing this for a long time [00:32:00] and want to want nothing more than to, to see this.

Jay Kopelman: Come to, come full circle so that we can take care of many, many, many people. Um, you know, like I say, I, I wanna work myself out of a job here. I, I just, I would love to see this happen and then I, you know, I don’t have to send guys to Mexico to do this. They can go to their local VA and get the care that they need.

Jay Kopelman: Um, but one thing that I don’t think we’ve touched on yet, or regarding that is that the VA isn’t designed for that. So it’s gonna be a pretty big lift to get the right types of providers into the va with the knowledge, right, with the institutional knowledge of how this should be done, what is safe, what is effective, um, and then it, it’s not just providing these medicines to [00:33:00] people and sending them home.

Jay Kopelman: You don’t just do that, you’ve gotta have the right therapists on the backend who can provide the integration coaching to the folks who are receiving these medicines. And I’m not just talking, I bga, even with MDMA and psilocybin, you should have a proper period of integration. It helps you to understand how this is going to affect you, what it, what the experience really meant, you know, because it’s very difficult sometimes to just interpret it on your own.

Jay Kopelman: And so what the experience was and what it meant to you. And, and so it will take some time to spin all that up. But once it’s, once it’s in place, you know, the sky’s the limit. I think.

Joe Moore: Kinda curious Jay, about what’s, what’s going on with Ibogaine at the federal level. Is there anything at VA right now? [00:34:00]

Jay Kopelman: At the va? No, not with ibogaine. And, you know, uh, we, we send people specifically for IBOGAINE and five MEO, right? And, and so that, that doesn’t preclude my interest in seeing this legislation passed, right?

Jay Kopelman: Because it, it will start with something like MDMA or psilocybin, but ultimately it could grow to iboga, right? It the think about the cost savings at, at the va, even with psilocybin, right? Where you could potentially treat somebody with a very inexpensive dose of psilocybin or, or iboga one time, and then you, you don’t have to treat them again.

Jay Kopelman: Now, if I were, uh, you know, a VA therapist who’s not trained in psychedelic trauma therapy. I might be worried [00:35:00] about job security, but it’s like with anything, right? Like ultimately it will open pathways for new people to get that training or the existing people to get that training and, and stay on and do that work.

Jay Kopelman: Um, which only adds another arrow to their quiver as far as I’m concerned, because this is coming and we’re gonna need the people. It’s just like ai, right? Like ai, yeah. Some people are gonna lose some jobs initially, and that’s unfortunate. But productivity ultimately across all industries will increase and new jobs will be created as a result of that.

Jay Kopelman: I mean, I was watching Squawk Box one morning. They were talking about the AI revolution and how there’s gonna be a need for 500,000 electricians to. Build these systems that are going to work with the AI [00:36:00] supercomputers and, and so,

Joe Moore: mm-hmm.

Jay Kopelman: Where, where an opportunity may be lost. I think several more can be gained going forward.

Melissa Lavasani: And just to add on what Jay just said there, there’s nothing specific going on with Ibogaine at, at the va, but I think this administration is, is taking a real look at addiction in particular. Uh, they just launched, uh, a new initiative, uh, that’s really centered on addiction treatments called the Great American Recovery.

Melissa Lavasani: And, um, they’re dedicating a hundred million dollars towards treating addiction as like a chronic treatable disease and not necessarily a law enforcement issue. So, um, in that initiative there will be federal grant programs for prevention and treatment and recovery. And, um, while this isn’t just for psychedelic medicines, uh, I think it’s a really great opportunity for the discussion of psychedelics to get elevated to the White House.

Melissa Lavasani: Um, [00:37:00] there’s also, previous to this announcement last week from the White House, there’s been a hundred million dollars that was dedicated at, um, at ARPA h, which is. The advanced research projects, uh, agency for healthcare, um, and that is kind of an agency that’s really focused on forward looking, um, treatments and technologies, uh, for, um, a, a whole slew of.

Melissa Lavasani: Of issues, but this a hundred million dollars is dedicated to mental health and addiction. So there’s a lot of opportunity there as well. So we, while I think, you know, some people are talking about, oh, we need a executive order on Iboga, it’s like, well, you know, the, the president is thinking, um, about, you know, what issues can land with his, uh, voting block.

Melissa Lavasani: And I think it’s, I don’t think we necessarily need a specific executive order on Iboga to call this a success. It’s like, let’s look at what, [00:38:00] um, what’s just been announced from the White House. They’re, they’re all in on. Thinking creatively and finding, uh, new solutions for this. And this is kind of, this aligns with, um, HHS secretaries, uh, Robert F.

Melissa Lavasani: Kennedy Junior’s goals when he took on this, this role of Health Secretary. Um, addiction has been a discussion that, you know, he has personal, um, a personal tie to from his own experience. And, um, I think when this administration started, there was so much like fervor around the, the dialogue of like, everyone’s talking about psychedelics.

Melissa Lavasani: It was Secretary Kennedy, it was, uh, secretary Collins at the va. It was FDA Commissioner Marty Macari. And I think that there’s like a lot of undue frustration within folks ’cause um, you don’t necessarily snap your fingers and change happens in Washington dc This is not the city for that. And it’s intentionally designed to move slow so that we can avoid really big mistakes.

Melissa Lavasani: Um. [00:39:00] I think we’re a year into this administration and these two announcements are, are pretty huge considering, um, you know, the, we, there are known people within domestic policy council that don’t, aren’t necessarily supportive of psychedelic medicine. So there’s a really amazing progress here, and frustrating as it might be to, um, just be waiting for this administration to make some major move.

Melissa Lavasani: I think they are making major moves like for Washington, DC These, these are major moves and we just gotta figure out how we can, um, take these initiatives and apply them to the issue of psychedelic medicines.

Joe Moore: Thanks, Melissa. Um, yeah, it is, it is interesting like the amount of fervor there was at the beginning. You know, we had, uh. Kind of one of my old lawyers, Matt Zorn, jumped in with the administration. Right. And, um, you know, it was, uh, really cool to [00:40:00] see and hopeful how much energy was going on. It’s been a little quiet, kind of feels like a black box a little bit, but I, you know, there was,

Melissa Lavasani: that’s on me.

Melissa Lavasani: Maybe I, we need to be more out in public about like, what’s actually happening, because I feel like, like day in and day out, it’s just been, you gotta just mm-hmm. Like have that constant beat with the government. Mm-hmm. And, um, it’s, it’s, it’s not the photo ops on the hill, it’s the conversations that you have.

Melissa Lavasani: It’s the dinner parties you go to, it’s the fundraisers you attend, you know? Mm-hmm. That’s why I, I kind of have to like toot my own horn with PCs. Like, we need to be present here at, at not only on the Hill, not only at the White House, but kind of in the ecosystem of Washington DC itself. There’s, it’s, there are like power players here.

Melissa Lavasani: There are people that are connected that can get things done, like. I mean, the other last week we had a big snow storm. I walked over to my friend’s house, um, to have like a little fire sesh with them and our kids, and his next door neighbor came over. He was a member of Congress. I talked about the VA bills, like [00:41:00] we’re reaching out to his office now, um, to get them, um, up to speed and hopefully get their co-sponsorship for, uh, the two VA bills.

Melissa Lavasani: So, I mean, it, the little conversations you have here are just as important as the big ones with the photo ops. So, um, it, it’s, it’s really like, you know, building up that momentum and, and finding that time where you can really strike and make something happen.

Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. Yeah. Jay, anything to add there?

Jay Kopelman: Yeah, I was just gonna say that, you know, I, I, I think the fervor is still there, right?

Jay Kopelman: But real life happens.

Melissa Lavasani: Yes,

Jay Kopelman: yes. And gets in the way, right? So,

Melissa Lavasani: yeah,

Jay Kopelman: I, I can’t imagine how many issues. Secretary Kennedy has every day much less the president. Like there’s so many things that they are dealing with on a daily basis, right? It, we, we just have to work to be the squeaky wheel in, in the right way, right.

Jay Kopelman: [00:42:00] With the, with the right information at the right time. Like just inundating one of these organizations with noise, it’s then it be with Informa, it just becomes noise, right? It it, it doesn’t help. So when we have things to say that are meaningful and impactful, we do, and Melissa does an amazing job of that.

Jay Kopelman: But, you know, it, it takes time. You know, it’s, you know, we’re not, this is, this is like turning an aircraft carrier, not a ski boat.

Melissa Lavasani: Yeah,

Joe Moore: yeah, absolutely. Um, and. It’s, it’s understandably frustrating, I think for the public and the psychedelic public in particular because we see all this hope, you know, we continue to get frustrated at politics. It’s nothing new, right? Um, and we, we wanna see more people get well immediately. [00:43:00] And I, I kind of, Jay from the veteran perspective, I do love the kind of loud voices like, you’re making me go to Mexico for this.

Joe Moore: I did that and you’re making me leave the country for the thing that’s gonna fix me. Like, no way. And barely a recognition that this is a valid treatment. You know, like, you know, that is complicated given how medicine is structured here domestically. But it’s also, let’s face the facts, like the drug war kind of prevented us from being able to do this research in the first place.

Joe Moore: You know? Thanks Nixon. And like, how do we actually kind of correct course and say like, we need to spend appropriately on science here so we can heal our own people, including veterans and everybody really. It’s a, it’s a dire situation out there.

Jay Kopelman: Yeah. It, it really is. Um, you know, we were talking briefly about addicts, right?

Jay Kopelman: And you know, it’s not sexy. People think of addicts as people who are weak-minded, [00:44:00] right? They don’t have any self-control. Um, but, but look at, look at the opioid crisis, right? That Brian Hubbard was fighting against in Kentucky for all those years. That that was something that was given to the patient by a doctor that they then became dependent on, and a lot of people died from that.

Jay Kopelman: And, and so you, you know, it’s, I I don’t think it’s fair to just put all addicts in a box. Just like it’s not fair to put all veterans in a box. Just like it’s not fair for doctors, put all their patients in a box. We’re individuals. We, we have individual needs. Our, our health is very individual. Like, I, I don’t think I should be put in the same box as every other 66-year-old that my doctor sees.

Jay Kopelman: It’s not fair. [00:45:00] You know, if you, if you took my high school classmates and put us all in a photo, we’re all gonna have different needs, right? Like, some look like they’re 76, not 66. Some look like they’re 56. Not like they’re, we, we do things differently. We live our lives differently. And the same is true of addicts.

Jay Kopelman: They come to addiction from different places. Not everybody decides they want to just try heroin at a party, and all of a sudden they’re addicted. It happens in, in different ways, you know, and the whole fentanyl thing has been so daggum nefarious, right? You know, pushing fentanyl into marijuana.

Jay Kopelman: Somebody’s smoking a joint and all of a sudden they’re addicted to fentanyl or they die.

Melissa Lavasani: I think we’re having a,

Jay Kopelman: it’s, it’s just not fair to, to say everybody in this pot is the same, or everybody in this one is the same. We have [00:46:00] to look at it differently.

Joe Moore: Yeah. I like to zoom one level out and kind of talk about, um, just how hurt we are as a country, as a world really, but as a country specifically, and how many people are out of work for so many.

Joe Moore: Difficult reasons and away from their families for so many kind of tragic reasons. And if we can get people back to their families and back to work, a lot of these things start to self-correct, but we have to like have those interventions where we can heal folks and, and get them back. Um, yeah. And you know, everything from trauma, uh, in childhood, you know, adulthood, combat, whatever it is.

Joe Moore: Like these things can put people on the sidelines. And Jay, to your point, like you get knee surgery and all of a sudden you’re, you know, two years later you’re on the hunt for Fentanyl daily. You know, that’s tough. It’s really tough. Carl Hart does a good job talking about this kind of addiction pipeline and [00:47:00] a few others do as well.

Joe Moore: But it’s just, you know, kind of putting it in a moral failure bucket. It’s not great. I was chatting with somebody about, um, veterans, it’s like you come back and you’re like, what’s gonna make me feel okay right now? And it’s not always alcohol. Um, like this is the first thing that made me feel okay, because there’s not great treatments and there’s, there’s a lot of improvements in this kind of like bringing people back from the field that needs to happen.

Joe Moore: In my opinion. I, it seems to be shared by a lot of people, but yeah, there’s, it’s, it’s, IGA is gonna be great. It’s gonna be really important. I really can’t wait for it to be at scale appropriately, but there’s a lot of other things we need to fix too, um, so that we can just, you know, not have so many people we need to, you know, spend so much money healing.

Joe Moore: Mm-hmm.

Jay Kopelman: Yeah. You ahead with that. We don’t need the president to sign an executive order to automatically legalize Ibogaine. Right. But it would be nice if he would reschedule it so that [00:48:00] then then researchers could do this research on a larger scale. You know, we could, we could now get some real data that would show the efficacy.

Jay Kopelman: And it could be done in a safe environment, you know? And, and so that would be, do

Joe Moore: you have any kind of figures, like, like, I’ve been talking about this for a while, Jay. Like, does it drop the cost a lot of doing research when we deschedule things?

Jay Kopelman: I, I would imagine so, because it’ll drop the cost of accessing the medicines that are being researched.

Jay Kopelman: Right? You, you would have buy-in from more organizations. You know, you might even have a pharma company that comes into this, you know, look at j and j with the ketamine, right? They have, they have a nasal spray version of ketamine that’s doing very well. I mean, it’s probably their, their biggest revenue [00:49:00] provider for them right now.

Jay Kopelman: And, and so. You know, you, it would certainly help and I think, I think it would lower costs of research to have something rescheduled rather than being schedule one. You know it, people are afraid to take chances when you’re talking about Schedule one

Melissa Lavasani: labs or they just don’t have the money to research things that are on Schedule one.

Melissa Lavasani: ’cause there’s so much in an incredible amount of red tape that you have to go through and, and your facility has to be a certain way and how you contain those, uh, medicines. Oh, researching has to be in a specific container and it’s just very cumbersome to research schedule one drugs. So absolutely the cost would go down.

Melissa Lavasani: Um, but

Joe Moore: yeah, absolutely. Less safes.

Melissa Lavasani: Yeah.

Joe Moore: Yes. Less uh,

Melissa Lavasani: right.

Joe Moore: Locked. Yeah. Um, it’ll be really interesting when that happens. I’m gonna hold out faith. That we can see some [00:50:00] movement here. Um, because yeah, like why make healing more expensive than it needs to be? I think like that’s potentially a protectionist move.

Joe Moore: Like, I’m not, I’m not here yet, but, um, look at AbbVie’s, uh, acquisition of the Gilgamesh ip. Mm-hmm. Like that’s a really interesting move. I think it was $1.2 billion. Mm-hmm. So they’re gonna wanna protect that investment. Um, and it’s likely going to be an approved medication. Like, I don’t, I don’t see a world in which it’s not an approved medication.

Joe Moore: Um, you know, I don’t know a timeline, I would say

Jay Kopelman: yeah.

Joe Moore: Less than six years, just given how much cash they’ve got. But who knows, like, I haven’t followed it too closely. So, and that’s an I bga derivative to be clear, everybody, um mm-hmm. If you’re not, um, in, in the loop on that, which is hopeful, you know?

Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. But I don’t know what the efficacy is gonna be with that compared to Ibogaine and then we have to talk about the kind of proprietary molecule stuff. Um, there’s like a whole bunch of things that are gonna go on here, and this is one of the reasons why I’m excited about. Federal involvement [00:51:00] because we might actually be able to have some sort of centralized manufacturer, um, or at least the VA could license three or four generic manufacturers per for instance, and that way prices aren’t gonna be, you know, eight grand a dose or whatever.

Joe Moore: You know, it’s,

Jay Kopelman: well, I think it’s a very exciting time in the space. You know, I, I think that there’s the opportunity for innovation. There is the opportunity for collaboration. There’s the opportunity for, you know, long-term healing at a very low cost. You know, that we, we have the highest healthcare cost per capita in the world right here in the us.

Jay Kopelman: And, and yet we are not the number one health system in the world. So to me, that doesn’t add up. So we need to figure out a way to start. Bringing costs down for a lot of people and [00:52:00] at the same time increasing, increasing outcomes.

Joe Moore: Absolutely. Yeah. There’s a lot of possible outcome improvements here and, and you know, everything from relapse rates, like we hear often about people leaving a clinic and they go and overdose when they get home. Tragically, too common. I think there’s everything from, you know, I’m Jay, I’m involved in an organization called the Psychedelics and Pain Association.

Joe Moore: We look at chronic pain very seriously, and IGA is something we are really interested in. And if. We could have better, you know, research, there better outcome measures there. Um, you know, perhaps we can have less people on opioids to begin with from chronic pain conditions. Um,

Jay Kopelman: yeah, I, I might be due for another Ibogaine journey then, because I deal with chronic pain from Jiujitsu, but,

Joe Moore: oh gosh, let’s

Jay Kopelman: talk

Joe Moore: later.

Jay Kopelman: That’s self inflicted. Some people would say take a month off, but

Melissa Lavasani: yeah,

Jay Kopelman: I’m [00:53:00] not, I’m not that smart.

Joe Moore: Yeah. Um, but you know, this, uh, yeah, this whole thing is gonna be really interesting to see how it plays out. I’m endlessly hopeful pull because I’m still here. Right. I, I’ve been at this for almost 10 years now, very publicly, and I think we are seeing a lot of movement.

Joe Moore: It’s not always what we actually wanna see, but it is movement nonetheless. You know, how many people are writing on this now than there were before? Right. You know, we, we have people in New York Times writing somewhat regularly about psychedelics and. Even international media is covering it. What do we have legalization in Australia somewhat recently for psilocybin and MDMA, Czech Republic.

Joe Moore: I think Germany made some moves recently. Mm-hmm. Um, really interesting to see how this is gonna just keep shifting. Um

Jay Kopelman: mm-hmm.

Joe Moore: And I think there’s no way that we’re not gonna have prescription psychedelics in three years in the United States. It pro probably more like a [00:54:00] year and a half. I don’t know. Do you, are you all taking odds?

Melissa Lavasani: Yeah. I mean, I think

Jay Kopelman: I, I gotta check Cal sheet, see what they’re saying.

Melissa Lavasani: I think it’s safe to say, I mean, this could even come potentially the end of this year, I think, but definitely by the end of 2027, there’s gonna be at least one psychedelic that’s FDA approved.

Joe Moore: Yeah. Yeah.

Melissa Lavasani: If you’re not counting Ketamine.

Joe Moore: Right.

Jay Kopelman: I, I mean, I mean it mm-hmm. It, it doesn’t make sense that it. Shouldn’t be or wouldn’t be. Right. The, we’ve seen the benefits. Mm-hmm. We know what they are. It’s at a very low cost, but you have to keep in mind that these things, they need to be done with the right set setting and container. Right. And, and gotta be able to provide that environment.

Jay Kopelman: So, but I would, I would love, like I said, I’d love to work myself out of a job here and see this happen, not just for our veterans, [00:55:00] but for everybody.

Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. Um, so Melissa, is there a way people can get involved or follow PMC or how can they support your work at PMC?

Melissa Lavasani: Yeah, I mean, follow us in social media.

Melissa Lavasani: Um, our two biggest platforms are LinkedIn and Instagram. Um, I’m bringing my newsletter back because I’m realizing, um, you know, there is a big gap in, in kind of like the knowledge of Washington DC just in general. What’s happening here, and I think, you know, part of PC’s value is that we’re, we are plugged into conversations that are being had, um, here in the city.

Melissa Lavasani: And, you know, we do get a little insight. Um, and I think that that would really quiet a lot of, you know, the, a lot of noise that, um, exists in the, our ecosystem. If, if people just had some clarity on like, what’s actually happening or happening here and what are the opportunities and, [00:56:00] um, where do we need more reinforcement?

Melissa Lavasani: Um, and, and also, you know, as we’re putting together public education campaign, you know. My, like, if I could get everything I wanted like that, that campaign would be this like multi-stakeholder collaborative effort, right? Where we’re covering all the ground that we need to cover. We’re talking to the patient groups, we’re talking to traditional mental health organizations, we’re talking to the medical community, we’re talking to the general population.

Melissa Lavasani: I think that’s like another area that we, we just seem to be, um, lacking some effort in. And, you know, ultimately the veteran story’s always super compelling. It pulls on your heartstrings. These are our heroes, um, of our country. Like that, that is, that is meaningful. But a lot of the veteran population is small and we need the, like a, the just.[00:57:00]

Melissa Lavasani: Basic American living in middle America, um, understanding what psychedelics are so that in, in, in presenting to them the stories that they can relate to, um, because that’s how you activate the public and you activate the public and you get them to see what’s happening in these clinical trials, what the data’s been saying, what the opportunities are with psychedelics, and then they start calling their members of Congress and saying, Hey, there is this.

Melissa Lavasani: Bill sitting in Congress and why haven’t you signed onto it? And that political pressure, uh, when used the right way can be really powerful. So, um, I think, you know, now we’re at this really amazing moment where we have a good amount of congressional offices that are familiar enough with psychedelics that they’re willing to move on it.

Melissa Lavasani: Um, there’s another larger group, uh, that is familiar with psychedelics and will assist and co-sponsor legislation, but there’s still so many offices that we haven’t been able to get to just ’cause like we don’t have all the time in the world and all the manpower in the world to [00:58:00] do it. But, you know, that is one avenue is like the advocates can speak to the, the lawmakers, the experts speak to the lawmakers, and we not, we want the public engaged in this, you know, ultimately, like that’s.

Melissa Lavasani: Like the best form of harm reduction is having an informed public. So we are not, they’re not seeing these media headlines of like, oh, this miracle cure that, um, saved my family. It’s like, yes, that can happen psychedelics. I mean, person speaking personally, psychedelics did save my family. But what you miss out of that story is the incredible amount of work I put into myself and put into my mental health to this day to maintain, um, like myself, my, my own agency and like be the parent that I wanna be and be the spouse that I wanna be.

Melissa Lavasani: So, um, we, we need to continue to share these stories and we need to continue to collaborate to get this message out because we’re all, we’re all in the same boat right now. We all want the same things. We want patients to have safe and [00:59:00] affordable access to psychedelic assisted care. Um, and, uh. We’re just in the beginning here, so, um, sign up for our newsletter and we can sign up on our website and then follow us on social media.

Melissa Lavasani: And, um, I anticipate more and more events, um, happening with PMC and hopefully we can scale up some of these events to be much more public facing, um, as this issue grows. So, um, I’m really excited about the future and I’m, I’ve been enjoying this partnership with Mission Within. Jay is such a professional and, and it really shows up when he needs to show up and, um, I look forward to more of that in the future.

Joe Moore: Fantastic. And Jay, how can people follow along and support mission within Foundation?

Jay Kopelman: Yeah, again, social media is gonna be a good way to do that. So we, we are also pretty heavily engaged on LinkedIn and on Instagram. Um, I do [01:00:00] share, uh, a bit of my own stuff as well. On social media. So we have social media pages for Mission within Foundation, and we have a LinkedIn page for mission within foundation.

Jay Kopelman: I have my own profiles on both of those as well where people can follow along. Um, one of the other things you know that would probably help get more attention for this is if the general public was more aware of the numbers of professional athletes who are also now pursuing. I began specifically to help treat their traumatic brain injuries and the chronic traumatic encephalopathy that they’ve, uh, suffered as a result of their time in professional sports or even college sports.

Jay Kopelman: And, you know. I people worship these athletes, and I [01:01:00] think that if more of them, like Robert Gall, were more outspoken about these treatments and the healing properties that they’ve provided them, that it would get even more attention. Um, I think though what Melissa said, you know, I don’t wanna parrot anything she just said because she said it perfectly Right.

Jay Kopelman: And I’d just be speaking to hear myself talk. Um, but being collaborative the way that we are with PMC and with Melissa is I think, the way to move the needle on this overall. And like she said, if she could get more groups involved in, in these discussions, it would, it would do wonders for us.

Joe Moore: Well, thank you both so much for your hard work out there. I always appreciate it when people are showing up and doing this important, [01:02:00] sometimes boring and tedious, but nevertheless sometimes, sometimes exciting work. And um, so yeah, just thank you both and thank you both for showing up here to psychedelics today to join us and I hope we can continue to support you all in the future.

Jay Kopelman: Thank you, Joe. Thank you, Joe. It’s a pleasure being with you today and with Melissa, of course, always

Melissa Lavasani: appreciate the time and space.

Joe Moore: Thanks.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on February 2, 2026February 3, 2026

Patient Safety After a Death: What Transparency Can and Cannot Do

Psychedelics Today - Ibogaine Safety after an incident

A Tragedy at an Ibogaine Clinic — and the Policy Failure Behind It

A patient death in any care setting is a tragedy. In this case, it involves ibogaine, a medically complex intervention that sits outside regulated medical systems in the United States.

On January 21, 2026, Ambio published a public statement reporting that a patient “recently passed away while participating in Ambio’s Detoxification Program.” Ambio did not disclose the person’s identity or additional details, citing privacy.

At the time of writing, key facts remain unconfirmed publicly. Ambio is a clinic governed by privacy laws. Generally in situations like these, providers can’t release patient details without consent from the family (think HIPAA rules). The cause of death has not been established in a public record. In situations like this, speculation fills the gap quickly, and it often hardens into certainty before evidence exists.

Ambio is bound to privacy rules, just like other clinics. They did acknowledge the incident publicly, which is more than what many operators choose to do. That does not resolve unanswered questions, and it does not remove risk. It does set a tone. In a field where silence is often treated as the safer option, plain communication helps.

This death should not trigger a rush to assign certainty where none exists.

The Limits of Working Alone

Ibogaine is not a casual intervention, particularly in detox contexts. Its risk profile is well known among clinicians and experienced providers. Cardiac risks, including QT prolongation and arrhythmias, can be relevant. Electrolyte shifts and drug interactions are important to track. Ibogaine and noribogaine have long half lives, which complicate monitoring and follow up. Many people seeking ibogaine arrive with complex substance use histories, co-occurring conditions, and a body already under strain.

Anyone who has spent time around ibogaine work knows how much safety knowledge lives informally inside individual clinics, shared verbally, adjusted on the fly, and rarely written down. 

Some have hundreds of SOPs, and some have very few. 

What is missing across much of the ibogaine ecosystem is not awareness of risk. It is a shared infrastructure for learning from it.

Many ibogaine providers operate as islands. Screening standards vary. Near misses and adverse events may be handled internally. There is no widely adopted registry and no protected reporting channel that allows clinics to share safety information without elevating legal exposure.

For providers, sharing details can, as of today, break privacy rules, create civil liability risk, criminal scrutiny, or the loss of the ability to operate. 

Here is a paper out of UC Davis that discusses one configuration that may help the field. 

This isolation is not just cultural, it is structural.

Addiction Under Prohibition

Worth keeping in mind, is that the global marketplace for drugs –including substances like fentanyl – and heroin is inconsistent, and rife with problems. There are MANY new drugs hitting markets worldwide that can impact how people need to detox. Novel drugs can also introduce new confounding factors when introducing complicated medicines like ibogaine. Ibogaine detox clinics are facing this issue head on without much data about what these substances are, and how long they could impact people pursuing detoxification. Ambio cites this problem in its statement, saying:

“… we feel it is important, during a period of increasing interest in the promise offered by ibogaine treatment, to reiterate that there are ongoing risks associated with ibogaine as a detoxification treatment. Recently, these risks have been heightened and underscored by the increasing number of dangerous, unknown, and ever-changing adulterants in the global supply of street fentanyl.”

What “Prohibition” Means in Practice for Ibogaine

When people refer to prohibition in the context of ibogaine, they often mean more than illegality.

In the United States, ibogaine’s legal status produces several practical effects. It limits formal clinical pathways and pushes patients toward care outside regulated healthcare systems. It complicates research and funding, slowing evidence development. It drives medical tourism into mixed legal environments. It discourages transparency by making safety communication legally risky. It keeps the field fragmented by making coordination feel dangerous.

Prohibition does not eliminate demand. It tends to suppress coordination, data sharing, and the pace at which safety practices improve.

If ibogaine were legal and regulated in the United States, safety could be addressed more openly. Standards could be shared. Data could be pooled. Protocols could change in response to evidence rather than rumor. Under current policy, much of this remains difficult, and safety advances remain uneven.

Why a Central Safety Effort Exists in Medicine

In regulated medicine, systems exist to learn from adverse events and near misses. They are imperfect, but they exist because isolated practice reliably repeats preventable harm.

If the ibogaine field wants fewer tragedies, it needs a central mechanism for safety learning. That could take the form of an industry association, a trade group, a university affiliated project, or a nonprofit coalition or consortium with clear legal and ethical guardrails.

This structure should protect and incentivise learning from experience. 

To their credit, Ambio did acknowledge that they are improving protocols based on this incident and are sharing their modifications to help the field improve safety outcomes.

Established providers, with medical oversight, need a way to share what went wrong and what changed afterward without turning every report into a liability event. These databases will likely need to protect PII (personal identifying information) and will have access tightly restricted to approved researchers. Medicine handles this well elsewhere. This is essential because practitioners need baseline standards that evolve with evidence. Researchers need access to usable real world data. Patients need safety knowledge that travels with the practice, not just with individual clinics.

Bryan Hubbard’s proposed IbogaVerse points toward one possible model, meaning a structured cross provider effort focused on safety data and protocol refinement. Work like this is routine in regulated healthcare. In prohibited care, it remains optional and risky.

A practical starting point is simple: a standing working group among established providers with medical oversight, plus outside clinical and research input, and a clear firewall between quality improvement and public blame. Not a tribunal. A safety table.

Here is one example of an effort from a few years back. Clinical Guidelines for Ibogaine-Assisted Detoxification (2016).

The Cost of a Broken Treatment System

This death also sits within broader failures in addiction care in the United States. The dominant treatment model absorbs enormous spending, yet many people struggle to find sustained support after discharge. Outcomes vary widely. People cycle through multiple episodes of care when follow up, housing, or mental health support is insufficient.

That pattern reflects system design, not just individual choices.

As Americans for Ibogaine and others have argued, policymakers have not funded serious research pathways for ibogaine at a scale that demand and risk would justify. When government declines to study a practice people are already pursuing, it does not necessarily reduce use. It shifts risk onto patients and onto providers operating in legal gray zones.

If federal and state governments are serious about returning people to their families and communities, they should fund rigorous research, build regulated pilot pathways, and compare outcomes honestly against existing models rather than treating those models as fixed.

Spending is substantial. Results are inconsistent.

A Way Forward

Ambio’s decision to acknowledge the death publicly was constructive and makes more serious conversation possible.

What comes next should be unglamorous: shared standards, shared learning, and protected reporting of adverse events. This work will not fully mature under prohibition, but parts of it can begin now among established providers willing to coordinate around patient safety.

The larger fix is policy. Keep forcing ibogaine into the margins and serious harms will remain part of the risk patients and providers quietly carry. Allow research and coordination to happen in the open and safety can improve faster.

Until research and regulation catch up, the limits of the system will continue to set the ceiling on safety.

Disclaimer

This article is for informational purposes only and does not provide medical advice. Ibogaine carries serious medical risks, including cardiac complications and death. Anyone considering ibogaine should consult qualified medical professionals, understand the legal risks in their jurisdiction, and approach treatment claims with caution.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on January 21, 2026January 22, 2026

Did New Jersey Really Just Legalize Psilocybin?

NJ S2283 - Psilocybin

What S2283 Actually Does — and Why It Is a Research Pilot, Not Legalization

In January 2026, the New Jersey Legislature passed Senate Bill S2283, formally titled the Psilocybin Behavioral Health Access and Services Act. On January 20, 2026, shortly before leaving office, Governor Phil Murphy signed the bill into law.

Despite widespread media coverage suggesting that New Jersey has “legalized psilocybin,” S2283 does not create legal public access to psilocybin. Instead, it establishes a narrow, state-run, hospital-based research pilot designed to study the clinical use of psilocybin under tightly controlled medical conditions.

What the Bill Does

At its core, S2283 creates a Psilocybin Behavioral Health Access and Therapy Pilot Program under the authority of the New Jersey Department of Health. The purpose of the program is explicitly evaluative: to generate clinical outcome data and assess whether psilocybin therapy should play a role in New Jersey’s future mental health care system.

Key elements include:

Hospital-based pilot program
One hospital from each of New Jersey’s three regions (North, Central, and South) will be selected through a competitive process. These hospitals will be authorized to administer psilocybin exclusively within hospital settings under medical supervision. The pilot will run for two years.

Department of Health oversight
The New Jersey Department of Health is responsible for rulemaking, implementation, and compliance. The program remains embedded within existing medical and regulatory frameworks.

Alignment with federal standards
The pilot must operate in a manner consistent with FDA clinical trial guidelines and federal drug regulations. The program is research-focused rather than a public access or service model.

Data collection and reporting
Participating hospitals must collect clinical and experiential outcome data and submit findings to the Governor and Legislature. These reports will inform any future policy decisions regarding psilocybin therapy in the state.

Advisory board
An 11-member multidisciplinary advisory board will oversee safety, review outcomes, and make recommendations to the Legislature regarding potential expansion or modification of the program.

Appropriated funding
The bill allocates $6 million to support the pilot, with each participating hospital eligible to receive up to $2 million for research and program operations.

What the Bill Does Not Do

S2283 is intentionally limited in scope. It does not legalize, decriminalize, or broadly authorize access to psilocybin.

Specifically, the bill does not:

  • Legalize psilocybin for adult or public use
  • Decriminalize possession, cultivation, or distribution
  • Create licensed psilocybin service centers open to the public
  • Permit independent facilitators, guides, or non-hospital providers
  • Establish a commercial production or distribution system
  • Provide expungement or retroactive relief for past psilocybin-related convictions

While some earlier drafts contained broader elements, these provisions were removed during the legislative process. The final bill is focused narrowly on clinical research.

Expungement: A Notable Absence

One of the most consequential omissions in S2283 is the absence of expungement provisions. Individuals previously arrested or convicted for psilocybin-related offenses receive no legal relief under this legislation.

From a harm-reduction and justice perspective, this omission reinforces the bill’s strictly medical and institutional framing rather than a comprehensive public health or equity-based approach. Expungement remains governed by New Jersey’s existing criminal record statutes, which operate independently of this pilot.

How New Jersey Compares to Other States

States are taking markedly different approaches to psilocybin policy, reflecting divergent assumptions about access, risk, and governance.

Oregon: Regulated Adult Access

Oregon was the first state to establish a statewide, non-medical psilocybin services system through Measure 109.

  • Legal psilocybin services for adults 21+
  • No medical diagnosis required
  • Licensed service centers and facilitators
  • Non-medical, wellness-oriented framework

Oregon treats psilocybin as a regulated service rather than a prescription medication and intentionally situates it outside traditional healthcare systems.

Colorado: Decriminalization Plus Regulated Healing Centers

Colorado took a different and arguably more radical path through Proposition 122, which:

  • Decriminalizes personal possession, cultivation, and sharing of certain natural psychedelic plants and fungi, including psilocybin
  • Establishes a pathway for licensed healing centers
  • Allows access for adults 21+ without requiring a diagnosis
  • Creates protections against criminal penalties for personal use
  • Recognition of community-based and non-clinical use

Colorado’s model combines personal liberty with regulated access and explicit harm-reduction principles.

New Mexico: Medical Legalization With Delayed Access

New Mexico’s new Medical Psilocybin Act (SB 219) was signed into law in April 2025.

  • Medical psilocybin authorized for qualifying diagnoses
  • A regulated program where licensed clinicians can provide psilocybin in approved facilities only
  • Advisory board and phased implementation
  • Program expected to be operational by 2026–2027

New Mexico adopts a medicalized approach but authorizes eventual patient access rather than research alone.

New Jersey: Hospital-Based Research Pilot

  • No decriminalization
  • No public access
  • No licensed service centers
  • Strictly hospital-based and research-oriented

New Jersey remains in an evaluation phase rather than an access phase.

Final Thoughts

New Jersey’s S2283 represents a cautious, data-driven entry into psychedelic policy. It is neither legalization nor comprehensive reform. Instead, it reflects a decision to study psilocybin therapy within highly controlled medical environments before considering broader policy changes.

Clear public discourse requires precision, especially when early-stage research is mistaken for access. While S2283 is a meaningful development, it should be understood for what it is: a limited research pilot, not a transformation of psilocybin law in New Jersey.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on January 11, 2026June 11, 2026

From Brussels to the Ballot: How PsychedeliCare Took Psychedelic Therapy to the European Public

PsychedeliCare EU - Article on Psychedelics Today

Théo was stuck. At twenty-something, he had everything that should have made sense on paper: a political science degree, a job in the European Parliament, and involvement with advocacy groups. His career trajectory looked right, but something fundamental was missing. “I didn’t really like what I was doing,” he admits. “I couldn’t find meaning in my job.”

Then something shifted. During an exploratory evening with psilocybin shared with friends, Théo encountered something he hadn’t been looking for: profound relief. “This experience benefited my mental health in a way I could have never imagined before.”

For someone without a background in psychiatry or neuroscience, this was disorienting. He began researching widely and quickly encountered a substantial body of evidence: clinical trials showing how psychedelics could help people with treatment-resistant depression, end-of-life anxiety, addiction, and other conditions where conventional medicine often fell short.

The disconnect became unbearable. While research momentum accelerated, access to care remained largely out of reach. The contrast between scientific progress and political inertia became increasingly difficult to ignore.

Through his studies, Théo was familiar with the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI), a democratic mechanism that allows EU citizens to formally petition the European Commission by collecting one million signatures within twelve months. He also knew the landscape well: by 2023 lobbying groups like Psychedelic Access Research European Alliance (PAREA) and Psychedelics Europe were beginning to take shape. Yet something was missing. There was no clear signal to political circles that ordinary citizens across Europe needed change to mental health policy.

So Théo made a choice to align his political skills with this emerging field and work to ensure that access to psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) would not be left to chance. In 2023, he began contacting associations, drafting requests, and shaping what would become PsychedeliCare EU. By January 2025, the ECI signature campaign had officially launched. What began as a personal shift evolved into a pan-European initiative.

PsychedeliCare emerged as a grassroots initiative, formed not by institutions or established lobbying structures, but by a small group of citizens who felt that waiting for top-down reform was no longer sufficient. In January 2023, the initiative began with just ten people sharing a common vision. Within a year, it had grown into a network of more than 200 volunteers across Europe, each bringing distinct professional backgrounds and personal motivations.

Operating at a European scale presents unique challenges. The EU is a rich tapestry of 27 countries with distinct languages, cultures, histories, and attitudes—particularly around mental health and drug policy. Public perceptions vary widely: what is accepted in one country may remain taboo or heavily regulated in another.

Europe’s governance combines EU-level coordination with national decision-making. While EU institutions can set broad policy direction, health and drug laws largely remain the responsibility of individual member states, adding complexity and often slowing progress. As a result, coordinated action across borders is essential to move in a unified direction. Awareness remains one of the most urgent challenges in the psychedelic field. Across much of Europe, psychedelics are still commonly associated with danger, illegality, or counterculture, rather than with therapy, research, or care. This framing has contributed to widespread misunderstanding and, in practice, has pushed many people toward unregulated underground use, often without adequate support or safety structures.

For this reason, public education became a central focus of the initiative. Over the past year, PsychedeliCare volunteers brought evidence-based information into settings where these conversations had rarely taken place, including cultural festivals, community events, and academic and professional symposia. These spaces frequently evolved into informal moments of harm-reduction education, legal literacy, and shared storytelling among patients, clinicians, and researchers.

Rather than producing immediate, visible outcomes, the impact of this work is unfolding gradually. The effects of awareness are difficult to quantify. They appear less in formal metrics than in subtle changes: increased curiosity, new collaborations, and conversations that previously felt impossible. Over time, these shifts are translating into local engagement, as citizens and organizations seek ways to participate and contribute.

From the outset, the initiative recognized that scientific data alone rarely moves policy. Human stories give evidence its force. PsychedeliCare therefore centered patient voices, not as emotional framing around science, but as evidence in their own right.

Patients carry knowledge clinicians and researchers can describe but never fully convey: chronic exhaustion, isolation, and the erosion of hope when available treatments fail. When patients speak about their experiences with psychedelic-assisted therapy, they describe concrete changes—relief, reconnection, and renewed agency—grounding abstract debate in lived reality. However, stigma persists, exposing patients to judgment and professional risk. In several contexts, patient testimony has helped shift policy discussions toward the human consequences of delayed access.

As the PsychedeliCare ECI approaches the end of its formal campaign period, it is important to assess outcomes with clarity. The ECI is intentionally a high-threshold democratic instrument, requiring not only agreement but public identification with a cause. In the context of psychedelic-assisted therapy, that step remains socially and culturally challenging in many parts of Europe.

The signature count does not reflect a lack of need or effort, but rather how constrained public expression around this topic remains. This reality helps ground a more honest conversation about what comes next. The work ahead is not solely legislative, but cultural, shaped by decades of stigma. Creating conditions in which people feel safe enough to speak openly remains a prerequisite for policy change.

Over the past year, PsychedeliCare has built relationships with partner organizations across Europe, engaged public figures from science and culture, and attracted interest from a range of stakeholders. While the signature campaign concludes in January, the broader engagement continues beyond the formal ECI process.

The next phase, informally referred to as PsychedeliCare 2.0, builds on these foundations with a focus on long-term engagement, education, and collaboration. Its core premise remains unchanged: that psychedelic-assisted therapies require safe, ethical, and evidence-based pathways into European health care systems.

Change at this scale does not emerge from a single initiative or institution. It develops through sustained dialogue among stakeholders and civil society more broadly. PsychedeliCare’s first phase illustrated what coordinated, citizen-led action can initiate. The work ahead lies in continuing that exchange, carefully and responsibly, across contexts and communities.

A Shared Invitation

PsychedeliCare EU is an open invitation to move beyond stigma and silence toward a mental-health future grounded in evidence, care, and shared responsibility.

This movement belongs to everyone who shapes that future: citizens whose lived experience gives it meaning; researchers and clinicians who safeguard its integrity and ethics; educators who foster understanding; and policymakers who turn insight into systems that serve people.

To anyone who cares about mental health in Europe—whether you bring expertise, experience, or curiosity—there is a place for you here. The future of psychedelic care will not be built by a few but shaped collectively.

To join PsychedeliCare’s growing community, please contact info@psychedelicare.eu

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on December 27, 2025June 11, 2026

Chronic Pain, Illicit Markets, and a Preventable Pipeline to Addiction

Chronic Pain

Chronic pain is one of the most common and least discussed entry points into substance-related harm in the United States. Long before heroin or illicitly manufactured fentanyl appear in a person’s life, many people are simply trying to endure severe, persistent physical pain. Opioids have long been central to that effort. They are not a mistake. They remain indispensable in surgery, cancer care, trauma medicine, and some forms of chronic pain management.

The problem is not opioids themselves. The problem is how pain is managed, regulated, and constrained in the United States today.

I write in part from personal experience. I lived with chronic pain for many years, from my early 20s through most of my 30s. I also write from years of study and work in this field.

For many people living with chronic pain, long-term opioid therapy initially provides stability, functionality, and the ability to work, care for family, and participate in daily life. Over time, stigma, regulatory pressure, and fragmented care can erode that stability. Patients on chronic opioid therapy are increasingly viewed through a lens of suspicion and liability rather than continuity of care. Prescriptions may be tapered or discontinued abruptly. This is improving in some places, but clinicians still fear legal and professional consequences, and patients fear being labeled, abandoned, or criminalized. This is often where risk meaningfully increases. The evidence bears this out: a 2021 JAMA study found that patients on stable, long-term opioid therapy who were tapered had a 68% increase in overdose events and roughly twice the rate of mental health crises compared with patients who were not tapered, with the greatest risk among those facing faster reductions and higher starting doses. A 2022 follow-up found the elevated risk persisted up to two years after the taper began.

When people lose access to prescribed opioids, most do not immediately turn to heroin or fentanyl. Many first seek illicitly obtained pharmaceutical opioids: OxyContin and similar medications made by pharmaceutical companies but sold outside the medical system. These substances feel familiar and, relative to non-clinical drugs, safer. The limiting factor is cost. Illicit pharmaceutical opioids are expensive, and maintaining a supply can quickly become financially unsustainable.

As pain persists, tolerance increases, and access to consistent medical care diminishes, economic pressure intensifies. Cheaper alternatives become more attractive. Heroin and illicitly manufactured fentanyl are far less expensive and far more potent. They are also far more dangerous in this illicit context. This transition is rarely driven by recklessness or a desire to “get high.” It is more often driven by price, access, desperation, and untreated pain. It is one of the clearest and most preventable pathways from chronic pain into high-risk opioid use and overdose.

These dynamics did not emerge in isolation. They are a predictable consequence of prohibition-based drug policy and aggressive criminalization of drug supply. In such systems, people managing pain are forced to navigate unstable and increasingly lethal markets rather than receiving long-term, adaptive care. Potency, unpredictability, and contamination become structural features of supply rather than exceptions.

Precision matters here. Opioids are not inherently the problem. Fentanyl is one of the most effective analgesics ever developed and remains indispensable in regulated medical settings. Risk escalates when people are pushed out of supervised care and into illicit supply chains that reward potency over safety.

What remains largely absent is a middle path: a pain-care model that treats opioids as valuable but incomplete tools, and that offers additional ways to reduce suffering without forcing patients into all-or-nothing choices.

This is where psychedelics warrant careful, serious consideration. Not as a fix for the overdose crisis, and not for everyone in pain. The evidence so far is narrow, and it is worth being precise about what it actually covers.

Psychedelics and Chronic Pain: What the Evidence Shows

The published work on psychedelics and chronic pain is still small: a handful of mechanistic reviews and individual case reports, with no large randomized controlled trials completed to date. Within those limits, certain psychedelics may influence pain intensity, pain perception, and functional outcomes when used carefully alongside adjunctive therapies. The proposed mechanisms are distinct from opioids and include modulation of central sensitization, emotional processing, inflammation, and the maladaptive fear-pain feedback loops that can entrench chronic pain.

A review by Castellanos et al. describes how classic psychedelics act primarily through serotonin 5-HT2A receptor agonism, initiating downstream processes associated with neuroplasticity, altered functional connectivity, and anti-inflammatory signaling. Chronic pain conditions, particularly centralized pain syndromes, are increasingly understood as disorders of maladaptive neural circuitry rather than purely peripheral injury. Psychedelics may temporarily destabilize rigid brain networks, allowing reorganization toward less pain-dominant patterns.

The review identifies conditions such as complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), phantom limb pain, and other centralized pain syndromes as candidates for investigation. The biological rationale is coherent and consistent with contemporary pain neuroscience, but it remains a rationale, not a result.

Case-Level Signals

A few published case reports illustrate what an integrated, non-opioid-centered pain-care model might look like.

In one documented case, an individual experienced severe phantom limb pain following amputation, a condition closely linked to cortical reorganization and central sensitization. After a structured program involving psilocybin alongside adjunctive therapies, pain intensity decreased substantially and remained lower over time. Similar outcomes have been reported combining psilocybin with mirror therapy for phantom limb pain.

In another case, a person lived with refractory complex regional pain syndrome for more than a decade, with pain consistently rated at extreme levels. Despite aggressive conventional treatment, including high-dose ketamine infusions, functional improvement was limited. Following a structured course involving psilocybin and adjunctive therapies, the individual reported meaningful reductions in pain and regained previously lost functions, including driving and fine motor control. These outcomes align with a 2024 case report describing substantial functional improvement in refractory CRPS following psilocybin use. Hear directly from the patient on the Psychedelics Today podcast.

These are signals, not proof. They suggest existing pain-care paradigms may be incomplete and that additional tools deserve rigorous study. They do not establish that psychedelics work for chronic pain at scale, and they say nothing yet about the much larger population caught in the opioid pipeline described above.

That gap is the point. Even if psychedelics eventually help a subset of patients with centralized pain, the people most exposed to overdose are not waiting on a new molecule. They are waiting on a system that does not push them off prescribed medication and into a contaminated illicit supply. The case for studying psychedelics seriously and the case for fixing pain care are related but separate, and conflating them helps no one.

One caveat worth keeping in view: this research is early and concentrated among a small, overlapping group of clinicians and advocates, several of whom are affiliated with the organizations now advancing the work.

This work is being advanced by organizations such as the Psychedelics & Pain Association, which supports interdisciplinary collaboration, research coordination, and responsible evidence-building around psychedelic approaches to pain. The goal is not to replace opioids or to romanticize psychedelics. It is to expand the clinical toolkit with rigor, ethics, and care.

The current system pushes people in pain toward the most dangerous drug supply available, then treats the result as a failure of character rather than policy. Any serious alternative has to start there. Psychedelics may turn out to be one piece of that alternative. Right now they are a research question worth funding, not an answer worth selling.


Donate to Psychedelics and Pain Association and join our newsletter here. The author is a founding board member of Psychedelics and Pain Association.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on December 2, 2025December 20, 2025

Logan Davidson – American Ibogaine, State Strategy, and the Future of Psychedelic Policy

PT 643 - Logan Davidson

Logan Davidson joins the show to talk about the fast-moving world of Ibogaine in American and why state-based leadership is shaping the future of psychedelic reform. Davidson is the executive director of Texans for Greater Mental Health, the legislative director at VETS, and a key strategist behind Texas’ landmark interest in ibogaine research. He also advises for Americans for Ibogaine. His work sits at the intersection of science, policy, and lived experience, and this conversation offers a clear look into what is happening right now.


Early Themes: The Rise of State Advocacy

Davidson explains how he entered politics at nineteen and how his professional path merged with psychedelic policy work during the 2021 Texas legislative session. Through that first bill, he saw how science, bipartisan cooperation, and strong local leadership could advance major reform.

Early discussion focuses on:

  • How Texas became the first state to pass a major psychedelic research bill
  • Why ibogaine became a central focus
  • How the special operations community helped shift political momentum
  • The personal mental health stories that shaped Davidson’s commitment

This section also highlights how Americans for Ibogaine entered the conversation through veterans, researchers, and state lawmakers who felt the urgency of the opioid crisis and traumatic brain injury.


Core Insights: Ibogaine, Risk, and the New Research Model

In the middle portion of the episode, Davidson breaks down the strategy, challenges, and promise behind ibogaine research and state-based policy innovation.

Key insights include:

  • The unique bipartisan environment in Texas
  • Why stories from veterans and spouses moved lawmakers
  • The importance of medical screening for cardiac risk
  • Why research is essential for safety
  • How states can use funding, revenue sharing, and public health goals to shape future access

What policymakers are watching right now

  • Effectiveness for opioid use disorder
  • Data from traumatic brain injury studies
  • Cardiac safety protocols
  • The risk of untreated depression and addiction
  • The national security implications of forcing service members to seek illegal care

Davidson also explains why removing the psychedelic experience from the molecule remains controversial and why many researchers believe the full experience matters.


Later Discussion and Takeaways: The Road Ahead for American Ibogaine

In the final part of the conversation, Davidson speaks about the future of American Ibogaine and the broader psychedelic field. He outlines why local leadership matters, why federal funding, like what Psychedelic Medicine Coalition is supporting, could be the next major tipping point, and how big pharmaceutical companies may eventually enter the space through acquisitions or proprietary molecule development.

Concrete takeaways include:

  • States should expect clear benefits: lower-cost treatments, shared revenue, and local control
  • Community leaders, not outsiders, often drive legislative wins
  • The need for long-term safety data remains
  • National security concerns highlight why regulated access must expand
  • Federal research money could radically transform the pace and scale of studies

He also encourages listeners to join or build local organizations, since nearly every major win comes from people who live in the state pushing from the ground up.


Frequently Asked Questions

Is Ibogaine safe?

Ibogaine has cardiac risks that require medical screening and careful monitoring. Researchers stress that safety improves with proper protocols and more clinical data.

Why is Ibogaine important for veterans?

Many special operations veterans report major benefits for traumatic brain injury, PTSD, and addiction. Their stories have driven political momentum.

How are states involved in Ibogaine research?

States like Texas are funding clinical trials, drug development, shaping policy, and exploring revenue and access models to support long-term public health benefits.

Will Ibogaine become federally supported in America?

New federal interest, including major grants and bipartisan discussions, suggests that broader support may be coming in the next few years.


Closing Thoughts

This episode shows why the work of Logan Davidson sits at the center of today’s psychedelic resurgence. It highlights a complex but hopeful moment where science, policy, and lived experience are beginning to align. As American Ibogaine research expands, state leaders, clinicians, veterans, and advocates all have a role in shaping a safer and more effective future for these treatments.

Transcript

Joe Moore: [00:00:00] All right, here we are everybody. Thanks for tuning back into psychedelics today. Today I’m joined by Logan Davidson from Texans for Greater Mental Health and a few other projects. Logan, how you doing today? I’m doing well, Joe. How are you doing man? Lovely, lovely. So, um, we just had the chance to meet in person at the recent, um, I BGA Summit, I’ll call it for short, in Aspen.

Joe Moore: Um, and that was lovely, but we had a chance to connect online a few times before, which is great. Um, big fan of your works and thanks. Thanks for joining us today.

Logan Davidson: Yeah, absolutely. It was, it was great to finally meet you in person. I’m a big fan of your work as well and, uh, you know, it’s, it’s been fun before and after the Aspen meeting, listening to all the different names that we’ve all given at the Aspen Summit.

Logan Davidson: Aspen. I began meeting 2.0, uh, what’s the title? I think technically it was Aspen. I began meeting 2.0. Aim 2.0 is, uh, is what I saw around a lot, but also maybe that’s a OL Instant Messenger 2.0 and we’re gonna reenter [00:01:00] the nineties. You know,

Joe Moore: uh, there’s ways in which that was more pleasant, but who knows? I dunno if I can go backwards.

Joe Moore: Yeah, I know. So, um, excited to have you here and before we really kind of dig into you as an individual, can you give us a high level of, of, um, the. Groups and projects you’re working on right now, and then we’ll kinda like dig into you as an individual.

Logan Davidson: Yeah, absolutely. So I’m the executive director of Texans for Greater Mental Health.

Logan Davidson: We’re obviously a, a Texas-based, Texas focused education and engagement and advocacy organization, which just means that we wake up every day and figure out how to advance psychedelic medicines in Texas with a science led research first approach, which aligns really well to the, the, the psychedelic political climate in the state of Texas.

Logan Davidson: I’m also the legislative director for Vets Veterans Exploring Treatment Solutions, Marcus and Amber Capone’s organization where I get to work in concert with my colleague Khe Kja, um, on all things policy and advocacy. I do a lot of state work, [00:02:00] um, and have been really fortunate to get to work in North Carolina with Gina Georgio in the North Carolina Psychedelic Policy Coalition, Hawaii, the Clarity Project with Ashley Lukins.

Logan Davidson: Um, uh, I’m through vets involved in launching Valor, the Veterans Alliance for Leadership Outreach and Recovery, which is a project founded by Vets, Navy Seal Foundation, green Beret Foundation, and Wounded Warrior Project focused on federal advocacy. And then I serve in, uh, you know, an amorphous, uh, someday to be determined advisory role with Americans for Ibogaine, bringing the wisdom and lessons that we learned in Texas forward for them to use in in other states and across the country.

Joe Moore: Right on. One of the, one of the fun things I kept hearing in Aspen was, how do we get our own Logan? I gotta think that’s funny. But I also, for you, but I, I also have to think like, oh my God, my heart’s gonna explode ’cause I’m, you know, not getting enough rest. ’cause I’m doing so much and it’s not just, you know, you working in Texas, you’re working all over the place.

Joe Moore: Right. So it’s, um, [00:03:00] yeah, it’s gotta be exhausting. So, to get into that point, how did you, how did you get here? How did I begin? Inter psychedelics come into your radar is something you wanted to work on.

Logan Davidson: Yeah. Um, uh, it’s funny you mentioned the Harken explode thing. I’m, I’m very ready for the holiday. Um, but it is, you know, if you love what you do, you never work a day in your life.

Logan Davidson: Um, and I, and I do love what I do, and I, and I don’t think it has felt like work, uh, yet. Although, you know, someone, something’s gonna happen in the next year to challenge that theory, I’m sure. Um, I got into this, I started my career in, in politics and especially legislative politics, uh, when I was 19 years old, um, in 2014 working.

Logan Davidson: Interning in local congressional offices and then working on my first campaign for a member of the Texas House, and then fell in love with that and just basically committed my entire life to, to politics and, uh, legislative service, both at the state and federal level while that was happening. You know, obviously, uh, like a ton of other people, I had my own mental health struggles, major depressive disorder and, [00:04:00] and suicidal agent was just a feature of my life for a really long time.

Logan Davidson: And then when I was in college, I came to learn a little bit more about psychedelics, um, the way that they can help with that, especially, uh, the way that they could help veterans with PTSD and other conditions. My brother deployed to Africa when he was in the Army, um, serving in a civil affairs team. And so that was very personal to me.

Logan Davidson: And so I had kind of these dual tracks and it really was, you know, my career. And then I, I was deeply interested in psychedelics and especially psychedelic medicine. Learned about the research happening at Hopkins, um, and never really thought that these two things were gonna cross into one kind of, you know, mission path.

Logan Davidson: But in 2021, I went to work for state representative Alex Dominguez, um, who it, you know. If you’ve ever seen Charlie Wilson’s war, there’s this phenomenon where this congressman who you know, is of no relative importance, I think is what they say in the movie trailer, but he happens to sit on every single important committee to get what he was doing done.

Logan Davidson: And that was Alex. He was on the appropriations committee. He was on one of the calendars committee. He was a vice chair, he was a leadership, he was [00:05:00] a former prosecutor, um, who himself had been really interested in this. He had two siblings, um, who served. And uh, he decided to file a bill to see if we could start a conversation on psychedelics.

Logan Davidson: And that was HB 1802, which went on to be the first psychedelic research legislation passed in the country. Um, almost first piece of psychedelic reform legislation passed in the country. But Connecticut beat us by, by just a little bit and huge credit to Jesse McLaughlin for getting that done. Um, but so we passed that bill and that was the most important thing I’d ever done in my life up to that point.

Logan Davidson: And I knew that, you know, even while we were doing it, we all knew this was the biggest thing we were potentially ever gonna work on. You could spend 80 years and never work on anything that’s gonna be as significant as. And then about a year and a half later, I was recruited to, to come work at Texan or Greater Mental Health by the founder Eric Cosar, uh, who also brought Alex onto the board.

Logan Davidson: Um, he brought Lynette Avril, the researcher from Baylor College of Medicine, um, who, who was leading the 1802 trial and was our subject matter expert onto the advisory board. And the theory was. If there was a team that got this done in [00:06:00] Texas, so let’s try to get as many people on that team back together and go keep on doing it.

Logan Davidson: And um, that was, uh, almost three years ago, uh, to the day pretty close that I had that first conversation with Eric. And it’s been a whirlwind ever since. Joined the vets team after that, got to work in a bunch of other states. Um, and yeah, it’s, it’s a really amazing thing to get, to be able to work on your passion, um, to feel like you’re doing good in the world and, and helping people, which is nice.

Logan Davidson: Not always something you get working in politics and especially in a state legislature. Um, and that I get to, you know, it’s an emerging space for the most part, especially from my side of the world and the, and the political legislative world. You don’t really get to do anything new. The, the boundaries already exist and you’re just playing within this, this field.

Logan Davidson: But with psychedelic medicine and psychedelics broadly, you’re essentially, you know, paving your own road. You’re, you’re planting the sod of your own green, green field. So it’s a really exciting place to work.

Joe Moore: Yeah. It’s not at all like, um. A lot of other traditional fields where there’s a hundred plus [00:07:00] years of history.

Joe Moore: Um, yeah, we’re dealing, well we have a lot of history here, but Right. Yeah. Yeah. We have a lot of like new ground in terms of legislation and ways in which we could see this play out and we can have a lot of impacts here, um, for good and bad. Yeah, absolutely. You know, I think one of the better things we all have going for us here is that we all care that this is done well and Right.

Joe Moore: And, um, while we might not agree on particular, sometimes we’re all working towards what we think is the right thing, which, you know, what could be better than that? That’s right.

Logan Davidson: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. The common cause is great and uh, it is always one of the things I really enjoy about some of the conferences and summits we get to go to, um, Aspen didn’t account as much because everybody was so iboga focused, but you’ll get someone who’s ardently decrim and opposes medicalization and someone who’s ardently opposed to decrim and only wants medicalization.

Logan Davidson: And you’ll just see them off in the corner, you know, excitedly talking to each other about how they’re wrong and you’re wrong. And here’s my vision for it. And I [00:08:00] think, I think the right answer and where great things come is from, from the middle of that tension. You know, you gotta have the two opposing viewpoints.

Logan Davidson: You gotta have the whole spectrum. Get everybody together, have some conversations, and figure out what the best path forward is. And that’s also like our philosophy for state advocacy. Every state’s gonna do what’s right for that state, and then the federal government gets to look and pick and choose what they think worked best and, and ditch what they think didn’t work.

Joe Moore: Yeah, it’s fascinating. So, um. Was there a particular angle on the Ibogaine story that made it seem like a really compelling substance to be working on?

Logan Davidson: Um, yeah. I mean the, the relationship, the special operations community has to ibogaine. So, um, that Sila seven bill we passed in 2021. You know, Marcus Capone was one of our key witnesses.

Logan Davidson: Morgan Latrell was a key witness for us. They all were essentially telling the story of Ibogaine. You know, we never, if you, if you go listen to their testimony, none of them ever say it was psilocybin. It was [00:09:00] iboga, it was just, it was psychedelic assisted therapy. But even then, all those years ago, I knew this was headed towards iga, whether it’s four years or 40 years.

Logan Davidson: The psychedelic space is gonna get to Ibogaine, and it’s an incredibly powerful medicine, obviously. Um, the impact on the brain is incredible, especially traumatic brain injury, it’s ability to resolve opioid withdrawal syndrome. And so it’s, it’s powerful. The stories are incredibly compelling, but really I think the thing that made it most compelling to legislators and then, and then obviously made it the vehicle for which I would do a lot of work as the relationship the special operations community has to it.

Joe Moore: Yeah. Um, so. I guess let’s characterize the substance for a little bit. So it comes from Africa, generally speaking. Right? We’ve actually found Iboga in some South American plants. I’m sure you’ve kind of heard rumor of that here and there. Mm-hmm. Which is, which is interesting. Um, you know, Pangaea and all, but I think, yeah, exactly.[00:10:00]

Joe Moore: I think there’s some interesting conversations to be had around, like, where does it come from? How do we, how do we become fair, um, to the people that had this before? And what I loved about the Aspen meeting was that the, um, blessings of the forest crew was there. Um, and they’re kind of a group that’s really helping get some sort of reciprocity.

Joe Moore: And you and Brian really insisted that you’re gonna work really hard to make that happen. Can you speak about that a little bit?

Logan Davidson: Yeah, yeah, absolutely. It, um, you know, as, as we said in. Aspen. Um, no one has the right answer on that on that point yet. There’s a couple of layers to it, right. Just thinking about like the Texas project, um, setting aside Texas’s politics for a second, which definitely played a role in how that bill came into being, but it’s, it’s FDA approved clinical research, FD approved DEA license clinical research, which to date, broadly speaking, is synthetic only.

Logan Davidson: Right? There’s some exceptions. You have Dr. Sicily, um, who successfully sued the DEA. There’s like some limited exceptions, but the general rule, if you’re doing clinical research, it’s gotta be synthetic. So there is an [00:11:00] inherent incompatibility between the way these medicines work and the way that both like our community in the United States and the international psychedelic community kind of interact with these medicines in this world in the way that like our medical system can fit it.

Logan Davidson: So there’s an ongoing. Process, uh, you know, and I, I only just kind of dipped my toes in at the federal level, but from advocates who are trying to change the FDA’s attitude on that at least creates some sort of exception where you are allowed to do natural or semi naturally derived, um, nonsynthetic substances.

Logan Davidson: Uh, so that’s one track. I think the big key is not only reciprocity though, um, and making sure that we honor where it comes from and that, you know, uh, we try to try to not be exploitative the way that that folks have been for so many generations and centuries, but also to tap into the wisdom, right? Uh, Joseph Parlia, I think, speaks really, really well on this.

Logan Davidson: Um, but it’s, you know, you’ve got some western medical practitioners who are gonna come in and this is gonna be their very first experience with Iboga or a substance [00:12:00] like this. And they’re gonna try to identify the best practices and codify those and publish them. And Aetna will provide reimbursement for that and everything.

Logan Davidson: And then you have folks in Gabon. Who have been working with this medicine for centuries, generations who have a deep inherent wisdom, who understand how it works. They may not understand how it works in the terms of, you know, biological chemistry or anything like that, but they can explain it from a spiritual perspective.

Logan Davidson: And also I think from a practical perspective. So part of it is obviously the reciprocity, right? But also, you know, within that is not only financial reciprocity, but also hopefully for, for those of us in the west, uh, you know, sort of a wisdom reciprocity and a cultural reciprocity as well.

Joe Moore: Yeah, it’s gonna be really fascinating and interesting to see how we can do some sort of like, um, cultural exchange there and actually learn from them.

Joe Moore: I’ve got, you know, I’ve got a lot to say on it, but let’s not do that here. Yeah. So, um, let’s see. So famously Texas put in a lot of [00:13:00] money. To this kind of, um, project to develop Ibogaine as an FDA approved drug. Can you give us a little bit of that story? Like what, what happened there?

Logan Davidson: Uh, yeah. Well, um, the, the story of Texas putting in the money, there’s a thing that happened a long time ago and then we fast forward.

Logan Davidson: So, uh, over a hundred years ago, they struck oil at Spindletop and Texas’s Wealth as a state skyrocketed. Relative to everything else. And that’s a really important factor because we were able to get what we got done in Texas because Texas was sitting on a really significant budget surplus. Um, it wasn’t opioid settlement funds, it wasn’t out of this dedicated research fund.

Logan Davidson: Texas had just, we’ve collected more money than we thought we were going to over the past few years. We had tens of billions of dollars in surplus funds. So coming and asking for the appropriation was really interesting. ’cause at no point in the process did anybody say, we can’t afford this. There were plenty of people who said, you can’t have lots of money to research your, your African psychedelic, you know, what are you talking about?

Logan Davidson: But no one [00:14:00] said, oh, we can’t afford this. And that’s a stark contrast to some other states that are supportive of psychedelics that don’t have the same budgetary position that we do. So that’s an important kind of fact and a factor in what played out. Um, the, the story of the Texas IGA initiative is actually quite an efficient story.

Logan Davidson: Um, it all started last summer. Um, governor Perry and a few other people engaged Brian in a conversation said, you’ve been working on, I began in a bunch of other states, we think there’s an opportunity in Texas to do something big. We think this, this should be the big thing that we do. Do you want to come do this?

Logan Davidson: Um, that’s when Brian and I connected late summer in the early fall. There was one big in-person team meeting in October, uh, and then it was off to the races and you had this big. Coalition that ebbed and flowed and grew over time. Um, uh, you know, you had the Rogan podcast, we got the bill filed. Like all of these things kind of come together.

Logan Davidson: And then another important thing is Texas is in legislative session every, every odd number of year for 140 days. So, you know, the [00:15:00] conversation started last summer, 12 months basically from when that conversation started. We were gonna be at a time. Working on this. And so it was a really rapid, you know, bringing together of folks.

Logan Davidson: You know, Lynette Avril was back involved, uh, who helped pass HB 1802, the V-M-H-L-C was at the table. Um, Brian obviously was leading, uh, pretty significantly. He and Rick Perry did the famous Joe Rogan podcast. Um, vets came to the table at the very beginning of this year, um, and really supercharged the effort and took, um, advocacy lead.

Logan Davidson: And, and I will say I am biased. I work with them, but even before I, I worked for vets, I was a strong believer that when, when vets is at the tip of the spear, um, you generally see advocacy success. You’ve seen it twice in California and then, and then obviously twice in Texas. Um, and so we decided to do it and then it became about finding the right author and representative Cody Harris, who filed HB 37 17, uh, was the right author.

Logan Davidson: Not only was he a powerful member of the house, great relationships across the conservative movement, credibility with [00:16:00] the minority party. Um, he also. Knew about Iboga before that Joe Rogan episode. He had heard about it on Sean Ryan. Um, he has some family members with neurodegenerative conditions and that was where his real personal interest came from.

Logan Davidson: He was aware of the veteran stories and found them to be incredibly compelling and that we should make this treatment available for those folks that shouldn’t have to leave the country. He learned more about its ability to treat addiction, but he also brought his own personal passion for this. Um, and we then got Senator Tan Parker, um, who actually I mentioned that first political job back in 2014.

Logan Davidson: I was working for then Representative Tan Parker. Um, and he’s a prominent conservative in the Senate now, the chairman of the House Republican Caucus. So you had the, the right guys to get this done. Um, and that’s, we started from there. And then ran the most aggressive, most efficient, time constrained, stressful legislative campaign I’ve ever been a part of.

Logan Davidson: Um, I think Brian and I got very close for how many times we had to get on the phone to try to unravel and solve some Rubik’s cube, um, that [00:17:00] had just been thrown up at us. The number of times he called me and said, I’ve got a hot potato and I’m passing it to you. Uh, you know, I have no skin left on my hands from, from juggling hot potatoes.

Logan Davidson: Um, and then all of a sudden in May. We found out we were gonna get the $50 million. I, I knew from the beginning, oh, we’re gonna pass this thing, the legislature’s ready, folks are gonna support this, but how much money is it gonna be? Um, and, and someday, if you haven’t yet, I hope you have Brian on the podcast.

Logan Davidson: And he can tell you that I was encouraging him in January. You know, we should be willing to take 1 million, we should be willing to take 1000 and come back and get more money later, but let’s get this established. And he said, no, 50 million. And then he went into a negotiation with our state leaders and he said, no, 50 million.

Logan Davidson: Uh, uh, I think, I think you maybe have heard part of the story this infamous like hour and 30 minute meeting that he went into that was supposed to last half an hour and then all of a sudden we had the 50. Um, and that was, you know, such a huge moment. I actually think that day felt like the bigger achievement than when the bill was actually signed [00:18:00] into law, because that was the thing that seemed.

Logan Davidson: Inconceivable, even though Texas had the funds, um, to go from 2.1, 2.2 million for psilocybin in 20 21, 25 x that to 50 for I bga the substance people hadn’t heard of. That’s so far back in the drug development process. Um, but that’s where, where it really came from. And I think there’s a few key things.

Logan Davidson: I’ll finish this long answer, but just a few key things that the legislature really. Latched in on one was a treatment for opioid use disorder. That was huge. Two was the stories from special operations veterans of how it helped him, whether it be Marcus Latrell, Marcus Capone, Chris Thompson, but also especially Chase Rowens, who was able to connect the story of the special operations community to the addiction community.

Logan Davidson: He was injured in a training jump. The VA prescribed him Percocets and sent him on a decade plus, you know, Odyssey with addiction that he was finally delivered from a couple of years ago by Ibogaine. And those stories were so powerful and so compelling. The data from the Stanford study was great, but it was really the stories.

Logan Davidson: And [00:19:00] then the, the final piece of the story was the spouses, Amber Capone, Becca Thompson, Kristen Grier came and told the story of what it was like to be right on the edge of losing their husband if their kids losing their fathers, and then them going away essentially for a weekend coming back and all of a sudden dad’s home again.

Logan Davidson: And what that means to the family and what it means to the community. Um, so that’s how it came together, and a little bit of how we were able to pass that bill.

Joe Moore: Yeah. I love that so much energy in action. It must have been like edgier seat often. Um,

Logan Davidson: the, the whole way through. The whole way through.

Joe Moore: Let’s take one.

Joe Moore: Yeah. That, uh, Brian telling the story on stage was really something. Um, yeah. And I, I have to say, I really appreciate the, um, kind of dynamic duo feel you two have. Mm-hmm. Like, it feels, you know, you show up with a lot and he shows up with a lot and it’s very different. You know, um, yes. Yeah. Mm-hmm.

Logan Davidson: Yeah. Uh, I appreciate that.

Logan Davidson: Yeah. I do [00:20:00] think we’re a dynamic duo. Um, the, the evidence supports it as well. But yeah, we are very different people. He’s, you know, this towering figure with that Maine of red hair and that deep Appalachian accent, and I’m, you know, a kid out of the suburbs of Dallas-Fort Worth, um, who still looks a little bit like I’m in college at times.

Logan Davidson: Um, and, uh, Brian is such an incredible storyteller and order, um, and just a real, it is hard not to be inspired and fired up every day when you’re working with Brian. Uh, ’cause every time he talks it’s the, you know, it’s, it’s the, the halftime pep talk that you’re getting in the state championship, um, and then getting sit back out onto the field.

Logan Davidson: Um, it’s a really great, really great partnership.

Joe Moore: I haven’t had him on yet to talk about this, I really want to, but there, there was this, um, moment, he was on stage with Sue Sicily at South by Southwest. Mm-hmm. And, um, Brian was kind of like laying out a lot of his history in Kentucky. Mm-hmm. And a lot of problems that were in Kentucky.

Joe Moore: [00:21:00] Mm-hmm. Um, do, do you know if he’s still developing those ideas or working on that story at all? About like, what he encountered there? Or is he just kind of head down on this other stuff? Uh,

Logan Davidson: yeah, that’s an interesting question. Um, I think he’s pretty much head down this other stuff there. Kentucky’s on the Americans for IGA list.

Logan Davidson: They’ve got, you know, supporters in the legislature. They’ve obviously got really strong community support. Um, a lot of desks got kicked up around it, back when it was the Kentucky IGA initiative. So he’s certainly still working in Kentucky. Um, still wants to bring it home. Um, I do think he’s quite busy looking at other states and, and coming outta Aspen.

Logan Davidson: There’s even more states on the agenda now. Um, but I do think he still has some, some time and attention for Kentucky.

Joe Moore: Cool. Yeah, I love hearing that. Yeah. I’ll, I’ll get with him on the more controversial aspects of that. ’cause it’s so exciting and interesting and I, I really, I really wanna see him get loud with that.

Joe Moore: Um, it’s like

Logan Davidson: one of the first [00:22:00] psychedelic advocacy political stories that has kind of real political intrigue in it, right?

Logan Davidson: Mm-hmm.

Logan Davidson: There’s act, you know, there were op-ed, there were hit pieces, put in newspapers and, you know, shadow fighting between state leaders, all with the back backdrop of a, you know, gubernatorial election.

Logan Davidson: It’s, um, it’s sort of, it’s sort of a made for TV story in a lot of ways. Oh

Joe Moore: yeah. Maybe I’ll try to buy the rights.

Logan Davidson: Yeah. Oh, there you go. That’s a good idea.

Joe Moore: Yeah. Um, that’s funny. So. All right. Um, one of the, one of the things that, you know, gets interesting when we start talking about Ibogaine is, you know, we have so much hope for it to help with addiction, um, in, in particular interrupting opioid addiction in a, in a really unique way.

Joe Moore: And then, um, you know, other addictions too. But then, um, you know, other things like this head injury story outta Stanford that, you know, vets and I forget, maybe it was Ambio was involved there. Mm-hmm. Yep. Ambio then, um, there was then, um, [00:23:00] yeah, brain injury, A-P-T-S-D. There’s, there’s a lot of potential conditions that could be treated.

Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. The one thing that comes up often to say, oh, I don’t, this is never gonna happen, or like, this is gonna take a long time, is the cardiac risk and have you like, you know, medically it seems like we can handle it really well. I would say that not all of the retreats are handling it medically, super skillfully.

Joe Moore: We’re still on occasion seeing deaths. Mm-hmm. Um, you know what, like are politicians or are, are people in the development like overly concerned about the cardiac risk? Or do they feel like it’s manageable from your perspective?

Logan Davidson: Yeah, that’s a great question. Um, I would not say folks are overly concerned.

Logan Davidson: I think they’re appropriately concerned. There’s a couple of dynamics here. One, there is this kind of overarching faith in the ability of our medical system to handle this. Whether it’s creating a solution like an iboga analog like Gilgamesh has [00:24:00] worked on that removes that cardiotoxic risk. Whether it’s having, you know, the acute care and necessary to respond in the event of an an adverse event or just learning more about a delivery protocol to, to mitigate and hopefully eventually reduce to zero the risk of a cardiotoxic event.

Logan Davidson: Um, but I do think they are, you know, so there is that. I do think another piece of it is. The risk inherent in any sort of significant medical event. So from the perspective of like a mental health treatment, the idea that it’s potentially fatal is sort of alien to us. Like, oh, you’re gonna go into EMDR and something can go wrong, and all of a sudden you die.

Logan Davidson: Like that doesn’t really happen. Right? But if you think about it in the terms of, it’s similar to like a surgery, it’s actually a lower risk or a very comparable risk to that you can, you can die of a surgical complication from getting your tonsils out. Um, you know, and you have to weigh the pros and cons and make a decision, you know, in consultation with your doctor and your family, um, on what is best for you.

Logan Davidson: And I think there’s an, an attitude that I began and, and other psychedelic assisted therapies, but especially ibogaine, [00:25:00] kind of falls into the same category, that it’s not such a significant risk that it is, that it is really any more risky than a lot of the other medical treatments that are relatively common.

Logan Davidson: And then the kind of final component that I would offer is the risk of not. Doing it. So I think this was a, a big part of the conversation we had around MDMA. I think we’ve seen it around other substances. We know for sure this many people are dying of deaths, of despair, su you know, suicide, alcoholism, drug overdose.

Logan Davidson: We know this is, we know we’re here and available treatments have us right here and there’s a treatment that maybe brings us down here. But then, you know, maybe as a result of that treatment, you see suddenly an uptick of deaths in another category. What’s the, not to be really cold about it, but kind of what’s the cost benefit analysis?

Logan Davidson: And at a certain point, isn’t the current level of death unacceptable. We have to try something new. Even if there is some risk with that new treatment, is it, are more people going to die from [00:26:00] suicide as a result of not getting treatment for PTSD or traumatic brain injury or die of a drug overdose than may die as a result of this treatment?

Logan Davidson: And I, I think we haven’t, we don’t, we don’t necessarily have the data on that, but I do think just from a, a, you know, back of the napkin kind of math, you would see the overall deaths come way down if these substances were approved as a treatment. And that, I think is something that comes into play a lot for policymakers because 17 to 44 veterans die by suicide every day.

Logan Davidson: That’s a statistic that we all know used to be 17 to 22, you know, revised estimate, 17 to 44. The danger of being, uh, a decision maker, whether it’s an estate, legislature or certainly the federal legislature is you get hit with numbers like that all the time. And you can become very comfortable with that.

Logan Davidson: One in four children, you know, are food insecure. One in five children living in poverty, 17 to 44 veterans dying by suicide every day. That the idea of taking a risk to solve it becomes like somehow more stress inducing because you are [00:27:00] comfortable with this number. But for those who are not comfortable with that number, it’s basically a no-brainer that we have to do something.

Logan Davidson: This is unacceptable and, you know, uh, we must do right. And risk the consequences. And that, I think, is an attitude that they bring to the table.

Joe Moore: Yeah, it’s, um, it’s definitely important to have this conversation and, and talk about this cost benefit analysis and, and there is an aspect where it feels cold.

Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. There’s also an aspect where the existing treatments are garbage. And this is kind of where I exist in the psychedelic ecosystem often. It’s like, guys, yeah, there’s risk here. There’s a little bit of expense here, but that like if we’re doing cost benefit analysis, total cost analysis, and then like downstream benefits, it’s staggering.

Joe Moore: Oh yeah. Getting people back to their families, the, the integrated family life that’s possible after, you know mm-hmm. And the benefits from that versus deep addiction and harm. Yeah,

Logan Davidson: absolutely. Um, you know, Elliot Marse, I think is doing great research on that out at, out [00:28:00] at Berkeley. And, and his research has been hugely helpful in the advocacy space of kind of laying out the cost of not doing this, the cost efficiency of doing it.

Logan Davidson: And, um, you know, if you wanna, you wanna have a, a, a particularly American conversation. How about people just being able to show up to work at their full capacity? Again, the economic benefit of someone not being in the depth of depression or addiction is quantifiable and significant. And that’s one of the other like kind of exciting things you get to talk about, like when you’re thinking of the advocacy space.

Logan Davidson: We have 150 members of the Texas House, 31 members of the Texas Senate. Basically all of them are gonna make their decision a little bit differently, but they might get lumped into groups. And there are some who, it’s the data on how effective the treatment is. Some it’s the spirituality aspects, some it’s just the anecdote.

Logan Davidson: Some, it’s that the guy next to them is voting for it. And so being able to frame it in the conversation of the, the long-term impact of this is not just saving this life, but saving all the lives around them. ’cause we also don’t conceive of it really the other way. We don’t, you know, oh, [00:29:00] someone. Dies by suicide.

Logan Davidson: That’s tragic. They’re gone. How sad. But you don’t think about the fact that essentially every life immediately connected to them has been impacted. And some of them can be ruined by that reality. And so again, that comes back to the what is the risk here and what is, what is the greater risk and what is the greater cost to, to make an effective a treatment available, even with some physical risk, even with some risk that it won’t work.

Logan Davidson: You know, that’s also another piece. It’s not gonna work for everybody, but it’s gonna work for a lot more people than current treatments are. Right? I mean, these, essentially, the current treatment for opioid addiction is traditional, uh, rehab and then abstinence, which, if you’ve ever heard Brian talk about it, that’s got like an eight to 12% success rate.

Logan Davidson: You flip the script over to Iboga and you’re talking about eight to 12% is now the population that will not be successful versus the successful population. So there’s just, there’s a, there’s a lot there and a lot of really interesting angles and dynamics to that conversation.

Joe Moore: Yeah. So. The, yeah, the, [00:30:00] I wonder what the FDA thinks and how they would want to manage that.

Joe Moore: I hope there’s room for them to understand and characterize the cardiac risk better. I mm-hmm. Personally think, um, it’s under characterized the cardiac risk and as a result under like not as well understood as we should, you know, have it so that we can actually be speaking skillfully about it. I think, um.

Joe Moore: You know, there’s, there’s clearly best practices out there for, you know, how do we keep people safest. Mm-hmm. Um, you know, Baria and, and, um, Eastman have a lot to say on this, and I think, um, you know, plenty of other doctors too. Mm-hmm. Um, you know, there’s ways to do this really well. It’s tragic when we see people get hurt.

Joe Moore: But, you know, also there is this element of, and I’m, I’m not trying to do victim blaming here, but people when they often die, um, in these scenarios, they’re really, really weak from addiction. Right. You know, their heart’s really damaged, [00:31:00] and as a result, can they handle this stress? It’s not always the case.

Logan Davidson: Yeah. Yeah. And it’s why the medical screening is so important, but also why the research is so important. Part of why we don’t understand it is we have not been able to, uh, essentially have not been able to research it since the passage of the Controlled Substance Act, which puts us in this perpetuating cycle of, you know, we think we, we think it’s effective.

Logan Davidson: We don’t fully understand the risks and the burden to do the research to understand those risks is so high that we’re really limited in how much we can do. And until we see FDA approval for at least one psychedelic compound, maybe that then changes the conversation on scheduling for all of them or just each one individually.

Logan Davidson: We won’t see the depth and breadth of research that we really need to fully understand how to, how to treat people whose conditions can be effectively treated with these substances.

Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. Yeah. Makes, yeah. Amazing. So, um, do you think that there’s impact on, um, how this. [00:32:00] Development’s gonna be seen in the United States, um, if certain business people aren’t operating as safely as they could be safely and as high performance, you know, wise as they could be.

Logan Davidson: Yeah, I mean, the stakes are really high, right? Um, we talk, uh, somewhat often in the space, and I, I don’t think this is unique to Ibogaine, but um, very often in the broader psychedelic advocacy space, if something goes wrong in one of these clinical trials and even an international retreat, if it’s a particularly prominent person, if, if the treatment isn’t effective enough, anything like that can take all of the momentum that we have and send it back the opposite direction.

Logan Davidson: Right. So that’s certainly a, a concern. And so making sure that it’s done safely and effectively is so important. I think, you know, you mentioned business, which is a, I think, an apt thing to mention because a lot of times, and it’s, it’s not a criticism, it’s an observation. Business will cut corners. They wanna move as quickly as they can.

Logan Davidson: They wanna reduce costs, they wanna make it, you know, they, they’re, they’re serving their bottom line [00:33:00] shareholders, a particular end goal that isn’t necessarily the treatment and betterment of their patient. That’s not all businesses, right? That’s some of them. And so making sure that how this goes out, especially in the early years of this ibogaine drug development movement, the IBO verse as Brian dubbed it, uh, is absolutely critical because the potential consequences of something going wrong in any, any capacity in this, um, are, are, uh.

Logan Davidson: Cannot be understated. We cannot be overstated. The risk cannot be overstated.

Joe Moore: Yeah, absolutely. Um, you know, I, the late Great Nolan Williams had some really great lines about the promise of this molecule because it, it, he described it really well as a sort of very strange molecule. Mm-hmm. Very alien from what we are used to in terms of pharmacology in humans.

Joe Moore: And he, he kind of put it as kind of a, a gen two, gen three kind of psychedelic. And I think it goes beyond that. Um, [00:34:00] in a lot of ways. I, you know, I think there’s so much potential here are beyond addiction mm-hmm. And beyond, you know, p ts d Are you, are you hearing, uh, about any kind of like promising futures, um, with people kind of modifying the molecule?

Joe Moore: I know let’s, you know, not get too into Gilgamesh ’cause they’re, you know, made it shorter, made it maybe a little safer, but you know Right. That’s beyond that, beyond that kind of frontier.

Logan Davidson: Yeah. Yeah. Um, yeah, definitely. I mean, I think, you know, innovation is, is at the core of like, so much of what we do in the medical field, especially in the United States, but everywhere.

Logan Davidson: Um, it also, I think, would be naive not to note that innovation offers businesses like unique edges over one another. If you have a proprietary molecule, you can patent that molecule, take it to market, have maybe like a better profit, um, space than, than one who doesn’t have a proprietary molecule. The things that I’ve heard about, and I think you’ve heard of this too, and we’re talking about it with LSD and with psilocybin and with Igan and all of ’em, is removing the [00:35:00] trip.

Logan Davidson: We’ve had a lot of people talk about, you know, can you replicate the benefits without the psychedelic experience? Um, I think that’s a, that’s a totally understandable and, and correct. Conversation to have. I’m not a, a scientific expert, medical expert, mental health expert. I’m an expert in essentially nothing except the state legislative committee process.

Logan Davidson: Um, but certainly it seems a lot of the researchers, the folks who are smarter than me think you can’t really separate the trip that there is, that these two things have to work together, the physiological and the spiritual. But that I think, is a debate that we’re gonna continue to see play out for years and maybe forever, because I also think, you know, a little bit, let the market decide.

Logan Davidson: Let patients decide what they need, let people decide, but make it all available in a safe, therapeutic regulated way that you know what’s in it and you know what you’re getting. One of the other things that I’ve heard. Yeah, shortening it obviously is key to a lot of people, but then and neurodegenerative conditions come to mind as people think about Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s related to Ibogaine or think about the opioid use disorder [00:36:00] related to Iboga is either, if we better understand the molecule, can you tinker with it to create a version of ibo.

Logan Davidson: That is actually more effective for those neurodegenerative conditions versus an addiction issue and vice versa. Um, and really all conditions and that you can take this one thing that works pretty well for everything and then modify it a little bit and make it work really well for these specific things.

Logan Davidson: But part of it is we don’t understand it. I don’t wanna say at all. That would be, I think, a disservice to Nolan and Goul and, um, Dolly and everyone involved in IGA research. But there’s so much of it that we don’t understand, and you get into conditions that we are aware people are going to international treatments, that international retreats to, to receive treatment on Parkinson’s is a good example, but you don’t have the Stanford Parkinson’s trial.

Logan Davidson: You have the Stanford IGAN trial dealing with special operations veterans. So until we get that research and better understand how it works, we won’t really know the, the scope of our ability to tinker with the molecule and develop different compounds to treat different [00:37:00] conditions. But those are the things I’m hearing.

Logan Davidson: And the last one is what I think is really exciting, the idea that you can kind of optimize the molecule for a specific condition.

Joe Moore: Yeah, absolutely. Do you know, um, who some of the leaders thinking about Ibogaine and Parkinson’s are on the research side? Offhand?

Logan Davidson: Uh, no, not offhand. Um, mm-hmm. I’ll be honest, I, I’ve been so focused on the, the T-B-I-P-T-S-D piece mm-hmm. For years. Um, you know, OUD just got in, um, someone who I know who I have heard speak, you know, very intelligently and effectively on it, who I think just given the depth and breadth of her existing research would be a natural person to, to lead in that space is Goul Dolan.

Logan Davidson: Yeah. Um, you know, I’ve, I’ve been at two different summit conference type things where I’ve heard her speak on it, and both times there’s been a question on the neurodegenerative piece. Um, but other than that, no. I’m not sure who, who’s leading.

Joe Moore: Right on. Yeah, I’ll check in with Cool on that. It’s, um, always an interesting topic to me ’cause I so many people are suffering, [00:38:00] um, yeah.

Joe Moore: From so many different conditions, but neurodegenerative stuff, just so, uh, gutting.

Logan Davidson: So gutting and I think like terrifying to a lot of people. ’cause once it starts it’s, you know, there’s no stopping it. Mm-hmm. I will say, just as like a little anecdote, we did, uh, this ibogaine kind of educational event in San Antonio a couple of weeks ago as we’re kind of spreading the news across Texas that, you know, we’re, we’re leading on this issue.

Logan Davidson: And there’s a gentleman who came, he had come to an event with us in Austin and he came to San Antonio and spoke who was a Parkinson’s patient. And Iboga essentially gave him the ability to walk again. Just an incredibly powerful story. He had a slightly different treatment model than what we’re seeing, uh, like ambio for the veteran population for example.

Logan Davidson: But, um, it was great to have someone come and tell that story and I think offer that new ray of hope in this whole space.

Joe Moore: One person, uh. Stood up in Aspen and, and made a really interesting point. And I thought it was really, really useful given kind of the hype cycle that can exist around this stuff.[00:39:00]

Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. And, you know, um, this stuff still requires a lot of support, you know? Yeah. It’s not, it’s not a one shot, you know, two day treatment. Right. It, it, it could for opioid use disorder or other addictions be part of a couple weeks or month mm-hmm. Process. Right. You know, which makes it look a little bit more like a traditional rehab with an expensive drug intervention.

Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. But Brian talks a lot about how the, um, traditional, uh, rehab is, is a, you know, we’re kind of chasing good money after bad in a lot of ways because the performance just seems really low there. But this would actually, you know, based on our speculations, perform really well. Can you talk about like, you know, this, this kind of like, uh, hype cycle that might want to remove this need for.

Joe Moore: Additional psychological support services around this treatment. Yeah, yeah,

Logan Davidson: yeah. I mean, and we, yeah, let’s focus in on iboga, but also it exists like with all of these [00:40:00] molecules, right? Mm-hmm. Um, I think one. Part of it is this, I, I, I think it is human. I think it is also, especially American. And I, and I say that as a very, you know, very proud American and proud Texan, but this like, one and done, here’s the fix.

Logan Davidson: You have a headache, here’s an Advil, you’re done, you know, you have this condition, here’s the treatment. You’re done. Um, we, you know, e even, you know, you think about, I don’t know about you. I played rugby in college. How many of my friends got surgery and then skipped, skipped the physical therapy component so they could get back on the field and play again.

Logan Davidson: And I think that is like a perfect, at least close to perfect analogy for the way this works is IGA is like having surgery on your knee or your shoulder. And if you don’t go do the physical therapy after, and if you also don’t do the prep before the surgery, you’re just gonna get hurt again and maybe have a, have a catastrophic injury compared to what you’re.

Logan Davidson: Prior injury was. Um, but I think, I think there is this desire for it to be really simple and you go do this over the weekend and you’re all, you’re all better. Um, I also think [00:41:00] there’s a cost thought to it. How do you make it more accessible? Well, let’s just window it down to the smallest, you know, the most minimal possible delivery of care we can.

Logan Davidson: And then that’s the, the floor. And if you want anything above that, it’s extra instead of standardizing the necessary treatment that goes around it, which also I think is maybe like a very American proclivity. Um, uh, and then there’s also, you know, I think there are some people who, who in this space so much is driven by personal experience and anecdote right now.

Logan Davidson: And you have a ton of people who I think very honestly and accurately describe that IGA was a new beginning, but then the work really began and it’s mindfulness, it’s exercise, it’s diet, it’s gave them the, gave them the ability to kind of retake control of their life. I think there are also people who say.

Logan Davidson: I did, I began over the weekend and I’m good. I’m all better. I’m fine. I don’t need to go do all of those things. And so I do think there’s something incumbent as we explore the research side of this to try to make sure that we’re researching, [00:42:00] researching the difference in outcomes from people who do the integration, who do the, the therapy after, who do the prep, even who stay in touch with their cohort and, and have a peer support element to it versus those who don’t and track those outcomes.

Logan Davidson: I know Dr. Greg Fonzo at UT Austin’s McGill Center at the Dell Medical School, uh, is, is definitely very interested. And is it just the psychedelic or is it the psychedelic assisted therapy or is it somewhere in between or somewhere outside of that? Um, that binary. So, um,

Joe Moore: yeah. It’s just one of my favorite ones here, Logan, is, I think it was USANA ran a trial a while ago with people.

Joe Moore: Under the influence of anesthesia and psilocybin to see if there were benefits and there were benefits, which is fascinating and really challenging to a lot of people in the psychedelic space who think it needs to be both or, you know, I,

Logan Davidson: yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. It’s, and I like. And again, I’m not an expert or anything, but I think we should all maintain curiosity as we move forward and never be too certain.

Logan Davidson: It’s very dangerous to be certain about anything, um, because [00:43:00] if you’re even like 5% wrong on what you’re certain about, it can kind of lead to your house of carts crumbling, even if there actually was a really good foundation. So I think we don’t yet, we, we definitely don’t know how these work. I think we don’t yet know the best way to deliver care, um, with psychedelics.

Logan Davidson: Um, I think that’s something we’re gonna learn about over the next few years. And I’ll even go like a little further. I think we’re gonna get these drugs approved, get them into the world, and then still have at least another few years of refining the way that we deliver care. ’cause I think that’s just the reality of how basically every treatment and medication goes.

Logan Davidson: You get it out there and then you find out more of what it can be used for. Think about Wellbutrin, right? Uh, a treatment for depression and a number of other conditions, and also an off label, very effective treatment for A DHD. And until it got into the world, we didn’t know that. And so there’s just so much more we’re gonna learn.

Joe Moore: Yeah. Amen to that. Um, a story I like to tell just to like further this point is, um, I, I was in chronic pain from probably age like 22 to like [00:44:00] 33, 35, something like that. Um, really intense. MDMA and psilocybin use actually helped it go away. Mm-hmm. No clinician really made a meaningful difference in it over time.

Joe Moore: Um, but it was me, me, but, you know, there was a lot of context around that. It wasn’t just the, um, just the drug. Yeah. There was, you know, social, the different activities going on and stuff like that. So it was really, you know, fascinating and yeah. You know, worth not.

Logan Davidson: Yeah, for sure. Something that I think, and I’ve, I’ve, I think we may have talked about this offline at some point.

Logan Davidson: I’ve kind of waxed poetic on it for the last few months is, and, and, and I’m one of the people I think who has kind of helped make this happen, but we’re so focused on the medicalized version of psychedelics, and then there’s kind of the, the ritualized and theo church spiritual side of it. But some of the most incredible stories that you’ll hear.

Logan Davidson: Or people who did kind of heal alone or heal in a, in a context of friends and community. And we wanna make sure that people are accessing care safely. And you know, maybe the compounds they’re accessing in the [00:45:00] underground or from illicit, um, sources are not there. So I’m not in any way endorsing this, but you hear about people who go to a music festival with their best friends, right?

Logan Davidson: And they have this experience and it’s a set and setting, and they’re with people who they’re able to process things. And whether it’s a physical condition or a mental condition, there’s a whole element to the way that psychedelics work, even from the, the treatment perspective that we’re not really able to engage in because of the sort of strict limitations of advocacy and research.

Logan Davidson: But to your point, um, you know, there are all these people who have these stories about, I got it, I used it in my, my own setting, my own kind of container, and here are the benefits that I saw. But you can’t get that published in a journal. Um, at least not yet,

Joe Moore: you know, so we’re, we’re kind of working on case series like that.

Joe Moore: Um, there’s all sorts of really interesting end of once. That are finally getting put into literature. Um, I work at the, uh, psychedelics and pain association. We’re seeing a lot of that kind of stuff, you know, serious, like snowmobile accidents or ski accidents. One of my friends, actually, Logan, [00:46:00] he um, he had a really bad, uh, skiing or snowboarding accident in South America.

Joe Moore: Total paralysis, never gonna walk again. You know, months and months at the rehab hospital. Was doing mushrooms at a music festival months later. His toes actually started moving and now he’s walking, you know? Yeah, yeah. Psychedelics, it’s,

Logan Davidson: there’s, there’s a guy here who had a stroke who, you know, told his doctor he was gonna do it.

Logan Davidson: There was a conversation, but he’s similar to use psilocybin and had a, had a dramatically accelerated recovery timeline compared to other people. And those are things that I think are so interesting and, and one of the big reasons it would be great to see the federal government start putting significant funding towards psychedelic research and even other states, is there being a pot of money to better understand how that works and if it is a safe and effective treatment, make it available to everybody, not just the folks who know where to access, you know, these medicines and, and how to use ’em.

Joe Moore: Yeah. My, um. Final, final thing on this thing is the, uh, the recent trial with IV DMT for people in strokes [00:47:00] that looked really, really good. And I would be really curious to see what kind of like a low dose infusion of Ibogaine would do for a similar population, um, given what we know about TBI now. Um, so fascinating frontiers, everybody.

Logan Davidson: Yeah. Yeah. Really exciting stuff. And you know, even once we answer some of those questions, Joe, it will produce infinite new questions as we continue to go on this, on this journey.

Joe Moore: I wouldn’t have it any other way. So I wanna talk about national security concerns and psychedelics and, um, we, I love this kind of conversation.

Joe Moore: So, um, do you ever see the series Homeland? Oh yeah, absolutely. So. You know, I think this is a really cool like, kind of case right? Of um, a person in a pretty, you know, sensitive position in the government needing psychiatric care and not necessarily getting, you know, it’s a little more complicated than it not getting what they need.

Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. And, um, I think we see that [00:48:00] regularly. People with top clearances really, you know, serious info and, um, sometimes they can’t get the help they need inside the existing healthcare apparatus of the armed services or whatever it is. Mm-hmm. You know, sometimes they’re going doing cash pay with a clinician that is wildly, you know, not on the books, you know, and Right.

Joe Moore: Getting that care. And then we have, um. You know, service members receiving drugs overseas, you know, through different means. And you know, that’s kind of wild. Sometimes they’re exposing themselves to legal risk by buying locally, um, which could induce some sort of compromise, compromise situation. And then if we, if we look at scenarios like, um, psychedelic psychotherapies or, you know, interventions like Iboga, um, received illicitly.

Logan Davidson: Mm-hmm.

Joe Moore: You, you, you then kind of have an individual that has compromise over somebody with really, [00:49:00] you know, serious intelligence. And, you know, I’m not saying anybody in particular is a bad actor necessarily here. Like, I’m not naming names, uh, put it that way. And then, uh, you know, what does that, what does that mean for us as a nation?

Joe Moore: And, and this is kind of, this comes from us shooting ourselves in the foot with, um. The, uh, controlled substances act, right? Yeah. Generally, like we did this to ourselves, put ourselves in a compromised position, and should we, and you know what, what’s cool here is that it looks like there’s a path towards some sort of availability, you know, but we’re still exposed right now, and it’s a, it’s a real living threat.

Logan Davidson: Yeah, absolutely. I mean, I, I, I think we have socially put ourselves in these positions, various different positions over many, many decades. You think about there was a time in, especially within, in the United States, and not just the United States, where even, you know, being an a homosexual with [00:50:00] something that could be used against you and could end your professional career and or, you know, essentially destroy your personal life.

Logan Davidson: Fortunately, we are, we are past that, most of the way past that. But you look back and it’s okay, we created this framework by which we could be exploited, by which we were vulnerable, and it was an entirely, uh, a human made social construct. I think the Controlled Substances Act is a really good example of that as well.

Logan Davidson: Kind of like you noted. There’s lots of consequences of the CSA, um, more than we could get into and, and even a three hour podcast probably. But yeah, one of the biggest ones is all of a sudden. We made accessing this care something that, that put an individual at risk and then by extension puts an entire community or an entire country at risk.

Logan Davidson: And no, I don’t think we should, I think we should be careful right about the way folks can access this. And I’m, I’m very optimistic that in the next few years we start to see an acceleration of reform and reconsideration at the federal level. That will include, I imagine, national security concerns. But it’s something we see, you know, the military is not necessarily, uh, and the, and the national security apparatus [00:51:00] too, at the forefront of change, right?

Logan Davidson: They usually kind of lag behind it a little bit. And so I think you’ll see. Differences for folks who are in the veteran community, maybe who have a security clearance than you will active duty service members. One silver lining here is that it is something people are thinking about. You look at the Douglas Mike Day Act, which was passed as the Crenshaw Latrell Amendment, um, uh, led by Dan Crenshaw, Morgan Latrell to Congressman from Texas, shameless plug for the Lone Star State.

Logan Davidson: Um, and also both, uh, former Navy seals. And that legislation allows active duty service members to participate in this clinical research. And that was historic and essentially a first of its kind. Um, and that I think is the first small step in the right direction towards folks being able to access, uh, this care, not compromise themselves, not lose their livelihood.

Logan Davidson: That’s another piece of it. Say you have a top security clearance, you don’t wanna be compromised, but this is what you’ve done your entire life. Um, you have folks in that side of the world who entered their career at 18 or 19. That’s all they’ve done [00:52:00] forever. Um, so there is no real choice of do I keep this or do I give it up?

Logan Davidson: They, they have to do it. And if they wanna survive, in a lot of cases they have to sometimes engage in a treatment that can compromise that security clearance. So it’s a very fascinating space to play in. It’s a relatively small population, so it doesn’t get a ton of attention. Um, but it is one that I think at least major policy makers are thinking about.

Logan Davidson: Um, both in, I think if, if we’re honest, both about making sure that people in that population can access care, but also making sure humans are gonna do what humans are gonna do. So making sure that we’re, we’re not gonna be compromised for vulnerable as a result of that.

Joe Moore: Yeah, I think it’s super important and, um.

Joe Moore: Yeah, I think there’s so many, so many ways in which this is a, a, a a thing people could be looking at. Did you see the recent, um, grant from ARPA h kinda like a DARPA affiliate? Uh, I did. Yeah. I, yeah, I did. Um, very exciting stuff.

Logan Davidson: Yeah, I think that’s right.

Joe Moore: That sounds right. It was just yesterday, everybody, so we didn’t, [00:53:00] this hasn’t been assimilated yet into everything we do, but fascinating amount of money, um, coming from the feds, which is a huge move.

Logan Davidson: Yeah. Um, sorry, I just went and pulled up, pulled up the email that I got about it and it is a hundred, a hundred million dollars for the effort confirmed.

Joe Moore: Yeah. Amazing. You know, it’s fascinating to me that like the military apparatus has to actually, you know, step in, um, when, you know realistically, uh, federal science funding.

Joe Moore: Could really kind of do Right. Do a big part here. And that’s, I’m a, I’m a board member at the Psychedelic Medicine Coalition with Melissa Sani, and I’m really hopeful for her, her efforts at the federal level to, to hopefully unlock a lot of money. And there’s, there’s this kind of like exponential waterfall effect I think that would impact.

Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. Projects like yours with IGA and, and any other psychedelic project, just because there’s far more papers that everybody could be working with than just scaffolding the science and medicine.

Logan Davidson: Oh, totally. I mean, that is, I think it’s hard to pinpoint what [00:54:00] like the, you know, uh, uh, high water moment is going to be.

Logan Davidson: But I think unlocking significant federal dollars, like from my perspective, has to be it, the largest funder of medical research on the planet is the, is the federal government of the United States. Mm-hmm. And we’re essentially on the sidelines in this space. Um, uh, and, you know, credit to the philanthropists that have driven this so far, credit to the states that have put money into research, credit to the, the small amount of money that the federal government has put in.

Logan Davidson: But we all know we’re, we’re dealing with a, a small puddle of water compared to the ocean that exists, um, in broader federal medical research. And so someday we just gotta get our puddle of water into that ocean.

Joe Moore: So speaking of oceanic pools of cash, the big pharma groups, like what, what are you all kind of speculating on about big pharma generally in terms of when might they come to the table?

Joe Moore: ’cause they have plenty of money too, and they can do things pretty quickly.

Logan Davidson: Yeah, yeah. I think, [00:55:00] um, well the issue of, of big pharma generally is, you know, probably one of the, the. Most difficult touch points in this space. Um, I, you know, I’ll, I’ll offer my speculation. I won’t speak for anybody else. I think over the next three to five years, you’re gonna see major pharmaceutical companies start to engage in a much bigger way.

Logan Davidson: I think the first time one of these molecules gets approved, whether it’s psilocybin from Compass or sna or Lycos, you know, gets their, their additional phase three done and gets it in front of the FDA. Um, once that happens, I think that will be the major moment. This, the, the proof of concept has happened.

Logan Davidson: Um, you have a bunch of these small kind of startup pharma companies. I am certainly not a, not a, not a business expert, but I feel like if I were a multinational conglomerate, like you see from like Johnson and Johnson or Pfizer, the thought of like, oh, well let’s just acquire this new business unit and we don’t need to start over.

Logan Davidson: We can just do it, I think is a really realistic expectation for what’s gonna happen or mm-hmm. That they immediately begin working on [00:56:00] their own. Generic or, or, or, or comparable version of it. Um, there are many things that can be said about pharma. Many, most of them critical. But one of the, the, I think silver linings is they’re not gonna miss out on a profit opportunity or a market opportunity.

Logan Davidson: And so I think they’re absolutely going to take it and they’re just waiting for the next thing. You know, we, we don’t need to go in depth, but AbbVie’s deal with Gilgamesh, I think is a really, really instructive model for what you may see happen. Um, I also am reminded a little bit of the way that things work in the oil patch in Texas, during good times, you have a lot of expansion during, during bus times, right?

Logan Davidson: You have contraction. But a lot of that expansion looks like the major oil and gas companies acquiring smaller exploration companies, right? And so you have all the smarter startups, they do the work, they get it above, you know, this level, and then the big behemoth come and comes and acquires them. And that is my speculation for what I think is gonna happen.

Logan Davidson: And like psychedelic pharma development,

Joe Moore: that’s, that’s generally how I, um. I use a software [00:57:00] analogy ’cause that’s my background, but like, I think Okay. Yeah, there’s a lot there. Like you, you develop all this ip uh, this other group can make way more money off of it than you can they buy it and Yeah. Uh, yeah.

Joe Moore: And why wouldn’t they? Um, so yeah, I’m, I’m expecting to see a lot of m and a activity in the next year. Um, yeah, I think, I think you’re spot on that once we see FDA approval on one, we’re gonna see an acceleration. Um, yeah. I would hope it comes before that though. ’cause the, the results are so promising. We just keep getting breakthrough designation status on these molecules.

Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. You know, that to me is the signal. Um, yeah. You know, and, uh, I’m hopeful. Um, so Logan, what else, what else did we maybe miss that’s really important that, that people are curious about here?

Logan Davidson: Um, wow. Uh, that, that might be the hardest question you’ve asked me this whole time because there’s too much Um, because there’s too much.

Logan Davidson: Yeah, there’s too much. Yeah. Um, if there’s one thing that, that I have not gotten the chance to cover in a lot of podcasts or, or talks that we’ve [00:58:00] done ’cause everything’s so focused on what happened or what, or what happened in Texas or how did you get $50 million? Um, which I would encourage all of you to keep buying gas ’cause that gives Texas more money and then we will spend it on psychedelic research.

Logan Davidson: Um, uh, but is the kind of the role of a bunch of different advocacy organizations, a model that I’m really passionate about, which is the state model. I think a lot of people see all of this happening and they wonder, how can I get involved? And their first thought is, I should go work at maps. I should go work with Brian Hubbard at Americans For, I began, I should go join one of these national, you know, mission-driven organizations.

Logan Davidson: But what we’ve seen, um. Across the country is the really effective, really significant kind of surprise. Victories have been driven by people and organizations that are local to and dedicated to that state. You think about like the New Mexico psilocybin win that we got, and this, this legislative session that was of New Mexico by New Mexico foreign, New Mexico National partners didn’t come in until that was already cruising Texas.[00:59:00]

Logan Davidson: We had T 4G MH. Hawaii has the Clarity project and so I just, you know, if I can take a moment to get on a soapbox and plug that if you’re in a state and you wanna see change, the most efficient and effective thing you can do is start to engage your state. Find out who’s on the ground and working in your state capital.

Logan Davidson: If it’s nobody, that generally means it’s you. When you look around and wonder who’s doing this and there’s no one else and you have a, a passion and a commitment to it, then I think that that kind of falls to you. And if there’s already a state-based organization, join up with them and see how you can help everything from.

Logan Davidson: Volunteering at events, writing letters to members of the legislature calling if you’re comfortable showing up and going to meetings and kind of telling your story because these wins have, all the big wins have all been driven by folks who are, who are from those states, who care about those states, who have a personal connection to them.

Logan Davidson: Um, and so I think that’s something that kind of gets missed a lot as people talk about. And I, and I, you know, I talk about vets, for example, right? And it’s, but so often vets is collaborating with other organizations to get the win, and a lot of times it’s local state orgs led by [01:00:00] local leaders.

Joe Moore: Hmm. Yeah.

Joe Moore: And I, one thing I’d Aspen I was really inspired by was just how. Excited lawmakers were mm-hmm. Um, you know, people, elected officials in the room saying, you know, snarky stuff to me off the record. Well, I didn’t ask to go on the record with them, but, you know, saying, I just didn’t even know who I was.

Joe Moore: We’re talking about Suboxone and like kind of the racket around Suboxone. Mm-hmm. I’m pro suboxone, everybody, but there’s limits. There’s limits and there’s a lot of issues around it. And um, you know, just hearing lawmakers have that kind of sophisticated. Knowledge. Mm-hmm. And talking points. I don’t, you know, I don’t expect a lot from politicians.

Joe Moore: It was really great to get Nor should you. Yeah, yeah. It was really great. Like hear that and like, oh, okay, you guys understand that we need a new, holistically appropriate system and that people are just conning us as taxpayers. Regularly. [01:01:00] Oh yeah, yeah. And we could do so much better. I think that’s kind of, I think at the end of the day, that’s kind of the thing.

Joe Moore: Yeah. Maybe, maybe no utopia, but we could do so much better.

Logan Davidson: We can do better. Yeah. We can absolutely do better. We’re doing better now than we were a few decades ago, and we’ll be doing a lot better a few decades from now than we will, than than, than we are now. Um, and yeah, those politicians who, who get it, who see the change, and there were a lot of them in Aspen, I think there were even more who couldn’t quite make the trip.

Logan Davidson: Um, not to, to shamelessly push this again, but they’re looking for someone from their state to come walk arm in arm with them who can push from outside the legislature while they push from inside it. And so, um, I know you’ve got a lot of listeners and, and yeah, it’s a question I get a lot is how do I get involved and I think in a big way, like, stop looking for a seat at the table and just grab your chair and pull it on up.

Joe Moore: Yeah, I told a friend the same thing. I was like, Hey, I could probably get you on that board. Do you want it? Like, wait, really? I was like, yeah, it’s not hard. Yeah. Like people [01:02:00] need help. Like not enough people are stepping up. It’s not all that competitive. Yeah. And you know, well-intentioned people with some energy to spare.

Joe Moore: Please, please do it. Um, we need, this is an all hands on deck moment, kind of always has been. Mm-hmm. But, um, we can do a lot here in the next couple years to do a lot of good. Um, yeah. I’m trying to check my notes here. Do we do, um, final thing? Final thing, and hopefully this is relatively clean, but the, um, idea of, um.

Joe Moore: What does this deal look like for states? So we’ve got, you know, Texas and a few other states jumping in. Hopefully a big pharma group will jump in, a Texas university will be attached. And um, like what, what kind of benefits do states get and is there, um, yeah, like, I guess what is the hopeful long-term benefit look like to states in this kind of a participatory model?[01:03:00]

Logan Davidson: Yeah, absolutely. Well, outside of the benefit of getting Brian Hubbard to come to your state and getting to, to hear from him live, right? Um, uh, yeah, so the way the legislation is drafted is, it kind of puts the onus currently on the developer and the applicants to say, give us the best deal that you see realistic for the states.

Logan Davidson: I think there’s a couple of things that could come into play in each state. We will see how it goes. There may eventually become a standard model, um, where it’s just copy paste across every state, but likely the thing is, is it’ll be a little bit different for every single state things that I know have been proposed or, um, you know, discounted lower no cost access to the treatment, excuse me, for patients in that state.

Logan Davidson: Right. So that’s one of the things that’s come up, certainly in conversations about Texas. Texas put the money in to maybe develop this, this pharmaceutical. So at the end of the road, Texas patients will have access to it cheaper. There’s also conversations around revenue sharing, seeing a return on their investment, either just up to the amount they invested or maybe even more [01:04:00] royalty payments, that kind of thing.

Logan Davidson: And I think if you really see, if you see the full vision of what is possible here, which is, you know, I don’t think you’d ever get to 50, but a really significant geographically ideologically diverse set of states that come together to do this. Say you’ve got a, you know, west coast, California, Oregon, Washington, joining up with the Mountain West and Colorado and Nevada, and all the way across into the deep South and up into the northeast.

Logan Davidson: Mm-hmm. Then you start to have a really substantial conversation about changing the way drugs are researched and developed and doing it in a way that houses a lot of that authority and benefit in the states. We’re not there yet, but that I think is going back to something we said a little bit earlier about the entire space.

Logan Davidson: So much of this is being written right now. There’s so much innovation that’s gonna happen. I made an analogy last year in a conversation with a bunch of people at a conference that like, we’re staring at a blank page and it’s an incredible burden and an incredible opportunity and we’re gonna put some things on the page that don’t work and we’ll cross those out and we’ll keep trying new things.

Logan Davidson: But those are the [01:05:00] kind of the key benefits to the states that I understand from the way the I Begin initiative can go is some revenue and then also reducing the cost. And then the final point is that revenue can then go to support all kinds of public services. A portion of any revenue Texas gets is dedicated to veteran services in the state.

Logan Davidson: You could see the same thing happen in states that maybe were hit a little bit harder or, or had more acute experiences with the opioid crisis supporting traditional wraparound treatments there, or emergency intervention, or even start to see, you know, a lot of times there’s a casino in your state, the tax revenue from that goes to public safety.

Logan Davidson: So what does it mean when that revenue generator for your state is a, you know, is a pharmaceutical that’s helping heal people. You know, Dr. Dream, no small dreams, right? Be as flexible and innovative as you want, go to your legislature and say, I think this is a good idea. Um, they don’t have many good ideas in legislatures, so bring your good one.

Logan Davidson: And I’m sure, uh, folks will engage with it in a really positive way.

Joe Moore: Yeah. And um, I think finally on that, to extend that point, you made a great point and it’s been about [01:06:00] just the energy of the local community being engaged. Mm-hmm. And having local champions is hard to overstate. You know, you can fly in people from outta state, but so what, what about that guy that’s in every single meeting?

Logan Davidson: Oh, yeah. Oh, I mean, I mean, I can’t tell you the number of times I, as a staffer in the Texas House would have a meeting with someone who wasn’t from Texas and. I can admit I absolutely took that meeting in a different context than I would have if they were from here. There’s a big attitude. If you’re not, you’re not from around here.

Logan Davidson: What are you doing in our legislature? Uh, what, you know, if, if, if you’re from Texas and you’re in Nebraska, you’re gonna get the question, what are you doing in Nebraska? But if you are from that state and passionate and, uh, and especially a community leader, and that doesn’t necessarily mean you hold some elected position or appointed position, maybe you’re just a good neighbor and a good friend and you should, you know, you coach your little league team.

Logan Davidson: And so when someone sees you leading on this initiative, it creates a permission structure for them to get involved, but also exposes them to this from a [01:07:00] totally trusted, credible messenger. That otherwise wouldn’t exist. And we’ve got local leaders all over the country. I’ve mentioned a couple of them, but from the Ivy game perspective, you’ve got Sally Roberts in North Carolina, Nate Morgans in Oklahoma, um, you know, Ricky in Tennessee, chase in Texas, who have really taken up the mantle of this cause and said, we’re gonna go, we’re willing to put our reputation on the line.

Logan Davidson: We’re willing to, you know, do the interviews, show up on, on podcasts, and post more on our social media accounts. And those are the things that really drive change. It all comes together. Identifying any one thing is a bit of a fallacy because it requires everything. Every single player on the basketball court is necessary to get a win.

Logan Davidson: Um, or a football field. If you’re a fan of Texas Tech football, every player on the field is gonna get us a win. Um, but that’s a really impactful one. That’s someone who maybe walks away with the game ball, is that local leader who leverages that credibility and those local relationships.

Joe Moore: Yeah. I love that.

Joe Moore: All right, Logan. Um, where can people find you online?

Logan Davidson: Uh, yeah, you can find me, uh, uh, at Logan Davidson, [01:08:00] tx. That’s my, my handle on Instagram and Twitter. But really, if you want to keep track of me and the work that I’m doing, uh, at t the number 4G MH, it’s text igra and mental health, and then at Vet Solutions is vets, and you can see all the incredible work being done on the advocacy space with those organizations.

Joe Moore: Amazing. Logan, thanks so much for your efforts. Thanks for joining us today, and hope we get to do it again.

Logan Davidson: Absolutely, Joe, this was great. Looking forward to the next time. Thanks.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on November 30, 2025November 30, 2025

International Conference on Assisted Dying and Other End of Life Care (ICEL5)

International Conference on Assisted Dying and Other End of Life Care (ICEL5)

The International Conference on Assisted Dying and Other End of Life Care (ICEL5) will be held in Brisbane, Australia from Wednesday 8th April – Saturday 11th April 2026. 

The Australian Centre for Health Law Research invites you to attend ICEL5 for an engaging program of interdisciplinary research on assisted dying in context. We welcome presentations illuminating empirical, ethical, legal, psychedelic and clinical perspectives on assisted dying and its intersection with other end of life issues. 

We hope you will join us for this stimulating three-day program of interest to academics, researchers, legal and health practitioners, policymakers and more. 

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on November 30, 2025January 5, 2026

The Ram Dass Institute of Psychedelic Studies with The Dying Inaugural Event on Maui

RIPS - LeadStory

The Ram Dass Institute of Psychedelic Studies with The Dying (RIPS) 

 brings together professionals from the conscious dying field and healthcare practitioners engaged in the therapeutic use of psychedelic medicine to: 

  • Advance research, education, and compassionate care at the end of life
  • Create a teaching and gathering platform
  • Learn and network with practitioners worldwide 
  • Share and integrate and grow best practices
  • Deepen our practice through shared wisdom 
  • Support this field being rooted in ministry, service, and love
  • Co-create sacred space amidst the mana and aloha of Maui

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on November 13, 2025January 21, 2026

In Aspen, a Bipartisan Strategy for Ibogaine Takes Shape as Advocates Confront the Limits of Traditional Rehab

American Ibogaine Meeting - Aspen Colorado 2025

ASPEN, Colorado — The drive into the Aspen Meadows Resort, with its open mountain views and Bauhaus-inspired architecture, offered a tranquil approach to what became one of the most strategically focused psychedelic policy gatherings of the year. Inside, at the Americans for Ibogaine (AFI) convening, the mood was not utopian but pragmatic — a coalition of researchers, lawmakers, veterans’ groups, communications strategists, and international observers trying to solve a problem the country has failed to contain.

Perhaps the most striking feature of the gathering was the atmosphere of genuine bipartisanship. In an era where cooperation is rare, attendees sensed an unusual alignment. “No one cares about the politics when they’re burying their kids,” said AFI front-man Bryan Hubbard, capturing the mood. The opioid crisis, and the parallel rise in PTSD among veterans, appears to have created a rare, shared purpose: building a new system where traditional approaches have fallen short.

Texas as Blueprint and Proof of Concept

Much of the attention centered on Logan Davidson, the strategist behind Texas’s ibogaine research initiative — the most ambitious and well-funded in the nation. Davidson walked attendees through Texas’s playbook: identifying bipartisan champions early, understanding opponents before they could mobilize, and producing constantly updated educational collateral to shape legislative conversations.

Texas, he reminded the audience, only moved because both parties recognized the scale of the crisis. Hubbard echoed this point: “Texas proved you can do this in the reddest state in America.” The breakthrough came from institutional credibility — with Baylor University, the Texas Tech University System, and the Menninger Clinic signaling they were ready to conduct rigorous research — combined with a disciplined political strategy.

One of the stories that circulated throughout the conference involved Bryan Hubbard meeting with government leaders that was originally scheduled for 30 minutes that stretched into 90, ultimately resulting in a major commitment of state-aligned support for the research effort. Hubbard explained why momentum shifted so rapidly. You listen to people, you handle their opposition, and you keep telling the same simple story.

Psychedelics Today Mug

The Cost Question — and a System Under Strain

Several policy advisors underscored that the United States’ addiction-treatment system is widely viewed as ineffective and increasingly expensive. Hubbard was blunt:
We’re spending billions of dollars on addiction treatment that doesn’t work. Most people are going through six, seven, eight rounds of treatment, and they’re right back where they started.

The financial burden is staggering. States often pay $150,000 to $200,000 per person across multiple failed treatment attempts — a figure Hubbard referenced as a driving force behind legislative interest. “What we’re doing now isn’t just ineffective,” he said. “It’s economically unsustainable.”

National averages back this up: standard inpatient rehab often costs $10,000 to $30,000 for a single 30-day stay, and yet relapse remains common. Against this landscape, ibogaine’s potential to interrupt opioid dependence in a single administration is what makes it politically resonant. As Hubbard put it, “Ibogaine isn’t a silver bullet, but it’s the only thing we’ve seen that can interrupt opioid dependence so quickly.”

Communications Strategy Comes Into Focus

A significant portion of the event explored how ibogaine is communicated in the public sphere. Several attendees pointed to media strategist Anne-Claire Stapleton as an essential, if understated, force shaping AFI’s narrative. Her approach emphasizes short, digestible stories from diverse voices, rather than clinical or technical explanations alone.

Davidson highlighted the power of informal political communication: What legislators repeat to colleagues over happy hour can be more influential than what they say on the record. Veterans’ testimonials, he noted, act as potent social proof. Hubbard summarized the strategy succinctly: “You keep telling the same story, and eventually people realize it’s their story too.”

Psychedelics Today Mug

Standards, Safety and the Long Timeline Ahead

A federal addiction-policy advisor raised a concern many share: ibogaine cannot be treated as a “one-shot solution.” Intake protocols and long post-care windows may prove essential. Hubbard acknowledged the challenge: “We’ve never had a tool that works at this speed, but that also means we need standards we’ve never had before.”

He noted that ibogaine clinics like Ambio, Beond, Mission Within, and Transcend each use their own methodologies. The United States will eventually require unified standards — something he informally referred to as an “Iboverse,” a consortium of clinics and researchers shaping best practices.

Davidson also expressed interest in leveraging Gabon’s long-standing traditional use of iboga as a research opportunity. Representatives from Gabon, participating through live translation, urged researchers to consider observational studies of existing cultural practices as a globally efficient way to gather data. Davidson agreed, with the caveat that Texas’s legislation doesn’t formally authorize international collaborations — though future funding might. Hubbard and Davidson insisted that they will do everything in their power to include Gabon in a fair way in these developments despite the law not requiring it. A NGO, Blessings of the Forest, supporting Gabon’s Bwiti was there urging discussion around ethical commerce of Ibogaine.

Colorado’s Potential Role and the National Horizon

Colorado emerged as a likely next mover. According to Hubbard, Gov. Jared Polis has expressed interest in making ibogaine a priority, potentially positioning the state as a model for clinical access. Yet he cautioned that federal timelines remain slow: “We don’t have twenty years. People are dying now.” The Colorado NMHA framework is slated to allow for state level access before accessible in more traditional pathways to market in less than two years.

At the national level, figures from across the political spectrum — including Newt Gingrich and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema — are reportedly monitoring AFI’s work, underscoring growing mainstream attention.

Psychedelics Today Mug

A Movement Taking Shape

Perhaps the most notable feature of the Aspen gathering was its sober realism. There was hope, but not naivety. Attendees noted that other states should conduct their own due diligence, examine AFI’s roadmap carefully, and consider alternative pathways, including state-level initiatives, international treatment options, and the current pharmaceutical pipeline. This includes the high-profile AbbVie acquisition of Gilgamesh Pharmaceuticals’ ibogaine-analog program, which could reshape the field dramatically in coming years.

Yet despite the complexities, Aspen felt like a turning point — not because consensus was reached, but because a viable map forward is beginning to appear.

As Hubbard put it:
“We’re not just trying to pass a bill. We’re trying to save lives.”

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on September 30, 2025October 7, 2025

Mary Carreón — Censorship, Psychedelic Media & Policy Crosscurrents

Joe and Mary dive into how platform censorship and shifting algorithms have reshaped psychedelic media, why DoubleBlind moved to a “newsletter-first” model, and what that’s revealed about true audience engagement. They reflect on the post-2024 MDMA decision headwinds, state-level policy moves (wins and losses), and how funding, politics, and culture continue to reconfigure the field. They also explore alternatives to alcohol, chronic pain research, reciprocity around iboga/ibogaine, and lessons from PS25 (MAPS’ Psychedelic Science 2025).

Highlights & themes

  • From platforms to inboxes: Social and search suppression (IG/FB/Google) throttled harm-reduction journalism; DoubleBlind’s pivot to email dramatically improved reach and engagement.
  • Post-MDMA decision reality: Investment cooled; Mary frames it as painful but necessary growth—an ecosystem “airing out” rather than a catastrophic pop.
  • Policy pulse: Mixed year—some state measures stalled (e.g., MA), others advanced (e.g., NM; ongoing Colorado process). Rescheduling cannabis may add complexity more than clarity.
  • Censorship paradox: Suppressing education makes use less safe; independent outlets need community support to keep harm-reduction info visible.
  • Chronic pain & long COVID: Emerging overlaps and training efforts (e.g., Psychedelics & Pain communities) point beyond a psychiatry-only frame.
  • Alcohol alternatives: Low-dose or occasional psychedelic use can shift habits for some; Mary stresses individual context and support beyond any single substance.
  • Reciprocity & iboga: Rising interest (including from right-leaning funders) must include Indigenous consultation and fair benefit-sharing; pace of capitalism vs. community care is an active tension.
  • PS25 field notes: Smaller, more manageable vibe than 2023; fewer “gold-rush” expectations; in-person dialogue beats online flame wars.

Notable mentions

  • DoubleBlind: Newsletter-first publishing; nurturing new writers and reported stories.
  • Psychedelics & Pain Association / Clusterbusters: Community-driven models informing care and research (cluster headache protocols history).
  • Books & media: Body Autonomy (Synergetic Press anthology); Joanna Kempner’s work on cluster headaches – Psychedelic Outlaws; Lucy Walker’s forthcoming iboga film.
  • Compounds to watch: LSD (under-studied relative to MDMA), 2C-B, 5-MeO-DMT (synthetic focus), and broader Shulgin-inspired families.
Transcript

This transcript was automatically generated and may contain minor errors or inaccuracies.

Mary Carreon: [00:00:00] Okay, I’m gonna send it to my dad because he wants to know. Here

Joe Moore: we go. Yeah, send it over. So, hi everybody. We’re live Joe here with Mary Anne, how you doing today?

Mary Carreon: I’m great Joe. How are you?

Joe Moore: Lovely. I actually never asked you how to pronounce your last name does say it right?

Mary Carreon: Yes, you did. You said it perfectly

Joe Moore: lovely.

Joe Moore: Um, great. So it’s been a bit, um, we are streaming on LinkedIn, YouTube, Twitch X and Kick, I guess. Yeah. Kick meta. Meta doesn’t let me play anymore. Um,

Mary Carreon: you’re in forever. Timeout. I got it. I got it. Yeah.

Joe Moore: Yeah. I think they found a post the other day from 2017. They didn’t like, I’m like, oh cool. Like neat, you

Mary Carreon: know, you know.

Mary Carreon: Yeah. That happened to me recently, actually. Uh, I had a post taken down from 2018 about, uh, mushroom gummies and yeah, it was taken down and I have strikes on my account now. So

Joe Moore: Do you get the thing where they ask you if you’re okay?

Mary Carreon: Yes, with, but like with my searches though, [00:01:00] like if I search something or, or someone’s account that has, uh, like mushroom or psychedelic or LSD or something in it, they’ll be like, mm-hmm are you okay?

Mary Carreon: And then it recommends getting help. So

Joe Moore: it’s like, to be fair, I don’t know if I’m okay, but Yeah, you’re like, probably not. I don’t really want your help. Meta. Yeah.

Mary Carreon: You’re like, I actually do need help, but not from you. Thanks. Yeah,

Joe Moore: yeah, yeah.

Mary Carreon: So not from the techno fascists.

Joe Moore: Oh, good lord. Yeah. Uh, we’ll go there.

Joe Moore: I’m sure.

Mary Carreon: I know. I just like really dove right there. Sorry. Yeah. All right, so let’s,

Joe Moore: um, before we go, let’s give people like a bit of, you know, high kicks on, on who is Mary, where you working these days and what are you doing?

Mary Carreon: Yeah, thank you. My name is Mary Carryon and I am forever and first and foremost a journalist.

Mary Carreon: I have been covering, I say the plant legalization spaces for the past decade. It’s, it’s been nine and a half years. Uh, on January 3rd it will be [00:02:00] 10 years. And I got my start covering cannabis, uh, at OC Weekly. And from there went to High Times, and from there went to Mary Jane, worked for Snoop Dogg. And then, uh, I am now.

Mary Carreon: Double blind. And I have become recently, as of this year, the editor in chief of Double Blind, and that’s where I have been currently sinking my teeth into everything. So currently, you know, at this moment I’m an editor and I am basically also a curator. So, and, and somebody who is a, uh, I guess an observer of this space more than anything these days.

Mary Carreon: Um, I’m not really reporting in the same way that I was. Um, but still I am helping many journalists tell stories and, uh, I feel kind of like a story midwife in many ways. Just like helping people produce stories and get the, get the quotes, get the angles that need to be discussed, get the sentences structures right, and, um, uh, helping [00:03:00] sometimes in a visionary kind of, uh, mindset.

Mary Carreon: So yeah, that’s what I’m doing these days.

Joe Moore: Oh, there it is. Oh, there you are. Love that. And um, you know, it’s important to have, um, editors who kind of really get it from a lot of different angles. I love that we have a lot of alignment on this kind of, and the drug war thing and kind of let’s, uh, hopefully start developing systems that are for people.

Joe Moore: Yeah, absolutely. If you wanna just say that. Yeah, absolutely.

Mary Carreon: Yeah, absolutely.

Joe Moore: So, um, yeah, I almost 10 years in January. That’s great. We um, it’s so crazy that it’s been that long. I think we just turned nine and a half, so we’re maybe just a few, a few months shorter than your I love it. Plant medicine reporting career.

Joe Moore: That’s great. I love it. Um, yeah, so I think. I think one of the first times we chatted, [00:04:00] um, I think you were doing a piece about two cb Do you, do you have any recollection of doing a piece on two cb?

Mary Carreon: I do, yes. Yes. Wait, I also remember hitting you up during an Instagram live and I was like, are you guys taking any writers?

Mary Carreon: And you guys were like writers, I mean, maybe depending on the writer.

Joe Moore: And I was like, I was like, I dunno how that works.

Mary Carreon: Like me. Yeah.

Joe Moore: Yeah. It was fun. It was fun to work with people like yourself and like get pieces out there. And eventually we had an awesome editor for a bit and that was, that was really cool to be able to like support young startup writers who have a lot of opinions and a lot of things to point out.

Joe Moore: There’s so much happening. Um, there was so much fraud in like wave one. Of kind of the psychedelic investment hype. There’s still some, but it’s lesser. Um, and it’s really a fascinating space still. Like changing lives, changing not just lives, right? Like our [00:05:00] perspective towards nearly everything, right?

Joe Moore: Yeah.

Mary Carreon: Yes, absolutely. Absolutely. I mean, it’s interesting because the space has matured. It’s evolved. It’s different than it was even, what a, I mean, definitely nine years ago, but even five years ago, even four years ago, even last year, things are different. The landscape is different than it was a year ago.

Mary Carreon: And I, it’s, it’s interesting to see the politics of things. It’s interesting to see who has money these days given like how hard it is just to kind of survive in this space. And it’s interesting just to. Bear witness to all of this going down because it really is a once in a lifetime thing. Nothing is gonna look the same as it does now, as it, uh, then it will like in a, in a year from now or anything.

Mary Carreon: So it’s really, yeah. It’s interesting to take account of all of this

Joe Moore: That’s so real. Uh, maybe a little [00:06:00] too real, like it’s serious because like with everything that’s going on from, um, you know, governance, governments, ai Yes. Drug policy shifts. Drug tech shifts, yes. There’s so much interesting movement. Um, yes.

Joe Moore: You, you know, you, you kind of called it out and I think it’s really actually worth discussing here since we’re both here on the air together, like this idea that the psychedelic market, not idea, the lived experience of the psychedelic market having shifted substantially. And I, I, I think there’s a lot of causes.

Joe Moore: But I’ve never had the opportunity to really chat with you about this kind of like interesting downturn in money flowing into the space. Mm-hmm. Have you thought about it? Like what might the causes be? I’m sure you have.

Mary Carreon: Yeah. Yeah, I have. Yeah. I’ve thought about it. I mean, it’s hard. Well, I don’t know. I am really not trying to point fingers and that’s not what I’m [00:07:00] trying to do here.

Mary Carreon: But I mean, I think a lot of people were really hopeful that the FDA decision last June, not last June, the previous June, a year ago, 2024, June was going to open the floodgates in terms of funding, in terms of, um. In terms of mostly funding, but also just greater opportunities for the space and, uh, greater legitimacy granted to the psychedelic medicine space.

Mary Carreon: Mm. And for those who might not know what I’m talking about, I’m talking about the, uh, FDA decision to reject, uh, MDMA assisted therapy and, um, that whole, that whole thing that happened, I’m sure if it, you didn’t even have to really understand what was going on in order to get wind of that wild situation.

Mary Carreon: Um, so, so maybe, yeah. You probably know what I’m talking about, but I, I do think that that had a great impact on this space. Do I think it was detrimental to this space? [00:08:00] I don’t think so. We are in a growth spurt, you know, like we are growing and growing pains happen when you are evolving and changing and learning and figuring out the way forward.

Mary Carreon: So I think it was kind of a natural process for all of this and. If things had gone forward like while, yeah, there probably would be more money, there would be greater opportunity in this space for people wanting to get in and get jobs and make a living and have a life for themselves in this, in this world.

Mary Carreon: I don’t know if it was, I don’t know if it would necessarily be for the betterment of the space in general for the long term. I think that we do have to go through challenges in order for the best case scenarios to play out in the future, even though that’s difficult to say now because so many of us are struggling.

Mary Carreon: So, but I, but I have hope and, and that statement is coming from a place of hope for the future of this space and this culture.

Joe Moore: Yeah. It’s, um, I’m with [00:09:00] you. Like we have to see boom bust cycles. We have to see growth and contraction just like natural ecosystems do.

Mary Carreon: Absolutely, absolutely. It has to be that way.

Mary Carreon: And if it’s not that way, then ifs, if. It’s, it like what forms in place of that is a big bubble or like a, a hot air balloon that’s inevitably going to pop, which, like, we are kind of experiencing that. But I think that the, I think that the, um, the, the air letting out of the balloon right now is a much softer experience than it would be if everything was just like a green light all the way forward, if that makes sense.

Mary Carreon: So,

Joe Moore: right. And there’s, there’s so many factors. Like I’m, I’m thinking about, uh, metas censorship like we were talking about before. Yes. Other big tech censorship, right? Mm-hmm. SEO shifts.

Mary Carreon: Oh. Um, yes, absolutely. Also, uh, there were some pretty major initiatives on the state level that did not pass also this past year that really would’ve also kind of [00:10:00] helped the landscape a little bit.

Mary Carreon: Um. In terms of creating jobs, in terms of creating opportunities for funding, in terms of having more, uh, like the perception of safer money flow into the space and that, you know, those, those things didn’t happen. For instance, the measure for in Massachusetts that didn’t go through and just, you know, other things that didn’t happen.

Mary Carreon: However, there have been really good things too, in terms of, uh, legalization or various forms of legalization, and that’s in New Mexico, so we can’t, you know, forget that there, and we also can’t forget just the movement happening in Colorado. So there are really great things happening and the, the movement is still moving forward.

Mary Carreon: Everything is still going. It’s just a little more difficult than maybe it could have been

Joe Moore: right. Yeah. Amen. Amen. Yes. But also, we

Mary Carreon: can’t forget this censorship thing. The censorship thing is a horse shit. Sorry. I’m not sure if I’m allowed to cuss, but it is, [00:11:00] but it is

Joe Moore: calling it out and it’s important to say this stuff.

Joe Moore: And you know, folks, if you want to support independent media, please consider supporting Doubleblind and psychedelics today. From a media perspective, absolutely. We wanna wanna put as much out as we can. Yes. The more supporters we have, the more we can help all of you understand what’s happening and yes.

Joe Moore: Getting you to stay safer.

Mary Carreon: Yeah, absolutely. And that’s the whole difficulty with the censorship is that psychedelics today, and Doubleblind for instance, but also Lucid News, also other, uh, other influencers, other creators in the space, they like. What all of us are doing is putting out information that is ultimately creating a safer user experience.

Mary Carreon: And so with the censorship, we are not able to do so anymore, which creates actually a lot of danger. So. Yeah, it’s, it’s difficult. The censorship is difficult, and if you are somebody who posts about psychedelics, I know that you know this and I am preaching to the choir.

Joe Moore: Yeah. So can you talk a [00:12:00] little bit about you all at Double Blind made a major shift in the last number of months towards, uh, kind of not necessarily putting everything out there and, and kind of like, um, actually I don’t even know the language you use.

Joe Moore: What’s the, what’s the language you use for the kind of model shift you took on?

Mary Carreon: Yeah, I mean, it’s great. It’s been a wild shift. It’s been a wild shift. Um, what we are currently doing is we went to a newsletter first model, which instead of just posting onto a website for everyone to see, and then, um, you know, hopefully getting SEO hits and also posting on their, then posting those stories onto Instagram and Facebook and Twitter, and hoping to get traffic through social media.

Mary Carreon: Uh, we decided that that was no longer working for us because it wasn’t, um, because the censorship is so bad on, on social media, like on Instagram, for instance, and Facebook and Twitter, well, less on Twitter, [00:13:00] but still, nonetheless on social media, the censorship is so bad. And also the censorship exists on Google.

Mary Carreon: When you Google search how to take mushrooms, double blinds is not even on. You know, our guide is not on the first page. It’s like, you know, way the heck, way the heck down there. Maybe page 2, 3, 4, 5. I don’t know. But, um, the issue, the issue with that, or, or the reason why rather that it’s that way is because Google is prioritizing, um, like rehabilitation centers for this information.

Mary Carreon: And also they are prioritizing, uh, medical information. So, like WebMD for instance. And all of these organizations that Google is now prioritizing are u are, are, are, are organizations that see psychedelic use through the lens of addiction or through drug drug abuse. So [00:14:00] again, you know, I don’t know, take it for how you want to, I’m not gonna say, I’m not gonna tell anybody like what is the right way to use their substances or whatever.

Mary Carreon: However, it’s really important to have the proper harm reduction resources and tools available. Uh, just readily available, not five pages down on a Google search. So anyways, all of that said double blind was our traffic was way down. And it was looking very bleak for a while. Just we were getting kicked off of Instagram.

Mary Carreon: We weren’t getting any traffic from social media onto our website, onto our stories. It was a, it was a vicious kind of cycle downward, and it wasn’t really working. And there was a moment there where Doubleblind almost shut down as a result of these numbers because there’s a, like you, a media company cannot sustain itself on really low page views as a result.

Mary Carreon: So what we [00:15:00] decided to do was go to a newsletter first model, which relies on our email list. And basically we are sending out newsletters three days a week of new original content, mostly, uh, sometimes on Wednesdays we repost an SEO story or something like that. Um, to just to engage our audience and to work with our audience that way, and to like to actually engage our audience.

Mary Carreon: I cannot emphasize that enough because on Instagram and on Facebook, we were only reaching like, I don’t know, not that many people, like not that many people at all. And all of that really became obvious as soon as we started sending out to our email list. And as soon as we did that, it was wild. How many, how many views to the website and also how many just open like our open rate and our click through rate were showing how our audience was reacting to our content.

Mary Carreon: In other words. [00:16:00] Social media was not a good, in, like, was not a good indicator of how our content was being received at all because people kind of weren’t even receiving it. So going to the newsletter first model proved to be very beneficial for us and our numbers. And also just reaching our freaking audience, which we were barely doing, I guess, on social media, which is, which is wild, you know, for, for a, an account that has a lot of followers, I forget at this exact moment, but we have a ton, double blind, has a ton of followers on, on Instagram.

Mary Carreon: We were, we, we get like 500 likes or, you know, maybe like. I don’t know. If you’re not looking at likes and you’re looking at views, like sometimes we get like 16 K views, which, you know, seems good, but also compared to the amount of followers who follow us, it’s like not really that great. And we’re never reaching new, like a new audience.

Mary Carreon: We’re always reaching the same audience too, [00:17:00] which is interesting because even with our news, with our, with our email list, we are still reaching new people, which is, which says just how much more fluid that space is. Mm-hmm. And it’s because it’s, because censorship does not at least yet exist in our inboxes.

Mary Carreon: And so therefore email is kind of like the underground, if you will, for this kind of content and this type of material journalism, et cetera. So, so yeah. So it, it, it has been a massive shift. It is required a lot of changes over at double blind. Everything has been very intense and crazy, but it has been absolutely worth it, and it’s really exciting that we’re still here.

Mary Carreon: I’m so grateful that Double-Blind is still around, that we are still able to tell stories and that we are still able to work with writers and nurture writers and nurture the storytelling in this space because it needs to evolve just the same way that the industry and the [00:18:00] culture and everything else is evolving.

Joe Moore: Yeah, I think, I think you’re spot on like the, when I watch our Instagram account, like, um, I haven’t seen the number change from 107 K for two years.

Mary Carreon: Absolutely. Same. And, um, same.

Joe Moore: Yeah. And you know, I think, I think there’s certain kinds of content that could do fine. I think, uh, psychedelic attorney, Robert Rush put up a comment, um, in response to Jack Coline’s account getting taken down, um, that had some good analysis, um.

Joe Moore: Of the situation. Go ahead. You had No,

Mary Carreon: no, I’m just like, you know, I can’t, when, when journalists are getting kicked off of these, of these platforms for their stories, for their reported stories, that’s like, that is a massive red flag. And that’s all I have to say. I mean, we could go into more, more details on that, but that is a [00:19:00] huge red flag.

Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. Yeah. Um, for sure. The, I, yeah. And like I’m sure he’ll get it back. I’m sure that’s not for good, but I think he did. Okay, great.

Mary Carreon: I think he did. Yeah. Yeah, I think he did.

Joe Moore: Yeah. So thank you. Shout out to Jack. Yeah, thanks Jack. Um, and I think, you know, there’s, there’s no one with that kind of energy out there.

Joe Moore: Um, and I’m excited to see what happens over time with him. Yeah. How he’ll unfold. Absolutely unfold. Oh yeah. It’s like, um. Crushing the beat.

Mary Carreon: Oh yeah, absolutely. Especially the political, the political beat. Like, there’s no, there’s few people who are really tackling that specific sector, which is like mm-hmm.

Mary Carreon: So exciting for a journalist.

Joe Moore: Yeah. Um, so model shifting, like we all have to like, adapt in new ways. Kyle and I are still trying to figure out what we’re gonna do. Like maybe it is newsletter first. Like I, I realized that I hadn’t been writing for [00:20:00] years, which is problematic, um, in that like, I have a lot of things to say.

Mary Carreon: Totally.

Joe Moore: And nobody got to hear it. Um, so I started a substack, which I had complicated feelings about honestly. ’cause it’s just another. Rich person’s platform that I’m, you know, helping them get Andreessen money or whatever. And, you know, so I’m gonna play lightly there, but I will post here and there. Um, I’m just trying to figure it all out, you know, like I’ve put up a couple articles like this GLP one and Mushrooms article.

Mary Carreon: I saw that. I saw that. Really? And honestly, that’s a really, like, it’s so weird, but I don’t, like, it’s such a weird little thing that’s happening in the space. I wonder, yeah, I wonder, I wonder how that is going to evolve. It’s um, you know, a lot of people, I, I briefly kind of wrote about, um, psychedelics and the GLP, is that what it is?

Mary Carreon: GLP one.

Joe Moore: GLP one. Say Ozempic. Yeah, just, yeah, Ozempic. Yeah, exactly.

Mary Carreon: Yeah, exactly. I wrote about [00:21:00] that briefly last year and there were a bunch of people like obviously horrified, which it is kind of horrifying, but also there’s a bunch of people who believe that it is extremely cutting edge, which it also is.

Mary Carreon: So it’s really interesting, really fascinating.

Joe Moore: Yeah. Um, I remember Bernie Sanders saying like, if this drug gets as much traction as it needs to, it will bankrupt Medicaid. I guess that’s not really a problem anymore. Um, but, but, uh, but so like naming it real quick, like it changed the way we had to digest things, therefore, like mushrooms get digested differently and, um, some people don’t respond in the expected ways.

Joe Moore: And then there was some follow up, oh, we, in the regulated model, we just do lemon tech. And then I was like, is that legal in the regulated model? And I, I don’t know the answer still. Mm-hmm. Like there was a couple things, you know, if users know to do it, you know, I don’t, I don’t totally understand the regulated model’s so strange in Oregon, Colorado, that like, we really need a couple lawyers opinions.

Joe Moore: Right. I think

Mary Carreon: yes, of course

Joe Moore: the lawyers just gave it a [00:22:00] thumbs up. They didn’t even comment on the post, which is,

laughs: thanks guys. Um,

Joe Moore: but you know,

laughs: yeah. You’re like, thank you.

Joe Moore: Thanks and diversity of opinions. So yeah, there’s that. And like GLP ones are so interesting in that they’re, one friend reached out and said she’s using it in a microdose format for chronic neuroinflammation, which I had never heard of before.

Joe Moore: Whoa. And um, I think, you know, articles like that, my intent was to just say, Hey, researchers yet another thing to look at. Like, there’s no end to what we need to be looking at. Abso

Mary Carreon: Oh, absolutely, absolutely. You know, reporting on this space actually taught me that there’s so much just in general that isn’t being researched, whether that’s in this space, but also beyond and how, um, yeah, just how behind, actually, maybe not, maybe behind isn’t the right word, but it kind of feels from my novice and from my novice place in the, in the world and [00:23:00] understanding research, it’s.

Mary Carreon: Hard for me to see it as anything, but being behind in the research that we all really need, that’s really going to benefit humanity. But also, you know, I get that it’s because of funding and politics and whatever, whatever, you know, we can go on for days on all of that.

Joe Moore: What’s the real reason? What’s the real reason?

Joe Moore: Well, drug war.

Mary Carreon: Yeah. Well, yeah, definitely the drug war. Nixon. Yeah. Yes, yes, definitely the drug war. Yeah. I mean, and just the fact that even all of the drug research that happens is, again, through the lens of addiction and drug abuse, so

Joe Moore: mm-hmm. Hard to right. Yeah. Um, like ni a is obviously really ridiculous and, and the way they approach this stuff, and Carl Hart illustrates that well, and,

Mary Carreon: oh man, yes, he does.

Joe Moore: Like, I think Fadiman’s lab in Palo Alto got shut down, like 67, 66 or 67, and like that’s, you know, that was one of the later ones,

Mary Carreon: right? And,

Joe Moore: and like,

Mary Carreon: and here we are.

Joe Moore: The amount of suffering that could have been alleviated if we [00:24:00] had not done this is. Incalculable. Um, yes. Yes. Yeah.

Mary Carreon: I mean the, yeah, it’s hard to say exactly how specifically it would be different, but it’s difficult to also not think that the fentanyl crisis and the opioid addiction rate and situation that is currently like plaguing the, the world, but particularly the United States, it’s hard to think that it wouldn’t be, like, it wouldn’t be a different scenario altogether.

Joe Moore: Right, right. Absolutely. Um, and it’s, um, it’s interesting to speculate about, right? Like Yeah. Yes. Where would we be? And

Mary Carreon: I know, I know, I know, I know it is speculation. Absolutely. But it’s like hard, as I said, it’s hard not to think that things would be different.

Joe Moore: Right. Right. Um, I like, there’s two kind of quotes, like, um, not, this one’s not really a quote.

Joe Moore: Like, we haven’t really had a [00:25:00] blockbuster psychiatric med since Prozac, and I think that was in the eighties or early nineties, which is terrifying. And then, um, I think this guy’s name is James Hillman. He is kinda like a Jungian, um, educator and I think the title of one of his books is, we’re a hundred Years Into Psychotherapy and the World is Still a Mess.

Joe Moore: And I think like those two things are like, okay, so two different very white people approaches didn’t go very far. Yes. Um, yes and

laughs: mm-hmm.

Joe Moore: Thankfully, I think a lot of people are seeing that. Mm-hmm. Um, finally and kind of putting energy into different ways. Um,

Mary Carreon: yeah. Absolutely. I think, yeah, I mean, we need to be exploring the other options at this point because what is currently happening isn’t working on many fronts, but including in terms of mental health especially.

Mary Carreon: So mm-hmm. We gotta get going. Right? We [00:26:00] gotta get moving. Geez.

Joe Moore: Have you all, have you all seen much of the information around chronic pain treatments? Like I’m, I’m a founding board member with the Psychedelics and Pain Association, which has a really fun project. Oh, that’s interesting.

Mary Carreon: Um, I’ve seen some of the studies around that and it’s endlessly fascinating for obvious, for obvious reasons.

Mary Carreon: I, um, we have a writer who’s been working for a long time on a story, uh, about the chronic pain that has since. Become an issue for this, for her, for the writer. Mm-hmm. Um, since she had COVID. Mm-hmm. Since, since she is just like, COVID was the onset basically of this chronic pain. And, um, there she attended a psychedelics in pain, chronic pain conference and, uh, that has pretty much like, changed her world.

Mary Carreon: Um, well, in terms of just the information that’s out there, not necessarily that she’s painless, but it’s just, you know, offering a, a brand new, a brand new road, a brand new path that is giving her, [00:27:00] um, relief on days when the pain is, uh, substantial.

laughs: Yeah.

Mary Carreon: So that’s interesting. And a lot of people are experiencing that as well.

Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. So there’s, there’s a really cool set of overlap between the COVID researchers, long COVID researchers and the chronic pain people. ’cause there is Yes. This new science of pain that’s yes. Our group, PPA put out like a really robust kind of training, um, for clinicians and researchers and even patients to get more educated.

Joe Moore: And we’re, we’re getting, um, kind of boostered by cluster busters and we’re kind of leveraging a lot of what they’ve done.

Mary Carreon: Wait, what is a cluster buster?

Joe Moore: Oh gosh. Um, so they’re a 5 0 1 C3. Okay. Started with Bob Wald. Okay. Bob Wald is a cluster headache survivor. Oh, oh, oh,

Mary Carreon: okay. Got it. Got it. Yes. So they’re

Joe Moore: the charity that, um, has been really championing, um, cluster headache research because they found a protocol [00:28:00] with mushrooms.

Joe Moore: Yes, yes, yes. To eliminate. Mm-hmm. Yeah. Um, this really great, I

Mary Carreon: love that.

Joe Moore: This really great book was written by a Rutgers, um, I think medical sociologist or anthropologist psychedelic. Love

laughs: that.

Joe Moore: Joanna Kempner. Cool. Um, and it kind of talks about the whole, um, cluster busters saga, and it was, it was pretty cool.

Joe Moore: Nice. So they’ve been at it for about as long as maps. Um, oh wow. Maybe a little earlier. Maybe a little later.

Mary Carreon: I love that. Cool. I mean, yeah, that’s really great. That’s really great.

Joe Moore: So we’re copying their playbook in a lot of ways and Cool. We about to be our own 5 0 1 C3 and, um, nice. And that should be really fun.

Joe Moore: And, uh, the next conference is coming up at the end of next month if people wanna check that out. Psychedelic. Nice.

Mary Carreon: Nice, nice, nice. Cool.

Joe Moore: Yeah, so that, like, how I leaned into that was not only did I get a lot of help from chronic pain with psychedelics and going to Phish shows and whatever, um, you know, I, and overuse for sure helped me somehow.

Joe Moore: [00:29:00] Um, God bless. Yeah. But I, I like it because it breaks us out of the psychiatry only frame for psychedelics. Mm. And starts to make space for other categories. Mm-hmm. Is one of the bigger reasons I like it.

Mary Carreon: Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Yes. Yes. Which, like, we need to be, we need to, we, no one else is gonna do it for us. We like the people in the space who are finding new uses for these substances need to be creating those, those pathways and those new niches for people to then begin studying, et cetera, and exploring and yeah.

Mary Carreon: Making, making a proper avenue for,

Joe Moore: right, right. And, you know, um, I don’t know that this is a Maha thing, so No, I’m going there, I guess, but like, how do we kind of face squarely America and the world’s drinking problems? Not [00:30:00] knowing what we know now about alcohol, you know what I mean? And then like, what are the alternatives?

Joe Moore: You know, some, some writers out there on substack are very firm that everybody needs to not do any substance. And like all psychedelics are super bad and drugs are evil, you know, famous sub stackers that I won’t name. But you know, like what is the alternative? Like, I, like we have to have something beyond alcohol.

Joe Moore: And I think you’ve found some cannabis helpful for that.

Mary Carreon: Yeah, I, you know, it’s, it’s interesting because it’s, there are, there’s definitely an argument to be made for the power of these substances in helping, I don’t wanna, I don’t wanna say curb, but definitely reduce the symptoms of, uh, wanting to use or to drink or to consume a specific substance.

Mary Carreon: There’s obviously there is an argument to be made. There are, there is ano another camp of people who are kind [00:31:00] of in the, in the, in the, in the realm of using a drug to get off of a drug isn’t how you do it. However, and, and I do, it depends on the individual. It depends on the individual and the, and how that person is engaging with their own addiction.

Mary Carreon: I think for whether or not the substances work, like whether psychedelics work to help somebody kind of get off of alcohol or get off of cocaine or stop using opioids or, you know, et cetera. Mm-hmm. However, I think like, when the situation is so dire, we need to be trying everything. And if that means, like, if, like, you know, if you look at the studies for like smoking cessation or alcohol use, mushrooms do help, psilocybin does help with that.

Mary Carreon: Mm-hmm. But, you know, there’s, there’s a lot of, there’s a lot of things that also need to happen. There’s a lot of things that also need to happen in order for those, uh, that relief to maintain and to stick and to, uh, really guide [00:32:00] somebody off of those substances. Mm-hmm. It’s not just the substance itself.

Joe Moore: Right. So I’m, I’m explicitly talking like recreational alternatives, right. Like how do I Yeah. On per minute, like, am Anitas becoming helpful? Yeah, yeah. Are helpful and Yeah. Yeah. I think like even, um, normal. What we might call like normal American alcohol use. Like Yeah. That’s still like, quite carcinogenic and like, um, absolutely.

Joe Moore: We’re kind of trying to spend less as a country on cancer treatments, which I hope is true. Then how do we, how do we develop things that are, you know, not just abstinence only programs, which we know for sure aren’t great.

Mary Carreon: Yeah. They don’t work. Yeah. I don’t, it’s, it’s difficult. Mm-hmm. It’s difficult to say.

Mary Carreon: I mean mm-hmm. I don’t know. Obviously I, I, well, maybe it’s not obvious at all for people who don’t know me, but, you know, I exist in a, I exist in, in a world where recreational use is like, it’s like hard to define what recreational use is because if we are using this, if we are using mushrooms or LSD even, or MDMA, [00:33:00] you know, there are so many, there’s a lot of the therapy that can happen through the use of these substances, even if we’re not doing it, you know, with a blindfold on or whatever and yeah, I think like.

Mary Carreon: There is a decent swap that can happen if you, if you are somebody who doesn’t wanna be, you know, having like three beers a night, or if you are somebody who’s like, you know, maybe not trying to have like a bottle of wine at a night or something like that, you know, because like Americans drink a lot and a lot of the way that we drink is, um, you know, like we don’t see it as alcoholism.

Mary Carreon: Even though it could be, it could be that’s like a difficult

Joe Moore: potentially subclinical, but right there.

Mary Carreon: Um, yeah. Yeah. It’s like, you know, it’s, um, we don’t see it as that because everybody, a lot of people, not everybody, but a lot of people drink like that, if that makes sense. If you know mm-hmm. If you, if you get what I’m, if you get what I’m saying.

Mary Carreon: So, you know, I do think that there’s a lot of benefit that, I don’t [00:34:00] know, having, like a, having a mushroom, having a mushroom experience can really help. Or sometimes even like low dose, low doses of mushrooms can also really help with, like, with the. Desire to reach for a drink. Yeah, totally. And, and AMS as well.

Mary Carreon: I know that that’s also helping people a lot too. And again, outside of the clinical framework.

Joe Moore: Yeah. I’m, a lot of people project on me that I’m just like constantly doing everything all the time and I’m, I’m the most sober I’ve been since high school. You know, like it’s bonkers that like Yeah. Um, and you know, probably the healthiest event since high school too.

Joe Moore: Yeah. But it’s fa it’s fascinating that like, you know, psychedelics kind of helped get here and even if it was like For sure something that didn’t look like therapy. Yeah,

Mary Carreon: yeah, yeah, yeah. Absolutely. Absolutely. Yeah. I, I think, I think most of us here in this space are getting projected on as to like, you know, being like what Normies would consider druggies or something, or that we are just like, you know, high all the time.

Mary Carreon: Um, [00:35:00] I know that that is definitely something that I face regularly, like out in the world. Um, but, you know, I would also, I would also argue that. Uh, like mushrooms have completely altered my approach to health, my approach to mental health, and not even having to consume that, you know, that substance in order or that, you know, that fun fungi, in order for me to like tap into taking care of my mental health or approaching better, uh, food options, et cetera.

Mary Carreon: It’s kind of like what these, it’s like how the mushrooms continue to help you even after you have taken them. Like the messages still keep coming through if you work with them in that capacity. Right. And yeah, and also same with, same with LSD too. LSD has also kind my experiences with that have also guided me towards a healthier path as well.

Mary Carreon: I, I understand that maybe for some people it’s not that way, but, um, for me that substance is a medicine as well, [00:36:00] or it can be.

Joe Moore: Yeah. Um, so. What are, what are some things popping up these days about like US drug policy that’s like getting exciting for you? Like, are you feeling feeling like a looming optimism about a, a major shift?

Joe Moore: Are you kind of like cautiously optimistic with some of the weird kind of mandatory minimum stuff that’s coming up or?

Mary Carreon: Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I know that there was a huge, a, a pretty huge shift over at the DEA and I wish I remembered, I wish I remembered his name. The new guy who’s now, I believe the head of the DEA, I don’t know enough information about it to really feel a way.

Mary Carreon: However, I don’t think that he’s necessarily going to be serving us as a community here, uh, in the psychedelic space. I, you know, I just don’t think that that’s something that we can ever depend on with the DEA. Uh, I also don’t think that [00:37:00] the DEA is necessarily going to be. All that helpful to cannabis, like the cannabis space either.

Mary Carreon: Um, I know that, that Trump keeps kind of discussing or, or dangling a carrot around the rescheduling of cannabis. Um, for, he’s been, he’s been, but he’s doing it a lot more now. He’s been talking about it more recently. Uh, he says like, in the next like couple weeks that he’s going to have some kind of decision around that, allegedly.

Mary Carreon: But we will see also, I’m not sure that it’s going to necessarily help anybody if we reschedule two. Uh, what from schedule one to schedule th two, three, schedule three.

Joe Moore: Either way it’s like not that useful. Right. Exactly.

Mary Carreon: Yeah. Yeah, exactly. It’s, um, just going to probably cause a lot more red tape and a lot of confusion for the state rec markets.

Mary Carreon: So it’s like something that we, it’s like only ridden with unintentional, unintentional consequences. Unintended consequences. Mm-hmm. Because no one knows how it’s really going to [00:38:00] impact anything, um, if, if at all. But I don’t know. It’s hard, it’s hard to imagine that there won’t be any, uh, like more complex regulatory issues for business owners and also probably consumers as well.

Joe Moore: Hmm. Yeah. This guy’s name’s Terry Cole.

Mary Carreon: Oh, the new DEA guy.

Joe Moore: Yeah. Um, I don’t know much about him. Terry. Yeah. Terry, I would love to chat.

Mary Carreon: Yeah. Terry, let’s talk. I’m sure your people

Joe Moore: are watching. Yeah. So like, just let him know. We wanna chat. Yeah. We’ll come to DC and chat it out. Um, yeah. It’s, um, but yeah, I, Carl Hart’s solution to me makes like almost most of the sense in the world to just end the scheduling system Absolutely.

Joe Moore: And start building some sort of infrastructure to keep people safe. That’s clearly not what we have today.

Mary Carreon: No. But building an infrastructure around the health and wellness and uh, safety of [00:39:00] people is the exact opposite system that we have currently right now. Because also the scheduling system has a lot to do with the incarceration in the United States and the criminal just, or the criminal system.

Mary Carreon: So, so yeah, like we can’t disentangle the two really.

Joe Moore: It just started, um, I feel negligent on this. Uh, synergetic press put out a book like a year or two ago called Body Autonomy. Mm-hmm. Um, did that one come across your desk at all? Mm-hmm. No. I wish basically contributed. Oh, nice. A number of people. So it’s both like, um.

Joe Moore: Drug policy commentary and then like sex work commentary. Oh, nice. And it was like high level, like love that really, really incredible love that detailed science based conversations, which is not what we have around this. Like, that doesn’t make me feel good. So you should go to jail kind of stuff. Or like, I’m gonna humiliate you for real though.

Joe Moore: Ticket. Yeah,

Mary Carreon: yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Oh God. Uh, when you think about it like that, it just really also shows [00:40:00] just the uh, um, the level at which religion has also kind of fundamentally infused itself into the scheduling system, but also our laws, you know, like what you just said, this like, shame-based, I’m going to embarrass you and make you into a criminal when you know actually you are a law for the most part, a law abiding citizen, with the exception of this one thing that you’re doing for.

Mary Carreon: A, your survival and or your, like, your feeling good, wanting to feel good addressing pain. Um, there’s a large, uh, like noise coming out of the front yard of my house right now. Hold on. Just a, it doesn’t sound too bad. It doesn’t sound too bad. Okay. Okay, good. Not at all. Not at all. Okay. Yeah, I had

Joe Moore: people working on my roof all day and somehow it worked out.

Joe Moore: Oh, good. Um, yeah. Um, yeah, it’s, it’s fascinating and I, I’ve been coming around like, I, I identify as politically confused, [00:41:00] um, and I feel like it’s the most honest way I can be. Um,

Mary Carreon: I am also politically confused these days, impossible to align with any, uh, party or group currently in existence at this exact juncture in American history.

Joe Moore: I can’t find any that I want to throw my dice in with. Nah. This idea of like fucking way being. Like what is the most humane way to do government as a way it’s been put to me recently. And that’s interesting. So it comes down to like coercion, are we caring for people, things like that. And um, I don’t think we’re doing it in a super humane way right now.

Mary Carreon: Um, we, yeah, I am pretty sure that even if there was, I mean, I think that even if we looked at the data, the data would support that we are not doing it in a humane way.

Joe Moore: So

Mary Carreon: unfortunately, and

Joe Moore: you know, this whole tech thing, like the tech oligarch thing, you kind of dropped at the beginning and I think it’s worth bringing that back because we’re, we’re on all [00:42:00] these tech platforms.

Joe Moore: Like that’s kind of like how we’re transmitting it to people who are participating in these other platforms and like, you know, it’s not all meta. I did turn on my personal Facebook, so everybody’s watching it there. I hope. Um, see if that count gets,

Mary Carreon: um,

Joe Moore: but you know, this idea that a certain number of private corporations kind of control.

Joe Moore: A huge portion of rhetoric. Um, and you know, I think we probably got Whiffs of this when Bezos bought Washington Post and then Yes. You know, Musk with X and like yes. You know, is this kind of a bunch of people who don’t necessarily care about this topic and the way we do, and they’re like in larger topics too about humane government and like, you know, moving things in good directions.

Joe Moore: Um, I don’t know, thoughts on that rift there as it relates to anything you, wherever you wanna go. Yeah.

Mary Carreon: Yeah. I mean, I don’t think that they are looking at, I don’t think that they are looking [00:43:00] at it the way that we are. I don’t think that they can see it from their vantage point. Um, I think that like, in the, in a similar way that so many CEOs who run businesses have no fucking clue about what’s actually happening in their businesses and the actual workers and, and employees of their businesses can tell them in more detail.

Mary Carreon: Far more detail about what’s actually happening on the, on the floor of their own business. Uh, I think that it is something like that. However, that’s not to say that, you know, these, these CEOs who employ people who build the A algorithm are obviously guided to create the limitations on us as people who speak about drugs, et cetera, and are creating a algorithm that ultimately is looking at things in a very blanket way in terms of, uh, like we’re probably seen on the same level as like drug dealers, if that makes sense.

Mary Carreon: Which is obviously a much, you know, there’s, [00:44:00] it’s a very different thing. Um, so, you know, there’s like these CEOs are giving directions to their employees to ultimately create systems that harm. Information flow and inform and, and like the information health of, of platforms and of just people in general.

Mary Carreon: So it’s hard to say because there’s nuance there, obviously, but I would bet you that someone like Elon Musk doesn’t really have a full grasp as to the, the nuances and details of what’s even happening within, on the ground floor of his businesses. Because that’s like, not how CEOs in America run, run, and operate.

Mary Carreon: They’re stupid companies. So, so yeah. And I feel like that, like, that’s across the board, like that’s across the board. That’s how I, that’s probably how Zuck is operating with Meta and Facebook, et cetera. And yeah, just likewise and across, across the whole, [00:45:00] across the whole spectrum.

Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. Yeah. And I think, um, a thing.

Joe Moore: Then as the people like, we need to keep looking at how can we keep each other informed. And that’s kind of circling back to drug journalism like we do and like, um, other, other sorts of journalism that doesn’t really get the press it deserves. Right. And I’ve been getting far more content that I find more valuable off of tragically back on Zucks platform like IG is getting me so much interesting content from around the world that no major outlet’s covering.

Mary Carreon: That’s so interesting. Like what? Like what would you say?

Joe Moore: Oh, um, uh, certain, um, violent situations overseas. Oh, oh, got it. Yeah, yeah, yeah. And, um, you know, that America’s paying for, so like, you know, I just don’t love that I don’t have a good, you know, journalistic source I can [00:46:00] point to, to say, hey, like right.

Joe Moore: These writers with names, with addresses, like, and offices here. Yes. You know, they did the work and they’re held, you know, they’re ethical journalists, so yes. You can trust them. Right. You know what I mean? Yes,

Mary Carreon: yes. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I mean, all of this makes everything so much harder for determining, like, the censorship specifically makes it so much harder for the people to determine like, what’s real, what’s not.

Mary Carreon: Because, because of exactly what you just said. Mm-hmm. Like, you know, we are, we are basically what that means, like what is required of the people and people who are consuming information is becoming a smart consumer and being able to determine what’s real, what’s not. How can we trust this individual?

Mary Carreon: How can we not, which isn’t analysis process that all of us need to be sharpening every single day, especially with the advent of AI and, uh, how quickly this, this type of content is coming at all of us. Like, especially if you’re on TikTok, which many of us are, you know, like information comes flying at you 3000 miles an hour, and it’s sometimes [00:47:00] really difficult to determine what’s real, what’s not, because AI is.

Mary Carreon: AI is not where it’s going to be, and it still is in its nascent phase. However, it’s still pretty fucking good and it’s still very confusing on there. So, so again, like the media literacy of the people needs to be sharpened every single day. We cannot be on there, we cannot be on the internet existing.

Mary Carreon: That everything that we are seeing is real. Whether that’s about, you know, these, um, the violence overseas, uh, happening at the hands of the United States, whether that is, uh, even drug information like, you know, et cetera, all of all of it. Or just like news about something happening at Yellowstone National Park or something that is happening in the, uh, at like.

Mary Carreon: Um, like potential riots also happening at protests in downtown la, et cetera. Like all, all of it, we need to be so careful. And I think what that also, like, one way that [00:48:00] we can adjust and begin to develop our media literacy skills is talking to people maybe who are there, reaching out to people who are saying that they were there and asking them questions, and also sussing that out.

Mary Carreon: You know, obviously we can’t do that for all situations, but definitely some of them.

Joe Moore: Yeah, absolutely. Like,

Joe Moore: um, a quick pivot. Mm-hmm. Were you at PS 25?

Mary Carreon: Yes, I was. What did I think? Uh, you know, I, I was running around like crazy at this one. I felt like I didn’t even have a second to breathe and I feel like I didn’t even have a second to really see anybody. I was like, worry. I was jumping from one stage to the next.

Mary Carreon: However, I would say, uh, one of, one of the things that I have said and how I felt about it was that I felt that this, this event was smaller than it was two years ago. And I preferred that I preferred the reduction in size just because it was, uh, less over, less overwhelming [00:49:00] in an, in an already very overwhelming event.

Mary Carreon: Um, but I thought that from the panels that I did see that everyone did a really great job. I thought that maps, you know, it’s impressive that maps can put on an event like that. Um, I also was very cognizant that the suits were there in full effect and, uh, you know, but that’s not unusual. That’s how it was last time as well.

Mary Carreon: And, um, I felt that there was

Mary Carreon: a, uh, like the, the, the level of excitement and the level of like opportunity and pro, like the prosperous. The like, prospect of prosperity coming down the pipeline like tomorrow, you know, kind of vibe was different than last time. Mm-hmm. Which that was very present at the one, two years ago, uh, which was the last PS psychedelic science.

Mary Carreon: Yeah. Um, anyways. Yeah. But it was, you know, it was really nice to see everybody. [00:50:00] I feel like in-person events is a great way for everybody in the psychedelic space to be interacting with each other instead of like keyboard warrioring against each other, you know, uh, over the computer and over the internet.

Mary Carreon: I think that, um, yeah, uh, being in person is better than being fighting each other over the internet, so, yeah.

Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. People seem to be a little bit more civil in person.

Mary Carreon: Exactly. Exactly. Mm-hmm. And I think that that is something that we all need to be considering more often, and also inviting people from across the aisle to your events and creating peace, because in person it’s a little different than it is.

Mary Carreon: When you have the opportunity to, uh, yeah, like keyboard attack someone over the internet, it’s like, yeah. It’s just so silly. So silly. We look like fools. Like we look like absolute idiots doing that. And you know what? I cannot sit here and say that I haven’t looked like an idiot. So, you know, it’s like I’m not, I’m not talking from like a high horse over here, but, but you know, it’s like, it’s [00:51:00] better when it’s in person.

Mary Carreon: I feel like there’s like more civil engagements that we can all have.

Joe Moore: It’s practice, you know? Yeah. We’re learning. Yeah. We are. We should be learning, including us, and yes, of course. Um, I, I play a subtler game these days and, uh, you know, I, I, I, it’s better when we all look a lot better in my opinion, because yes, we can inform policy decisions, we can be the ones helping inform really important things about how these things should get implemented and absolutely right.

Joe Moore: Like,

Mary Carreon: absolutely. Yeah, it does. It does. Nobody, any service, especially these medicines, especially these sacraments, especially these plants, these molecules, et cetera, if we are all sitting here fighting each other and like calling each other names and trying to dunk on one another, when like in reality, we are also all kind of pushing for the same thing more or less.

Joe Moore: Mm-hmm. So a thing that [00:52:00] I, it’s a, it’s kind of a, I, I had a great time at PS 25. I have no, no real complaints. I just wish I had more time. Yeah, same. Um, same. Yeah. Our booth was so busy. It was so fun. Just good. And it was like, good. I, I know. It was really good. I’m trying to say it out loud. I get to talk at the conference before Rick did.

laughs: Oh, oh,

Joe Moore: the morning show they put us on at like seven 30 in the morning or something crazy. Oh my god. It was early. I dunno if it was seven 30.

Mary Carreon: That’s so early. That’s so early.

Joe Moore: Yeah, right. Like that’s crazy. I got zero nightlife in That’s okay. Um, I was not, I was there for work. Yeah,

Mary Carreon: yeah. I was

Joe Moore: jealous. I didn’t party, but you know, whatever.

Joe Moore: Yeah, yeah.

Mary Carreon: I did not party this time really in the same way that I did at PS 20. Was it 2023?

Joe Moore: 23, yeah. 23. I only stay up till 11 one night in 23. Nice.

Mary Carreon: Okay. Um, okay.

Joe Moore: So I behaved, I have a pattern of behaving. ’cause I like That’s good. I’m so bent outta shape inside going into these things. I’m like, I know, I know.

Joe Moore: And, and I’m like, oh, all [00:53:00] my friends are gonna be there. It’s gonna be great. And then it’s like, yeah. It’s mostly friends and only a little bit of stress. Yeah. Um, yeah. Yeah,

Mary Carreon: yeah. I had a, I had a great time. It was really good seeing everybody again. Like you, I wish that I had more time with people. Like there are people that I like didn’t even see who are my friends,

Joe Moore: so, which Yeah.

Joe Moore: Which is sad. That’s like a subtext in, in like the notes coming away from 25. Is that the, um, American Right, if we wanna call it that, is very interested in this stuff. Oh yeah. Like the Texas establishment. Oh yeah. Um, the Texas contingent, right? They’re deep. They’re real deep. Mm-hmm. I have, um,

Mary Carreon: let’s talk about that more.

Mary Carreon: Yeah. So

Joe Moore: it’s optimistic in, in some sense that psychedelic science is getting funded more. By states. ’cause the feds aren’t stepping up. Right. I love that. Right. Yeah. Like, Hey feds, look what we can do. And you can’t somehow, and [00:54:00] then, um, we’ll see if state rights stays around for a while longer, maybe, maybe not.

Joe Moore: And then the other part is like, is there a slippery slope given the rhetoric around addiction and the rise in interest in iboga for compulsory addiction treatment with psychedelics or, or compulsory mental health treatments with psychedelics because of the recent, it’s illegal to be a person without housing.

Joe Moore: Um, and you’re gonna get put in treatment. Mm. Like, that’s now a thing. So like, I don’t know, I don’t think forced treatment’s good at all. I, and I don’t think like, um, like the data is something like 15% effective, maybe less. Right. Right. It’s not a good use of money. I don’t know. We’re, let’s, I. You can go there if you want, and riff on that, or if you wanna talk about like, Texas, um, Arizona more generally.

Mary Carreon: Yeah. I mean, I will just say this, I also don’t really believe that forced treatment is like good, you [00:55:00] know, data

Joe Moore: says it’s bad.

Mary Carreon: Yeah. Yeah. I also, yeah, I mean, it’s like, I don’t know. Yeah, that’s, it’s complex. It’s a complex issue. I also don’t think it’s good, but I also do think that we need a much better framework and foundation for like, if people do want the help, helping them get it.

Mary Carreon: Much more easily and in a way that’s going to be beneficial for them. Um, and I don’t think that that system or that pathway currently exists as we saw in, uh, with, with, um, measure 1 0 9 and the failure of measure 1 0 9 or, or was it Measure 1 0 10, 1 10, measure one 10 in Oregon.

Joe Moore: But did you see the response yesterday or two days ago?

Joe Moore: No, I didn’t. No, I didn’t. I’ll I’ll send it to you later. Okay. So the university did the research, um, Portland State University did the research Yes. And said, Hey, look, there was actually 20 other things that were higher priority. Like that actually influenced this increase in overdoses, not our law.

Mary Carreon: Right.

Mary Carreon: Yes. It was really COVID for Okay. [00:56:00] Like for, yeah. Right. Absolutely. Also, there was not a. Like there was not a framework in place that allowed people to get off the street should they want to, or you know, like, like you just can’t really have a, all drugs are legal, or small amounts of drugs are legal without also offering or creating a structure for people to get help.

Mary Carreon: That, that’s, you can’t do one without the other. Unfortunately. That’s just like a, that’s faulty from the start. So that’s all I’ll really say about that. And I don’t think that that had fully been implemented yet, even though it was something that wasn’t ideal for the, um, for the, for the measure. And I believe it was measure one 10, not measure 1 0 9, to be clear.

Mary Carreon: Measure one 10. Um, yes, but confirmed one 10 confirmed one 10, yes. Mm-hmm. Um, but yeah, uh, that’s, you know, that’s kind of what I’ll say. That’s what I’ll, that’s where I’ll leave that portion. Mm-hmm. You know? Uh, but yeah, forced treatment. I don’t know. [00:57:00] We can’t be forcing, forcing people to do stuff like that.

Mary Carreon: I don’t know. It’s not gonna, it’s, yeah, it doesn’t seem

Joe Moore: very humane.

Mary Carreon: Yeah. No. And it also probably isn’t gonna work, so,

Joe Moore: right. Like, if we’re being conservative with money, like, I like tote, like to put on Republican boots once in a while and say like, what does this feel like? And then say like, okay, if we’re trying to spend money smartly, like where do we actually get where we want to be?

Joe Moore: And then sometimes I put on my cross and I’m like, okay, if I’m trying to be Christian, like where is the most, like, what is the most Christian behavior here in terms of like, what would the, you know, buddy Jesus want to do? And I’m just like, okay, cool. Like, that doesn’t seem right. Like those things don’t seem to align.

Joe Moore: And when we can find like compassionate and efficient things, like isn’t that the path? Um,

Mary Carreon: compassionate and t. Yeah, even, I don’t know, I don’t know if it looks lefty these days, but Yeah, I know what you mean. Yeah, I know what you mean. I know what you mean. Yeah. [00:58:00] Yeah. Um, yeah, it’s complicated. It’s complicated, you know, but going back, kind of, kind of pivoting and going back to what you were talking about in regards to the subtext, some of the subtext of like, you know, where psychedelic medicine is currently getting its most funding.

Mary Carreon: You know, I do believe that that was an undercurrent at psychedelic science. It was the, the iboga conversation. And there’s, there’s a lot, there’s a lot happening with the Iboga conversation and the Iboga conversation and, um, I am really trying to be open to listening to everyone’s messages that are currently involved in.

Mary Carreon: That rise of that medicine right now? Um, obviously, yeah, we will see, we’ll see how it goes. There’s obviously a lot of people who believe that this is not the right move, uh, just because there’s been no discussions with, uh, the Wii people of West Africa and, you know, because of [00:59:00] that, like we are not talking to the indigenous people about how we are using their medicine, um, or medicine that does like that comes from, that comes from Africa.

Mary Carreon: Um, also with that, I know that there is a massive just devastating opioid crisis here that we need to do something about and drug crisis that we need to be helping with. And this medicine is something that can really, really, really help. Um, I find it absolutely fascinating that the right is the most interested party in moving all of this forward, like psychedelic medicine forward.

Mary Carreon: And I, I currently have my popcorn and I am watching and I am eating it, and I am going to witness whatever goes down. Um, but I’m, I, I hope that, uh, things are moving in a way that is going to be beneficial for the people and also not completely leave behind the indigenous communities where this medicine comes from.

Joe Moore: [01:00:00] Mm-hmm.

Mary Carreon: We’ll see how it goes. Yeah. We’ll see how it goes. We’ll see how it goes. It

Joe Moore: would be lovely if we can figure it out. Um, I know, and I think, uh, Lucy Walker has a film coming out on Iboga. Mm. I got to see it at Aspen, um, symposium last summer, and it was really good. Mm. So I’m sure it’ll be cut different, but it’s so good and it tells that story.

Joe Moore: Okay. Um, in a helpful way. I’m gonna, I, yeah. I always say I’m gonna do this. I’m like, if I have space, maybe I’ll be able to email her and see if we can screen it in Colorado. But it’s like a brilliant film. Yeah. Cool. This whole reciprocity conversation is interesting and challenging. And so challenging being one of the few countries that did not sign onto the Nagoya protocol.

Joe Moore: Absolutely. We’re not legally bound, you know, some countries are

Mary Carreon: I know. Yes, yes, yes. So

Joe Moore: we’re, you know, how do we do that? How do we do that skillfully? We still haven’t done it with, um, first Nations folks around their [01:01:00] substances. Um, I think mushrooms are a little flexible and account of them being global, um, from Africa to Ireland and beyond.

Joe Moore: And, but you know, that’s, we still want to give a nod to the people in Mexico for sure. Yeah, absolutely. Absolutely. Yeah. Um, yeah. Yeah, it’s, I had some fun commentary there that I would love to flesh out someday. Uh, but yeah, it’s not for today.

Mary Carreon: Yeah, yeah, yeah. Um, there’s, yeah, there’s obviously, there’s obviously a lot with the conversation of reciprocity here and, um, I know, I, I don’t know.

Mary Carreon: I, I, what I do know is that we need to be listening to the indigenous people, not just listening to them second, like secondhand or listening to them, uh, once we have moved something forward, like actually consulting with them as the process goes. And that, you know, the way that both parties move, indigenous folks and, uh, western folks move, uh, are at inherently different paces.

Mary Carreon: And, [01:02:00] um, I just hope, and I wish, and I, I hope, I just hope that, uh, Western what, like the Western party, the western folks who are diving into these medicines. Slow the fuck down and listen and just are able to at least make one right move. Just one, just like you. Like it’s, doesn’t have to be this, it doesn’t have to be that hard.

Mary Carreon: Although the pace of capitalism usually propels, uh, the western folks at, at a much quicker rate than, um, yeah. Then it’s like at, at a dangerous rate, I believe through the eyes of indigenous folks. So we’ll see how it goes. Michael

Joe Moore: Douglas from Wall Street, like, it was like actually the devil, and like, I think there’s like this, this like capitalism will, somebody will do it if I don’t, and so, like, you’re right.

Joe Moore: Yeah. Speed. So if I choose to try to slow down Yeah. Immediate loss for me. Yeah. As an individual. Yeah. That’s how it’s perceived. Yes. Let’s not go deep down there. Where do you go? Where do, do sit with l [01:03:00] SD and md MA?

Mary Carreon: Where do I sit? Where do you mean? Like,

Joe Moore: should we, should we slow down with LSD and MD MAI

Mary Carreon: don’t think so.

Mary Carreon: I don’t think so. I don’t, I don’t think so. I mean, you know. It’s different with the molecules. It’s different with the molecules, I believe. Um, I think that we actually should be looking more towards, I think that we should be looking more at LSD in terms of the benefits that we could be reaping from that molecule, uh, in a similar way that we have been looking at MDMA.

Mary Carreon: We’ve been looking at MDMA for a very long time, and I think that we should give LSD the proper, uh, like the proper, uh, scientific analysis. And I don’t think that we are because of its, you know, like the way that it’s been, uh, projected through history. So, so yeah. Um, that’s how I, that’s how I feel about that.

Mary Carreon: And I think that, uh, there’s a safe way to do these substances and yeah. What about you, Joe?

Joe Moore: I’m gonna vote for two cb, I’m gonna vote for, um, five M-E-O-D-M-T ’cause there’s no indigenous use, [01:04:00] um, with the toad. There was YoPo and some other things, but like there wasn’t, wasn’t like we’re doing it today. Um, and then, okay, there’s so many other Shogun molecules we could look at and, I don’t know, three mmc, four MC.

Joe Moore: We got some, you know, Dr. Z molecules. That guy’s extraordinary. Dr.

Mary Carreon: Z.

Joe Moore: Mm-hmm.

Mary Carreon: Yeah.

Joe Moore: Uh, yeah, he was gonna headline our conference in LA when we were still gonna do that.

Mary Carreon: Oh, oh yeah. Oh yeah. Way back. I, yeah. Oh wow. I remember, I remember when you guys were doing that.

Joe Moore: It was gonna be fun. Yeah. Anyway, um, anything you want to give a shout out to as we kind of wrap up here?

Mary Carreon: I would just like to shout out you, Joe. Thank you for having me on. Thank you for still standing and existing and leading. Psychedelics today into the future. I think that’s really commendable and noble of you given how difficult it is to be running a media company, particularly in [01:05:00] psychedelics, but in general in media at large.

Mary Carreon: And, uh, I would like to also say, if you don’t follow me on Instagram, you can find me at Mary Prankster. That’s Mary, MARY, YY prankster. Uh, you can find me across social media there and also sign up for Double Blinds Newsletter. We send out, we send out, uh, stories. Uh, we have great journalists writing stories for us.

Mary Carreon: Uh, we send out Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and yeah, that’s pretty much it.

Joe Moore: Mary, carry on. Thank you so much for joining us and I hope we get to do more of this.

Mary Carreon: Yeah, absolutely. Thank you, Joe.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on August 15, 2025April 14, 2026

Toad, Truth, and the Trouble with 5-MeO: Why Bufo alvarius Needs Our Protection

The Sonoran Desert toad (Incilius alvarius, formerly Bufo alvarius) produces 5-MeO-DMT in its skin. Demand for that molecule now pressures a fragile animal. Retreats and celebrity stories fuel it. The result is stress on a wild species and its habitat. This piece is pro-facts, pro-ecology, and pro-ethics. Fund population science. Stop pressuring wild toads. Use synthetic instead.

Facts, not myths

These toads spend most of the year underground. They breed when summer rains come. They use temporary pools, canals, and other water sources. Counts swing. In some years people see many toads; in other years almost none. Rain, landscaping, and artificial water drive much of that change. A summer boom is not proof of health.

There is no verified ancient Indigenous practice of smoking toad secretions. The modern practice began in the 1980s after a self-published pamphlet by “Albert Most” (Ken Nelson) explained how to collect and smoke them. A later “revival” story tied to Seri/Comcaac people is false.

The pressures on the toad

Poaching is a problem. Capturing and “milking” toads stresses and displaces them; many die trying to return to their home ranges. But poaching is not the only pressure. Habitat is lost to development and water diversion. Road kill of amphibians here is substantial. Invasive bullfrogs prey on natives. Monsoon timing shifts with climate change. UV-B harms eggs and larvae. Chytrid fungus spreads fast and kills populations.

Two points:

• Sourcing claims are not verifiable in an underground market. Some try to handle animals carefully and release them where found, but illicit supply chains don’t work this way. Buyers cannot verify provenance.
• Good intentions can still cause harm. Moving amphibians or holding them in bins spreads chytrid. Ad-hoc captive holding drifts toward CAFO-like setups: crowded, unsanitary, and cruel. Toad tourism also adds lights, roads, and people to breeding zones, raising mortality.

Cartels have noticed demand. Reports from Mexico describe cartel-linked night harvesting and trafficking of toads and their secretions. When a wildlife product gets hot, professional exploiters move in and out-compete “ethical” claims.

Are toads endangered? We don’t know
We lack a modern, range-wide population study. The IUCN still lists I. alvarius as “Least Concern,” based on a 2004 assessment. California treats the species as extirpated. New Mexico lists it for protection. Arizona restricts collection. NatureServe calls the global rank “Secure,” but state ranks vary. We need data.

Next steps? Commission a government-backed, university-partnered survey across Arizona, New Mexico, Sonora, and Sinaloa. Map key breeding sites. Set baselines. Update status. Then wildlife agencies can use standard tools: habitat protection, permit rules, and, if needed, listings.

Toad vs. tryptamine

Chemically, 5-MeO-DMT is 5-MeO-DMT. Synthetic is the same molecule. Surveys and naturalistic studies show high rates of “mystical-type” experience from both synthetic and toad-sourced material. The animal does not add an extra essence beyond the molecule.

Toad secretions are a mix of 5-MeO-DMT and other alkaloids, including bufotenin, which may increase cardiovascular risk and body load. Ratios vary. Dosing is inconsistent. Synthetic avoids extra alkaloids and allows precise dosing.

Cost and scale also favor synthetic. Markets show routes from low-cost materials, even melatonin. There is no ecological or economic case for milking wild toads for a compound we can make.

A fair critique of synthetics—and the answer

Making fine chemicals produces waste. In regulated pharmaceuticals, ~5–50 kg of waste is generated per kilogram of product. Under prohibition, clandestine labs may dump solvents and reagents. Waste is a real problem. That does not justify wildlife extraction. The answer is regulated, above-ground production with enforceable environmental and worker safety standards. Decriminalization works

Why blanket bans are not the fix

Parts of the U.S. already restrict or ban collection. California treats the species as gone. Drug-war logic tends to make markets more dangerous. It does not solve root problems. Do this: reduce demand for toad-sourced material, improve lawful access to synthetic, enforce wildlife laws, and fund population science. If the data show a decline, apply the normal endangered-species rules. We need numbers and action.

The market problem

Some claim to harvest “ethically.” Buyers can’t verify. As demand rises for 5, the cheapest supply wins. Predatory actors keep “blood toads” in bins or a chain link fence. They are harvested repeatedly and moved between sites. Disease spreads. Welfare collapses. Buyers cannot easily distinguish between them at the time of purchase.

What you can do

• Choose synthetic, not toad. The experience comes from the molecule.
• Say so, publicly. Inform facilitators and retreat operators that you will not purchase toad-sourced materials. Push sellers to drop it.
• Support field work. The Tucson Herpetological Society’s Sonoran Desert Toad Fund backs monitoring and research.
• Read credible work. Start with Robert A. Villa’s biocultural history and conservation analysis, and Anny Ortiz’s myth-busting on “ancestral” claims.
• Educate. Informed consent should include ecosystem impacts. Share what you learn.

A personal note

I’ve worked in psychedelics for years. I don’t want a species’ blood on our hands. Our search for healing can cause harm. We should face that. We have a clean option here. Use the synthetic molecule. Leave the toad alone. If these tools connect us to nature, our methods should also honor it.

Editor’s note / Call to action

If this matters to you, donate to the Tucson Herpetological Society’s Sonoran Desert Toad Fund and share this article with peers who may not know the stakes. Choosing synthetic 5-MeO-DMT today helps keep wild toads in the desert tomorrow. Let’s work towards a safe supply for humans and toads.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on July 31, 2025August 6, 2025

Psilocybin Enters German Psychiatry: A Clinical Milestone for Mental Health

OVID CLINIC - German Update 2025

Germany’s decision to permit psilocybin therapy for patients with treatment-resistant depression—under a compassionate use policy—marks a pivotal shift in European drug policy. It may set a precedent for others in the region exploring psychedelic-assisted treatments.

Unlike centralized models that require regulatory approvals, Germany’s model empowers licensed psychiatrists to make case-by-case decisions on psilocybin treatment. They don’t need to submit individual applications. This professional discretion, paired with oversight from public health authorities, could pave the way for reimbursement by insurers and more scalable access to care.

OVID Clinic is leading the program. They are a private psychiatric center in Berlin, co-founded by psychiatrist Dr. Andrea Jungaberle and researcher and author Dr. Henrik Jungaberle. Both are longtime contributors to Germany’s psychedelic medicine movement and maintain close ties to the MIND Foundation, a nonprofit focused on science-based psychedelic education and ethics. OVID has been recognized for its integrative model, which includes virtual reality–supported psychotherapy and ketamine-assisted treatment alongside research-driven psychedelic care.

According to a press release issued by MIND Foundation and OVID Clinic, the psilocybin treatments offered through this program are part of “a multi‑professional and integrative therapeutic approach that takes into account the psyche, body, and life context in equal measure,” said Dr. Andrea Jungaberle. The model blends somatic and psychiatric insight with structured preparation and integration support.

Her co-founder, Dr. Henrik Jungaberle, emphasized that this program is more than just access to a molecule—it’s about embedding psychedelic treatment within a responsible care ecosystem. “With Compassionate Use, we are creating a clinical application space where research knowledge, medical care, and psychotherapeutic experience can be meaningfully combined,” he said.

Psilocybin—the psychoactive compound found in “magic mushrooms” (P. cubensis) has gained momentum globally as a potential breakthrough treatment for assorted depressive disorders (and much more), particularly for patients who haven’t responded to conventional treatments like SSRIs or talk therapy. Clinical trials in Europe and North America have demonstrated its ability to produce rapid and durable reductions in depressive symptoms, especially when administered with professional psychological support.

Germany’s move joins a patchwork of other European models that reflect growing interest—and divergence—in how nations are approaching psychedelic regulation. In Switzerland, a compassionate use pathway for LSD and psilocybin has been in place since 2014, though it requires federal approval for each patient. The Netherlands permits the use of psilocybin truffles (a legal workaround to the mushroom ban), fueling a booming retreat industry in what many view as a legal gray zone. Meanwhile, the Czech Republic is actively developing legislation to legalize psilocybin and MDMA for therapeutic use under licensed medical supervision—a sign of political openness unmatched elsewhere in the EU.

Public reaction to the announcement has been largely positive among leaders in the psychedelic field. Anne Philippi, founder of the Berlin-based New Health Club and U.S.-based New Health Institute, remarked, “This is an unexpected move for Germany, and I think the narrative around psychedelics as new tools to heal will be much easier to change. Public opinion will be affected by this tremendously.”

Her colleague, Philip Drechsel, added: “Germany’s move to allow psilocybin under compassionate use is both bold and overdue. It marks the start of a new era in EU psychiatric care. It’s a triumph of ethics, showing what’s possible when science and suffering are both heard.”

Germany’s model occupies a middle ground between central control and loose regulatory ambiguity. It allows trusted clinicians to act in the best interest of their patients while still operating within the clinical frame.

While limited to clinical contexts, the program’s launch marks a cultural turning point: psychedelic therapies are increasingly being treated not as fringe experiments, but as legitimate psychiatric tools.

Advocates of cognitive liberty, harm reduction, and trauma-informed care will note the momentum toward more humane, personalized, and integrative mental health systems.

More EU nations are exploring regulated access, and Germany’s experience could shape a broader continental conversation.

Beyond legal structures, this also raises more profound questions:

Who will receive treatment first?

How can clinicians be adequately trained?

How can we ensure that the unfolding psychedelic ecosystem prioritizes access, safety, and equity, not just innovation and profit?


Sources

  • Psychedelic Alpha
  • OVID Clinics
  • OpenPR: Medical Milestone Press Release
  • Mugglehead: VR and Psychedelic Therapy
  • MIND Foundation
Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on July 22, 2025

Karina Bashir on Psychedelics, Islam, and Human Rights

In this engaging episode of the Psychedelics Today podcast, host Joe Moore sits down with Karina Bashir, an attorney working at the intersection of law, business ethics, and psychedelics.

Karina, of counsel with Antithesis Law and an active member of the psychedelic community, shares her unique journey from human rights advocacy into the evolving field of psychedelic law. The conversation explores her presentation at Harvard on psychedelics and monotheistic religions, and her efforts to bridge the gap between Islamic communities and psychedelic-assisted healing.

She discusses the legal frameworks she navigates to support clients in the psychedelic ecosystem, the spiritual depth of Sufism, and the expansive tradition of Islamic philosophy and mysticism.

If you’re intrigued by the intersections of religion, law, and psychedelic healing, this episode offers deep insights and hopeful perspectives.


📌 Episode Highlights

00:00 – Introduction and Guest Welcome
00:19 – Meeting at the Psychedelic Safety Institute
01:04 – Karina’s Legal Work and Background
04:03 – Human Rights and Migration Work
07:30 – Psychedelics as a Human Rights Issue
18:01 – Legal Challenges in the Psychedelic Space
23:03 – Islam and Psychedelics
28:15 – The Fatwa Process and Islamic Scholars
28:57 – Building Momentum in the Muslim Community
29:08 – Islamic Law and Psychedelics
29:30 – Engaging Muslim Scholars and Community
33:45 – Sufism and Islamic Mysticism
35:09 – Access to Psychedelic Medicine for Muslims
36:49 – Positive Responses and Growing Interest
39:17 – Sufism’s Rich Traditions and Practices
40:51 – Intersection of Sufism and Psychedelics
44:14 – Islamic Cosmology and Psychedelic Experiences
51:26 – Concluding Thoughts and Future Directions

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on May 14, 2025May 21, 2025

Reflections on the 2025 Federal Summit on Psychedelic Medicine

Federal Policy Summit on Psychedelic Medicine 2026

By Joe Moore

A Historic Gathering in Washington

On May 8, the Psychedelic Medicine Coalition (PMC) convened a historic event at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. The first-ever Federal Summit on Psychedelic Medicine brought together over 100 delegates. This included lawmakers, scientists, veterans, healthcare professionals, and international policy leaders. As a result, the day marked a new level of seriousness and coordination in the national conversation around psychedelic-assisted therapies.

Leadership from PMC

Melissa Lavasani, Founder and CEO of (PMC), opened the event. While she first entered the space leading Washington, D.C.’s successful 2020 decriminalization campaign, her focus has since shifted to national policy. Today, she’s a leading voice in federal advocacy for integrating psychedelic therapies into mainstream healthcare. Under her leadership, PMC works across party lines to advance thoughtful legislation and convenes inclusive, solution-driven conversations — like this Federal Summit — to build the infrastructure needed for real, lasting change.

Congressional Support for Psychedelics

The Summit began with remarks from Representatives Lou Correa (D-CA) and General Jack Bergman (R-MI). Both co-chair the Congressional Psychedelics Advancing Therapies (PATH) Caucus. They emphasized the need for new mental health treatments, especially for veterans. Therefore, their bipartisan message signaled growing momentum in Congress. These two members of Congress also discussed their recently introduced VA Bill titled “The Innovative Therapies Centers of Excellence Act of 2025“.

Clinical Voices Call for Preparedness

Dr. Manish Agrawal of Sunstone Therapies spoke about choosing the right patients for psychedelic care. He stressed that while these therapies offer promise, true healing often requires years of follow-up and work.

Dr. Fred Barrett from Johns Hopkins University added that psychedelics seem relatively safe when used carefully. Still, he noted the FDA now focuses heavily on how long treatment results last (durability). This shift signals the agency’s growing interest in lasting mental health outcomes.

Rethinking the Role of Medicine

One key discussion focused on whether the medicine might do much of the therapeutic work. While many emphasize therapy alongside the drug, some speakers suggested the psychedelic alone may have significant value. As a result, this shift in perspective invites more profound questions about how these treatments are structured and studied.

Cultural Humility and Infrastructure Planning

Sarah Norman from Brain Futures called for more cultural humility in the field. She encouraged the community to recognize other valid systems of knowledge beyond Western science. Furthermore, she urged the development of affordable and free training, along with tools like checklists and informed consent for providers well before FDA approval. This preparation would help ensure a faster, safer rollout when the treatments become legal.

Don’t Overlook Pain

While mental health was the Summit’s focus, chronic pain came up several times. As someone working in that area, I believe including pain in this conversation is essential. It affects millions and could benefit from psychedelic treatments. Consequently, expanding the scope now helps build a stronger foundation for future care. Check out the Psychedelics and Pain Association’s free introduction class here.

Global Momentum

The Summit also drew participation from European leaders. Vojtech Nemec of Psychedelics Europe shared that the Czech Republic now officially approves and reimburses ketamine for mental health treatment — a major step forward for access. Nemec, who is also part of the European policy consultancy Nemec+Chvatal, praised the event and emphasized the importance of global collaboration in addressing shared mental health challenges. The Psychedelics & Healing Initiative within the Global Wellness Institute was also well represented, with leaders like Sa’ad Shah of Noetic Fund and Dr. Julia Mirer joining the conversation..

A Turning Point for Policy

As the Federal Summit closed, Melissa Lavasani summed it up: “This is no longer a fringe topic. It’s a serious, data-driven movement gaining traction in Washington.” Thanks to her leadership, PMC creates spaces where science, lived experience, and smart policy come together.

This Summit marked real progress. While challenges remain, the groundwork is forming. With continued collaboration and honest discussion, psychedelic therapies could reshape care for mental health, pain, and more in the U.S.

Disclosure: Joe Moore, author of this article, serves on the board of the Psychedelic Medicine Coalition.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on April 4, 2025October 27, 2025

The Tide Is Turning: Psychedelic Therapies Take a Step Toward the VA

The Innovative Therapies Centers of Excellence Act of 2025

A major bipartisan bill introduced on April 3rd in Congress signals a potential turning point in both psychedelic policy and the future of veterans’ healthcare. The Innovative Therapies Centers of Excellence Act of 2025, led by Representatives Lou Correa (D-CA) and Jack Bergman (R-MI), proposes the creation of new centers within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to study and offer access to psychedelic-assisted therapies.

If passed, the legislation would establish at least five “Innovative Therapies Centers of Excellence” across the U.S., where treatments like MDMA, psilocybin, ibogaine, ketamine, and 5-MeO-DMT could be administered in tightly controlled clinical settings. The bill reflects a growing recognition that traditional psychiatric and pain management approaches are not meeting the needs of many veterans—and that alternative treatments deserve serious scientific and medical attention.

What’s in the Bill

The proposed legislation outlines a comprehensive infrastructure for research, clinical care, and training within the VA system. It directs the VA Secretary to identify medical facilities with the capacity to partner with accredited medical schools, psychiatric training programs, and social work departments. These partnerships would support the development of clinical programs and ongoing research on therapies that, for decades, were relegated to the fringes of medicine.

Significantly, the bill includes chronic pain as one of the covered conditions, alongside PTSD, depression, anxiety, substance use disorder, bipolar disorder, and Parkinson’s disease. This is a meaningful expansion—it signals an understanding that the scope of suffering among veterans goes beyond trauma alone and into long-term, often invisible, physical pain that’s been poorly addressed by conventional pharmaceuticals.

Therapies explicitly named in the bill include MDMA (commonly associated with PTSD research at MAPS & LYKOS), psilocybin, 5-MeO-DMT, ibogaine, and ketamine. Other treatments may be considered at the discretion of the VA Secretary, opening the door for future developments as research progresses.

Crucially, these centers would also create national repositories of treatment data, facilitating broader knowledge sharing and transparency. Oversight would include annual reports to Congress, and advisory panels made up of researchers, veterans, and medical professionals—adding credibility and accountability to what could otherwise be a politically risky endeavor.

Vital Psychedelic Training
Learn more about our 12- month training program and sign up for the wait list for the next cohort at vitalpsychedelictraining.com

A Broad Base of Support

This bill isn’t just the product of a few voices. In addition to Correa and Bergman, the legislation is co-sponsored by Reps. Morgan Luttrell (R-TX), Ro Khanna (D-CA), and Dan Crenshaw (R-TX). It has also been endorsed by major veteran service organizations, including the American Legion, Veterans of Foreign Wars, Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, Disabled American Veterans, and the Wounded Warrior Project.

Veteran advocate Amy Rising, who has long championed cannabis and psychedelic therapies for veterans, highlighted the collaborative effort behind the bill:

“The result of all that listening and relationship-building is this bill—truly years in the making. And what’s especially exciting is that it has bipartisan support.”
— Amy Rising, as quoted in Psychedelic Alpha

Rising’s personal story—transitioning from prescription opioids to alternative therapies—underscores why this bill resonates so deeply with many who have experienced the limits of the current system. It also reflects the growing call for more holistic, person-centered approaches in mental health care.

A Watershed Moment

Melissa Lavasani, CEO of the Psychedelic Medicine Coalition (PMC), emphasized the evolution of the conversation around psychedelic medicine:

“This is no longer a fringe issue. It’s a serious, cross-cutting policy area with growing recognition on both sides of the aisle that we need to explore new approaches to care, especially for our veterans.”
— Melissa Lavasani, as quoted in Psychedelic Alpha

Lavasani also pointed out the more significant implications:

“This is more than a policy proposal—it’s a blueprint for a new era of mental health care in the United States.”

The bill’s structure is notable for its emphasis on clinical rigor and cross-institutional collaboration. Each center would be peer-reviewed for scientific merit and supported by advisory panels of medical experts and veterans. The VA must report regularly on outcomes, making the initiative actionable and accountable.

Why This Matters

It’s no secret that VA suicide and mental health statistics remain deeply troubling. Despite decades of efforts and billions in spending, suicide rates among veterans have remained stubbornly high—averaging more than 6,000 deaths per year between 2001 and 2022. Many veterans report dissatisfaction with current treatments, particularly the overreliance on pharmaceuticals that often fail to address root causes.

The demand for more effective, lasting interventions has only grown louder. With the FDA already signaling support for MDMA-assisted therapy in the treatment of PTSD and a surge of academic and clinical research into psychedelics, this bill represents a timely opportunity to bring those advances into the federal system.

Some veterans have turned to psychedelic therapies abroad, seeking relief in places like Peru, Jamaica, and Mexico through organizations such as Heroic Hearts. Psychedelic retreats like MycoMeditations are attempting to validate psilocybin therapy for PTSD as another alternative for those suffering. 

This bill could allow that same healing work to happen legally, safely, and close to home—potentially transforming access for thousands who might otherwise be left behind.

Tim Jensen of the Grunt Style Foundation put it succinctly in Task & Purpose:

“What it provides is the opportunity for getting this treatment, or having access to this treatment, and not having to leave the United States.”

For many, that access could be life-changing.

Learn more about our 12- month training program and sign up for the wait list for the next cohort at vitalpsychedelictraining.com

Moving the Needle

What makes this bill particularly notable is its bipartisanship—something increasingly rare in today’s political climate. Veterans’ health has long been one of the few areas where both parties are willing to come together, and this legislation is a prime example of that possibility.

Even more encouraging is that this isn’t a one-off initiative. The VA recently announced its first federally funded psychedelic study since the 1960s. Meanwhile, the FDA has continued to approve expanded access and breakthrough therapy designations for substances like MDMA and psilocybin.

This bill ties all those threads together into something scalable, sustainable, and grounded in oversight. If successful, it could set a precedent for the VA and how we treat mental health across the U.S.

What Comes Next

Whether this bill becomes law will depend on sustained momentum and continued bipartisan support. But the mere fact that such legislation exists—and is attracting broad backing—is a sign of how far the conversation has come.

Once considered too fringe for serious political consideration, psychedelic-assisted therapies are now being positioned as credible tools in one of the most conservative corners of American healthcare: the VA. And perhaps most importantly, this is happening because veterans themselves have demanded better options.

This moment isn’t just about access. It’s about acknowledging the urgency of the crisis and the validity of experiences that, for too long, were dismissed. It’s a turning point for policy and how we value the lives and well-being of those who have served.

As the field of psychedelic medicine evolves, legislation like the Innovative Therapies Centers of Excellence Act sets a precedent for evidence-based innovation that meets suffering with science—and finally begins to catch up to the need.

Learn more

Psychedelic Medicine Coalition

Task & Purpose – New bill could create VA centers to treat vets with psychedelic therapies

Behind the Bill: Inside a Bipartisan Effort to Bring Psychedelic Therapy to Veterans

Disclosure: The author is a board member of the Psychedelic Medicine Coalition, an advocacy group that has supported the Innovative Therapies Centers of Excellence Act.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on January 21, 2025January 21, 2025

Is the DEA Sabotaging Psychedelic Research? Inside the Push to Schedule DOI and DOC

In this episode, Joe interviews renowned chemist, filmmaker, and journalist, Hamilton Morris. 

After originally backing down from its first attempt in 2022, the DEA is once again looking to apply schedule I status to two lesser-known compounds: DOI (2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine) and DOC (2,5-dimethoxy-4-chloroamphetamine). For decades, DOI and DOC have been incredible tools for researchers studying serotonin receptors, showing promise for chronic pain, anxiety, depression, and more.

Originally recorded as a livestream in November, we felt this discussion deserved more attention, as Morris was present during the hearing and saw first-hand the damage that can come from the combination of immense overreach and outdated beliefs.

He talks about:

  • The bureaucratic mess behind so much of what the DEA does
  • The safety profile and research capacity of DOI and DOC and complete lack of data showing recreational use
  • The DEA’s claim that advocates weren’t experts
  • The fight to protect the Sonoran Desert toad

and more!

While we wait for the conclusion of the hearing, head to Hamilton’s Patreon to hear his daily breakdowns.

Links

Watch this episode on YouTube

Hamiltonmorris.com

Hamilton Morris patreon

PT Live: Joe Moore & Students for Sensible Drug Policy (SSDP) Discuss the DEA’s Hearing on DOI & DOC

SSDP.org: Stop the DEA from Scheduling DOI & DOC!

PT268 – PCP, 5-MeO-DMT, and The Synthesis of New Psychedelics, featuring: Hamilton Morris

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on January 7, 2025January 25, 2025

Can Legalization Serve the Greater Good? The Ethical Challenges of Psychedelic Law

In this episode, Joe interviews Ariel Clark: Anishinaabe attorney and co-founder of the Psychedelic Bar Association, a national association of lawyers involved in the highly-regulated ecosystem of psychedelic law.

She talks about ethics: How do the different societal norms of each lineage we carry interact with each other? What is the cultural framing that informs those ways of knowing, and do we align with it? Is there a code of ethics we can all agree on? As the rush to legalize psychedelics increases, Clark finds herself at a crossroads of wondering if our actions are really of service to the greater good: Can the overculture legalize psychedelics effectively, while doing less harm to Indigenous culture and the medicines themselves?

She discusses:

  • The challenges of working in psychedelic law with all of the other factors at play: How do you ethically support a client?
  • The idea that these medicines can have agency – even the synthetic ones
  • Shifting from a Western mind state of “what are my rights?” to an Indigenous frame of: “What are my responsibilities?”
  • Her story of healing from debilitating back pain with psychedelics and spiritual alignment
  • The need for public education to be at the center of future legislation attempts

and more!

Links

Thepsychedelicbar.org

The Myth of Normal: Trauma, Illness, and Healing in a Toxic Culture, by Gabor Maté MD

Psychedeliceducationcenter.com: Psychedelics and Religious Liberty in the United States

*Amazon links are affiliate links, meaning that Psychedelics Today will receive a percentage of the sale

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on January 3, 2025January 25, 2025

Pot for the People: Debunking Cannabis Myths and Empowering Consumers

What is RSO? What is THC-A? Do sativa and indica really mean what we think? How much do we really know about cannabis?

In this episode, Joe interviews Angie Roullier: longtime veteran of the cannabis industry and author of the book, Pot for the People: The Plant, the People, and the Shop Policies of Cannabis.

Diagnosed with the neurological disorder, Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT), Roullier tells the story of how cannabis replaced all her medications, which led to a personal journey and career centered on cannabis education. She talks about the challenges patients face in today’s rapidly evolving cannabis markets, misconceptions surrounding cannabis, the ignorance of many budtenders, and how not knowing enough can lead to an underwhelming high. She discusses how she educated people in shops and how her book was written to teach people how to ask the right questions to not only ensure a safe and effective experience, but to also give them the experience they’re looking for.

She talks about:

  • The early days of Michigan’s medical program and the state’s current attempt to essentially combine medical and recreational markets
  • Cannabis culture and an emerging “I can take more milligrams than you” bravado
  • Why understanding terpenes and the entourage effect can be game-changing toward finding a preferred strain
  • The rise of hemp-derived THC products, the regulatory loopholes they exploit, and their potential risks
  • Why home growers and caregivers are essential to the cannabis ecosystem

and more!

Links

Potforthepeople.co

Bookshop.org: Pot for the People: The plant, the people, and the shop policies of cannabis, by Angie Roullier

Mayoclinic.org: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Hereditary Neuropathy Foundation

Leafly.com: What is Rick Simpson Oil? Your complete guide to RSO

Dosedmovie.com

Burningdaily.com: Is THCA Legal in South Carolina? Understanding the Legal Landscape

YouTube: Grandmas Smoking Weed for the First Time (likely the video Joe is talking about)

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on December 13, 2024December 13, 2024

The War on Drugs: The DEA’s Attempt to Schedule DOI & DOC and the Fight for Sensible Policy

Whether you’re a drug user or not, society as a whole has been hurt tremendously by the War on Drugs. Can we win the battle with education and sensible policy?

In this episode, Joe interviews Kat Murti: executive director of Students for Sensible Drug Policy (SSDP), the largest nationwide network of students fighting to replace the War on Drugs with policies rooted in evidence, compassion, and human rights.

She talks about how she became interested in drug policy, which not surprisingly aligns with the many problems of The War on Drugs: how it’s a war on people, personal liberty, and our communities; how laws are not effective in enforcing morality; and how getting in trouble with the law often incentivizes more illegal activity. We all know that our current system doesn’t work and that the drug war no longer appeals to most reasonable people, but how can we move towards sensible policy? She discusses previous successes (both at SSDP and before), and some of their current projects, from the work they’re doing with fentanyl strip training and distribution, to education work at festivals and their program, “Just Say Know.”

She talks about:

  • How drug policy isn’t going to look the same everywhere and shouldn’t: How do we effectively use different models in different places together for the benefit of everyone?
  • The dangers of forcing drug users through drug courts and treatment centers
  • The repealing of Oregon’s Measure 110 and how it’s unfair to blame its failure on problems that already existed in the state
  • Their new focus on how the War on Drugs specifically affects women and reproductive rights, inspired by Louisiana recently scheduling Mifepristone and Misoprostol

and much more.

The SSDP’s biggest battle now is fighting the DEA’s attempted scheduling of DOI and DOC, two compounds that have been used in research for decades and pose no real threat to safety – which would drastically derail a ton of research. They just completed a 10-day hearing with the DEA. Watch Joe and Hamilton Morris’ breakdown here, and stay tuned to SSDP and PT for updates. 

Links

SSDP.org

SSDP.org: Donate

Cato.org: Jeffrey Singer

Studentsforliberty.org

Lastprisonerproject.org: 420 Unity Day of Action

North Carolina Psychedelic Policy Coalition

PT427 – The Philosophy of Law Enforcement, The Criminalization of Self-Directed Behavior, and Transformative Care for Police, featuring: Sarko Gergerian, MS, MHC, CARC

Lawenforcementactionpartnership.org

Missoula: Rape and the Justice System in a College Town, by Jon Krakauer

Learnaboutsam.org: Smart Approaches to Marijuana

Koin.com: Oregon Senate passes bill to end Measure 110, recriminalize hard drugs

SSDP:org: “Just Say Know” Drug Education

Chasing the Scream: The First and Last Days of the War on Drugs, by Johann Hari

Drug Use for Grown-Ups: Chasing Liberty in the Land of Fear, by Dr. Carl L. Hart

YouTube: PT Live: Joe Moore & Students for Sensible Drug Policy (SSDP) Discuss the DEA’s Hearing on DOI & DOC

YouTube: PT Live: Joe Moore and Hamilton Morris Discuss the DEA’s Attempt to Schedule DOI & DOC, and Why

SSDP.org: Stop the DEA from Scheduling DOI & DOC!

NPR.org: A new Louisiana law will re-classify misoprostol as a dangerous controlled substance

*Amazon links are affiliate links, meaning that Psychedelics Today will receive a percentage of the sale

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on December 6, 2024January 3, 2025

Regulation, Decriminalization, and Religious Freedom: Prop 122’s Challenges and Opportunities

In this episode, Joe interviews Veronica Lightning Horse Perez: therapist, speaker, author, activist, and co-chief proponent for the Natural Medicine Health Act of 2022 (Prop 122); and Sean McAllister: attorney specializing in the regulatory, health care, business, and religious freedom aspects of psychedelic medicines, and one of the drafters of Prop 122.

This episode was recorded live at the Plant Medicine Cafe in Denver, CO – which served as an unofficial Prop 122 headquarters – and cohosted by Meaghan Len, co-founder of the U.S.’ first ayahuasca church, Sanctuary of the Sovereign Heart.

They dive into the details of Prop 122 and discuss why it’s the most freeing legislation we’ve seen, but also very complicated in the clash between an expensive regulated side and a risky and ambiguous decrim side. While the implementation process continues, they’ve learned that there is still a huge need for public education, and that one of the most important tasks now is to be hyper aware of how legislators will try to change what people already agreed on.

They discuss:

  • The Federal vs. state legality issues we still see even after such sweeping legislation
  • The huge gap in understanding why Indigenous communities are upset and why they need to be included in all discussions
  • The Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the complications of religion when many of us simply feel spiritual
  • The natural vs. synthetic fallacy and the future of churches offering a synthetic sacrament
  • The ontological shock many have after a big experience and why churches and community are needed to help guide people

and more! 

Links

Lhthehealingground.com

Mcallisterlawoffice.com

Sean McAllister – The Successful Psilocybin Mushroom Decriminalization Initiative in Denver

Plantmagiccafe.com

Plant Magic Cafe instagram

Magicdoctress.com (Meaghan Len)

Caught in the Act: A Chemist’s Battle Against Felony Drug Charges

Churchofeagleandcondor.org

The Way of the Shaman, by Michael Harner

Zendoproject.org

*Amazon links are affiliate links, meaning that Psychedelics Today will receive a percentage of the sale

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on November 1, 2024November 1, 2024

Psychedelics Lately – Massachusetts’ Question 4 and Updates in Psychedelics and Chronic Pain

In this episode, Joe and Kyle finally meet up again for the first episode of Psychedelics Lately: the updated version of the much-missed Psychedelics Weekly, where they’ll meet each month to talk about the most interesting stories in psychedelics.

The main story this month is the fate of Massachusetts’ Question 4: Regulated Access to Psychedelic Substances Initiative (The Natural Psychedelic Substances Act). They discuss what they like about the bill, its opposition, and its support, including actress Eliza Dushku Palandjian, who went from a diagnosis of PTSD and an in-the-psychedelic-closet underground experience to becoming a very public, soon-to-be certified psychedelic facilitator. If you live in Massachusetts, make sure to read about the bill and get out and vote this Tuesday (or now, if you’re registered for early voting).

They also discuss:

  • Joe’s recent east coast travels to Harvard and the PhilaDelic conference
  • Alfred North Whitehead and Process Philosophy
  • The Psychedelics and Pain Association, and Court Wing’s involvement in the first published case report of complex regional pain syndrome being treated with psilocybin
  • The scientific community needing to embrace more experientially-based approaches and practices
  • The challenge of making meaning out of the mystical

and more! 

Links

Boston.com: Question 4: What to know about the proposal to legalize some psychedelics

Bostonmagazine.com: Massachusetts Question 4 on Psychedelics: What You Need to Know

What You Need to Know About Massachusetts’ Question 4 and the Natural Psychedelic Substances Act, featuring: Graham Moore & Jamie Morey

Bostonmagazine.com: Eliza Dushku’s Bold New Journey

Holistictherapeutix.com

Plantmagiccafe.com

Tatteredcover.com

Psychedelic Revival: Toward a New Paradigm of Healing, by Sean Lawlor

Cooking with Magic: The Psilocybin Cookbook, by David Connell

A Century of Process Thought: Commemorating Whitehead’s Legacy at Harvard and Beyond

Philosophy and Psychedelics: Can Metaphysics Bring Meaning to Non-Ordinary States?, featuring: Dr. Peter Sjöstedt-Hughes

From the Eleusinian Mysteries to Modern Mysticism: The Role of Religion in the Psychedelic Experience, featuring: Charles Stang

John B. Cobb Jr. – How Exceptional Experience Can Help Save the World

The Holographic Universe: The Revolutionary Theory of Reality, by Michael Talbot

Philadelic.org

The Penn Psychedelics Collaborative and the Power of Interdisciplinary Connections, featuring: Taylor Andrews Flatt, PMHNP, Victor Pablo Acero, Ph.D., Jackie Tileston, & Michael Baime, MD

Glow-wacky.com (David Glowacki)

Psychedelicsandpain.org

Introduction to Psychedelics for Chronic Pain

Chronic Pain and Inducing Neuroplasticity With Psychedelics, featuring: Lynn Watkins, Retired USAF & C.J. Spotswood, PMHNP

Wiley.com: Refractory CRPS pain treated with psilocybin: A case report

Eduardo Schenberg’s tweet

Oxford Academic: Breathwork-induced psychedelic experiences modulate neural dynamics

The Blind Spot: Why Science Cannot Ignore Human Experience, by Adam Frank, Marcelo Gleiser, and Evan Thompson

Spotify: Hyphae Leaks season 1

Spotify: Bum Bag – “Another White Boy With a Podcast”

Heroicheartsproject.org

*Amazon links are affiliate links, meaning that Psychedelics Today will receive a percentage of the sale

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on October 24, 2024October 24, 2024

Meet the Legal Team Fighting the DEA to Save Psychedelic Research

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is poised to ban two psychedelic compounds, DOI and DOC, which could deliver a disastrous blow to psychedelic science and research if successful.

The United States is one of the most advanced societies because our visionaries have the freedom to innovate. That is, unless, we’re talking about drugs. The U.S. government has sweeping blinders on when it comes to researching and developing psychoactive compounds, especially hallucinogenic ones that target the 5-HT2A serotonin receptor.

Nearly every one of these classic psychedelics exists as a Schedule 1 illicit substance. And if the DEA has its way, the last remaining unregulated, DOI and DOC, will suffer the same fate.

A hearing this November, led by attorney Robert Rush Esq., will elucidate what comes next.

What are DOI and DOC, and Why Do They Matter?

What are DOI and DOC, and Why Do They Matter?

DOI (2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine) and DOC (2,5-dimethoxy-4-chloroamphetamine) are relatively obscure synthetic psychedelic compounds in the amphetamine class. They bind to and activate 5-HT2A receptors, just like psilocybin, LSD, and DMT, influencing everything from decision-making and pain-processing to gut function.

One property that makes DOI and DOC unique is their strength – only small dosages are reported to produce 20 to 36-hour trips.

Scientists are so fascinated by DOI and DOC’s mechanism of action that they’ve published nearly 1,000 papers on the substances. DOI, in particular, has been used to map 5-HT2A distribution in the brain and understand the receptor’s functions, including memory, learning, and sensory perception.

The Necessity of Researching Novel Compounds

UC Berkeley neuroscientist Dr. Raul Ramos is one of many researchers actively studying DOI to uncover its value. The therapeutic research areas for DOI are vast and promising. They include its potential to reduce inflammation and improve cognitive function and flexibility – both critical for overcoming depression. Other possibilities include treating asthma and combatting fentanyl and alcohol addiction.

“It’s not a stretch to say that the results of my research could inform future therapies in humans,” Ramos told Psychedelics Today.

Ramos explained that scientists today can freely explore these substances for planned experiments or to test spontaneous ideas. However, a Schedule 1 Controlled Substances Act (CSA) designation will strip them of that liberty.

“It will stifle spontaneity and creativity. It will stifle progress,” said Ramos.

The DEA, however, takes a wildly different stance. In December 2023, the notoriously conservative organization initiated its second attempt to brand DOI and DOC as illegal, lacking any medical value and high abuse potential.

If the DEA’s legal effort succeeds, these compounds will be criminalized, and Dr. Ramos and other non-DEA registered scientists must immediately cease research. To restart, they’ll need to undergo a lengthy, cost-prohibitive process seeking institutional, federal, and state approvals, according to Ramos. Unfortunately, most unpublished work will never be see the light of day.

Inside the Fight to Keep DOI and DOC Research Alive

Inside the Fight to Keep DOI and DOC Research Alive

Fortunately, Ramos’ lawyer, Robert Rush, refused to let the DEA proceed without resistance.

“I was nervous that the scheduling would go through, so I connected with people who might be interested parties [in challenging the decision]. I filed the request for a hearing 30 minutes before the post office closed on the deadline. It came together at the last minute,” said Rush.

Rush filed a request on behalf of Ramos and two other academic researchers. Elijah Ullman, a molecular neuropharmacologist, filed a separate request for Students for Sensible Drug Policy (SSDP). David Heldreth, CEO of Panacea Plant Sciences (PPS), also filed a hearing request.

In a recent development, Administrative Law Judge Paul Soeffing denied the DEA’s request to block a number of witnesses, including experts from SSDP and Panacea Plant Sciences (PPS), from testifying at the upcoming hearing. While the judge granted some of the DEA’s motions to exclude specific evidence, this ruling represents a partial victory for the researchers and organizations challenging the ban. However, the judge noted that the relevance of the witnesses’ testimony would still be determined later during the hearing.

The hearing, which starts November 12, will draw prominent witnesses, including psychedelic researchers Dr. David Nutt and Dr. David Nichols, to present the case for DOI and DOC’s utility for developing new therapeutic drugs.

“I have many colleagues who work with these compounds who will testify in the upcoming hearing, and that is only a subset of the research community,” said Ullman, who has been interested in science policy since he was a teen.

Ullman added, “The DEA alleges that DOI and DOC should be placed in Schedule 1 because of their high potential for abuse, but this does not align with over 40 years of data.”

To his point, not one DOI or DOC use report existed before 2005. After 2005, the DEA registered only 45 DOI seizures across local, state, and federal registries throughout a 13-year period. DOC confiscations were more common but mounted to a mere average of 60 annually nationwide. Most reports involved small-scale seizures in forms like blotter paper or powder that do not even register a mention in the DEA’s 2024 National Drug Threat Assessment.

Adverse events linked to DOI and DOC are also scarce. The DEA referenced just three case reports of serious reactions in its Schedule 1 recommendation, including one death related to DOC and caffeine in a 37-year-old with a history of methamphetamine abuse. DOI was not included in any of these reports.

The DEA’s push to classify these substances as Schedule I, despite the small number of incidents, limited evidence of recreational use, and their admission that physical dependence is not an issue, suggests an overreaction rooted in dogma rather than legitimate concern.

“I believe data integrity matters in policy decisions, and since the data does not align with the DEA’s viewpoint that it should be scheduled, it should not be,” said Ullman.

Rush adds that DOI and DOC’s day-long trips make the compounds highly undesirable for personal use.

“No one is seeking a 36-hour psychedelic experience,” said Rush. “There is no illicit drug trade. No one really wants [DOI and DOC], quite frankly.”

No one, except researchers, who assert that the compounds have transformed their understanding of brain function and disease. They’ve helped us learn that serotonin receptors are “much more than a ‘feel-good’ chemical,” according to Ullman.

“There’s incredibly cool data from Charles Nichols’ lab at Louisiana State University showing a reduction in airway inflammation in rodent asthma models with doses significantly less than that one that causes intoxication… A whole new class of anti-asthma medicines could arise because of DOI research, improving millions of lives worldwide.”

What Comes Next in the Legal Battle?

What Comes Next in the Legal Battle for DOI and DOC?

Rush and Phelps will present significant evidence during the 10-day hearing next month to counteract the DEA’s claims. Afterward, the judge will make his non-binding recommendation and send it to the administrator. Then, it’s up to the DEA to decide.

The recent ruling denying the DEA’s attempt to block key witnesses further bolsters the opposition’s case, adding momentum as they prepare to present evidence and testimony.

If the judge finds in the petitioners’ favor, the administrator could adopt the judge’s ruling

“There’s always a chance the DEA could do the right thing,” said Rush.

However, it could also ignore a favorable ruling and proceed with scheduling. If that happens, Rush said he will not give up. The next step will be to move forward with litigation, where he will challenge the organization’s rule-making authority in court.

“We have to check the DEA’s excessive power,” said Rush.

The Bottom Line

The DEA has been extraordinarily aggressive in scheduling psychoactive drugs since establishing the Controlled Substances Act of 1970, and if history repeats, DOI and DOC will not be spared. We’ve seen that their attempts to control chemicals have exacerbated cartel violence, spurred countless unjust arrests, and stifled scientific progress, especially regarding psychedelics and mental health interventions. Let’s hope sensibility and freedom win this time.

Want to show your support for the cause? Consider donating to SSDP to help them raise funds to bring the case’s witnesses, all university researchers, to the 10-day hearing.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on October 22, 2024November 1, 2024

What You Need to Know About Massachusetts’ Question 4 and the Natural Psychedelic Substances Act

With the passing of the Natural Psychedelic Substances Act (Question 4), Massachusetts could be the next state to follow in Colorado and Oregon’s footsteps and legalize and regulate natural psychedelics.

In this episode, Joe interviews two people on the frontlines of the campaign, Graham Moore and Community Engagement Director, Jamie Morey.

They discuss the specifics of the initiative, listed on the ballot as the “Limited Legalization and Regulation of Certain Natural Psychedelic Substances,” including the removal of criminal penalties for limited personal use, and the establishment of a regulatory agency that will provide therapeutic access to any of five natural psychedelics (psilocybin, psilocin, DMT, mescaline, and ibogaine). They tell their stories of how they discovered the power of psychedelics, and discuss the work they’re doing, educating a fairly interested – but still very hesitant – public about the bill and the importance of it passing this November.

They talk about:

  • The significance of this happening in Massachusetts, especially with the amount of biomedical research happening in Boston
  • The story of a member of Baystaters creating a fraudulent persona in a veterans advocacy group to fight against legalization efforts
  • The challenge of getting people to publicly support initiatives that deal with illegal substances
  • The power of small steps in legislation: Before this bill, MA had the most local measures in the U.S.
  • How data collection should be handled at service centers

and more! 

If you live in Massachusetts, learn about the bill here, check your voter registration status here, and make sure to get out and cast your vote in November.

Links

MAformentalhealth.org: Vote Yes on Question 4 to bring healing to Massachusetts

Heroicheartsproject.org

Hopeprojectusa.org

Facebook.com: Parents for Plant Medicine

Talkingjointsmemo.com: Psychedelics Opposition Alliance Forms In Mass, Further Divides Grassroots Coalition

Talkingjointsmemo.com: “Stolen Valor” Situation Rocks Massachusetts Psychedelics Community

PT Live: Joe Moore and Jack Gorsline Discuss Psychedelic Policy in Massachusetts

Clusterbusters.org

Psychedelicsandpain.org

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on October 15, 2024December 11, 2024

The FDA, MDMA, and Public Perception: Was the FDA Fair to Lykos?

The psychedelic space was dealt a huge blow when the FDA decided not to approve MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD under Lykos’ proposal. Was the FDA fair to Lykos? And what are the next steps for Lykos and MAPS?

In this episode, Joe interviews Rick Doblin, Ph.D.: founder and president of the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS), and former board member at Lykos Therapeutics, MAPS’ public benefit subsidiary.

Doblin tells his side of the story: that the FDA’s concerns with double blinding not working had been fully addressed ahead of time, that they had negotiated agreements that were no longer agreed to when new FDA employees came on board, that there was a lot of confusion from going back and forth with the FDA on how Phase 3 studies should be designed, and more. He believes that Lykos made a massive mistake in assuming that provable science was more important than public opinion, and that ignoring critics who were saying whatever they wanted caused them to lose control of the narrative – which clearly influenced the advisory committee. While Lykos figures out their next steps with the FDA, MAPS is focusing their attention on what they feel is most important in light of this ruling: better public education and drug policy.

He talks about:

  • How there’s a bias at the FDA to be harsh: Does automatically saying no just make it look like you’re being rigorous?
  • The work of the Dutch government in researching MDMA, and Lykos’ odd decision to not highlight any of it
  • Massachusetts’ Legalization and Regulation of Psychedelic Substances initiative, and the huge opportunity for progress at the local level
  • Why federal agents at Burning Man work so hard to give tickets to attendees for smoking cannabis
  • Why sharing stories of your positive experiences with psychedelics is so important

and more! 

MAPS has announced that 2025’s Psychedelic Science conference will be in Denver, June 16-20, and will have experiential opportunities before and after. If you’d like to donate to MAPS, please do so here.

Links

Maps.org

PT327 – Rick Doblin, Ph.D. – Confronting Abuse in Clinical Trials and the Future of Psychedelic Medicine

Icer.org: Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Releases Draft Evidence Report on Treatment for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

MAPS Podcast- Episode 33: Matthew Baggott – Beyond Fear – MDMA and Emotion

Maps.org: MAPS Statement on FDA Complete Response Letter on MDMA-Assisted Therapy for PTSD New Drug Application

Psychedelicalpha.com: Exclusive: David Hough on Lykos’ Path to Resubmission

Imdb.com: Of Night and Light: The Story of Iboga and Ibogaine

Bostonmagazine.com: Eliza Dushku’s Bold New Journey

Maps.org: Mark your calendar for the next Psychedelic Science conference: June 16-20, 2025 Denver, Colorado

Donate to MAPS

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on October 11, 2024October 17, 2024

Protecting Indigenous Wisdom: Rethinking Psychedelic Legalization

While legislators in several states are crafting their own psychedelic legalization bills, are Indigenous communities being included?

In this episode, Kyle interviews Gabriela Galindo: program coordinator of FLOWS (Foundations for Leaders Organizing for Water and Sustainability), an organization working towards social and environmental justice, ecosystem restoration, community building, and the preservation and protection of Indigenous medicines.

She discusses her entry point to psychedelics and how she got involved with Colorado’s Natural Medicine Health Act (Prop 122) when she saw a complete absence of Indigenous representation in the legislature. The narrative that we all have a right to healing and that these medicines belong to everyone is pretty common today, but Galindo argues that this is not fair: that each plant has its own history, and that each is protected by its own culture. Shouldn’t the communities that have stewarded these medicines for centuries have a say in whether their medicine is going to be shared and legislated at the state level? Shouldn’t they have the ability to consent to these new proposals?

She talks about:

  • Why she likes using ‘movement’ instead of ‘renaissance’ when discussing our psychedelic culture
  • What we could learn from Indigenous people’s harmony with nature as we face an ongoing climate crisis
  • The balancing act of pleasing everyone: Would decriminalization be as supported if Indigenous communities wanted to keep some of these substances criminalized for the protection of their culture and their ecosystems?
  • How psychedelic communities should evolve to include community work into their routines: What do local communities need and how can you help?
  • The importance of knowing when to step aside and truly center a community voice

and more! 

Links

Weareflows.org

Imdb.com: “What the Health”

Herbsandarts.com

Psychedelicpassage.com: Colorado Prop 122: A Complete Guide to Legal Psychedelic Therapy

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on October 3, 2024

Colorado’s Regulatory Models and the Path to Implementation: A Live Podcast Recording

Join the Psychedelics Today team for a live podcast taping at the Plant Magic Cafe in Denver, CO.

Co-Founder Joe Moore will host a discussion with Veronica Lightning Horse Perez and Attorney, Sean T. McAllister, exploring community-use models in Colorado, harm reduction, and the need for education beyond practitioner programs.

This event is perfect for anyone interested in open discussions and expanding their knowledge. Don’t miss this chance to connect with a vibrant psychedelic community and learn about our Vital program.

Program overview:

  • 6:00pm: Doors Open
  • 6:30pm: Program begins
  • 7:30-8:30pm: Gather and network

**Food and Refreshments from Plant Magic Cafe will be available for purchase after the program/during the networking portion.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on September 20, 2024September 20, 2024

Why Did the FDA Reject MDMA-Assisted Therapy for PTSD?

After years of work, MAPS/Lykos was finally able to present MDMA to the FDA as a possible tool in the fight against PTSD, only to be denied in devastating fashion. Just why did the FDA reject MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD?

In this episode, Joe interviews Ingmar Gorman, Ph.D.: clinical psychologist and co-founder and CEO of Fluence, a psychedelic education company.

Gorman served as a co-principal investigator and study therapist on MAPS’ Phase II and III clinical trials for MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for PTSD, and works with drug sponsors: training, developing the components for clinical trials, and designing therapy manuals. With his insider’s perspective, he discusses the reasons why he believes the FDA rejected MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for PTSD: from ICER’s 2.1 section of the report giving legitimacy to allegations they don’t have the authority to research, to Lykos not being able to defend some accusations due to confidentiality, to the damage caused over time (which likely influenced the decision) from attacks against Lykos from dissenters.

He discusses:

  • How, despite abuse claims, the main allegations in the report were actually about the mishandling of data or influence of investigators on participants
  • The complications of needing to follow study frameworks: Should your adverse experience be in the report if it happened outside the study window?
  • How easily opposition can attack and demonize a faceless company, while forgetting the humanity of the people behind it
  • Inner healing intelligence and the proposition that people have been indoctrinated into this concept by MAPS
  • The need for journalists to research more and not just jump on a narrative

and more! 

 

Links

Fluencetraining.com

Journals.sagepub.com: Scaling Up: Multisite Open-Label Clinical Trials of MDMA-Assisted Therapy for Severe Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Frontiersin.org: Psychedelic Harm Reduction and Integration: A Transtheoretical Model for Clinical Practice

Ingmar Gorman – MDMA Psychotherapy and how to get Involved with Psychedelic research

Elizabeth Nielson and Ingmar Gorman – The Importance of Psychedelic Integration Training for Therapists

Icer:org: Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Releases Draft Evidence Report on Treatment for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Lykospbc.com: Lykos Therapeutics Statement on FDA Advisory Committee Meeting

Psychedelicalpha.com: Exclusive: Therapists and Trialists from Lykos’ Phase 3 MDMA-Assisted Therapy Studies Push Back on ICER’s Critical Draft Report

An Inside Look at the FDA and Early Drug Development, featuring: Dr. Amanda Holley

MAPS Podcast: Episode 33: Matthew Baggott – Beyond Fear – MDMA and Emotion

Researchgate.net: Preliminary evidence for the importance of therapeutic alliance in MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder

Tactogen.com

YouTube: Breaking Points: OPEN WAR As FDA BLOCKS MDMA Therapy For Vets

Secondhallway.com: A Brief Statement on My Resignation from Psymposia

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on August 30, 2024August 30, 2024

Is Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy at a Crossroads? Exploring What’s Next for Lykos & MDMA Treatment

FDA MDMA therapy rejection

Lykos’ psychedelic-assisted therapy model was meant to reinvent mental healthcare as we know it. Its PTSD protocol, which included preparation support, three guided MDMA therapy sessions, and integration counseling, took a bold step toward merging pharmacology with psychotherapy. But the FDA’s decision to reject it may force the psychedelic industry to pivot from resource-intensive and holistic to streamlined and pharma-friendly.

How We Got Here: Understanding the FDA’s Rejection

On Aug. 9, Lykos announced that the U.S. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rejected its new drug application (NDA) for MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD. The company’s press release was so matter-of-fact and measured that I had to read it twice to grasp the meaning.

Eventually, my eyes refocused on two sentences: “The FDA communicated that it had completed its review of the NDA and determined that it could not be approved based on data submitted to date. The FDA has requested that Lykos conduct an additional Phase 3 trial to further study the safety and efficacy of midomafetamine (MDMA).”

Lykos has not shared the FDA’s complete response letter (CRL). However, it said the agency rejected its NDA for reasons aligning with the June 4 Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee (PDAC) hearing. 

I’ve investigated the infamous MDMA hearing in prior articles, so I’ll spare the exhaustive details here. But to briefly recap, PDAC members who lacked psychedelic expertise said that Lykos’ statistically significant clinical data was unreliable. It determined the trials contained inherent design flaws and feared that alleged misconduct, although unsubstantiated, could have skewed the data. Nine of eleven panelists said the NDA was not ready for approval. 

PDAC’s vote confused many advocates, who noted that Lykos followed the FDA’s draft psychedelic therapy FDA approval guidance. Others pointed out that MAPS and the FDA co-created the trial design through a Special Protocol Assessment in 2017. 

In the FDA’s words, “We have completed our review and, based on the information submitted, agree that the design and planned analysis of your study adequately address the objectives necessary to support a regulatory submission.”

Dr. Scott Shannon, Principal Investigator in MAPS Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, added that the FDA thoroughly investigated MAPS’s research sites during the trials to ensure proper data acquisition.

However, the advisory committee ignored these facts. Instead, they lamented over Lykos’ drug plus psychotherapy protocol, consistently questioning its validity and whether emotional support was even necessary alongside MDMA to alleviate PTSD. Worse, despite blatant contrary evidence, they asserted that MAPS’ FDA-aligned MDMA therapy protocol could do patients more harm than good.

Facing the fallout: MDMA therapy FDA rejection

Facing the Fallout: Lykos’ Next Steps

Lykos must now conduct a third Phase 3 clinical trial to overcome issues it thought were ironed out. The new trial will take at least two years and cost millions of dollars the team may not have. 

In preparation, Lykos laid off 75% of its workforce, discontinued funding MDMA therapy research in Europe, and radically shifted its leadership team.

Rick Doblin, PhD, founder of Lykos’ non-profit parent company MAPS, resigned from the board shortly after the MDMA therapy FDA rejection. Doblin, a beloved psychedelic trailblazer and somewhat controversial figure, said his activist nature interfered with Lykos’ regulatory path. He will now pursue MAPS’ broader research, education, and policy reform goals. 

Upon Doblin’s departure, Lykos hired a seasoned pharmaceutical executive, Dr. David Hough, to oversee the NDA’s next steps. In a recent press release, Lykos Chairman Jeff George said, “Dr. Hough is a consummate industry professional and exactly the right person to lead the crucial work of engaging with the FDA for our resubmission.”

Hough’s resume includes bringing Spravato (esketamine nasal spray) to market at Johnson & Johnson, where he led compound development and the medical, scientific, and regulatory processes.

Spravato is a ketamine-analog medication with dissociative psychedelic properties prescribed for major depressive disorder. The FDA approved Spravato’s NDA in 2019 with a protocol requiring patients first to prove that traditional antidepressants failed before becoming eligible for coverage. 

Glaringly, Spravato’s application did not include therapeutic intervention, begging the question, could Hough have similar plans for MDMA?

A New Path: MDMA therapy FDA rejection

A New Path for Psychedelic Therapy?

The future of psychedelic-assisted therapy remains uncertain. Doblin, among others, believes that Lykos will eventually bring MDMA therapy to the masses, but following the FDA rejection, he has grave concerns about the direction the industry might take.

On a recent Modern Enlightenment podcast by Ceremonia, he expressed fears that the FDA’s decision could have a chilling effect on future psychedelic NDAs, setting a hands-off precedent he deems immoral.

Doblin told Ceremonia, “We (MAPS) had suggestions that it might be interesting to do a study just giving people MDMA without any support, but Michael Mithoefer, our lead psychiatrist, myself, and others thought it would be unethical to do that.”

“…stuff comes up [on MDMA], and if you’re not capable of processing it, you can end up worse off,” he added.

Doblin also articulated why he believes MDMA alone is insufficient to extinguish PTSD.

He explained that 40% of Lykos’ clinical trial participants had previously tried MDMA recreationally before joining the study. If the drug alone were all they needed, these patients would’ve been cured of PTSD. But they weren’t. Many had suffered for years without relief. And it was the combination of MDMA plus psychotherapy that finally helped them achieve remission.

Doblin explained, “It’s not about the drug. It’s about how you process. And it also is not just about the drug experience. It’s about integration. It’s also about preparation. All of that is what contributes to the outcomes.” 

In other words, the idea that a psychedelic experience alone can cure mental health issues ignores the complexities of trauma and the human psyche.

Nevertheless, the FDA skepticism about MDMA therapy means psychedelic NDAs may start to look like Spravato’s, or they may follow the “psychological support” approach that pharmaceutical companies Compass Pathways (Compass) and Mind Medicine (MindMed) are promoting. 

“Profit-oriented companies like Compass are minimizing any psychotherapeutic angle. They just want [psychedelic medicine] to fit into the psycho-pharm model that people understand,” said Shannon.

He added, “I have to tell you that 95% of the people that I know in the psychedelic realm don’t believe in that {approach},” he added.

According to Shannon, “psychological support” means licensed therapists are on-site during drug administration. But instead of providing counseling intervention, they serve in more passive roles, stepping in only to prevent psychological harm when necessary.

“[This approach comes from] people stuck in the old ways. People who want something comfortable and not challenging. This is what fading, failing paradigms do. They try to prevent new ideas from coming in,” said Shannon. 

A New Path: MDMA therapy FDA rejection

Will Lykos Carry MDMA Therapy to the FDA Finish Line?

Lykos has vowed to bring this novel psychedelic medicine to the current regulatory framework. However, industry insiders think its new Phase 3 trial will introduce different study design elements that could render the original protocol unrecognizable.

At the very least, Lykos may need to shift from integrative, holistic therapies, like Internal Family Systems, Hakomi, and Holotropic Breathwork, to accepted “evidence-based approaches” like Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) that fit neatly into the traditional medical structure. CBT can be effective for PTSD, but today’s mental health crisis proves it is remarkably substandard.

Amid the tug-of-war between innovation and convention, I fear psychedelic-assisted therapy, as we now know it, may be headed toward extinction. But I won’t mourn its passing. Instead, I’ll see this phase as a metamorphosis—where the old form dissolves, making way for a model that adapts to today’s framework while (hopefully) preserving the transformative essence of psychedelic healing.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on August 27, 2024August 27, 2024

The Illinois CURE Act: Shaping the Future of Psychedelic Policy

While Oregon and Colorado make all the headlines around establishing legal frameworks for psychedelic use, much is happening behind the scenes in other states. One state is Illinois and what they hope to accomplish with the Illinois CURE Act.

In this episode, Joe interviews Jean Lacy: Executive Director of the Illinois Psychedelic Society; and La Shawn K. Ford: 17-year member of the Illinois House of Representatives, representing the 8th District.

Together, they are working on the CURE (Compassionate Use and Research of Entheogens) Act, which aims to decriminalize plant medicines and bring a state-regulated model for psychedelic use to Illinois. Similar to Oregon’s model – but with hopefully a more cohesive ecosystem – it would include service centers, different license types, the removal of psilocybin and psilocin from the controlled substances list, and a percentage of taxes allocated to the education of first responders and law enforcement. Guided by the mistakes of cannabis legalization, they’re putting a lot of focus on accessibility – not just for consumers, but for people trying to get licenses and open businesses. What does equity and inclusion look like in a psychedelic service model?

They discuss:

  • The need to educate lawmakers about psychedelics and shine a light on the myths and lies of the Drug War
  • The importance of understanding the process when working with lawmakers: When it’s done right, democracy can actually happen
  • Why conversations about accessibility and certain provisions need to happen up front, as bills are being written
  • The impact of bipartisan support, and how bipartisan psychedelics are starting to become
  • The overwhelming support for the CURE Act that Rep. Ford has seen, from people of all walks of life

and more!

If you want to help, please sign their petition and/or make a donation. And if you want to help on a larger scale, get out there and have those conversations: Tell your story, and tell it to lawmakers. Your voice can make a bigger difference than you realize. 

Links

Lashawnkford.com

Illinoispsychedelicsociety.org

Illinoispsychedelicsociety.org: CURE Act

Donate: Supporting the Compassionate Use and Research of Psilocybin in Illinois

Senatorventura.com

Senatorwilcox.com

PT223 – Daniel Carcillo – Life After Sports

Psychedelicmedicinecoalition.org

PT213 – Dr. Matt Brown – Osteopathy and Exploring Energy

Meetup.com: Psychedelics and the Future of Psychiatry

Sanahealingcollective.org

Lawenforcementactionpartnership.org

PT427 – The Philosophy of Law Enforcement, The Criminalization of Self-Directed Behavior, and Transformative Care for Police, featuring: Sarko Gergerian, MS, MHC, CARC

Aspenpublicradio.org: APS2024: First to Respond: Cultivating Compassion and Resilience in Law Enforcement Communities

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on August 15, 2024August 14, 2024

“It Was Exactly What I Needed – Until I Was Arrested For Growing It”: Former Nurse Avoids 10-Year Prison Sentence For Microdosing Psilocybin

In July 2022, a story sent shockwaves through the psychedelic community: an Indiana nurse and mother of five was about to be sentenced to 10 years in prison for growing mushrooms after she’d learned that microdosing psilocybin might improve her 20-year struggle with treatment-resistant depression.

Jessica Thornton (who now goes by Jessica Fitzmaurice) was charged with two felonies: dealing a scheduled substance and child endangerment. After an intervention from Tarin Hale, an Ohio lawyer who eventually became her legal advisor and helped her hire new counsel, she was given a suspended prison sentence and placed on 18 months’ probation with 180 days of house arrest. Eventually, her charges were reduced to a misdemeanor—something she refers to today as “a triumph.”

Two years later, the case is a shining representation of the jarring legal dichotomy in the United States when it comes to psychedelics; one in which a patchwork of county and state laws is in stark contrast with federal regulations that continue to classify psilocybin and other psychedelics as Schedule I substances (this means they possess “a high potential for abuse, no currently accepted medical use in treatment, and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision”).

From within the psychedelic echo chamber, it might feel like psychedelics are widely accepted, but the fact is, psychedelics are illegal in far more jurisdictions than they are not.

Shortly after the story was broken in Psychedelic Spotlight, readers shared their thoughts on Twitter (now known as X), describing the case as “shameful” and “pure insanity.” On a Reddit post in the subreddit r/Indiana, her actions were dubbed a “victimless crime.” Many had choice words for elected officials in Indiana, where psychedelic drug laws have not yet caught up to the sweeping changes that have occurred in other jurisdictions. In neighboring state Michigan, for example, criminal enforcement of the possession and use of psychedelics has been deprioritized in five cities, including Detroit and Ann Arbor.

During her probationary period, Fitzmaurice was unable to speak with the media about her case. For the first time since July 2022, she is breaking her silence. In an exclusive interview, she told Psychedelics Today just how profoundly the case has impacted her life—and how she’s moving forward.

Living with Treatment-Resistant Depression

A neonatal nurse and mother of five, Fitzmaurice did not take the decision to start microdosing psilocybin lightly. After decades of being on a series of antidepressants, in 2022, she says she hit rock bottom. 

“I felt like I had gone down every avenue of conventional mental health options. I was on pill after pill with combinations of medications,” Fitzmaurice said. “I was working hard as a travel nurse to support my children. I felt empty, I felt nothingness, and I felt numb. I started having suicidal thoughts and could not accept that there was nothing else out there to help.” 

On traditional antidepressants, her feelings and emotions were suppressed, and the side effects that came with them were unbearable.

“I experienced anxiety, trembling, hyperhidrosis, inability to orgasm, numbness of the soul, and diminished creativity and connection with no true love for life. The list goes on,” she explained.

Along with contemplating suicide, Fitzmaurice was regularly having panic attacks and would often break out in hives. Her debilitating struggle with depression deeply impacted her role as a mother.

“I felt as if what I could give wasn’t enough,” she said. “I was not confident in myself. I felt I was out of reach emotionally to my children at times.”

When a friend told her about the success they experienced with microdosing, Fitzmaurice became intrigued. She dove into available research, explored the psilocybin studies being published at Johns Hopkins University, and listened to different podcasts discussing psychedelics.

Several studies indicate psilocybin may very well have antidepressant effects. One 2022 study published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology on the efficacy and safety of psilocybin-assisted treatment for major depressive disorder found that two doses of psilocybin alongside supportive therapy produced “large and stable antidepressant effects” among participants for at least one year following treatment—well beyond the established duration of antidepressant effects reported with ketamine (about two to three weeks).

When it comes to microdosing psilocybin (a practice that involves taking small, sub-perceptual doses of the classic psychedelic regularly to enhance mood or creativity), although there is much hype, the science is largely considered inconclusive as most studies rely on self-reported data. One 2022 study published in Nature compared a group of microdosers to non-microdosers and found, “small to medium-sized improvements in mood and mental health that were generally consistent across gender, age, and presence of mental health concerns.” 

Microdosing Psilocybin Mushrooms: A (Risky) Last Resort

What Fitzmaurice learned was enough to convince her to give microdosing a try. She opted to grow her own mushrooms, assuming the process would be safer than trying to find psilocybin on the street. 

“I was so desperate to feel better and the research was so positive that I gave very little thought about the legal implications of growing psilocybin mushrooms for microdosing,” she admitted. “I was only focused on the potential benefits. I believed in the sincerity of what I was doing to save my life.”

After Fitzmaurice started microdosing psilocybin, she began to feel different: for the first time in years, she felt content and confident in her life and body. She felt the emotional weight of work, raising children, and societal standards begin to lift from her shoulders. 

“I was able to mentally move on from what had previously held me back. I felt less pressured, less anxious, and actually curious about the possibilities that lie ahead,” she said. “I started doing the things I loved to do.”

She began spending more time with her children, and even became involved in a local mountain biking team, planning trips and adventures with her family. With no intention of stopping, she gave up caffeine and eventually ceased taking her attention deficit disorder medication. Although she didn’t tell them about the microdosing psilocybin until after she was arrested, close family members told Fitzmaurice that they noticed she seemed happier.

Fitzmaurice said she’s embarrassed she wasn’t more aware of the potential legal ramifications of growing psilocybin mushrooms.

“Although I understood that certain mushrooms were illegal, I had no idea that growing mushrooms to treat depression would be seen as a level two felony with a potential prison sentence of 10 to 30 years,” she said. 

Courtney Barnes is a partner at Feldman Legal Advisors, where she provides a variety of services to the psychedelic ecosystem, including support with regulatory compliance and risk management. She told Psychedelics Today that Fitzmaurice’s case highlights the ongoing tension between the growing recognition of psychedelics’ potential therapeutic benefits and their strict and outdated classification in the legal system. That blatant conflict continues to put people like Fitzmaurice in a tough spot.

“The varying legal statuses across states lead to confusion, unequal treatment of individuals based on geography, and challenges in creating consistent public health policy,” said Barnes.

“This case underscores the legal risks faced by individuals who, in the absence of legal medical alternatives, turn to psychedelics for self-treatment. It also reflects societal ambivalence, where some see her actions as criminal, while others view them as a necessary and reasonable response to mental health challenges.”

Fitzmaurice said when police came crashing through the front door of her Indiana home to arrest her, her entire world came down along with it. She felt betrayed, violated, hopeless, and misunderstood upon learning she faced prison time and potentially the loss of the custody of her children.

“The most difficult part of facing potential prison time was the fact that I was going to miss out on watching my children grow up,” she said.

How Jessica Built a New Case

Fitzmaurice’s first lawyer failed to help her build a case, and after requesting several delays in court proceedings, he advised that she plead guilty to the felonies. Feeling she had no other option, she took his advice. 

Hale caught wind of her story just two weeks before Fitzmaurice was set to be sentenced. A lawyer with a deep personal connection to and understanding of psychedelics, he was appalled by the case and eager to help. Out of desperation, he reached her through the organizer of a GoFundMe campaign, launched to help cover Fitzmaurice’s legal fees.

“It was basically a done deal, but I had to reach out,” Hale said. “Here’s a woman who is 40 years old, with 20 years of documented anxiety and depression untreated by pharmaceuticals, thrown into this situation and she was scared, so she took the deal.”

When they finally spoke by phone, Fitzmaurice had already given up hope and was preparing to spend the next 10 years of her life in prison. After several conversations and with Hale’s help, she fired her lawyer and hired a new attorney, Andrew Maternowski. 

Hale said he knew that whoever represented Fitzmaurice would have to provide the prosecutor with some education on the safety and efficacy of microdosing psilocybin, and a better understanding of why she was growing mushrooms.

“When they arrested her, they came in wearing hazmat suits to avoid breathing the spores, which they thought would intoxicate them, so it was like starting from scratch,” he said.

Since her previous lawyer had failed to explain why Fitzmaurice was growing mushrooms, “the prosecutor thought she was this major drug dealer poisoning kids,” something they would have to change his mind on.

Together, Maternowski and Hale built a new case with letters of support from several experts, including researcher and author Jim Fadiman, psychologist and professor Dr. Alan Davis, psychiatric nurse practitioner Andrew Penn, and author and psychiatric nurse practitioner CJ Spotswood. The letters helped convince the prosecutor that Fitzmaurice was not a drug dealer, and Maternowski negotiated a plea agreement that would reduce the charge from trafficking to possession; from 10 years in prison to three months of house arrest and 18 months of probation. The judge later reduced the charge to a misdemeanor.

Legal Implications and Potential Reforms: Education is ‘Paramount’

Fitzmaurice’s case could have a nuanced influence on future prosecutions and defenses related to the use of Schedule I substances for personal medicinal use in the United States, according to Barnes.

“The fact that the prosecutor reduced the charges after reviewing her case and expert testimony indicates a recognition of the complexities involved in cases where individuals use Schedule I substances like psilocybin for self-treatment,” she said, adding that this outcome might encourage defense attorneys in future cases to present similar arguments.

Barnes also said the reduction in charges and comparatively lenient sentence could serve as a signal to both prosecutors and judges that, under certain circumstances, harsher penalties might not be warranted.

Several different approaches to drug policy reform could help prevent cases like this one from happening again, according to Barnes, who suggested that decriminalization of possession, production, and use of psychedelics could reduce the burden on the criminal justice system and allow more resources to be allocated toward public health approaches. Pairing decriminalization with legal access pathways, such as Colorado’s Natural Medicine Health Act, “is also a wise approach,” said Barnes.

At the federal level, she suggested that the reclassification of psilocybin and other psychedelics from Schedule I to a less restrictive schedule, “would more appropriately reflect [their] medical use in treatment in the U.S. and could reduce the severity of criminal penalties for use and possession.”

As more people turn to psychedelics and practices like microdosing psilocybin for their mental health, Barnes noted that although it is sparsely reported, there has been an increase in law enforcement seizures of psilocybin mushrooms.

“The growing public awareness about the potential benefits of psychedelics has resulted in a surge of people seeking out these substances,” said Barnes. “There have been a handful of reports indicating that arrests for psilocybin have increased over the past several years, likely, at least in part, resulting from an increase in demand for it.”

Barnes has also noticed an increase in regulatory confusion, especially in states like California, where an unregulated psychedelic market is currently thriving. She said the number of times she’s heard people confidently state psilocybin is legal there is “alarming.”

“There are harsh penalties for psilocybin possession in California, even if the law is sporadically enforced,” said Barnes. “As more localities and states adopt policy reform in a patchwork, the more likely it is for people to misunderstand the laws that apply to them. Public education is paramount here.”

How Jessica—and the State of Indiana—are Moving Forward

Despite the immense loss she has experienced, Fitzmaurice looks forward with a sense of hope. “I lost so many important aspects of my life: my children, my job, my career, and even my community, my hometown. Now’s the time to start rebuilding all of that.”

Now living in Arkansas, Fitzmaurice is committed to sharing her story with others and conveying the need for drug policy reform, especially in states like Indiana. As a recipient of a Psychedelics Today Vital psychedelic training program scholarship, she is eager to put her knowledge of and experience with psychedelics to use as a nurse. She intends to go back to school to become a psychiatric nurse practitioner so she can work with psychedelics in a legal manner. She is currently assisting at a ketamine-assisted therapy clinic and plays an active role in Decriminalize Nature Northwest Arkansas.

To help treat her depression, Fitzmaurice underwent ketamine-assisted psychotherapy and said with preparation, integration, and community support, she now has many tools that help her work through her trauma, “with a positive mindset.”

“The contemporary mental health treatment model may work for some people, and that’s fantastic. It doesn’t work for everyone, including me,” said Fitzmaurice. “I didn’t realize how badly we, as a global unit, were in a mental health crisis. Psychedelics opened my eyes to this and now, the nurse in me just wants to help.”

Since Fitzmaurice’s case made headlines in 2022, the legal status of psilocybin in Indiana remains unchanged—but that doesn’t mean Indiana lawmakers are ignoring it.

In March 2024, Indiana Governor Eric Holcomb signed a psilocybin research funding bill with a focus on veterans and first responders. Fitzmaurice called it “a great introduction” and said she’s hopeful psychedelics might soon be destigmatized in her home state, but said it’s unlikely the law will change in Indiana unless psilocybin is rescheduled at the federal level.

“People shouldn’t have to risk losing their life to prison for trying to care for their own mental health,” said Fitzmaurice. “These medicines need to be decriminalized or rescheduled at the very least. Humanity should not be punished for prioritizing mental health.”

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on July 25, 2024July 31, 2024

When Data Meets Doubt: Investigating the FDA Panel’s Rejection of MDMA

MAPS/Lykos’ MDMA trials for PTSD delivered overwhelmingly positive results. I thought that mattered until I sat through a nine-hour deliberation among the FDA’s Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee on June 4, including two hours of public comments that skewed anti-Lykos. 

After a long day of groupthink, the panel advised the FDA that MDMA therapy was neither safe nor effective for patients with PTSD. And while their vote is nonbinding, their opinion significantly impacts the FDA’s final decision on Lykos’ new drug application. 

So, how did the committee come to be? Were they up to the task of reviewing this historical application? And were their votes intellectually honest, given the failing mental healthcare system in the United States?

Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee: Who Are They?

The Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee (PDAC) consists of experts who provide independent advice to the FDA on the safety and efficacy of investigational drug products for psychiatric disorders. It consists of nine core voting members, including psychiatrists, neuropsychiatrists, consumer representatives, patient representatives, and one non-voting member, typically an industry representative.

Anyone can nominate themselves or others to PDAC. However, the FDA ultimately identifies and appoints candidates based on what they perceive as relevant expertise. Members serve one to four-year terms and attend several drug review hearings throughout the year.

The FDA also invites temporary voting members to certain meetings, bringing specialized expertise to address knowledge gaps in the core group. For the MDMA review, the FDA appointed six temporary members. But curiously, not one of them had specialized knowledge of psychedelic research or medicine.

Only one permanent PDAC voting member, Dr. Walter Dunn, holds a relevant background in psychedelic research. Dr. Dunn was also the only person to dissent from popular opinion, voting yes on both final questions:

  • Do the available data show that the drug is effective in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder?
  • Do the benefits of midomafetamine (MDMA) with FDA’s proposed risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) outweigh its risks for the treatment of patients with PTSD?

I don’t think the FDA purposely stacked the group against Lykos. But the committee’s lack of psychedelic expertise was grossly negligent, given the FDA’s goal of selecting experienced field experts. This novice lineup set the stage for a lopsided debate dominated by well-meaning status quo advocates who weren’t ready to unleash a transformative medicine they didn’t understand.

Kim O. Witczak, PDAC consumer representative, put it this way:

“Once you let the genie out of the bottle, you can’t put it back in.”

The Unprecedented Nature of the MDMA Review

The Unprecedented Nature of the MDMA Review

To be fair, the committee faced an incredibly challenging task of reviewing the FDA’s first-ever new drug application (NDA) for a psychedelic compound.

Members received a data packet with MAPS clinical trials findings and the FDA’s concerns prior to the meeting. They may have also reviewed the critical ICER report and citizen petition that prompted the hearing. Together, these documents feasibly served as their first foray into psychedelic medicine before casting incredibly consequential votes affecting 13 million Americans with PTSD. 

Additionally, it was the first NDA that merged a medicine, MDMA, with psychotherapy. The FDA does not regulate psychotherapy, so the committee had never seen such a proposal before. Until the MAPS MDMA trials for PTSD, they had only ever reviewed standalone prescription drugs.

This dual application caused distress and confusion as panelists struggled to reconcile their mandate with their desire to oversee the therapeutic aspect outside their jurisdiction. Admittedly, they were out of their wheelhouse, operating under a framework that didn’t adequately address the task at hand. 

“Maybe it’s time to say we have to look at the current way that we’ve always approved and reviewed drugs differently,” Witczak said.

Resistance to the Therapeutic Component

Resistance to the Therapeutic Component

With confusion looming, Lykos’ patient-directed therapy model was central to the panel’s skepticism throughout the hearing. They consistently questioned its validity and whether psychotherapy was even necessary alongside MDMA to alleviate PTSD. 

In my discussion with Witczak, she reiterated the concerns that Lykos’ protocol wasn’t tested against “recognized therapies” or no therapy at all, leading to doubts about its credibility.

She’s right that Lykos didn’t compare its MDMA-AT model to status quo approaches, like Prolonged Exposure. They also didn’t study an MDMA-only group.

In hindsight, they should have, given the panel’s doubt about alternative therapies amplified by public accusations that Lykos is a therapy cult imposing spirituality onto patients. But hindsight won’t help now. At the time of the trial, the FDA had approved the inner healer method. Also, though Lykos didn’t explicitly test mainstream therapies, scientific data give us a clear picture of their effectiveness, according to Dr. Scott Shannon, Principal Investigator in MAPS Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. Spoiler alert: mainstream therapies are not performing great. 

“Psychotherapy does something [for PTSD] but not that much,” said Dr. Shannon, who co-signed an open letter advocating for MDMA-AT’s safety and efficacy. 

According to Dr. Shannon, about 50% of people in PTSD psychotherapy trials drop out immediately, and of the 50% that pursue it, only half get better. 

“Our medications are even worse,” he said, adding that PTSD medicine hasn’t had a significant innovation in the last 23 years, and up to 17 veterans are taking their lives daily as a result.

Still, PDAC insisted that Lykos’ therapy was a significant X factor that might not be effective or safe.

Therapeutic Safety

Therapeutic Safety

A confirmed case of therapist misconduct within MAPS clinical trials exacerbated the panelists’ pushback. The case involved Meaghan Buisson, a participant in the phase-two trial, who filed a lawsuit against two MAPS therapists, Richard Yensen and Donna Dryer, alleging sexual assault and professional negligence. Buisson’s claims included video evidence showing the therapists physically restraining and spooning her during a session. Buisson moved near the therapists after the trial, where she alleges the abuse continued.

I’m not here to defend the therapists’ actions. I watched the MDMA session clip and was not ok with what I saw. I’m also uninterested in conjecture about what occurred between Buisson and Yensen after the clinical trial ended. No matter the details, this situation is a stain on the program, and the public needs to know about it so we can hold people accountable and prevent future harm.

At the same time, this inexcusable case does not erase MDMA-AT’s profound impact. For instance, Lykos’ second Phase III trial found that 71.2% of the MDMA cohort no longer held a diagnosis, compared to 47.6% in the placebo group. Additionally, its MDMA trials for PTSD had some of the lowest dropout rates in history.

We need to be able to hold two truths at once. 

1. Psychotherapist misconduct is unacceptable. We must continue raising ethical standards, recording therapy sessions, and holding offenders accountable for their actions.

2. At the same time, about 7% of conventional male therapists admit to having sex with at least one patient, and no one is suggesting we ban talk therapy as a result. Lykos’ misconduct case represents a lower risk profile than the status quo, and people with PTSD deserve a treatment that works. 

And not to beat a dead horse, but Dr. Shannon reminded me that the FDA has no mandate or interest in regulating psychotherapy. State licensing boards, professional associations, and the legal system assume that role.

Ultimately, the panel and public debated an issue that the FDA likely won’t factor into their final decision.

Broader Issues of Mistrust

Broader Issues of Mistrust in the MAPS Clinical Trial

The FDA cares about drug safety and efficacy data. But the panel’s broad dialogue extended well beyond the numbers into downright mistrust.

“I was surprised because usually [a drug] is approved more quickly, or [the panel] doesn’t raise many concerns. But this meeting had much more discussion,“ said Witczak, who added that it was “good conversation.”

Another committee member said, “It felt strange to vote no when the p-value started with three zeros.”

A low p-value, typically below 0.05, suggests that the results did not occur by random chance. So, a P < 0.0001 value – which was present in the MAPS clinical trial – is extraordinarily statistically significant.

Members cited functional unblinding (inadvertent awareness of group assignments) and expectation bias (preconceived notions about MDMA) as reasons why they didn’t believe the results. Additionally, they floated rumors from the citizen petition that the trial’s principal investigators and therapists engaged in data manipulation.

I’ll be honest. I wondered whether their points held weight, given the fact that most people in the MDMA group knew they were on MDMA.

Dr. Shannon explained that despite functional unblinding, the trial exhibited a significant effect size of 0.9. Effect size quantifies the magnitude of the treatment’s impact compared to placebo. Moderate effect sizes range from 0.4 to 0.6, according to Dr. Shannon, who explained that the best we for current SSRIs is a dismal 0.23.

“Even if our (MDMA-AT) effect size only turned out to be half of what we measured, it’s still much better than [the current treatments],” said Dr. Shannon.

But what about the potential fraud in MDMA trials for PTSD?

“I know several sites, and I know they did nothing untoward, nothing malicious, nothing underhanded. We knew we had to perform at the highest level of ethical and scientific investigation, and that’s what we did.”

Dr. Shannon added that FDA investigators were at his site for a week and had visited most sites throughout the clinical trial.

“We have been scrutinized to a high degree and stand by our data.”

Dr. Shannon could be wrong about the integrity of other actors in the trial. Some shenanigans may have occurred, and if they did, we need to question every single outcome.

However, such accusations are grave and rely on the FDA to investigate and determine their validity. The advisory panel meeting was not the format to litigate, yet the panel members clearly factored these stories into their votes.

Trying to Keep the Genie in the Bottle

MDMA-assisted therapy will revolutionize mental health treatment and society as we know it. I see that as broadly beneficial and necessary. But what do I know? I’m just one anecdote.

The data matter more than my opinion or that of any naysayer. But almost no committee member could speak to it with authority or provide any context on decades of historical MDMA therapy use. Without such a person, I witnessed the panel circle the drain in unison until they concluded they weren’t ready to let the genie out of the bottle.

I believe most members voted no out of genuine concern, like Watzeck, who said she entered the meeting with hope and optimism before the pervasive criticism impacted her vote. But others may have arrived with a pre-packaged vote.

“I would say some probably had biases. They may never agree to [MDMA therapy],” said Watzeck.

And that right there encapsulates why a committee hearing stacked with psychedelic novices could not come to an intellectually honest decision despite what may have been an utterly genuine effort.

Why the Political and Social Reality Might Supercede the Rejection of MDMA clinical trial

Why the Political and Social Reality Might Supercede the Rejection

Fortunately, the FDA’s decision is not made in a vacuum.

Witczak thinks the FDA may still approve MDMA-AT despite the panel’s concerns because of pressure from veterans groups and Congress to deliver effective PTSD therapies.

Dr. Shannon also thinks that the FDA will consider MDMA because of the dire need for innovation in mental health treatment. He believes the FDA will likely impose safety restrictions, like a limited rollout, enhanced data collection, and a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program. Still, he thinks the organization will ultimately say yes.

The FDA decision whether to approve or deny MDMA therapy is expected to be announced by Aug. 11.

“We’re in a paradigm shift from either a psychotherapy or a pharmacology model, which have grave limitations, into a new model that combines them both,” Dr. Shannon said.

I’d like to agree, but I suspect the FDA is filled with well-meaning experts who fear unleashing the unknown.

I hope I’m wrong.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on June 25, 2024July 2, 2024

Building a Unified Psychedelic Future: Ethics, Standards, and a Path to Affordable Access

In this episode, Joe interviews Lia Mix, LMFT, CPTR: founder and CEO of Delphi, a consulting firm dedicated to the healthy growth of the psychedelic movement.

After many years of working in community mental health and 15 years in the commercial health insurance industry (where she helped to establish coverage for autism), Mix was one of the first graduates of CIIS’s training program, and after a very distinct MDMA-assisted therapy session, she wondered: “How can I be of service?” She’s since helped to launch The Board of Psychedelic Medicines and Therapies, the American Psychedelic Practitioners Association, and Enthea, and is working every day toward a more unified and uniform psychedelic space, with healthcare frameworks, official boards and certifications, consumer protections, and a general consensus that this is our responsibility to manage – not some outside regulator’s. So how can we, as a scattered psychedelic community, come together?

She discusses:

  • Her path to psychedelics and how nobody was talking about how to bring psychedelics into healthcare
  • The need for a unified code of ethics for any practitioner of psychedelic therapy
  • The FDA, Lykos Therapeutics, and how the recent advisory committee’s recommendations on MDMA-assisted psychotherapy were largely based on fear
  • How there actually is a lot of financial possibility if we can all agree on what is absolutely essential right now

and more!

Links

Delphi-circle.com

Board of Psychedelic Medicine and Therapies

American Psychedelic Practitioners Association

Enthea.com

National Psychedelic Association

Psychedelic Medicine Association

Matthew Remski – Cultic Mechanisms and After Effects of High Demand Group Life

Psychedelicalpha.com: Exclusive: Therapists and Trialists from Lykos’ Phase 3 MDMA-Assisted Therapy Studies Push Back on ICER’s Critical Draft Report

Lykospbc.com: Lykos Therapeutics Statement on FDA Advisory Committee Meeting

MAPS Podcast: Episode 33: Matthew Baggott – Beyond Fear – MDMA and Emotion

Rocky Mountain Poison & Drug Safety

PT438 – The Psychedelic Medicine Association and Managing Medical Risk in Patients Seeking Psilocybin Therapy, featuring: Lynn Marie Morski, MD, JD

Mymodernmet.com: Kintsugi: The Centuries-Old Art of Repairing Broken Pottery with Gold

Psychedelics and The Shadow: The Shadow Side of Psychedelia: Exploring the dark and golden shadow of psychedelia

Psychedelic Pharmacists Association

Sandor Iron Rope

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on June 24, 2024June 24, 2024

What is MDMA’s FDA Approval Status? A Look Ahead

Following the multi-decade regulatory pursuit, legal MDMA-assisted therapy (MDMA-AT) seemed imminent to many people. In February 2024, the FDA accepted Lykos Therapeutics’ New Drug Application (NDA), and all markers indicated a likely approval.

However, on June 4, the Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee (PDAC) shattered optimism when nearly all members advised the FDA to reject Lykos’ application.

In a 9-2 and 10-1 vote, the committee asserted its belief that MDMA therapy, as it stands, is neither effective nor safe for Americans with PTSD.

So, what is MDMA’s FDA approval status following the hearing? 

The outlook seems grim, given that the FDA aligns with the advisory panel 88% of the time. Still, Lykos (formerly MAPS Public Benefit Corporation) remains hopeful.

“We believe there is a path forward and are focused on collaborating with the FDA as they continue to review our NDA over the months,” said Lykos in an email interview.

A final decision on MDMA for PTSD is expected on or around August 11th.

Unpacking the events that led to the recent developments in FDA approval for MDMA.

The Backstory

Starry-eyed psychedelic proponents didn’t see the dissent coming. The FDA had just granted Lykos’ NDA priority review, and everything seemed to be going smoothly. 

However, the contention became clear on March 26, when the Institute of Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) published draft evidence on MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD. In the report, ICER acknowledged MDMA’s potential to help people heal from trauma. However, it raised significant concerns about weaving this novel treatment into traditional medicine.

The TLDR of the report’s criticism was that Lykos’ clinical evidence did not sufficiently support MDMA therapy for PTSD. The report cited alleged data validity issues, potential biases from therapists and participants, and a reported incident of sexual misconduct. It also highlighted MDMA’s cardiovascular risks, unexamined adverse events, and lack of long-term data proving the therapy’s enduring effects.

A month later, five people submitted a citizen petition to the FDA commissioner requesting the organization convene an advisory committee meeting on MDMA-AT to discuss the application’s “shortcomings and risks.” The letter also called for an extended public comment period prioritizing concerned speakers, and a live webcast.

The letter’s primary claim against the NDA was that MAPS/Lykos allegedly “manipulated clinical trial data to hide adverse events from regulatory agencies, motivated in part by a belief that these agencies would not understand that these adverse events are a necessary part of their MDMA-AT.”

The FDA responded to the petition by granting the advisory committee meeting with an extended comment period. However, it denied the request to prioritize input from concerned stakeholders.

The Meeting

June 4th’s meeting was a nine-hour saga, inviting FDA members, public participants, Lykos representatives, and eleven PDAC panelists to debate the risks and benefits of MDMA-assisted therapy. 

PDAC boasted various roles in the psychopharmacologic field, including consumer representatives, pharmacists, patient representatives, scholars, and physicians. It did not include experts from the field of psychedelic research. Nevertheless, by 5:30 p.m., the board confidently dismissed MDMA-AT’s ability to do more good than harm for PTSD. 

Lykos told Psychedelics Today that they didn’t see the rejection coming.

“Going into the meeting, we knew this was a unique assignment for the panel to review a drug-plus therapy combination. We did, however, believe that the fact that studies showed MDMA-assisted therapy offers statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PTSD symptoms and functional impairment compared to placebo across two phase 3 trials with evidence of durability over time would compel the panel to support approval.”

MAPS / Lykos’ second Phase III Trial (MAPP2) found:

  • 86.5% of patients in the MMDA-AT group clinically benefited from the treatment compared to 69% in the placebo group. 
  • 71.2% of the MDMA cohort no longer held a PTSD diagnosis, compared to 47.6% in the placebo group. 
  • 46.2% of MDMA patients achieved remission compared to 21.4% in the placebo cohort. 

Despite the clinically impressive results, PDAC emphasized significant doubts about the data’s validity and MDMA-AT’s overall safety.

Functional Unblinding and Expectation Bias

Functional unblinding occurs when participants or researchers accurately predict the treatment they receive or administer. Expectation bias occurs when someone anticipates a particular result. Prior experience, previously held beliefs, and functional unblinding can cause such biases, potentially impacting patient experiences and reporting.

Dr. Paul Holtzheimer from the National Center for PTSD said, “Expectation bias can work in two ways. It can exaggerate the effect of the active treatment and blunt the effect of the placebo treatment.” 

It’s true that 40% of the trial participants used MDMA in the past and may have assumed the drug worked based on prior positive experiences. 

However, as Lykos points out in a recent statement, “The data indicates that prior illicit MDMA use had no impact on the results, as there was no meaningful difference in primary outcome measure or adverse events reported between the subgroup of Phase 3 participants who reported prior illicit MDMA use and the subgroup of participants who did not.”

Functional unblinding impacts, however, are far more debatable.

Renowned psychedelic drug researcher Matthew Johnson, PhD, explained Lykos’ unblinding problem in a recent X post. 

Johnson said, “For those [in the study] thinking they got MDMA, the therapeutic effect was nearly identical between MDMA and placebo [groups]. Yikes.” 

In other words, people who guessed they were on MDMA achieved similar therapeutic responses, whether or not they really took the drug.

Still, Johnson points out in The Illusion of Consensus podcast that functional unblinding is not a new issue for psychedelics, nor is it unique.

“There are a whole host of drugs that have been [FDA] approved. All of the sleep drugs… all of the anti-anxiety benzodiazepines, all the ADHD drugs… all of the opioid pain relievers. The practice of psychiatry is filled with psychoactive drugs that have very clear signatures… I want to know to what degree in FDA advisory panels this [functional unblinding issue] has come up… Because cutting through the blind is an issue for all these [compounds]… I don’t think psychedelics should be held to a higher standard than the normal process.”

Exploring misconduct and data integrity in MDMA clinical trials.

Misconduct and Data Integrity

Potential misconduct during the MAPS / Lykos trials added to PDAC’s concerns about the integrity of the results.

Allegations included reports that principal investigators: 

  • Discouraged patients with negative experiences, like suicidality, from participating in follow-up studies. 
  • Influenced patients to report favorable outcomes.
  • Inconsistently recorded adverse events. 
  • Purposely recruited patients who would respond well to MDMA therapy for PTSD.

PDAC also lamented the trials’ insufficient data on patients with severe trauma as well as an overall lack of diversity, citing low Black and Asian representation. 

Dr. Melissa Barone, a psychologist from the Maryland Healthcare System, said, “There are so many problems with the data that each one alone might [be okay]… But when you pile them up on top of each other… I think there are still a lot of questions about how effective the treatment is and how durable it is.”

At least some of the mistrust centered on the perception that Lykos and MAPS founder Rick Doblin, PhD, are determined to push MDMA approval at any cost.

Lykos says, “Like all research sponsors, Lykos and its clinical sites are subject to regular FDA inspections. We have full confidence that the FDA will continue to assess the integrity of Lykos’ research through its inspection process.”

Durability of Effect

Lykos’ clinical trials show that MDMA-assisted therapy exhibited durable therapeutic effects for at least six months. However, PDAC questioned the claim for several reasons. 

One was that patients utilized other integrative treatments in between MDMA therapy and the follow-up analysis, including:

  • Psychodynamic therapy
  • Eye movement desensitization reprocessing (EMDR)
  • Other cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)
  • Group psychotherapy
  • Prolonged exposure
  • Cognitive processing therapy
  • Holotropic breathwork
  • Interpersonal therapy

The committee expressed that these therapies introduced “confounding factors,” which made it challenging to isolate MDMA-AT’s specific impact.

Meeting chair, Dr. Rajesh Narendran, added more skepticism. He said, “I’m not convinced that this drug is effective in the short term… PTSD is a disorder where symptoms can fluctuate quite a bit. We all know that. And I feel like there should have been more repeated assessments over time to gauge where these people are heading.”

Psychological Intervention

Lykos’ unique psychotherapeutic approach was another confounding factor impacting the data, according to PDAC.

The FDA does not regulate psychotherapy, so this sticking point was beyond the meeting’s scope. However, several participants expressed distrust over what they perceived as an unstandardized and unproven modality. 

In reality, Lykos utilized an approved framework described in its MDMA-Assisted Psychotherapy for PTSD manual. The approach is a non-directive, inner healer method that facilitates patient-led trauma processing.

It employs standard protocols like Exposure Therapy, Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT), EMDR, and psychodynamic therapy. It also invites less conventional techniques, like Internal Family systems (IFS), Voice Dialogue, Hakomi, virtual reality, and Buddhist psychology.

Dr. Holtzheimer said, “I think the challenge here is that the psychotherapy in this case is not evidence-based yet.”

Dr. Barone added, “MDMA is not administered without the psychotherapy. And the psychotherapy is really vague. It is not well-determined. It seems like it was not standardized. And that makes it really hard to determine how effective it is…”

PDAC argued that the lack of standardization raises questions about the trials’ reproducibility and reliability. They also questioned the necessity of the therapy itself, wondering whether MDMA alone could elicit similar benefits.

Dr. Amanda Holley, a pharmacologist who previously worked at the FDA, explained this challenge in a recent Psychedelics Today Podcast.

“[The FDA] is having a hard time disentangling the contribution of therapy vs just MDMA. With this trial, they would’ve liked to see a factorial design that [tested] the therapy with the drug, an arm with the drug alone, and an arm with therapy alone. That would’ve given them a more holistic view of the data.”

What are the safety concerns raised about MDMA?

Safety Concerns

Another data gap involved cardiovascular health risks, which panelists said were not fully assessed throughout the studies. They raised concerns that MDMA could cause heart attacks and strokes.

In The Illusion of Consensus podcast, Dr. Johnson explained that this argument was somewhat “absurd” due to MDMA’s known effects. Sure, it raises blood pressure and heart rate. But it’s a reasonable risk-benefit ratio. Johnson compared MDMA’s cardiovascular impact to Adderall, which doctors give to children every day.

“Even with a minor abnormality at the end of a session, it doesn’t mean it will lead to a clinical event like a stroke, which is extremely rare,” said Dr. Johnson.

The FDA said it should have required Lykos to take EKGs and blood samples after MDMA sessions. However, the agency admittedly approved Lykos’ study design without these measures. 

The FDA’s admission did not shift the panelists’ perspective.

Sexual misconduct was another significant concern sparked by an incident in 2015.

A harrowing public comment on the matter came from Speaker 26, Sarah Grosh, who spoke as a proxy for Phase 2 participant Meaghan Buisson. In Buisson’s words, Grosh described the abuse that took place. Buisson’s descriptions of the assaults she suffered in session were recorded and are now publicly available.

Buisson also reported becoming suicidal during the trial and said that Lykos did not document this adverse event. She claimed MDMA therapy left her overwhelmingly vulnerable and led to further exploitation by her therapist, who she said trafficked her while still in the trial. 

Grosh asserted that Lykos’ leadership did nothing to intervene after she filed the ethics complaint in 2018 and that they continue to deny any ethical violations.

Lykos responded in its statement, saying, “This was a terrible and harmful instance of malpractice that caused profound suffering to a participant. Lykos reported this violation to Health Canada, the FDA, and the relevant Institutional Review Board and banned the therapist pair associated with this case from all future work. Since then, we carefully developed and implemented new policies and practices aimed to prevent, detect, investigate, encourage reporting of, and thoroughly respond to potential instances of misconduct or unethical behavior.”

Prospects of FDA Approval

Amid the shadow of alleged misconduct, data misalignment, and safety concerns, PDAC voted an overwhelming no to MDMA treatment for PTSD. The FDA is not required to follow PDAC’s guidance. However, the overwhelming pushback casts serious doubt over whether 2024 will be Lykos’ year. 

“It doesn’t look good at all. I imagine at some point MDMA will be approved for PTSD, but I wouldn’t put bets on it to be approved in August,” said Dr. Johnson.

Many people have read the statistic that the FDA aligns with advisory committees 88% of the time. However, a lesser-known fact is that in cases when the committee did not recommend approval, the FDA only agreed 67% of the time. This disparity leaves the door open for hope. 

Another hopeful sign, according to Dr. Holley, is that the FDA prioritizes public health when making NDA decisions. The fact that current PTSD therapies are highly deficient and no new drugs have been approved in decades represents a significant healthcare failure.

Lykos maintains that MDMA-assisted therapy can meet the nation’s critical mental health needs, and it has not given up on approval.

“While we understand that the FDA considers advisory committee recommendations, most of the conversation at the meeting centered on known issues that have already been discussed and investigated. In addition, the panel was focused on the regulation of therapy outside the FDA’s purview.”

Lykos added that the organization is discussing a potential post-approval REMS (Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy) program with the FDA. REMS would seek to ensure patient safety and regulatory compliance through measures to monitor and manage risks.

“If FDA-approved, prescription MDMA-assisted therapy will be launched with careful consideration of its potential benefits and risks, following established medical guidelines, protocols, and quality standards,” said Lykos. 

What’s Next if the FDA Approves MDMA-Assisted Therapy?

If the FDA approves Lykos’ application in August, the decision will spark a timeline that requires several bureaucratic steps before patients can access MDMA treatment for PTSD. 

  • First, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) must reschedule MDMA from Schedule I within three months of approval.
  • After the federal rescheduling, states must also reschedule the drug. Most have processes for automatic alignment, while others have state-specific scheduling procedures.

“Our plan is to make MDMA-assisted therapy available, if approved, in 2025,” said Lykos, who clarified that they would initially roll out the program to a limited number of sites.

What’s Next if Lykos’ Application Fails?

Lykos declined to speculate on what they might do if the new drug application for MDMA-AT fails.

However, in similar circumstances, trial sponsors must thoroughly rectify the issues through additional studies, further data collection, or modifications to the drug’s formulation, labeling, or manufacturing process. Once finished, sponsors must resubmit a package with all the information proving the issuers were resolved. The FDA then re-evaluates the application to determine if it meets the safety and regulatory requirements.

The process can delay FDA approval by a median of 435 days, requiring companies to spend significantly more time and money to get to the finish line.

The Bottom Line

PDAC does not think the current data proves MDMA therapy is effective for PTSD, nor does it believe the potential harms outweigh the risks. Lykos asserts that the clinical trial results speak for themselves and that treatment could significantly improve countless lives. Now, 13 million Americans with PTSD await MDMA’s FDA approval status in August. 

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on June 18, 2024June 18, 2024

An Inside Look at the FDA and Early Drug Development

In this episode, Joe interviews Dr. Amanda Holley: pharmacologist and regulatory consultant in nonclinical drug development, and previously a nonclinical pharmacology/toxicology reviewer at the FDA.

With Lykos Therapeutics working towards FDA approval of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for PTSD, ICER (Institute for Clinical and Economic Review) recently published its draft evidence report, concluding that they couldn’t endorse this modality. While disappointing to the psychedelic space, this report doesn’t determine the FDA’s official stance, and also really highlights a lot about how the FDA works, the knowledge gap between consumers and regulators, and how clinical studies should be designed in the future. Holley talks about the FDA’s dedication to safety and data, and how, essentially, drug development comes down to a risk/benefit analysis. 

She discusses:

  • Misconceptions about the FDA, especially related to psychedelics
  • The path of a substance in early drug development and how breakthrough designation works
  • The complications with blinding psychedelics, the placebo effect, and how much therapy is a factor
  • The contrast between productization and harm reduction: Should we be concerned with creating products, or understanding these substances better?
  • How changing one molecule really does create a different drug

and more!

Links

Icer.org: Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Releases Draft Evidence Report on Treatment for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine Assisted Psychotherapy for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): Draft Evidence Report

Psychedelicalpha.com: Exclusive: Therapists and Trialists from Lykos’ Phase 3 MDMA-Assisted Therapy Studies Push Back on ICER’s Critical Draft Report

Lykospbc.com: Lykos Therapeutics Statement on FDA Advisory Committee Meeting

Marijuanaindex.com: Delta 8 vs Delta 9 THC: Understanding the Differences and Effects

David Nutt’s drug harm scale

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on May 21, 2024May 21, 2024

Breaking Through Bureaucracy: Can D.C. Embrace Evidence-Based Drug Policy?

In this episode, Joe interviews two members of The Daschle Group: Founder and CEO, Senator Tom Daschle; and Public Policy Advisor, Charlie Panfil.

As Senator Daschle served in the House of Representatives for eight years (starting in 1978) and the Senate for 21, he was deep in the War on Drugs at its peak, and thankfully, as seen with so many of his constituents in recent years, the data and personal stories of so many healed people has broken through the propaganda and made him a strong advocate for psychedelic-assisted therapy. While minds are changing, and progress is happening before our eyes (the majority of substances the FDA is currently researching for psychiatric indications contain some form of psychedelic ingredient), government bureaucracy, a severe lack of communication between the FDA and DEA, and decades of lies are still massive roadblocks. How do we address all of this while advancing research?

They discuss:

  • The need to develop a partnership between the public and private sectors, mostly for the cost of treatments
  • The DEA’s place in all of this: If they’re essentially a law enforcement agency, why are they involved in the safety and efficacy of medical treatments?
  • The STATES Act, the Breakthrough Therapies Act, and how they can affect research
  • Why we need to move past relying on opioids, and instead, embrace a science-based drug policy

and more!

Links

Daschlegroup.com

VA.gov: The PACT Act and your VA benefits

Psychedelicreview.com: The Chemistry of DOI

DAV.org

IAVA.org

Legion.org

Woundedwarriorproject.org

Congress.gov: S.5123 – Breakthrough Therapies Act

PT488 – The Cost of War: Veterans’ Mental Health and Government Responsibility, featuring: Matthew ‘Whiz’ Buckley

Cato.org: STATES Act 2.0 Would Make the Federal Government More In Sync with the States and the People on Marijuana

Lykospbc.com

The Summit on Breakthrough Therapies for Addiction

PPA: Psychedelics and Pain Association

Gilgameshpharmaceutical.com

Abbvie.com: AbbVie and Gilgamesh Pharmaceuticals Announce Collaboration and Option-to-License Agreement to Develop Next-Generation Therapies for Psychiatric Disorders

APPA-us.org

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on April 16, 2024April 16, 2024

Tracking Legal Psychedelics in the U.S. and Worldwide

Legal psychedelics frameworks in the U.S. and abroad are rapidly shifting thanks to growing recognition of their transformative benefits. Where are psychedelics legal currently, and what can we expect around legal reform in the near future?

As of April 2024, dozens of U.S. cities have deprioritized criminal law enforcement for possessing psychedelics, while two states have passed sweeping regulated adult-use bills. Globally, Australia became the first country to codify legal psychedelic therapy. And Jamaica leads the world’s commercial psychedelics sector, fully embracing psilocybin use, sales, and cultivation.

Psychedelics legalization is occurring in various forms around the globe. The bottom line? Adults don’t have to look far for places that allow entheogens for personal or therapeutic use.

**Disclaimer: This article speaks to the legality of possession and use of psychedelics for personal, therapeutic, and ceremonial use, and largely, does not reference legal possession and production for research purposes. Be advised: drug laws change rapidly and frequently. This article is not a legal resource and may not be 100% up-to-date. Always check the latest local, state, and federal laws before engaging in psychedelics use in the U.S. and abroad. Have we missed anything in this article? Reach out to our team at editor@psychedelicstoday.com with your input.

Defining Legal Psychedelics

‘Legal psychedelics’ is an incredibly broad term. People use it interchangeably with ‘decriminalization,’ ‘deprioritization,’ and ‘regulated use.’ These terms integrate and sometimes overlap. But they also hold distinct implications worth defining.

Fully legal psychedelics refer to hallucinogenic substances that adults can use, produce, and sell because no local, state, or federal law prohibits it. Jamaica has one of the most robust legal psychedelics industries, but it only applies to psilocybin-bearing mushrooms.

Regulated psychedelics access refers to places with targeted legalization bills that allow adults to purchase and use these compounds for specific purposes, such as therapeutic treatment or research. Regulated access can also include state-level bills that enable limited psychedelic use under professional guidance, such as in Oregon and Colorado. However, state-level bills do not supersede federal legislation.

Decriminalization involves reducing or eliminating criminal penalties associated with possessing or using psychedelics for personal reasons. Decriminalization codifies psychedelic use as a non-criminal offense. It does not legalize production, sale, or distribution.

Deprioritization means that local law enforcement agencies decide to treat psychedelic possession offenses as their lowest priority. However, the substances remain illegal under the law, and offenders could still face penalties from state and federal prosecutors.

Where are Psychedelics Legal in the U.S.?

Psychedelics are not fully legal anywhere in the United States. Classic psychedelics, like psilocybin mushrooms, LSD, and DMT are Schedule I controlled substances. MDMA, mescaline, bufotenine, ibogaine, and several psychedelic analog compounds fall under the DEA’s Schedule I designation as well.

However, Oregon and Colorado recently legalized psilocybin mushrooms for adult use under professional supervision. These legal psychedelic states created regulated access industries – as of this writing, Oregon is ahead of Colorado – but do not allow retail sales or public consumption.

Oregon’s Legal Psychedelics Framework

Oregon became the first state to create a paradigm for the legalization of psychedelics after it passed Measure 109, the Oregon Psilocybin Services Act, in November 2020. The Act gave the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) two years to regulate psilocybin production, transportation, delivery, sale, purchase, and establish a psilocybin services industry through licensed healing centers.

In June 2023, the first healing center opened its doors, where Oregon adults over 21 could purchase and ingest psilocybin mushrooms in a supervised environment. State-certified facilitators must be present during the entire experience. Adults do not need a referral or a diagnosis to participate.

Who can become a licensed psilocybin service facilitator in Oregon?

People often assume Oregon’s psychedelic facilitators must be mental health professionals. However, any Oregon resident over 21 with a high school diploma can become a psilocybin facilitator if they complete the state-sponsored training program, pass an exam and background check, and pay a license application and renewal fee.

Oregon’s psilocybin services program did not legalize psychedelic therapy, where licensed practitioners offer psychotherapy services throughout the journey. Thus, facilitators cannot provide professional counseling during psilocybin sessions. Therapists who want to participate in Oregon’s psilocybin program can offer pre- and post-journey counseling. 

Expand your therapeutic tools by learning the art of pre-and -and post-psychedelic journey therapy. Enroll in our Navigating Psychedelics Course for Practitioners today.

Which psychedelics are legal in Oregon?

Measure 109 only legalized psilocybin mushrooms in Oregon. And only in a licensed and regulated environment. 

Decriminalization in Oregon

However, Oregon’s Measure 110 reduced criminal penalties and expanded addiction treatment services for various illicit drugs, including LSD, psilocybin and psilocin, methadone, oxycodone, heroin, MDMA, cocaine, and methamphetamine. These compounds remain illegal, but they are decriminalized – for now, anyway.
In February 2024, the Oregon Senate passed House Bill 4002, aiming to reverse the decriminalization policy, introducing up to six months in jail for possessing small amounts of psychedelics. The bipartisan bill now awaits Governor Tina Kotek’s review. As of this writing, Gov. Kotek has not indicated whether she will sign it.

Colorado’s Legal Psychedelics Framework

Two years after Oregon’s landmark Psilocybin Services Act, Colorado voted for Proposition 122, the Decriminalization and Regulated Access Program for Certain Psychedelic Plants and Fungi Initiative. Prop 122 made Colorado the second U.S. state to affirm regulated access to legal psychedelics.

Proposition 122 directed Colorado’s Department of Regulatory Agencies to establish a Regulated Natural Medicine Access Program where licensed healing centers will administer supervised natural medicine services. The Department may start accepting facilitator applications by the end of 2024, with healing centers expected to open in early 2025.

The measure also decriminalized personal use and possession of natural medicines but did not provide a framework for retail sales.

Which psychedelics are legal in Colorado?

Colorado’s Proposition 122 defines the term “natural medicine” to initially include only psilocybin and psilocin. However, on June 1, 2026, the term may be expanded to incorporate ibogaine, DMT, and mescaline (excluding peyote) if the Natural Medicine Advisory Board recommends it. Additionally, Proposition 122 decriminalized the possession, growth, and transport of these natural psychedelics for adults age 21 and older.

Decriminalization in Colorado 

Colorado’s Prop 122 included a provision for decriminalizing psychedelics. The provision affirms that “possessing, storing, using, processing, transporting, purchasing, obtaining, and ingesting natural medicine for personal use, or giving away natural medicine for personal use without remuneration” is not an offense under state law or the laws of any Colorado locality. It allows Colorado adults to grow natural plant psychedelics and fungi so long as they remain in the person’s private home and are secured from access by minors.

However, Colorado’s lawmakers recently revised the bill, placing $100 penalties on public consumption and $1,000 fines on people who violate the private property requirement.

Where in the U.S. are Psychedelics Decriminalized?

As of April 2024, Oregon and Colorado are the only states to enact statutes decriminalizing psychedelics use, possession, or cultivation. However, more than two dozen U.S. cities have deprioritized criminal enforcement of psychedelic offenses.

Which U.S. Cities Have Deprioritized Enforcing Criminal Penalties for Psychedelic Use?

Twenty-four cities, primarily in Massachusetts, California, and Michigan, have reduced psychedelics offenses to the lowest possible law enforcement priority. Most resolutions incorporate entheogenic plants and fungi, including psilocybin mushrooms, mescaline (except peyote), and ayahuasca. Most reforms exclude synthetic compounds like LSD, MDMA, and ketamine.

The current list of municipalities that have reduced psychedelic offenses includes:

1. Seattle, WA
2. Port Townsend, WA
3. Berkeley, CA
4. San Francisco, CA
5. Santa Cruz, CA
6. Oakland, CA
7. Eureka, CA
8. Arcata, CA
9. Denver, CO
10. Ann Arbor, MI
11. Detroit, MI
12. Hazel Park, MI
13. Ferndale, MI
14. Ypsilanti, MI
15. Portland, ME
16. Minneapolis, MN
17. Cambridge, MA
18. Somerville, MA
19. Northampton, MA
20. Easthampton, MA
21. Salem, MA
22. Amherst, MA
23. Provincetown, MA
24. Washington, DC

Where Are Psychedelics Legal Around the World?

Legal psychedelics only exist in a handful of places, including Jamaica, Brazil, Nepal, Samoa, and the British Virgin Islands. However, several countries allow psychedelic use and possession through decriminalization and spiritual freedom measures. 

Austria
Austria decriminalized personal possession of psilocybin in 2016 and generally avoids criminal penalties as its first drug enforcement option. However, all psychedelics are still illegal under federal law in Austria.

Croatia 
Croatia decriminalized drug use in small quantities, including psychedelics. However, psychedelics remain illegal overall in the nation. Offenders caught possessing psychedelics in Croatia may face mandatory rehab, community services, or a fine of €2,680.

The Czech Republic
The Czech Republic’s criminal code does not treat drug use as an offense. Possessing small quantities of drugs, including psychedelics, for personal purposes is punishable by a fine.

Costa Rica 
Costa Rica does not list Ayahuasca as a controlled substance and broadly accepts its cultural use. This acceptance allows ayahuasca retreat centers to operate without fear of prosecution throughout the country. Additionally, Costa Rica’s societal norms accept psilocybin use in traditional and spiritual contexts, although psilocybin mushrooms are not explicitly legal. 

Canada
Canada has not legalized psychedelics in a regulated or commercial capacity. However,  Vancouver and Toronto have decriminalized psilocybin possession under certain circumstances and are home to several psilocybin dispensaries operating in defiance of the law. Additionally, British Columbia recently decriminalized MDMA, methamphetamine, crack, powder cocaine, and opioid possession in small quantities of up to 2.5 grams.

Bahamas
The Bahamas legally allows the use of psilocybin-containing mushrooms, as they are not classified as a “dangerous drug” by the government. The 1971 UN Convention technically prohibits the sale of all illicit drugs in the Bahamas. However, psilocybin retreats and ibogaine clinics are prevalent throughout.

Brazil
People can readily find ayahuasca and mushroom retreats in Brazil and likely won’t face criminal penalties for possession or use. Neither are commercially available, and the active compounds they contain are banned. However, Brazil legalized the ayahuasca plant for spiritual use in 1968. And psilocybin mushrooms do not fall on the country’s list of prohibited substances.

British Virgin Islands
The British Virgin Islands permit the legal use and possession of psilocybin mushrooms. Selling them remains illegal. However, visitors and locals report that mushrooms are available for discreet purchase at public events.

Jamaica
Jamaica has become the world leader in the legal psychedelics industry. The Jamaican government actively promotes the nation as a destination for researching, developing, and exporting psilocybin products. It has set interim protocols for supporting cultivation and processing. Jamaica is also a global hub for psychedelic retreats and retail sales.

Mexico
Psilocybin mushrooms are Schedule I in Mexico. However, Indigenous communities openly use psilocybin mushrooms in traditional healing rituals, and several psychedelic retreat centers operate openly in Mexico. That’s because Article 195 of the Penal Code says Mexico’s Federal Public Ministry will not prosecute people who possess narcotics for personal medical treatment or who have peyote or hallucinogenic mushrooms intended for traditional ceremonies.

Netherlands
Magic truffles are legal in the Netherlands and available for sale in smart shops throughout Amsterdam. Additionally, psychedelics retreat centers operate legally in the nation, serving various entheogenic plants. However, possessing, selling, and using traditional psilocybin mushrooms remains illegal in the Netherlands. Additionally, psilocin, mescaline, and DMT extracts are banned, even for religious use.

Nepal
Psilocybin mushrooms are unscheduled in Nepal, meaning the government does not regulate or criminally prosecute their use, possession, sale, or distribution. According to local producers, psilocybin mushrooms have a significant cultural presence in the country, and adults regularly consume the fungi for spiritual purposes. 

Peru 
Peru legalized Ayahuasca in 2008 for traditional use, declaring it a National Cultural Patrimony. The law does not allow for consumer ayahuasca markets. However, commercial psychedelic retreats operate throughout the nation, and tourists travel from all over the world to attend.

Ecuador
In Ecuador, certain medicinal plants and derivatives, including San Pedro and ayahuasca are legally permitted in certain ceremonial contexts. Retreats serving foreigners are common throughout the country.

Portugal
Portugal enacted Law 20/2000 decriminalizing the personal possession of all illicit drugs, including psychedelics. Adult use of psychedelics is now an administrative offense rather than a criminal act in Portugal. At worst, offenders may have to surrender their stash and engage in community service. 

Samoa
Psilocybin mushrooms are legal in Samoa for personal use, possession, cultivation, and transport because they do not appear in the nation’s drug laws. Psilocybin mushrooms grow in natural settings and are called “Pulouaitu.”

Spain
Law enforcement in Spain typically does not criminally prosecute adults for possessing or using psychedelics like psilocybin. However, localities retain the authority to establish their own regulations.

Switzerland
Switzerland permits members of the União do Vegetal Church to legally consume ayahuasca for religious purposes. The country also decriminalized ingesting psychedelics in “negligible quantities,” including LSD, MDMA, and psilocybin, though it doesn’t clearly define what these quantities are. Additionally, in limited cases, therapists in Switzerland can conduct research with LSD.

Where is Psychedelic Therapy Legal Around the World?

Psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy is a brand-new modality in the West. Australia is the only country to codify this medical protocol into law. 

MDMA and Psilocybin for PTSD and Depression in Australia

On February 3rd, 2023, Australia became the first country to legalize psychedelic therapy. The nation’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) declared that psychiatrists could prescribe MDMA or psilocybin to manage PTSD and treatment-resistant depression. In September 2024, the first psychedelic therapy center, Clarion Clinics, opened its doors, charging patients $24,000 for a nine-month protocol.

Ketamine Therapy in the U.S. and Around the World

Ketamine therapy is legal throughout the United States due to its FDA-approval status. Canada, the United Kingdom, the Czech Republic, Germany, and several other nations allow ketamine for “off-label” medical and therapeutic use as well.

Ketamine is not a classic psychedelic compound. However, it does elicit dissociative psychedelic effects and a reported rapid mood boost through its NMDA receptor action. Most clinicians prescribe or administer ketamine as an off-label drug in IV, tablet, or nasal spray form for various mental health concerns, including treatment-resistent depression, chronic pain management, PTSD, severe anxiety disorder, suicidality, OCD, and substance abuse issues. 

Treatment does not require that patients seek professional mental health support. However, ketamine-assisted psychotherapy can help people experience more enduring benefits compared to receiving the medicine alone.

MDMA Therapy in the U.S.: A Look Ahead

In December 2023, the nonprofit Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS) submitted a new drug application for MDMA-assisted therapy. The application currently sits with the FDA for review, with potential approval as soon as August 2024. If approved, the DEA must reschedule the compound from Schedule I within 90 days. About half of the states are expected to follow federal recommendations. The other half must take legislative action to change their drug laws before patients can access the treatment.

Regardless of the red tape ahead, the U.S. could soon become the second nation to legalize psychedelic therapy, providing life-saving medicine to the most vulnerable populations.

Feeling like you’ve only begun to scratch the surface? Learn more about legal psychedelic considerations and how they may impact your practice in our course, Navigating Psychedelics for Clinicians and Wellness Practitioners. Classes begin May 8. Seats are limited, so don’t delay.


Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on April 9, 2024January 3, 2025

Preserving Psychedelic Legacies: Shulgin Farm and the Shulgin Archive Project

In this episode, Joe interviews Keeper Trout: archivist, author, photographer, co-founder of the Cactus Conservation Institute, and creator of Trout’s Notes, a website compiling personal research and collected data to help ethnobotanical researchers.

From an interest in cactus taxonomy, Sasha Shulgin urged Trout to go through his files, resulting in a friendship, and eventually, an 8-year project of digitizing all of these files into the ever-evolving Shulgin Archive.

Trout discusses:

  • His relationship with Sasha and The Shulgin Farm project, which aims to make the farm a community resource for therapy, research, events, and more
  • The messiness of cactus taxonomy, and how he believes we’re nearing the end of being able to properly identify cacti
  • The perception of LSD as unnatural and why the natural vs. synthetic argument is largely political
  • Why repealing the Controlled Substances Act is the path we should take over decriminalization or legalization

and more!

Links

Cactusconservation.org

Troutsnotes.com

Shulginfarm.org

Shulginfoundation.org

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on February 20, 2024February 20, 2024

PT488 – The Cost of War: Veterans’ Mental Health and Government Responsibility

In this episode, Joe interviews Matthew ‘Whiz’ Buckley: former decorated US Navy F/A-18 Hornet fighter pilot and now, founder and CEO of No Fallen Heroes Foundation, a non-profit focused on healing veterans and first responders with psychedelic-assisted therapy.

Buckley met Joe in D.C. while they were both campaigning for psychedelic therapy to any lawmaker they could speak with. He talks about how the government is spending a fortune on the military, but not paying the total cost, since so much of that is externalized onto the soldiers themselves. He points out how many of them care more about making money than saving lives, and how we need “We the people” moments to wake them up or remove them from office.

He discusses:

  • His time in the Navy and his transition back to civilian life, coming to terms with trauma and realizing how much was physical (including tinnitus)
  • His life-changing experiences under ibogaine and 5-MeO-DMT with the Mission Within
  • How we should be teaching veterans about various mental health options (including psychedelic-assisted therapy) as part of their transition process
  • The signing of the National Defense Authorization Act and the disappointing amount of money reserved for psychedelic research: Was it all just lip service?
  • The complications that arise when trying to get benefits from the VA while also trying to move on: When honesty about mental health isn’t incentivized, when do you tell the truth?
  • His experience operating legally in Colorado and how he plans to stay on top of Governor Desantis to bring psychedelics to Florida

and more!

Notable Quotes

“The military does an incredibly good job of turning us into human beings that are capable of doing some pretty horrific things to another fellow human being. And then when they’re done with us, they do a pretty shitty job of transitioning us back to being a human. They pay lip service to it, but there’s no return in it: ‘Hey man, you’re getting out. You’re not our problem anymore. We’ve got to focus on the next generation of killers.’”

“If we can get our first responders healed along with our military, I think this world would be a better place. …These medicines have the potential to turn warriors into peacemakers. And maybe that’s also why they’re illegal; they need little uniform killing machines that don’t do critical thinking.”

“Veterans: it’s interesting because it’s a tough community. We don’t listen to advertising or bullshit or anything; it needs to come from another vet for anything to have credibility. So you know, a Marcus Luttrell or a me or a JT looking a bro or a sister in the eye and going: ‘Hey man, this is what happened to me.’ Even in the back of their mind, if they’re like, ‘What the? That’s insane,’ there’s still a lot more of: ‘I trust this person. They would not steer me wrong.’”

Links

Nofallenheroesfoundation.org

MAX Afterburner podcast: Ep. 60 – Psychedelics Today Co- Founder Joe Moore

MAX Afterburner podcast: Ep. 84 – Healing Trauma from Columbine

HunterSeven Foundation

Militarytimes.com: First-ever provision for psychedelic studies included in defense bill

Psychedelics Today: PT427 – The Philosophy of Law Enforcement, The Criminalization of Self-Directed Behavior, and Transformative Care for Police, featuring: Sarko Gergerian, MS, MHC, CARC

Missionwithin.org

DoD TAP: Transition Assistance Program

Kranews.org: Can psychedelics combat prolonged grief? Dell Medical School launches study to find out

Psychedelics Today: PT432 – From NBA Dreams to Cultural Healing: Iboga and a Mission to Empower Gabon, featuring: Stéphane Lasme

Psychedelics Today: Could the Sonoran Desert Toad Cure Narcissism?

Tucsonherpsociety.org

Feb. 23 – 25: The Sacred Mycology Summit

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on January 31, 2024March 6, 2024

Caught in the Act: A Chemist’s Battle Against Felony Drug Charges

It was a cold, late afternoon in early January of 2022. I left my apartment as I had done countless times before. My destination was a church’s analytical lab, where I was involved in an ongoing psilocybin experiment.

Upon arriving at the warehouse, I parked my car in the familiar spot and headed into the lab. However, on this particular day, a strange feeling of impending doom crept up my spine as I approached the large roll-up door. Dismissing my intuition as an inconvenient interruption, I continued into the lab to work alone.

Inside, the deafening roar of the chemical-resistant fan that powered the fume hoods made it difficult to hear anything. But amid the noise, a destructive crash from somewhere in the building caught my attention. The sight of charred and mangled cars outside the warehouse did little to ease my growing concerns.

As darkness descended on the warehouse, I ventured toward the commotion. Frantic flashlight beams pierced through gaps in the large wooden roll-up doors leading to the loading bay. Through a small hole in the paneling, I witnessed a scene that sent shivers down my spine: heavily armed officers in bulletproof vests, armored helmets, and automatic weapons.

Disbelief washed over me as the officers repeatedly commanded me to open the doors. Still in shock and peering through the small hole in the paneling, I asked to see a search warrant. The response was swift and brutal, with the barrage of a battering ram shaking me from my stupor. As I was knocked to the floor along with shards of the door, the reality of the situation began to sink in.

I allowed the police inside, and the warehouse doors gradually rose to reveal a team of heavily armed officers in the loading bay. I was searched, cuffed, and placed face down on the hood of a police cruiser, surrounded by a fleet of police vehicles in the cold winter night.

Down the Rabbit Hole: How it All Began

As the cold settled into my chest, I reflected on everything that had led to this moment.

From an early age, I witnessed the tragic effects of addiction, compulsion, and mental affliction in my loved ones. This led me down a path of fascination with medicinal chemistry, introspective psychonautics, and the healing journey. I spent years immersed in laboratories, pushing the boundaries of my own limitations. But beneath my ambitions lay unprocessed trauma, and I was ultimately neglecting my own needs.

Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, I found connection with a community rooted in Kabbalistic Judaism. This diverse group (editor’s note: name withheld) embraced holistic practices, including holotropic breathwork, yoga, artistic expression, nature retreats, and guided ceremonies with psychedelic mushrooms as its sacrament. This religious nonprofit prioritized safety, with a doctor available at all times and thorough participant screening.

Recognizing the inherent variability in mushroom potency, the group sought to standardize their psilocybin sacrament. They launched an extensive cultivation and breeding project, and in the spring of 2021, I moved to Denver to support their efforts.

Over months, we transformed an empty warehouse into a 2,000-square-foot laboratory equipped with advanced analytical instruments. With chest freezers filled with freshly frozen, vacuum-packed psychedelic mushrooms, our goal was to extract, purify, and analyze the sacrament to determine its potency and enable consistent dosages.

Contributing to the safety of the congregation while delving into a subject close to my heart felt like a dream come true. My journey, marked by my biological father’s overdose, the study of Alexander Shulgin’s work, 18 months of immunosuppressive chemotherapy, and my near-participation in a MAPS clinical trial, had brought me full circle. I was now actively involved in a movement of compassion, community, and cooperation—a movement that offered solace and respite from the cruelties of modern life.

The Legal Conundrum

Despite my willingness to support the church’s mission, I hadn’t blindly walked into it. My legal counsel and the synagogue’s had cited multiple case precedents and interpretations of the law supporting the church’s actions as a legal and legitimate form of religious expression.

These legal arguments hinged on various factors, including the 2019 city-wide decriminalization of psychedelic mushrooms, the Denver Police Department’s pledge to deprioritize psychedelic mushroom-related offenses, and the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which guaranteed free religious expression for all faiths on American soil.

However, this thin veil of safety was torn apart as officers tore through the church’s facility, uncovering chest freezers filled with large frozen mushrooms. I couldn’t believe what I was witnessing: my arrest for sacramental mushrooms that didn’t belong to me, at a publicly registered and openly advertised religious nonprofit, in an era where psilocybin mushrooms were gaining recognition for their potential medical benefits and safety compared to alcohol or cannabis.

Despite my disbelief, the fact remained: I was bent over the hood of a police cruiser in a lab coat, surrounded by bags of mushrooms in the dead of night.

In an act of desperation, I chose to cooperate with the police, explaining the mission of the church, the foundational practices of Kabbalistic Judaism, and the purpose of the church facility they had raided.

It took two hours to fully explain my circumstances on record, and I could sense that the investigating officers were shocked by my story. Even for seasoned narcotics detectives, arresting a professional chemist with kilograms of wet psychedelic mushrooms at an advanced laboratory operated by a nonprofit Jewish synagogue was far from ordinary.

After the interview, I was told that the officers would investigate my claims by verifying the existence of the church and its community of over 300 congregants. For now, I was placed on investigative hold and sent to the city jail. As I was transported, the officer driving the cruiser expressed interest in my religious beliefs and confessed a desire to try psychedelics. I couldn’t resist informing the officer that the synagogue welcomed all without prejudice, should they ever choose to attend a ceremony.

The Reality of Incarceration

Upon arrival at Denver City Jail, I was processed, screened for COVID-19, and kept in a temporary holding room until a prison cell was ready. My court hearing was scheduled for the following morning, with release expected later that day. I changed into the orange scrubs of an inmate under the watchful gaze of a corrections officer who snickered at my visible discomfort.

Not long after I climbed into the top bunk above a fellow inmate, a nurse arrived to administer Suboxone to the man below me. Unfortunately, the inmate hit his head on the metal bed frame, opening a bloody gash, which went unnoticed by the medical staff. After administering the dose, the nurse advised the inmate to stay in jail until the effects of the Suboxone had dissipated, and then promptly left him in a sleepy stupor. He was released from prison hours later, without his glasses or cellphone, potentially unaware of the overdose risk he faced if he decided to use opiates again.

Moments after the nurse’s departure, a small wad of discarded paper appeared from underneath the cell door. It was a note from an inmate in the adjacent cell who had overheard the nurse administering Suboxone. The inmate offered coffee, sugar, and other commissary treats in exchange for more Suboxone. Although I was given a mangled pen shaft to respond, I had to disappoint the inmate by explaining that the drugs weren’t mine to give in the first place, and they were already gone.

Despite what I’d been told, I was not released the following morning. Uncertain hours dragged into days as I languished in jail, unable to speak to anyone outside.

Despite the challenges of incarceration, I found an anchor in the flimsy pen shaft I’d been given my first night behind bars. Throughout sleepless nights, I covertly journaled my experiences in the margins of my intake paperwork, holding the makeshift pen and papers out of sight from the guards. I began to notice the details of my surroundings—the layers of stained paint on the cinder block walls, the rank, humid smell of suffering and shame in the air. Desperate for news, I asked for an update from a corrections officer delivering the evening meals, but received only laughter in response.

My dreams were haunted by vivid visions of a court trial, conviction, and sentencing. Yet, amid the nightmares, I experienced a spontaneous endogenous psychedelic dream state that offered a glimmer of hope and resilience.

Pretrial Observation

Finally, I was released. Over the days that followed, the fleeting relief I felt upon leaving prison quickly decayed into anxiety and agoraphobia. Loud noises, emergency vehicle sirens, and media depictions of police officers triggered episodes of post-traumatic stress. Despite years of applying various psychotherapeutic methods for my own healing, and weekly support from a therapist, I struggled to remain emotionally present and descended into a deeply dissociative depression.

As an accused felon under mandatory pretrial observation, I was unable to leave the state of Colorado without court approval and had to check in with the assigned pretrial officer after every court hearing. Any attempts to secure employment were thwarted by the glaring red flag of a level one drug felony on my background check. Career opportunities that had been secured months prior were abandoned in light of the investigation. Even driving for Lyft was no longer an option.

In this haze of rejection and persecution, I received the support of family and friends, notably my civil attorney, Robert Rush, who connected me with Sean McAllister, a well-known champion of psychedelic and social justice local to Denver. His confidence and thorough understanding of the law were critical to the ongoing court proceedings and gave solace to my shattered sense of security in the future.

Sean and I reviewed hundreds of pages of documents and photos from discovery over the next few months. Just weeks after the arrest, I was reading various reports from officers describing their firsthand experiences arresting, detaining, and interviewing me, along with my mugshot, fingerprints, and a full transcript of the phone calls I made from prison. Working through the crippling weight of anxiety and deeply triggering nature of reviewing evidence, I attempted to offer insights and interpretations that eventually became integral to our initial argument for full dismissal of the criminal charges.

Despite seemingly insurmountable support for a guilty verdict and the shame I had internalized through the trauma of these experiences, I held onto the conviction that this criminal accusation was merely a relic of vestigial legislation. The misinformation and outright lies seeded by prohibitionist narratives since the advent of the War on Drugs had blossomed into burgeoning tendrils of prejudice and ignorance that stemmed throughout the criminal justice system and ensnared countless victims in its thorny grip.

Thankfully, I was hardly alone in this opinion. Mounting support for sweeping changes to psychedelic law had catalyzed the decriminalization of psilocybin in Denver just a few short years before, and a recent report from an impartial review board discovered that the past two years of decriminalization had not led to any significant public safety concerns.

Following his involvement in the initial campaign for decriminalization, my attorney continued to fight for psychedelic access through his work with the Natural Medicine Health Act (NMHA). This new law sought to retroactively decriminalize personal possession, storage, use, processing, transport, obtainment, ingestion, cultivation, gifting, and ancillary support services for psilocybin mushrooms and other natural psychedelic medicines, and create a legal clinical system for patients to access therapies at licensed facilities, staffed by specialists trained to state specified standards.

In comparison to my legal conundrum, this new paradigm seemed like salvation. Despite my social anxiety and traumatic episodes of police-related paranoia, I attended several events in support of the NMHA and immersed myself in the local ecosystem of fellow psychedelic enthusiasts and professionals. Stark differences in opinion over decriminalization versus legalization and regulation divided the group into clear sides: those in support of the NMHA and those opposed.

With the prospect of my freedom hanging in the balance, I was deeply confused and saddened by this conflict. Completely unable to discuss the details of the ongoing investigation, I repressed impulses to share my struggle, instead opted to thoroughly review the language of the NMHA itself and network with the incredible individuals responsible for drafting and supporting it. The guidance and expertise offered by this group was invaluable during this vulnerable time. I was humbled to receive their presence in my life and gladly accepted an invitation to host an educational psychedelic mini-conference at my home. The event included numerous presentations, talks, demonstrations, and group exercises from expert members of the local community and conjured a feeling of much-needed camaraderie in light of the glaring uncertainty surrounding the approaching election.

Despite all my efforts and attempts to support the campaign, review case evidence, and secure a path through this upheaval, I ultimately had to surrender to a lack of control. I slowly allowed a fickle feeling of freedom within myself and began to engage in my own life with renewed interest.

On a serendipitous skate down the Cherry Creek Trail into Confluence Park, I ran into a representative of the NMHA collecting signatures for the law’s inclusion on the upcoming November ballot. As I happily offered my support, I reflected upon the potency of surrender and its demonstrated ability to align me with an opportunity to support progress for the future of psychedelics and my freedom.

The Road to Redemption

Notwithstanding the inspiring support offered by compassionate communities, gaining ground with the prosecution moved at a snail’s pace. Resistance to dismiss the case outright was inherent to their initial plea offer of a level three drug felony (DF3), requiring up to four years of imprisonment and fines up to $500,000. Besides litigating the case in court, the upcoming vote for the Natural Medicine Health Act appeared to be the only way towards resolution.

After submitting my ballot in support of the NMHA as early as possible, I hit the road to visit loved ones and explore the natural beauty of the country. Over the months leading up to the November 2022 elections, I surrendered to the sweeping landscapes of North America, crossing the distance between California and New York twice before the ballots were counted. No matter what the future held for me, I was determined to bring my fullest attention to the precious days I had left and enjoy the freedom and simplicity allowed by a life rich with companionship and catharsis.

By November, the NMHA passed, marking significant progress in the psychedelic movement. Still, the prosecution remained resistant to dismissal. I contemplated accepting a plea deal to avoid incarceration, but it felt like a conviction in itself.

My legal journey took an unexpected turn in mid-December 2022 when my attorney presented a compelling argument for dismissal based on the NMHA’s language. To my astonishment, all criminal charges against me were entirely dismissed.

Reflections on Freedom and Justice

The dismissal of my case highlighted a profound shift in societal values regarding psychedelics. However, I couldn’t help but think about the countless lives affected by the War on Drugs and the thin line between freedom and persecution. My own burdens included debt, missed career opportunities, and traumatic memories.

As Colorado prepared to draft guidelines for the psilocybin industry, I continued to struggle to recover seized property. While progress had been made, the burdens of prohibitionist policies continued – and continues – to threaten the lives and liberties of many Americans.

My journey from arrest to legal redemption was a rollercoaster ride through the complexities of drug laws, personal trauma, and the evolving landscape of psychedelics. While I found freedom in the dismissal of my case, the broader fight for justice and the responsible use of psychedelics is very far from over.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on January 19, 2024January 19, 2024

PT479 – Psilocybin in the Midwest and the Need for Potency Testing

In this episode, Joe interviews Erik Vaughan: Co-Founder and Manager of Epiphany Mushroom, a mushroom and mental health company based in Akron, Ohio.

Epiphany mushrooms will initially be selling Lion’s Mane, Reishi, and Cordyceps, and they plan to expand into more functional mushrooms while also pursuing a license to operate healing centers in Colorado. Vaughan was involved in changing Colorado’s psilocybin legislation after lobbying to add a section that allows product testing labs to register and charge for their services – while voluntary and complementary to required testing, it allows growers to have an unlimited amount of product for testing purposes; adds an extra step in keeping the grower and lab in compliance with state law; and, as more states work on their own legislation, highlights the need for potency testing to let customers know exactly what they’re ingesting.

He discusses changing attitudes and how Michigan can lead the way for the midwest; why he’s excited about Colorado and what they got right; the enthusiasm of the mycology crowd; Rick Perry’s speech at Psychedelic Science 2023; the iron law of prohibition and mushroom products sold in Ohio; and the incredible inefficiency of the drug war (when viewed like it was not designed to do exactly what it’s doing).

Notable Quotes

“This is how we get to maximum access. There’s a lot of the population that wants a regulated, licensed program. But also, that is going to price out a lot of the population. And so, having access to all of these different delivery methods, all of these different programs, [all of the ways] you can do it, all of the different ranges of costs: I think this is how you allow responsible access to the most amount of people with the least amount of damage.”

“It’s just such an incredible inefficiency. We’re losing that war on every metric, and how is that good for anyone? …You don’t even have to care about the good that it does for the individual, you can just look at it purely from an economic standpoint: it creates this untaxed black market that has dangerous products. And how’s it going? That, again, is what excites me to see; that in 50 years, we’re going to look back and say, ‘Ok. Hey, we made it through that.’”

Links

Epiphanymushroom.com

Epiphanygardens.org

Courier-journal.com: Recreational marijuana is now legal in Ohio. Here’s what you need to know

Themushroomhunter.com

University of Michigan Psychedelic Center

Entheofest.org

Nbcnews.com: Could a little-known psychedelic drug treat opioid addiction? Kentucky wants to find out.

Vetsolutions.org: Stanford University Ibogaine Study

Narconomics: How to Run a Drug Cartel, by Tom Wainwright

Psychedelics Today: PT427 – The Philosophy of Law Enforcement, The Criminalization of Self-Directed Behavior, and Transformative Care for Police, featuring: Sarko Gergerian, MS, MHC, CARC

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on January 12, 2024January 12, 2024

PT477 – Oregon Measure 109: The Possibilities of Service Centers & What Businesses Should Consider

In this episode, recorded in-person at the recent reMind conference, Joe interviews Kaci Hohmann and Dave Kopilak: business attorneys at Emerge Law Group and co-chairs of Emerge’s psychedelics practice group. Hohmann also serves as Chair of the Oregon State Bar’s Cannabis and Psychedelics Law Section.

They were both drafters of Oregon Measure 109 (with Kopilak as the primary drafter), so this episode goes deep into the details, legalities, and possibilities behind Measure 109. What licenses are involved? What does a business heading to Oregon need to prepare for? What do they think the feds will do and how does that relate to cannabis’ Cole Memorandum? What is tax code 280E and how can its effects be minimized? What do they see the future looking like?

They discuss what they do for clients at Emerge Law Group; the differences between the cannabis and psychedelics industries; why service centers are likely more important than the products; and how the psilocybin service center experience is more like a relationship with clients than anything in the cannabis world, which makes everything much more complicated – but also much safer.

Joe also highlights some recent news, including MAPS PBC rebranding to Lykos Therapeutics, symptoms from traumatic brain injuries being improved by the combination of ibogaine and magnesium, and more!

Notable Quotes

“Cannabis growers have different philosophies on indoor/outdoor, all kinds of stuff that a discerning customer may or may not be interested in. So I think that some facilitators, just like service centers, can have any type of look and feel they want. Facilitators can have their own style of facilitation, which could range from anything: Indigenous/shamanistic or not, or health-oriented or something. And the ceremony part of it could be meaningful to folks or maybe not (like ‘here, take a capsule,’ you know). It sort of depends on a lot of things, but I think that’s interesting because it allows the facilitators to kind of mold their own ways of doing things and the service centers to mold their way of doing things. And you mix them all together and every experience might be unique.” -Dave

“I think there’s a lot of negative talk around Oregon’s program, or misconceptions. And I think some are valid, but overall, I think that things are going to trend in a positive direction, and I think as the program matures, we’re going to see a real healthy, sustainable program in Oregon. So I’m excited about the future, and I really enjoy all the clients that we work with. Everyone seems to be in it for great reasons. And I think that’s awesome, as an attorney, to be able to represent businesses who are doing something right in the world.” -Kaci

“I’m really hoping that this is a new industry that can, years from now, just be sustainable, be profitable for folks. So I want folks to stay in business. That’s why I want folks to go in with good business plans, good legal advice, good CPA advice, good business advice, know what they’re doing, play defense a little bit, not get sued (that’s a big one), get insurance when it’s available, and set a good example for other states. And I think if it proliferates like cannabis [did], that’s a great, great thing for the country. And I think it will. So every state will do things a little differently, there’s always things that can be improved under any system, but it’s all an evolution. We’re at the beginning stages, we just have to keep going and surviving.” -Dave

Links

Emergelawgroup.com

Emergelawgroup.com: Kaci Hohmann

Emergelawgroup.com: Dave Kopilak

Weedmaps.com: What is the Cole Memorandum?

Jdsupra.com: Section 280E and The Taxation of Cannabis Businesses

Links from the intro:

Psychedelicalpha.com: MAPS PBC Closes $100m Series A, Rebrands to Lykos Therapeutics

Nature.com: Magnesium–ibogaine therapy in veterans with traumatic brain injuries

Tenthamendmentcenter.com: New Hampshire Bill Would Legalize Several Psychedelics for Medical Use Despite Federal Prohibition

Scientificamerican.com: This Powerful Psychedelic Shows Promise for Relieving Traumatic Brain Injury

Marijuanamoment.net: DEA Confirms That Psychedelic Mushroom Spores Are Federally Legal Prior To Germination

Rockthebells.com: George Clinton to be Honored With Star on Hollywood Walk of Fame

Nytimes.com: Breathing Their Way to an Altered State

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on December 15, 2023December 19, 2023

PT469 – Drug Policy in 2023: The FDA’s Guidance for Clinical Trials, The Natural Medicine Act, and SB-303

In this episode, Joe interviews Mason Marks, MD, JD: drug policy analyst, writer, Professor at the Florida State University College of Law, and senior fellow and project lead of the Project on Psychedelics Law and Regulation (POPLAR) at the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics.

As somewhat of an expert on drug policy and FDA regulation, Marks discusses much of the current legal landscape: What was controversial and most interesting about the FDA’s recent guidance for researchers running clinical trials; how an amendment changed Colorado’s Natural Medicine Act and the odd vibe coming from the rule-making process (very private with canceled meetings and a notable lack of urgency); concerns over Oregon’s confusing program not being sustainable; and how Senate Bill 303 drastically changed confidentiality and how personal data would be collected in the state. 

He also discusses the complications and ethics of end-of-life care and psychedelics; the theoretical heart valve risk from chronic use and ways we could research this; the challenge of informed consent; the legal risk of transactions involving people gifting illegal substances; the Gracias Foundation’s recent $16 million grant to Harvard and how people at Harvard feel about psychedelics; and more. 

POPLAR, which was founded to essentially change laws around psychedelics, is hosting a conference on February 16 in Manhattan called “Drug Law for the 21st Century,” which will be looking back on 50 years of DEA drug policy and envisioning what could be different going forward. 

Notable Quotes

“I love the law because it’s sort of the rules by which society functions, and I think that’s why law in psychedelics is so interesting. And that’s why we founded this project, POPLAR, in the first place, was that we saw that there were academic, medical programs popping up all over the world (so they’re focusing on clinical trials), but it’s really the law that is the bottleneck in a lot of the scientific progress. So there wasn’t anyone focusing on fully investigating that bottleneck: How do we actually change the law [and] open up the valve so that we can get more scientific research done?”

“If you look at the law and you look at the Oregon Health Authority’s rules to implement Measure 109, there’s no question: It’s a non-medical program. People hate it when I use this word, but it’s a supervised recreational program. …Whatever term you use to describe adult use cannabis, that’s really what Oregon is with the change that there is this supervision component, and it creates a lot of problems, to be honest. One of them is the incredible cost.”

“I think just having honest conversations is what it really comes down to, telling people that we don’t really know. ‘This mystical experience you might have: It could be a very important part of the therapeutic process or it might be kind of ancillary. We don’t really know.’ I think a lot of people do jump to conclusions, and being open-minded like you said and educating oneself [is important]. I’m constantly learning. You have to be about this. You could study for a lifetime.”

Links

Yale Law School profile

Florida State University profile

Petrie-Flom Center profile

Ssrn.com: Academic papers

Psychedelicweek.com (substack)

The Project on Psychedelics Law and Regulation (POPLAR) at the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics

The New England Journal of Medicine: How Should the FDA Evaluate Psychedelic Medicine?

FDA.gov: FDA Issues First Draft Guidance on Clinical Trials with Psychedelic Drugs

Jamanetwork.com: State-Regulated Psychedelics on a Collision Course With FDA

February 16, 2024: Drug Law for the 21st Century: Learning from 50 Years of DEA-Led Public Health Policy

Nature.com: Introducing psychedelics to end-of-life mental healthcare

The Harvard Gazette: Harvard launches new Study of Psychedelics in Society and Culture

Ecstaticintegration.org: Do psychedelic treatments always require psychotherapy?

Psychedelics Today: PT409 – Pathology, The DSM, and The Ontological Shock of Psychedelic Experiences, featuring: Erica Rex & Mona Sobhani, Ph.D.

Apollo Neuro: Click here to get $50 off an Apollo wearable!

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on November 17, 2023November 20, 2023

Harming While Healing?: The Oppressive Nature of Psychedelic-Centric Drug Policy

Amidst the fervent cries of psychedelic-centric victory heard around Colorado since the passing of the Natural Medicine Health Act (NMHA), it is important to remember those less publicized, less well-funded, and less white, human beings who continue to suffer and die from various manifestations of the War on Drugs – the same political ill that prevented access to “natural medicines” in the first place.

A malignant disease afflicting the collective body of culture, the War on Drugs is among the most horrific, anti-human disasters in the history of American policy. Lack of access to psychedelics is one symptom of this disease, but there are many others; including the opioid overdose epidemic, mass incarceration, the creation of Mexico’s narco-state, the militarization of police, the erosion of personal rights, and continued institutionalized racism. Like a very expensive band-aid triumphantly placed on the skinned knee cap of a dying person by self-congratulatory doctors, the NMHA does absolutely nothing to alleviate these most malignant symptoms of the disease that is the War on Drugs. In this way, the NMHA and other psychedelic-centric drug policies paradoxically represent the continuation of oppression more than its end.

Passed on November 8th, 2022 by Colorado voters through a ballot initiative, the NMHA brought immediate statewide decriminalization and pending legalization of certain “natural medicines” including psilocybin, DMT, mescaline, and iboga. Those unfamiliar with the details of the NMHA can read about them extensively here. As far as psychedelic policy goes, the NMHA is a reasonably cutting-edge development, merging both legalization and decriminalization models. But there is no such thing as a “psychedelic policy,” only drug policy.

Dr. Carl Hart, Columbia University’s Department of Psychology Chair, defines the problem succinctly as “psychedelic exceptionalism,” “the perspective that psychedelics are somehow better and more useful than other classes of drugs like opioids or stimulants.” This rampant false belief that psychedelics can be meaningfully separated from the larger drug policy conversation enables the generally privileged and up-power “psychedelic community” to ignore prohibition itself as the core societal disease while profiting from the treatment of a single symptom. Rather ironic, really.

Gazing through the glamor and capitalist speculation currently surrounding the psychedelic phenomenon reveals a more essential truth: Psychedelics are morally-neutral substances just like any other. Our inability to see this is our responsibility, but, in part, not our fault. America has a long-standing tradition of simplistic moralistic judgments around substances which began with the Women’s Christian Temperance Movement in the 1800s and continued through programs like D.A.R.E. Our cultural soil is deeply seeded with the idea of “good drugs” used by “good people” and “bad drugs” used by “bad people.”

After decades of wrestling with this tired old narrative, we’re finally managing to change it, but only along those same dualistic lines of thinking. By highlighting the positive effects of psychedelics, we have begun to politically pry some useful substances from the realm of “bad” drugs. The DEA is now considering releasing MDMA from its unscientific schedule I clutches while states legalize and decriminalize some psychedelics. This is the entire basis of the psychedelic renaissance. What has unfortunately not been considered is the problem with assigning a moralistic value to substances in the first place. In a compensatory over-swing of the flawed rhetorical pendulum, “psychedelic people” and their “medicines” are now coming to be seen as “good.” Such thinking leads predictably to unjust policy outcomes. This is, after all, the same fallacious logic that sparked the War on Drugs in the first place.


The categorical separation of “good” drugs and “bad” drugs is synonymous with the assignment of human beings into those same categories. The prevalence of this bias in the psychedelic space, implicit or explicit, betrays a deep lack of contextual awareness leading to oppressive behavior, which is contrary to the kind of societal-level healing that the movement claims to represent. Despite the political utility of rhetorically distancing psychedelics from other substances, our “natural medicines” are still ultimately “drugs” that must be considered within the larger context of American drug policy.

The Cultural Context of Psychedelics: A Brief Reminder of The War on Drugs

To triage the symptoms of prohibition, addressing each by their lethality, reveals a clear picture of the injustice inherent in a myopic focus on psychedelic-centric policy change. While it’s true that lack of access to psychedelics is preventing untold numbers of people from receiving helpful treatments for things like anxiety, depression, PTSD, addiction, etc., these kinds of maladies are collectively overshadowed by more immediately fatal symptoms of prohibition.

Itemizing the harms of the War on Drugs is something akin to sorting through the rubble of a war-torn metropolis while bombs are still falling – an extensively horrific task far exceeding the scope of this article. Two vignettes that partially describe the scope of destruction can be found in the interwoven phenomena of the opioid epidemic and mass incarceration; two direct symptoms of the War on Drugs.

The number of people who died from opioid overdose in 2022 was the equivalent of a 9/11 attack every 2 weeks, and rising in 2023. After September 11th, 2001, the U.S. reacted swiftly to pass a series of sweeping legislation, initiate new programs, and even go to war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Opioids clearly kill many times more people than terrorism ever has, but no such action is being taken. We won’t even mention the fact that opium production in Afghanistan was higher under U.S. control. The solutions to the opioid problem can be clearly found in harm reduction-based policies such as those implemented in Canada and Portugal. These policies stand on much firmer empirical ground than those arguments that drove our country to war in the Middle East, so where is the commiserate response?

We surveyed 130 current students and past graduates of our Vital program to create a snapshot of the emerging psychedelic workforce. Click here to learn more.


The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention calls the recent spike in overdose deaths the “third wave.” It kicked off in 2013, is around nine times larger than any other overdose “wave” in history, and is primarily due to synthetic opioids like “illicitly manufactured fentanyl” and carfentanil. Fentanyl has long been found as an adulterant in compounds sold as heroin, but in recent years, it’s also been found in things that are not opioids like MDMA and cocaine. Fentanyl’s prevalence as an adulterant is directly tied to the underground market that was created by the War on Drugs.

Throughout alcohol prohibition in the 1920s, simple logistical realities incentivized clandestine distillers to manufacture the strongest possible concentrate of their drug, and moonshine was born. It was both easier to conceal and more profitable per gallon than beer or lesser-proof spirits. Fentanyl is the same story. One pound of Fentanyl is as potent as nearly 50 pounds of heroin, and one pound of carfentanil is as potent as 100 pounds of heroin. Which is more likely to be smuggled across a border? The manufacture and indiscriminate distribution of the most lethal substances is not stopped by the War on Drugs, it is directly caused by it.

An article published in the Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics titled “We Can’t Go Cold Turkey: Why Suppressing Drug Markets Endangers Society” names U.S. drug policy itself as a “key accelerant that transformed this wave of addiction into an inferno of death, disease, and personal destruction.” It’s well known that a policy approach centering harm reduction and public health over criminal punishment greatly reduces overdose deaths. Yet, we continue to quietly tolerate more than a hundred thousand American deaths each recent year.

Overdose is only one of many dark manifestations of prohibition untouched by psychedelic-centric policies. The United States, the “land of the free,” only has 4% of the world’s overall population, yet holds 20% of the prison population. Of those people in U.S. prisons, 45% are there for nonviolent drug offenses. This means that nearly 10% of human beings in prison on planet Earth are imprisoned in the United States as non-violent victims of the War on Drugs.

Is Vital right for you? Learn more and download the curriculum here.


The outcome of American drug policy is so horrifically maligned with the logical goals of such policies (public health & safety) that one can’t help but question the intentions of policymakers. Far from the realm of fringe conspiracy, we have seen institutional harm inflicted intentionally on substance users in the past.  In the 1920s, the U.S. Government intentionally poisoned alcohol heading for the underground market, resulting in the death of at least 10,000 people. This action was justified using logic that claimed people who use drugs are bad, morally reprehensible humans – that same tired old trick of moral conflation. If the goal of the War on Drugs was to reduce drug use and create a safer society, then it has failed horribly. If the goal is to punish “bad” drug users in some of the most severe ways imaginable, then the War on Drugs has been a resounding success.

Through the lens of trauma-informed care, which invites us to see substance use as a result of trauma, the situation becomes downright sinister. A common American story might be told as such: A traumatized person turns to substances as a momentarily helpful coping mechanism. (Those with 4 or more Adverse Childhood Experiences are 1,350% more likely to abuse opiates than the general population). As a direct result of prohibition itself, the substances they find on the street are concentrated to the highest potency imaginable. There are few, if any, harm reduction or effective mental health services available. Instead, a militarized police force backed by an 80-billion-dollar prison industry is actively seeking to put this person in a cage – that is if they don’t overdose first. It is into this maelstrom that policies like the NMHA interject: “Legalize psychedelics!”

Why Only “Natural Medicines”?

A report from the Colorado Department of Public Safety on substance use trends does not even mention psilocybin or other psychedelics as relevant factors in state public health. The report does, however, describe an increase in fentanyl-related incidents including lethal overdose, explaining that 275,569 doses of fentanyl were seized in 2021. According to the Denver Open Data Crime Catalog, only 14 people were arrested for psychedelics in 2021, and 24 people in 2020. For opioid arrests in those same years, the numbers were much higher: 236 and 348 people respectively. The numbers were even higher for the worst outcomes, with an average of about 1,000 people dying every year in Colorado from an opioid overdose. In this way, psychedelics are not an immediately pressing issue from a law enforcement or public health perspective. So why do they continue to be the sole focus of organized and well-funded political efforts such as that which birthed the NMHA? Why has this particular symptom of prohibition received so much attention, funding, and policy action?

Interest Convergence: Suddenly The Privileged Care About Drug Policy

It’s an unfortunate truth that our beloved Renaissance and all of the psychedelic research and policy are predominantly reflective of white interests. One historian asserts that “psychedelic culture [is] dominated by privileged white men.” Indeed, a recent U.S.-based survey of over 41,000 people found that more than half of the white respondents had used psilocybin or LSD, “whereas less than one-quarter of Black [people] reported lifetime psilocybin use.” A relevant meta-analysis examining 18 studies on psychedelic-assisted therapy that occurred between 1993 and 2013 revealed that “82.3% of the participants were non-Hispanic white.” Psychedelic exceptionalism appears to have firm roots in institutional racism and white privilege.

“Under the theory of interest convergence, there will be no racial progress unless the interests of the marginalized align with the interests of those in power,” said the dean of equity and inclusivity at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, Tomar Pierson-Brown. Drug use itself is nearly universal, and a full half of the people in the United States 12 years and older have used illegal drugs at least once, but there have always been substantial practical disparities in the way our culture takes and politically relates to substances based on arbitrary categorization.

Despite the fact that white people use drugs at higher rates, Black people are nearly three times as likely to be arrested for them; and people of color now make up more than 66% of the U.S. prison population while representing only 37% of the general population. Overdose rates also display increasing disparity across racial and economic lines. Between 2019 and 2020, overdose death rates throughout the U.S. rose 44% for Black people, 39% for American Indian/Alaska natives, and only 20% for white people. Counties with greater economic inequality saw Black people die from overdose twice as often compared to counties with more equal economic distribution.

As if by design, historically oppressed groups suffer and die from the War on Drugs at higher rates than white people. Though the recent intensification of overdose deaths allows a more clear view, we have seen these same kinds of disparities for decades with little attention given. Besides MAPS, which is perhaps the first pharmaceutical company in history to explicitly oppose the War on Drugs, there have been few for-profit organizations working to fight prohibition in any way. Now we see psychedelic ticker stocks, psychedelic venture capitalists, and psychedelic certificate programs all vehemently fronting the narrative of “healing” while functionally ignoring the collective disease that is the War on Drugs.

It seems institutional racism, the at-scale death of opioid users, and mass incarceration were not enough to attract the attention of the wealthy and powerful to drug policy. Only the promise of greater wealth has been sufficient to finally stir society’s biggest players into support of limited reform. Suddenly, every venture capitalist is a psychedelic advocate, but where are the drug policy advocates? After all, the only true difference between the heroin dealer and the “psychedelic entrepreneur” is that one is on a side of the culturally created narrative which happens to be favored at this particular moment in history. Tomar Pierson-Brown puts it succinctly in saying: “It’s not irony, it’s interest convergence.”

Join us for A Vital Journey: an 8-day breathwork retreat in Blue Osa, Costa Rica, January 6 – 13, 2024. Click here for more info.

Healing Without Harming: Anti-Oppressive Psychedelic Advocacy

Psychedelic modalities are without-argument desperately needed as accessible tools for front-line mental health professionals, but policy efforts focused on them exclusively are oppressive. Ibram Kendi, author of How to be an Antiracist, explains that “there is no such thing as not racist, there are either anti-racists or racists.” In this same way, drug policy is either anti-oppressive or oppressive. There is no in-between. Without applying this attitude, policy and organizational efforts within the psychedelic space are destined to become embodied examples of oppression.

Anti-oppressive approaches “minimize the effects of structural inequalities, social hierarchies, and power differentials.” As we have seen, psychedelic-centric policies like Colorado’s NMHA actually accentuate the power of the dominant groups and do absolutely nothing for the people suffering most from the War on Drugs. Drug policies like the NMHA neglect the most destructive aspects of the War on Drugs in favor of the more profitable, ‘sexy,’ and privilege-aligned substances (like psychedelics). These kinds of policies pander to the dominant culture while ignoring the core problem.

Fervent psychedelic purists (I know because I used to be one) will argue that making psychedelic healing widely available would lead to the amelioration of addiction. While this is true to a degree, it would not happen fast enough to meaningfully stem the tide of overdose deaths and is a backward way to approach the problem; like using nicotine patches to treat lung cancer.

Anti-oppressive psychedelic advocacy must necessarily include and prioritize an end to the War on Drugs as a whole, not just psychedelic legalization or decriminalization. The systemic situation that prevents access to psychedelics is the same that has created the overdose epidemic, mass incarceration, and a slew of other hugely destructive phenomena. It’s the War on Drugs and the disease of prohibition. As beneficiaries of recent drug policy changes, psychedelic institutions of all kinds have a clear responsibility to advocate for an end to the War on Drugs writ large. To ask “How can I make a psychedelic dollar?” without simultaneously asking “What can I do to help end the War on Drugs?” is unjust and tone-deaf. Only by directly addressing the core disease itself, and not just a single symptom, can we begin to truly heal as a culture.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on October 6, 2023October 6, 2023

PT448 – Ibogaine, Noribogaine, and the Challenges of Federal Drug Policy

In this episode, Joe interviews Deborah C. Mash, Ph.D.: neuroscientist; Professor Emerita of Neurology and Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; and leading researcher in addiction and brain disorders for over 30 years.

She is also the CEO and Founder of DemeRx Inc., a clinical stage drug development company working to advance ibogaine and its active metabolite, noribogaine, for the treatment of opioid use disorder. She talks about the Federal and state complications behind ibogaine research, the need for partnerships between clinics and researchers, what needs to be done to collect much needed Phase II and III ibogaine data, and why this all has to be in partnership with the FDA. 

And she discusses much more: her story of how studying Cocaethylene led to her finding out about ibogaine; ibogaine and QTc-prolongation; deaths related to iboga and the amount of variables that aren’t considered; how the French were essentially using noribogaine in the 1930s; and, as this was recorded at Psychedelic Science 2023, her thoughts on the event and Rick Doblin’s opening statement.

Notable Quotes

“We can now study all of the neurons in the brain for the first time and genetically phenotype them. So now we know there are subclasses of GABA neurons, there are subclasses of glutamate neurons. I mean, this is profound. And so here we are. We’re at, again, another next wave of learning about the human brain. There’s more neurons and neural connections in the human brain than there are stars in the Milky Way galaxy. So it’s a complicated story.” 

“If anything, ibogaine is the hardest psychedelic to work with. But I’m here for the challenge.” 

Links

DemeRx.com

ATAI.life

Tribecafilm.com: Of Night and Light: The Story of Iboga and Ibogaine

IPCI.life

Fireflyvr.com

Try Homecoming free for 90 days!

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on September 26, 2023September 26, 2023

PT445 – The Drug War, Harm Reduction, and the Middle Ground Between Liberty and Regulation

In this episode, Joe interviews Ethan Nadelmann: author, speaker, Founder and former Executive Director of Drug Policy Alliance, host of the PSYCHOACTIVE podcast, and one of the leading voices in drug policy reform and harm reduction. 

Nadelmann shares his journey from Princeton University to founding Drug Policy Alliance, to working with George Soros, encouraging Gary Johnson to push cannabis legalization, and interacting with prominent figures like Milton Friedman and Grover Norquist. He explores the motivations behind the drug war, the massive growth of incarcerations it led to, why the US spread its war on drugs abroad even when it went against our best interests, and, thankfully, the progress made in fighting the drug war – particularly with cannabis and psychedelics.

And he discusses much more: the banning of drug testing kits; the damages of our slow learning curve against the idea of a safe supply; the risks of under-prescribing opioids for people who actually need them; how libertarians, the right, and left are all starting to become against the drug war for the same reasons; why cigarette smokers should all switch to vaping; the concept of needing to pass a test at the pharmacy to prove you understand (and won’t abuse) medication; and some strong arguments for decriminalization as an incremental step. And he asks some pretty important questions that we can all simmer on for a bit: how do we find a balance between helping people and not opening the rest of society up to harm? How do we challenge abuse in a way that doesn’t hurt future harm reduction efforts? And how do we incentivize people into acting in their own best interests? 

Notable Quotes

“The drug war resulted in the unnecessary arrests of tens of millions of Americans, the unnecessary incarceration of millions of Americans (oftentimes for very long periods of time), hundreds of thousands of people dying in this country with HIV/AIDS unnecessarily, tens of thousands dying of overdose unnecessarily. That was the drug war.”

“If I could snap my fingers and all of the 30, 35 million American cigarette smokers in the country today, or all of the 1.1 billion smokers around the world were to suddenly stop smoking cigarettes, and all of them were to take up vaping (the e cigarettes); …it would represent one of the greatest advances in public health in U.S. and global history, because the risks of smoking are so dramatically, dramatically greater than the risks of consuming nicotine in non-combustible forms.”

“You look at people pursuing that type of legal course of action where they claim it’s about helping bring attention, but in fact it’s having exactly the opposite results. Yes, it’s important to fix these things, but the methods and ways you go about it are incredibly important. It’s just like the same thing when you had that case involving the therapist in the MAPS training program who did stuff that was sexually inappropriate, etc. And on the one hand, you definitely need people to bring attention to that, and more credit to them for bringing attention to those abuses. On the other hand, one has to have the basic realization that that happens in all areas of psychotherapy. You can’t eliminate this stuff. It’s human nature, it’s humankind. You can minimize the incidence of it, you can bring attentions to the abuses, but make sure that what you’re advocating as the fix is not leading to doing more harm.”

Links

Drugpolicy.org

PSYCHOACTIVE podcast

Ted.com: Ethan Nadelmann: Why we need to end the War on Drugs

Researchgate.net: U.S. Drug Policy: A Bad Export, by Ethan A. Nadelmann

Studentsforliberty.org

Nationalpain.org

iceers.org

Nudge: The Final Edition (Revised), by Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein

Visit remindmedia.com and use code REMPSYCTODAY for 10% off your registration.
Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on August 25, 2023August 25, 2023

PT435 – The Federal Right to Try Act, The Farm Bill, and the Constant Balance Between Risk and Regulation

In this episode, Joe interviews Satya Thallam: Policy Advisor at the international law firm, Arnold & Porter; and longtime policy expert based in Washington, D.C. who previously served in senior roles at both the White House and the U.S. Senate.

Thallam was the lead author and negotiator of the Federal Right to Try Act, which grants terminally ill patients access to experimental therapies and substances that have completed Phase I testing but have not yet been approved by the FDA. He discusses its intricacies and benefits, how psychedelics were not a focus but were always obvious, whether or not it allows people to grow their own mushrooms, and more. He talks abut the implementation of the first Federal legalization of hemp under the Farm Bill in 2018, breaking down the history and detail of how it came to be, and why a difference of .3% in weight truly matters when establishing law.

He discusses the changing landscape of politicians and psychedelics; how local action creates a culture of inspiring Washington; the internal fight between different agencies and the endless lobbying it takes to get things done; how one needs to cater their argument by who is listening; risk assessment and judgment-proof operations; the concern over whether or not we got everything wrong with cannabis; and why we will likely begin seeing a lot of coalitions popping up in the psychedelic space.

Notable Quotes

“All of this, even just the traditional FDA regulatory rubric, is about a trade-off between type one and type two errors. And you can set policy in such a way that there’s 0% chance of any harm, but then you forgo any possible benefits from that. There is no drug anywhere that has 0% risk. Even Advil has risk, right? It’s all about dosage, it’s all about use, it’s about other conditions that you may have, it’s about tailoring it to the appropriate indication. …We make these trade-offs all the time, and I just happen to fall more in the camp that a greater degree of those trade-offs should be at an individual level to the degree possible than establishing a macro floor or ceiling that people have to respond to, because you may forego some incredible benefits like we’re seeing – especially in some of the psychedelics here.”

“I’m reminded of that Simpsons episode where Homer just says: ‘When will people learn democracy just doesn’t work?’ Like, this is the necessary mess of democratic institutions, right? They’re not structured to listen to the single smartest person in the room. That’s by design. That’s a feature, not a bug. But it also means progress can be slow, slower than we want it to be. …I’m newish. I’m sort of a noob to the psychedelics community, but I’m not new to policy. I think the folks that you talk to that are in your circle, that listen to this show, should be pretty encouraged. I think overwhelmingly, things are going in the direction that you would want them to.”

Links

Arnoldporter.com: Satya Thallam

Psychedelics Today: PT405 – The Psychedelic Medicine PAC: The Push for Federal Funding and Politicians Who Will Fight for Us, featuring Melissa Lavasani

Politico.com: K Street warms up to psychedelics

Join us in the Netherlands for the Kiyumí Psilocybin Retreat & Vital Training: September 6-11, 2023. Click here to learn more and apply!
Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on August 18, 2023August 18, 2023

PT433 – From Personal Healing to Public Policy: The Path to Psychedelic Decriminalization in Mexico

In this episode, recorded in-person at Psychedelic Science 2023, Kyle interviews Senator for the Mexican Green Party, Alejandra Lagunes.

Lagunes is the first Senator in Mexico to promote the use of psychedelics, and has been organizing open parliaments to foster collaboration between researchers, scientists, politicians, and Indigenous people, culminating in a groundbreaking decriminalization initiative to decriminalize psilocybin and psilocin from list 1 to list 3 (meaning they could be prescribed), create a new chapter for entheogens (and move mushrooms there), build an economically beneficial framework for Indigenous people, protect ancestor knowledge by law, and make big bioconservation moves with changes to environmental laws. 

She discusses her personal journey with depression, anxiety, and a life-saving ayahuasca journey; how Covid uncovered a crisis in meaning and an openness to talk about mental health; the need for accessibility and safety in psychedelics against challenges in politics and policy implementation; our mental health crisis and the need for innovation, education, and overcoming stigma; the influence of US drug control policies on international regulations; the power of storytelling; and why we need to go back to our origins.

Notable Quotes

“The world means to go back to the beginning, to the point of beginning. And I like to think that this psychedelic revolution or renaissance is actually going back to the beginning, to the essence. And that space: you have to talk about environment, you have to talk about the planet, you have to talk about ancestors and their relationship with the planet and with the community. …The revolution is going back to that space, outside and inside. It’s like going back to the origin.”

“The medicine is as important as the places they grow in. The medicine is in the ecosystem. You have heard about the mycelium. You can grow a mushroom in your house. That’s great. But the mycelium in those places: it’s for them, the medicine. The rain, the thunder, and the earth, the soil where the mushrooms are grown: it’s the medicine. So we have to protect those areas.”

“You know what I think all the countries should do? The World Health Organization (the WHO) has these lists of substances, and as countries, we can ask our governments to ask for a revision of those lists. So we have to start. Like, there are many ways we have to work the decriminalization. I mean, the psychedelics shouldn’t be in that list, and they are in an international list. So my question is why governments aren’t moving that list?”

Links

Alejandralagunes.mx

Join us in the Netherlands for the Kiyumí Psilocybin Retreat & Vital Training: September 6-11, 2023. Click here to learn more and apply!
Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on July 28, 2023July 28, 2023

PT427 – The Philosophy of Law Enforcement, The Criminalization of Self-Directed Behavior, and Transformative Care for Police

In this episode, Joe interviews Sarko Gergerian, MS, MHC, CARC: a police peer support, community outreach, and health-fitness officer; founding member of the Community and Law Enforcement Assisted Recovery Program (C.L.E.A.R.); and psychotherapist trained in ketamine- and MDMA-assisted psychotherapy.

Any regular listener of the show should be familiar with how passionately Joe is against the drug war and the resulting policing of what many of us feel should be legal, so this in-person conversation with a police officer who seems to mostly be on our side is pretty refreshing to hear. 

Gergerian discusses his entry into the force in his 30s, and what it was like to bring in a healthy “why is this illegal?” viewpoint on drug use and personal agency vs. the slow moving attitudes he saw in much of law enforcement. He talks about how working nightclub security taught him about safe spaces; the problems with officers not proactively moving on actionable information and building relationships with communities; and the very philosophy behind law enforcement: what do they hope to accomplish, do they want to make real change, and do they believe in the laws they’re enforcing? 

And they discuss so much more: the need for diversity, cultural competency, and broadness in perspective; the criminalization of self-directed behavior; the effect critical incidents have on officers; drug war paranoia, legitimate concerns over hotlines and sensitive data, and psychedelic culture’s relationships with police; creating a culture of harm reduction within law enforcement, and what it might look like for police officers to receive psychedelic therapy.

Notable Quotes

“I think we, as a country, are more powerful by being diverse, and that includes diverse ways of thinking and that includes diverse ways of coming at challenges. And the more diverse our police departments are – I believe this with all my heart – the stronger we are for it. The stronger policing is for it. And I’m talking all types of diversity. …If we can diversify not only ways of thinking in police, but have a diversity of education and background in policing, then we’ll see some magic happen. Then we’ll see some creativity in how we respond to these very human problems that we all experience.”

“Keeping people alive has to be primary. If you don’t have a person that’s alive, you don’t have the possibility of recovery. So we’re tasked with watching out for one another, making sure people are alive, and whatever relationship they have with intoxicating substances: that’s their personal story, and they’re going to get to their healing journey and their recovery from any out-of-balance relationship in due time – their time.”

“I’ve been trained in [ketamine] and I was able to access it, so I’ve experienced it [at] very low dose (intermuscular). Magical. Magical. And the after effect for a couple of weeks, the reprieve, the relaxed feeling: it was beautiful. It was beautiful. And why shouldn’t our officers who are getting dark be able to access that before they’re pegged with depression? …Why shouldn’t they be able to access that before they put the barrel of the gun in their mouth, by themselves in their police cruiser? Why? Because you need a diagnostic label to access self-care? It makes absolutely no sense to me.”

Links

Storiescreatingchange.com

YouTube: Psychedelics for the Frontlines: A Police Officer on the Healing Potential of MDMA for PTSD

Lawenforcementactionpartnership.org

PAARIusa.org

Neverusealone.com

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on June 23, 2023June 27, 2023

PT418 – Psychedelic Morning Show #2 with Joe Moore and Anne Philippi

In the second episode of our special, two-part series, the Psychedelic Morning Show, Joe Moore and Anne Philippi are live once again bright and early from Psychedelic Science 2023 in Denver. Listen to this podcast as they interview four guests working on the front lines of psychedelic research, law, and the treatment of chronic pain.

Guests for this episode include: 

  • Tommaso Barba – PhD candidate at Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London
  • Allison Hoots – Attorney at Hoots Law Practice and advocate; President of Sacred Plant Alliance
  • Bob Wold – Founder & President, Clusterbusters
  • Court Wing – Founder, REMAP Therapeutics

Links

Imperial College London Centre for Psychedelic Research

Sacred Plant Alliance

Hoots Law Practice

Clusterbusters

PT404 – Clusterbusters: The Horrors of Cluster Headaches and the Miracle of Psilocybin

Court Wing – Pain and Its Relationship to the Mind

REMAP Therapeutics

Surprising Results: Psilocybin Trial for Depression Alleviates Chronic Pain, by Court Wing

Why Did Psychedelics Relieve My Chronic Pain? by Court Wing

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on June 22, 2023June 27, 2023

PT417 – Psychedelic Morning Show #1 with Joe Moore and Anne Philippi

Psychedelics Today is reporting live this week from the industry event of the year, Psychedelic Science 2023 in Denver. Listen in to this podcast as our co-founder, Joe Moore, and New Health Club founder Anne Philippi hit the conference floor bright and early in the first episode of a special two-part series, the Psychedelic Morning Show.

In this limited series, Joe and Anne chat in real-time with guests working in all corners of the psychedelic ecosystem, from advocacy, law and finance, to research and therapy. 

Guests for this episode include: 

  • Dr. Julie Holland – Psychiatrist, psychedelic researcher, author and medical advisor for MAPS
  • Daniel Goldberg – Co-Founder and Principal at Bridge Investments & Palo Santo
  • Hadas Alterman – Director of Government Affairs | American Psychedelic Practitioners Association
  • Melissa Lavasani – Founder and Chief Executive Officer at Psychedelic Medicine Coalition, Founder and President of Psychedelic Medicine PAC
  • Tracey Tee – Founder of Moms on Mushrooms

Links

DrHolland.com

MAPS

Working Weekends at a Psych ER – Interview with Julie Holland on NPR

Bridge Investments

Palo Santo

American Psychedelic Practitioners Association

PT249 – Hadas Alterman, Serena Wu, and Adriana Kertzer of Plant Medicine Law Group

Psychedelic Medicine Coalition

Psychedelic Medicine PAC

PT338 – Melissa Lavasani – The Power of Storytelling, The Preservation of Peyote, and “How to Change Your Mind”

PT405 – The Psychedelic Medicine PAC: The Push for Federal Funding and Politicians Who Will Fight for Us

Moms on Mushrooms

PT396 – Moms on Mushrooms: Motherhood and Psychedelics Inside a Broken Culture

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on May 19, 2023May 19, 2023

Psychedelics Weekly – Challenging the ‘Gifting’ Part of Prop 122, Public Perception in Oregon, and The Medicine of Music

In this episode of Psychedelics Weekly, Joe and Kyle are both on the road, so David and Alexa take the helm.

They cover news stories about:

-a man in Colorado facing a Class 3 drug felony for giving people psilocybin mushrooms in exchange for monetary donations – pointing out the bold (or stupid?) stances some are taking to highlight the absurdity of legislation that allows possession and donation as long as no money changes hands;

-a study showing what many of us have felt ourselves: that the day after psilocybin-assisted therapy, depressed patients had a stronger brain response to music and saw improvements in the ability to find pleasure in previously empty activities;

-a trip report from a psychedelically-naive 50-year old, showing the power and beauty of MDMA-assisted therapy;

-the New Hampshire state Senate continuing to be behind the times and voting down House Bill 639, which would have created a legal recreational cannabis framework for the state;

-a video where people on the street in Oregon were asked how much they thought psilocybin therapy would cost, showing a drastic misalignment between public perception and reality;

and a local TV news feature touring Rose City Laboratories, the first licensed psilocybin testing lab in Oregon.

And in conversation, they talk about some of the lesser-discussed (and often dismissed) tools like CBD, THC patches, and very low-dose edibles; the problem with drug dealers and harm reduction; the power of music in guiding a psychedelic experience (and in living a pleasurable life); and the importance of dosing and listening to your body to know what’s right for you.

Links

(bolded links are the discussed articles)

Myjewishlearning.com: Why Cheesecake on Shavuot?

Tales of Transformation: A panel on how psychedelic experiences can evolve into collective transformation and new life callings, featuring Ifetayo Harvey, Juliana Mulligan, Raad Seraj

Hemplucid.com (Use PSYCHEDELICS10 for 10% off)

YouTube: “Moms on Mushrooms”: A Growing Trend? (Tracey Tee on Dr. Phil)

Our IG live with Tracey Tee, hosted by Victoria

Entheoventures substack: Balancing the Psychedelic Narrative: A Call for Accuracy and Responsibility from All Sides

Summitdaily.com: Dillon man accused of selling psychedelic ‘magic mushrooms’ claims he was gifting them under Colorado’s new proposition

Psypost.org: Psilocybin therapy for depression appears to have a curious effect on the brain’s response to music

Sciencedirect.com: Increased low-frequency brain responses to music after psilocybin therapy for depression

Journal of Psychopharmacology: Changes in music-evoked emotion and ventral striatal functional connectivity after psilocybin therapy for depression

Alexa Jesse (with Host Bodies)- “Hourglass”

Psychedelicscene.com: The Healing Beauty of Ecstasy

Erowid.org

Hightimes.com: New Hampshire Senate Votes Down Cannabis Legalization Bill

Marysmedicinals.com

Wweek.com: How Much Would You Expect to Pay for Psilocybin Mushroom Therapy?

Epichealingeugene.com

Kgw.com: Touring the first Oregon lab licensed to test the strength of legal psilocybin

Psycon.org

Psychedelicscience.org (use code PT15 for 15% off)

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on May 12, 2023May 12, 2023

Psychedelics Weekly – Multi-Stakeholder Capitalism, Psilocybin Service Centers Begin Opening in Oregon, and Vancouver’s ‘The Drugs Store’

In this episode of Psychedelics Weekly, Joe and temporary-Colorado-resident Kyle once again record in-person, discussing how psychedelics could change business, the drug war and safe supply, and more. 

They cover: 

-a Rolling Stone profile on David Bronner, who makes the case for multi-stakeholder capitalism; where businesses are accountable to their workers, customers, the environment, and surrounding Indigenous communities instead of just investors – an idea more people would likely align with after a psychedelic experience; 

-The first psilocybin service center in Oregon (EPIC Healing Eugene) finally receiving their license via the Oregon Health Authority;

-A man who saw his color blindness improve for four months after a 5g mushroom experience;

-Delaware officially legalizing recreational cannabis; 

-The opening of ‘The Drugs Store’ in Vancouver, British Columbia: a mobile store selling drugs illegally as a response to the opioid epidemic and constant influx of untested and laced drugs – the “inevitable result of the government doing nothing” towards offering a safe supply; 

-and a survey from the CDC showing that cannabis use among teenagers has declined since legal dispensaries began opening, disproving one of the most common prohibitionist arguments that legalization would only increase use. 

And of course, these topics bring on a lot of conversation: how businesses need to be more reflective on how they’re operating; concern over if too much regulation is nerfing the world; the human cost of the drug war and the ever-escalating amount of ODs and drug poisoning cases; HPPD and the need for research around psychedelics and vision/perception; why we will always need both clinical access and the recreational underground, and more.

Links

(bolded links are the discussed articles)

Rollingstone.com: ‘It’s Ripped the World Apart’: David Bronner on How Psychedelics Could Be a Cure for Capitalism

Psychedelics Today: PT367 – Colorado Proposition 122 and the Decriminalization of Natural Medicines

Marijuanamoment.net: Oregon Approves Nation’s First Psilocybin Service Center For Adults To Receive Psychedelic Treatment

Epichealingeugene.com

Imdb.com: Wall-E

Goodreads.com: Janis Joplin quote

Saving Normal: An Insider’s Revolt Against Out-Of-Control Psychiatric Diagnosis, DSM-5, Big Pharma, and the Medicalization of Ordinary Life, by Allen Frances

Technologynetworks.com: Consuming Psychedelics Temporarily Improves Man’s Color Blindness

Louisville.edu: UofL researchers discover procedure to regenerate dormant cone cells, potentially to improve vision in retinitis pigmentosa

Psychedelics Today: PT229 – Dr. Matthew Johnson – What is Consciousness?

Psychedelics Today: HPPD and Flashbacks: Everything You Need To Know – And What We Don’t Know, Too, by Ed Prideaux

Futureconevents.com

Cato.org: Jeffrey Singer

Victorialitmanlaw.com

Lhthehealingground.com (Veronica Lightning Horse)

The Myth of Mental Illness: Foundations of a Theory of Personal Conduct, by Thomas S. Szasz, M.D.

Studentsforliberty.org

Vice.com: A Store Selling Heroin, Meth, and Cocaine Just Opened in Canada

Dancesafe.org

Teen Marijuana Use Has Been Declining Since Legal Dispensaries Started Opening, Federal CDC Study Shows

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on May 5, 2023May 5, 2023

Psychedelics Weekly – Psychedelics and Sports, The Risks of Over-Regulation, and What Makes Music Psychedelic?

In this episode of Psychedelics Weekly, Joe and Kyle record in-person again, discussing psychedelics and parenthood, sports, music, and more. 

They cover: 

-an Elle (!) article about how mushrooms are becoming the new ‘Cali sober,’ with more and more people starting to microdose – including parents; 

-ESPN’s documentary, “Peace of Mind,” highlighting the rise of psychedelic use among athletes, including retired NHL player, Riley Cote;

-An article discussing how interest in psychedelics has skyrocketed in Oregon since the passing of Measure 109, and how over-regulation and the glacial speed of the government is only driving the growth of the black market; 

-An essay attempting to define what it is that leads people to describe music as psychedelic (with several recommendations from Joe); 

-DMT aficionados using AI to create and catalog depictions of the entities they’ve seen;

and more!

And they have larger discussions about the drug war, how famous athletes are opening people’s minds to psychedelics, how strict regulation in psychedelic legislation can create more harm, how we need to collaborate more in the psychedelic space, the concept of a DMT ‘hyper-slap,’ and the problem of psychedelic exceptionalism and thinking your drug is good while others are bad.

Links

(bolded links are the discussed articles)

Psychedelic Neuroscience Demystified: How Psychedelics Alter Consciousness and Produce Therapeutic Effects

PT403 – Understanding the Brain: Psychedelic Neuroscience Demystified, featuring: Melanie Pincus, Ph.D. & Manesh Girn

Trailblazerspresents.com

Psychedelics Weekly – Breaking Convention, Decolonizing the Psychedelic Space, and How Colorado’s Senate Bill 23-290 Will Affect Prop 122 (Kyle and David break down SB23-290)

Psychedelics Today: PT217 – Erika Dyck – Canadian Psychedelic History

Elle.com: Shrooms Are the New Cali Sober

Psychedelics Today: Psychedelics Weekly – Roland Griffiths Faces the End, The NBA Lifts Its Cannabis Ban, and The Rising Popularity of Mushrooms for Moms

Espnpressroom.com: New ESPN E60 Examines Use of Psychedelics in Mental Health Treatment of Athletes

Wweek.com: Oregon’s Appetite for Psilocybin Is Being Fed Outside the Law in the Mushroom Underground

Cnn.com: High Profits (available to purchase on Amazon)

Psilotemple.org

Wikipedia.org: Fugio Cent

The Politics of Experience, by R.D. Laing

Psychedelicmedicinepac.com

Mapsbcorp.com: American Medical Association to Issue First New Code for Psychedelic Therapies

Psychedelicscene.com: What Makes Psychedelic Music Psychedelic?

YouTube: Shpongle – Hammock Therapy

Spotify: The Mars Volta – The Bedlam in Goliath (not their most acclaimed, but it’s this show notes writer’s favorite, and I think, most psychedelic)

The Beach Boys – Pet Sounds (Joe called it “Animal Sounds”…)

YouTube: The Beatles – Revolution 9 (Remastered 2009)

Spotify: LSDREAM

YouTube: Paul McCartney flipping people off

YouTube: Grateful Dead – Drums/Space – 12/28/1980 – Oakland Auditorium (Official)

Vice.com: DMT Users Are Using AI to Draw the Strange Beings They Meet While Tripping

Women of Visionary Art, by David Jay Brown & Rebecca Ann Hill

Psychedelics Today: Daniel McQueen – DMTx and Future Psychedelic Technologies

Reddit.com: Ever been hyperslapped? What happened?

Joe’s tweet about psychedelic exceptionalism

Drug Use for Grown-Ups: Chasing Liberty in the Land of Fear, by Carl L. Hart

Psychedelics Today: PT236 – Drugs: Honesty, Responsibility, and Logic, featuring: Dr. Carl Hart

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on April 28, 2023

Psychedelics Weekly – Breaking Convention, Decolonizing the Psychedelic Space, and How Colorado’s Senate Bill 23-290 Will Affect Prop 122

In this episode of Psychedelics Weekly, David speaks with Kyle, who recorded at Joe’s place while he was away at Trailblazers in NYC. 

They talk about David’s trip to the UK last week for Breaking Convention, then discuss a recent Vice article about looking outside the binary and confined thinking of Western medicine and embracing the underground – that there are cheaper and more accessible peer support models and affinity groups for everyone, but in going underground, we need to be careful that more accessible models aren’t dangerous or re-traumatizing. While businesses are competing to make headway in the psychedelic space, nobody is controlling all of it, which leads to both possibility and risk. 

They cover SB23-290, the bill Senate President Steve Fenberg created to establish a regulatory framework for psilocybin access and administration in Colorado in lieu of the advisory board that should have been put in place as part of Prop 122. They break down the positives and negatives of this framework, and ask: how much do these committees who are passing legislation really know about psilocybin? 

And they briefly discuss an article on what MDMA therapy may look like when MAPS hopefully gets approval via the FDA early next year, Rick Doblin’s speech at Breaking Convention, and his concept of society eventually having “net zero trauma.”

Links

(bolded links are the discussed articles)

Breakingconvention.co.uk

Philosophy and Psychedelics: Frameworks for Exceptional Experience, edited by Christine Hauskeller & Peter Sjostedt-Hughes

Breaking Convention: Celia Morgan

Breaking Convention: Leor Roseman

The Botany of Desire: A Plant’s-Eye View of the World, by Michael Pollan

Vice.com: Inside the Quest to Decolonise Psychedelics

Marijuanamoment.net: Colorado Senate Passes Psychedelics Regulation Bill

Senate Bill 23-290

The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down: A Hmong Child, Her American Doctors, and the Collision of Two Cultures, by Anne Fadiman

Nature.com: US could soon approve MDMA therapy — opening an era of psychedelic medicine

YouTube: PSYCH Interview: Rick Doblin – Net Zero Trauma by 2050

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on April 14, 2023April 14, 2023

PT405 – The Psychedelic Medicine PAC: The Push for Federal Funding and Politicians Who Will Fight for Us

In this episode, Joe interviews Melissa Lavasani: CEO of Washington, DC-based Psychedelic Medicine Coalition, and now, President of the brand new Psychedelic Medicine PAC.

She discusses her path to psychedelics, how she ended up running the Initiative 81 campaign (the Entheogenic Plant and Fungus Policy Act of 2020), and how she came to realize that decriminalization efforts can’t be the only option we go for – that, like it or not, we live in a system where politics and money are major factors behind any systematic change, and if we want to make any headway, we have to play the game. The Psychedelic Medicine PAC (Political Action Committee) was created to open up federal funding for psychedelic research, as nearly all research today (of which there still isn’t enough) is being funded by private companies. They will use donations to support politicians who are on our side and can advance psychedelic progress, who will push for federal funding to get the new and necessary data people who aren’t bought in yet need to see. 

They talk about speaking with people from the other side of the aisle at a recent education campaign in DC; how federal funding is neutral money; what she learned from DC’s deprioritization of cannabis policing; how personal stories and one-on-one human connection can change minds better than traditional confrontational activism; and the need to get ahead of the inevitable wave of big pharma propaganda they’ll bring when they officially step up to the table. She believes the path to helping the most people is advancing science and data through federal funding, and that begins with education and getting more politicians on our side. If you agree, follow them for details about their upcoming event in May, visit their table at Psychedelic Science this June (use PT15 for 15% off tickets), and donate to the PAC or the coalition. 

Also, as a bonus, this episode begins with a mini version of Psychedelics Weekly. Joe and Kyle didn’t have enough time to record a full episode, but still wanted to check in and review a few notable stories and highlight our recent Vital graduation ceremony. See you next week!

Notable Quotes

“I dipped my toes with the microdosing [and] I found immediate effects of that. I engaged with my children for the first time in many years, and with my son for, really, the first time since he was born. So that was a really mind-blowing experience of taking something for only a few days and feeling my humanity come back again.”

“I think when you take the media out of it and you isolate them in a place they feel very safe (in their office) and there’s no cameras around and they don’t feel the need to get their talking points across, and you have a human-to-human conversation with them about this issue, the result is that much better because you isolate all of these external influences that they’re constantly under and you say, ‘Listen, I am talking to you as a human being. This was my experience. This is what I did to heal myself.’ …Watching them have their epiphany about this is so fun.”

“When these campaigns win with very small margins (like 1%, 3%, 5%), that means half of the state voted against it, and that means half the state wasn’t being spoken to in these campaigns in the right way. …The U.S. is extremely diverse, and not just racially, but within perspectives that exist in this country, and we cannot just be speaking to one side of this issue. We have to really engage with the public in a meaningful way, and that is speaking to the half of the country that doesn’t understand this.”

“We forget that the traditional pharmaceutical industry has yet to step in on this issue. I think that they’re very closely watching what’s going to happen with psychedelics, but they have yet to stick their lobbyists on the hill. And that is the day that I am not looking forward to, because they have one of the most powerful lobbies in the country and they have budgets for this kind of work in the billions of dollars, really. So how is the psychedelic industry going to compete with that? How you counter that is: you educate members of congress, you educate those influential people before the pharmaceutical industry gets there so they can’t fill their heads with misinformation.”

Links

Psychedelic Neuroscience Demystified: How Psychedelics Alter Consciousness and Produce Therapeutic Effects

Maps.org: Zendo Project Celebrates a Decade at Burning Man and a New Beginning for the Organization

BBC.com: People were taking drugs in Spain 3,000 years ago, study finds

Telegraph.co.uk: Rory Lamont: ‘My rugby injuries made me suicidal – psychedelic drugs saved me’

Benzinga.com: Bipartisan Letter Calls For Including Active Service Members In Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy Research

Benzinga.com: This South American Country Wants To Legalize Natural Psychedelics: What’s Going On In Uruguay?

———————————————

Psychedelicmedicinecoalition.org

Psychedelicmedicinepac.com

Psychedelics Today: PT338 – Melissa Lavasani – The Power of Storytelling, The Preservation of Peyote, and “How to Change Your Mind”

NBCnews.com: Candidates who support psychedelics as medicine get a political action committee

Psychedelics Today: PT327 – Rick Doblin, Ph.D. – Confronting Abuse in Clinical Trials and the Future of Psychedelic Medicine

Psychedelics Today: PT229 – Dr. Matthew Johnson – What is Consciousness?

Governing.com: What Can Communities Do to Prevent Psychedelic Healing Centers?

Arpa-h.gov

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on April 7, 2023

Psychedelics Weekly – Roland Griffiths Faces the End, The NBA Lifts Its Cannabis Ban, and The Rising Popularity of Mushrooms for Moms

In this episode of Psychedelics Weekly, Kyle is back in Colorado and in-person with Joe, and they discuss what stood out to them in the news this week:

-A New York Times interview with Roland Griffths, where he talks about his cancer diagnosis and how meditation and psychedelics have helped him prepare for the inevitable end;

-An article on the rising popularity of psychedelics among mothers, and the benefits and risks of moms rejecting alcohol culture in favor of something new (and largely illegal);

-The NBA removing cannabis from its list of banned substances and allowing players to invest in cannabis companies, which follows years of other sports slowly accepting that cannabis is a part of our culture and there’s no need to play the part of “big brother” anymore;

and an article looking at legalization from the perspectives of people who were against recent measures like Prop 122, and how some towns in Colorado and Oregon are looking for ways to prevent the creation of psilocybin service centers from being built in their backyards.

They also go further into the Psychedelic Medicine Coalition’s recently created Political Action Committee and the work they’re doing to educate lawmakers; Harvard Law School hosting webinars comparing psychedelic legislation and the role of psychedelics in Indigenous groups in Europe, Australia, and North America; Arizona’s HB-2486, which would give $30 million in grants to universities and non-profit organizations to conduct psilocybin research; and Rick Doblin’s recent appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience.

They also discuss the many events we’ll be at in the coming months, and the excitement and often overwhelming aspects of psychedelic conferences, which are outlined in this week’s blog from Dennis Walker. If you’re attending any, come say hi! And for discounts: use code PSYCTODAY for 30% off tickets to DiscoveryCon, use PSYCHTODAYBC10 for 10% off tickets to Breaking Convention, and use code PT15 for 15% off tickets for MAPS’ Psychedelic Science 2023.

Links

(bolded links are the articles they discussed)

Psychedelics Today: Expanding Your Horizons: The Ultimate Guide to Attending a Psychedelic Conference

The Joe Rogan Experience: #1964 – Rick Doblin

Psychedelics Today: PT403 – Understanding the Brain: Psychedelic Neuroscience Demystified, featuring: Melanie Pincus, Ph.D. & Manesh Girn

Ssdp.org: 30 Under 30 Women in Psychedelics

NYtimes.com: A Psychedelics Pioneer Takes the Ultimate Trip

Griffithsfund.org

Romper.com: The Rise Of The Mushroom Moms

Psychedelics Today: PT396 – Moms on Mushrooms: Motherhood and Psychedelics Inside a Broken Culture, featuring: Tracey Tee

The ‘Housewife Syndrome’: An Indicator of Madness or Oppression?

Psychedelicspotlight.com: Indiana Nurse Faces Ten Years in Prison for Microdosing Psilocybin Mushrooms

Psychedelics Today: PT319 – Kole – Activism and Trust: A Cautionary Tale From Someone Who Got Caught

The Lancet: Development of a rational scale to assess the harm of drugs of potential misuse

Madinamerica.com: JAMA Psychiatry: We Must Look at the Harms of Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy

Plantph.com

Momsonmushrooms.com

Marijuanamoment.net: The NBA Is Lifting Its Ban On Marijuana In New Deal With Players Union, According To Report

Politico.com: Psychedelics coalition grows its advocacy footprint

Psychedelicmedicinecoalition.org: Donate

12news.com: There’s a push to legalize a specific psychedelic for medical research out of the Arizona legislature

Governing.com: What Can Communities Do to Prevent Psychedelic Healing Centers?

Thecrimson.com: Experts Discuss Psychedelics Policy in the Global North at Harvard Law School Webinar

Cnn.com: High Profits

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on March 17, 2023March 17, 2023

Psychedelics Weekly – Field Trip Health Closes Five Clinics, Legalization Bills Introduced in VT, and Ketamine Telehealth Uncertainty

In this episode of Psychedelics Weekly, Joe and Kyle join up once again to discuss the news and articles they found the most interesting this week. 

They start with the business news everyone is talking about: Field Trip Health & Wellness closing 5 of their clinics due to financial struggles (a deficit of $48.7 million since their inception and a net loss of $6.9 million reported for the last quarter), little confidence they’d be able to receive more funding, and the changing landscape of ketamine telehealth now that the Covid Public Health Emergency should finally come to an end in May. They also highlight an article dissecting the collapse of Synthesis Institute and the lessons to be learned, with both stories really showing just how new and unstable psychedelic business still is, and how the allure of first-mover advantage can be a dangerous gamble.

They also discuss four drug reform bills introduced in Vermont: two of which would decriminalize simple possession of all drugs, making a “personal use supply of drugs” a civil offense with a $50 fine; one removing penalties for using or selling psilocybin; and the last decriminalizing certain psychedelic plants and fungi. 

And they look at a research study aiming to learn more about people’s lives after they’ve been involved in a clinical trial, Time Magazine’s article about psychedelics and couples therapy, and a study that found that while 64% of survey respondents said at-home ketamine helped their symptoms, 55% (and 58% of Millennials) said they used more than the recommended dose – either by accident or on purpose.

Links

Investorsobserver.com: Field Trip Health to Close Ketamine Clinics as it Struggles to Find Profits

Meetfieldtrip.com: Field Trip Health & Wellness to Close Clinics in 5 Locations

Meetfieldtrip.com: Field Trip Health & Wellness Provides Business Update and Reports Fiscal Third Quarter 2023 Results

Harrisbricken.com: Good News for Ketamine Telehealth

Ecstaticintegration.substack.com: Synthesis and the shadow of psychedelic capitalism

Opb.org: Most students will continue with Oregon psilocybin program that ran out of money, new provider says

Twitter: @Eddietalksdrugs(Have you participated in a clinical trial involving #psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy? How has life been after the trial? Contact psychedelic.experiences@psych.ox.ac.uk for more information.)

Psychedelics Today: PT302 – Dr. Adele Lafrance – Vital Psychedelic Conversations

Boingboing.net: Oregonians work to make psychedelic psychiatric care a regulated, safe practice

Time.com: Psychedelics Could Revolutionize Couples Therapy

Psychedelicspotlight.com: Vermont Lawmakers File Bills To Legalize Psychedelics And Decriminalize All Drugs

Marijuanamoment.net: Vermont Lawmakers File Bills To Legalize Psychedelics And Decriminalize All Drugs

Legislature.vermont.gov: H.439

Legislature.vermont.gov: S.114

Dancesafe.org

Psychiatrictimes.com: Report Reveals More Than 50% of Americans Misuse At-Home Ketamine

Plusapn.com: 2023 Future of Mental Health: Ketamine Therapy Report

NYtimes.com: A Fraught New Frontier in Telehealth: Ketamine

Painnewsnetwork.org: New CDC Guideline: Too Little, Too Late for Chronic Pain Patients

The Stories of Vital 2022-2023 | Psychedelic Therapy Training

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on February 24, 2023April 17, 2023

PT393 – Religious Freedom and the Church of Psilomethoxin

In this episode, Joe interviews Greg Lake, Esq.: Co-Founder of the Church of Psilomethoxin, author, and trial and appellate attorney specializing in working with entheogen-based religious practitioners in establishing their right to consume their sacraments under existing religious freedom laws.

Psilomethoxin (4-Hydroxy-5-methoxydimethyltryptamine or 4-Hydroxy-5-MeO-DMT) was first synthesized in 2021 by mixing 5-MeO-DMT with psilocybin substrate, and after initial tests and months of user reports, it was deemed safe to use.* Lake co-founded the Church of Psilomethoxin in 2022 with the goal of shifting the paradigm of religion to primary direct experiences and individual beliefs rather than a dogma everyone must follow, with a big focus on community and discussing the ultimate questions of life together – with Psilomethoxin as the sacrament of choice. While he prefers member-to-member referrals, there is an application on the site, and he hopes to grow the church through linking people up regionally, (eventually) training people to facilitate, and partnering with a data collection company to gather real-world data on both Psilomethoxin and on why people are seeking out psychedelic churches in the first place. 

He discusses several cases that brought us here and inspired his work; why he believes Psilomethoxin won’t be a target of the Federal Analogue Act; the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) and the need for states to establish similar state legislation; the importance of new churches establishing evidence in the public record; how much courts take sincerity into consideration; and the concept that, while we’re quick to think of the law as the enemy, courts often don’t want to go after churches – religion is a sacred and intimate thing, so who is the victim if a court brings a church to court that hasn’t harmed anyone?

*Update, April 17, 2023: Results from analytical testing released on April 12, 2023, reveal that there is no evidence to suggest the compound psilomethoxin is present in the samples of sacrament material the Church of Psilomethoxin is offering to their members online. The report, prepared by Samuel Williamson and Alexander Sherwood of the Usona Institute, states, “Psilocybin, baeocystin, and psilocin, were, however, unambiguously identified in the sample, suggesting that the claims regarding the biosynthesis of psilomethoxin may be misguided. The implications of these findings should be critically considered within the context of public health and safety.”

We are following this story at Psychedelics Today and are working to update our community with commentary from the researchers. Stay tuned to our social media channels for more on this topic.

Notable Quotes

“I think eventually the courts will come around to realize that where medical and scientific and religious and spiritual begin or end within this space is not crystal clear, because as we’re all aware, in the research, people, even in clinical settings, are having mystical, religious experiences. And then they see that that really, at many times, translates to positive outcomes. If people, even in a medical setting, can have a religious experience, well then where does ‘This is a religious exercise, this is not’ come into play?”

“One of our core beliefs is that in the peak entheogenic experience like 5-MeO, where you experience unitive cosmic consciousness, that’s basically our moral code – that once you experience unity with all, that tells you pretty much everything that you’ll ever need to know about how you should be treating other people, how you should be treating other beings, and how you should be treating the environment.”

“One thing I’ve learned (and I learned real quick working with these churches) is that, especially post-Covid, the community, for a lot of people, is just as, if not more healing and spiritual than the actual ceremonies.”

Links

Psilomethoxin.com

*Psychedelicalpha.com: Opinions | The Church of Psilomethoxin: Fantasy Chemistry Gets Fact Checked

*Chemrxiv.org: Fungi Fiction: Analytical Investigation into the Church Of Psilomethoxin’s Alleged Novel Compound Using UPLC-HRMS

Entheoconnect.com

Psychedeliceducationcenter.com: Psychedelics and Religious Liberty in the United States

Wikipedia.org: 4-Hydroxy-5-methoxydimethyltryptamine

Cognitiveliberty.org: Ask Dr. Shulgin Online (Shulgin’s response to a question about Psilomethoxin)

Tripsitter.com: What Is the Federal Analogue Act?

Quantifiedcitizen.com

Psychedelics in Mental Health Series: Psilocybin, by George G. Lake Esq.

Law.justia.com: United States v. Meyers

Wikipedia.org: Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Wikipedia.org: Employment Division v. Smith

Wikipedia.org: City of Boerne v. Flores

Wikipedia.org: State Religious Freedom Restoration Acts

Law.justia.com: New Hampshire v. Mack

Leary.ru: Timothy Leary: Start Your Own Religion

Justia.com: Church of the Eagle and the Condor et al v. Garland et al

Psychedelics Today: Psychedelics, Religion, and the DEA’s Quest for Soul

Casetext.com: Ariz. Yage Assembly v. Garland

Cannadelic.miami

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on February 17, 2023February 17, 2023

Psychedelics Weekly – The Legalization of Medical MDMA & Psilocybin in Australia, and The World’s First Ayahuasca Pill

In this episode of Psychedelics Weekly, Kyle is joined by another new voice from the PT team: one of the main instructors and facilitators from our Vital program, Diego Pinzon. 

Originally from Colombia, Diego has been living in Australia since 2008 and has been involved in the Australian psychedelic scene, playing roles in the charity sector, research with Psychae Institute, and is one of the researchers in the St. Vincent’s Melbourne trial, Australia’s first trial using psilocybin for end-of-life depression and anxiety. Diego gives his insight into the recent TGA re-scheduling of psilocybin and MDMA for treatment-resistant depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, respectively.

They cover the details, unknowns, and concerns: Is there enough time to train enough people? Do they have the infrastructure for this? What are the substances actually going to be? What percentage of people who apply will be granted access? What will it cost? And while psychiatrists will be able to prescribe, how much will the program really focus on therapy? 

And they discuss Vancouver’s Filament Health creating the world’s first ayahuasca pill, which is close to FDA authorization to begin a Phase 1 trial. Of course this news begs some questions as well, mainly: with psychedelic use being such an active experience, how much does something like this change our relationship to ayahuasca? And with a consistent, more predictable experience, does that kill the magic?

Links

Svhm.org.au: Australia’s first psychedelic clinical trial commences recruitment

TGAov.au: Change to classification of psilocybin and MDMA to enable prescribing by authorised psychiatrists

Time.com: Psychedelics May Be Part of U.S. Medicine Sooner Than You Think

Psychedelicsociety.org.au

AHPRA.gov.au

Psychedelicspotlight.com: Vancouver Company Creates World’s First Ever Ayahuasca Pill

Goodreads.com: Terence McKenna’s “feather bed” quote

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on February 10, 2023February 10, 2023

Psychedelics Weekly – AIMS vs. the DEA: An Update on the Fight to Reschedule Psilocybin

In this episode of Psychedelics Weekly, David is joined by Kathryn L. Tucker, JD: Director of Advocacy at the National Psychedelics Association and a founding member of the Psychedelic Bar Association with over 35 years in advocacy in protecting the rights of dying patients. 

Tucker is currently working with Dr. Sunil Agarwal of the Advanced Integrative Medical Science (AIMS) Institute in a battle against the DEA: Agarwal works with end-of-life cancer patients and approached the DEA to see how they’d accommodate state and federal Right to Try laws to grant his patients access to psilocybin, which the DEA denied. This led to the federal case, AIMS vs. the DEA (AIMS I), then AIMS II (which petitions their denial of Right to Try access), and now, AIMS III, which appeals their denial of the petition to reschedule psilocybin. 

As with all things government-related, the story shows how little these people actually care about any of us, but Tucker gracefully walks us through the whole convoluted mess; explaining each step, what should happen next, where the DEA blatantly disregarded rules, what you can do to help, and ultimately, the importance of this case in how situations like these could be handled in the future (from both sides). She discusses the problems with state legalization under federal jurisdiction; what we can learn from what we saw with safe injection sites being canceled in Philadelphia; Cory Booker and Rand Paul’s Breakthrough Therapy Act; the idea of having state-legal programs actually run by the government to create a federal safe harbor; and more.  

And in the news, they cover recently submitted legalization bills, Australia legalizing the medical use of psilocybin and MDMA (for specific conditions by approved practitioners), and the concern over what will happen with ketamine telehealth when the Covid-19 Emergency is finally put to an end in May.

Notable Quotes

“As you may have seen just last week in Australia, MDMA and psilocybin were rescheduled. And you might have noticed in the press release a reference to the fact that the Australian agency took in a considerable amount of medical and scientific data when it was considering that rescheduling. That’s proper. That’s necessary. That did not happen here. So what happened in Australia exemplifies and throws into sharp light that the DEA failed as a matter of process here.”

“The problem with state legalization as mentioned earlier is that it can do no more than offer state safe harbor. It cannot alter federal law. …Under the Oregon statute, all psilocybin must be consumed at a psilocybin service center, which must be licensed by the state, and it must be purchased and consumed at that center in the presence of a licensed facilitator. That is what is legal under Oregon state law. However, the operation of those psilocybin service centers is still a federal crime. And I think there has been a hope and possibly even an expectation that the federal government is going to look the other way. We have no indication that that is going to happen.”

“Within the Controlled Substances Act, there’s a provision that if the action is taken by a government official, then there is a federal safe harbor. So one of the ways that one might be looking at creatively revising these state legalizations is to have the program be run by the government. Now could you make an argument that when, for example, the Oregon Health Authority issues licenses to Oregon service centers, that that means it’s a government-run facility? Maybe. I mean, I think that’s an argument worth fully vetting, because it could bring you within federal safe harbor.”

Links

National Psychedelics Association

Psychedelic Bar Association

Psychedelics Today: PT307 – Kathryn L. Tucker, JD – The Right to Try Act and the Battle for Psilocybin Access

FDA.gov: Right to Try

Pubmed: Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial

Congress.gov: S.4575 – Right to Try Clarification Act

Marijuanamoment.net: Cory Booker And Rand Paul File Bill To Reschedule Psychedelic Breakthrough Therapies And Remove Research Barriers

Shroomer.com: The 101 of the Bipartisan Breakthrough Therapy Act

DMT: The Spirit Molecule: A Doctor’s Revolutionary Research Into the Biology of Near-Death and Mystical Experiences, by Rick Strassman

Sunstonetherapies.com

Marijuana Moment: Psychedelics Bills Filed In Four More States As 2023 Reform Efforts Heat Up

Psychedelicalpha.com: Psychedelic Legalization & Decriminalization Tracker

Wikipedia.org: Cole Memorandum

Justice.gov: Appellate Court Agrees with Government that Supervised Injection Sites are Illegal under Federal Law; Reverses District Court Ruling

Rstreet.org: Overdose Prevention Centers and the Federal “Crack House Statute”

Microdose.buzz: Activists Protest the DEA for Psilocybin Access

The Nowak Society: Right to Try Psilocybin Advocacy Fund

Psychedelicinvest.com: The Future of Ketamine Telehealth When Biden Ends the Covid-19 Emergencies in May 2023

Yahoo.com: Field Trip and Nue Life Are Collaborating To Bring Psychedelic Therapy Into the Home

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on February 7, 2023February 7, 2023

PT387 – Psychedelic Ethics & Self-Reflexivity and Proposition 122 Conflict & Resolution

In this episode, Joe interviews Jessica “Jaz” Cadoch: anthropologist, Co-Director of the Global Psychedelic Society, and Prop 122 steering committee member; and Sovereign Oshumare: Founder of XRYSALIS, an online community and retreat for queer, transgender, and intersex people of color, and Founder of Shelterwood Collective, a 900-acre eco-village and retreat center led by LGBTQ Black and Indigenous people.

Together, they are Co-Founders of ALKEMI, a consulting firm for psychedelic ethics and accountability, created due to the amount of businesses coming into this space who likely have very little understanding of the values that were established while they weren’t paying attention. They’re asking businesses questions many don’t consider: Is there a true need for them? Do they know their community and does the community want them there? Are their internal operations hierarchal or decentralized? Do employees feel heard and seen? And most importantly, have they taken any of the lessons from psychedelics and applied them towards the way they handle business and treat each other? 

As Cadoch was a member of the steering committee for Colorado’s Natural Medicine Act (AKA Prop 122), she discusses what it was like from the inside: the problems (complaints about who was involved, if the voices from the community were a true representation, language in the bill); how the conflict showed how easily money and power could embody people; the problems with fighting over perfection while people are being sentenced to prison; and, where everyone is now: together in the aftermath, trying to figure out how to work together, unite missions, and build bridges between seemingly disparate parties.

They also discuss the problems with binary thinking, the concept of a business recalibrating its relationship to profit and ROI, what true access means, why it’s ok to go slow and not rush through the uncomfortable, and more.

Notable Quotes

“How are you really taking the lessons that the medicines are teaching us and applying them to the way you’re building your company? …Are you doing psychedelic business or are you doing business psychedelically?” -Jaz

“Each time that I’m broken, I’m rebuilt stronger. And that, to me, is such a journey. And committing to that journey is what I hope we as ALKEMI bestow upon people; giving them the endurance and stamina to be broken and be rebuilt, because we all need that. This system needs that. This world needs that. And we live in a system where we’re rewarded for not doing it.” -Sovereign 

“At the end of the day, we are all we got. And the more we know who we are, the more we find alignment, the more we find each other, the more we mend our differences, the stronger we’ll be.” -Sovereign

“When we talk about access, it’s not only like financial access, but it’s also cultural access – to make it make sense for people who don’t speak this language, make it make sense for people who have survivor’s guilt from growing up in the hood in D.C., make it make sense for Hispanic rural communities, make it make sense for my Grandmother that needs a doctor in a white coat to tell her that this is safe. That’s what access means. It’s all of that.” -Jaz

Links

Alkemi-consulting.org

Alkemi-consulting.org: Community Needs Assessment

Mayahealth.com

Mayahealth.com: Ethics

Psychedelics Today: PT265 – Jessica Cadoch, MA – Cooperation, Drug Exceptionalism, and 12-step Programs

Xrysalis.net

Shelterwoodcollective.org

Montrealpsychedelicsociety.org

Thespore.org: Society for Psychedelic Outreach, Reform, and Education

Ballotpedia.org: New Approach PAC

Thenowaksociety.org

Psychedelic Club of Denver

Denver Mushroom Cooperative

Thespore.org: The People’s Medicine Council of Colorado

Thepsychedelicbar.org: The Psychedelic Bar Association

National Psychedelic Conference

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, by Thomas S. Kuhn

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on January 20, 2023March 14, 2023

Psychedelics Weekly – Client Data Concerns in Oregon, Hopeful Legalization in New Hampshire, and Vital & The Five Elements

In this week’s episode, Joe is joined by Kyle, calling in from The Atman Retreat in Jamaica, where he’s running the fourth of five retreats offered through our Vital program. 

They first discuss some news: Oregon Senator Elizabeth Steiner introducing a bill (SB-303) to essentially override many of the recommendations of the Oregon Health Authority, especially around client data – which would be provided to government agencies instead of staying private (which the people voted for); a reparations proposal in San Francisco recognizing the harms of the drug war; GOP lawmakers in Missouri and New Hampshire proposing bills for psilocybin therapy and psychedelics legalization (respectively); and Canada’s Apex Labs being granted approval for a take-home psilocybin microdosing trial.

Then, Kyle gives us an update on his very busy last few months, running Vital retreats: breathwork in Costa Rica, breathwork and cannabis in Colorado, and psilocybin in Amsterdam and Jamaica. He talks about the retreats themselves, the five components of breathwork, the idea of safety and “brave spaces,” the power of community and being witnessed, the concept of focusing on technique over the substance, what students have been saying, and finally: how the five elements relate to Vital, psychedelic therapy, seasons, and the process of growth. Reminder that applications for Vital’s 2023 edition (beginning in April) close at the end of February (update: we’ve extended the date to March 26), so if you’re curious, head to the site to learn more or attend an upcoming Q+A here!

Links

Psychedelicweek.com: Psychedelic Surveillance Bill Would Raise Social and Economic Cost of Oregon Psilocybin Services

Psychedelic Science Funders Collaborative

Msn.com: San Francisco reparations committee proposes a $5 million payment to each Black resident

Cnn.com: North Carolina city votes to approve reparations for Black residents

SF.gov: African American Reparations Advisory Committee

Marijuanamoment.net: GOP New Hampshire Lawmaker Files Bill To Legalize Psychedelics Like LSD And Psilocybin

Marijuanamoment.net: Lawmakers Are Already Pursuing Psychedelics Legislation In Nearly A Dozen States For 2023

Marijuanamoment.net: New Hampshire GOP And Democratic House Leaders Team Up On Marijuana Legalization Bill For 2023 (there is progress!)

Wcia.com: Illinois lawmaker introduces bill to create regulated psychedelic therapy program

Newswire.ca: Apex Labs Granted Approval for 294 Patient Take Home Psilocybin Clinical Trial

Marijuanamoment.net: GOP Missouri Lawmaker Files Psilocybin Therapy Bill For 2023 Session

Psychedelics Today: What is Breathwork? (The five components)

Umaryland.edu: The 6 Pillars of a Brave Space

Brenebrown.com

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on January 13, 2023January 13, 2023

Psychedelics Weekly – Prince Harry and Psychedelics, Proposed Legalization, and The Roland R. Griffiths, Ph.D. Professorship Fund

For this week’s episode, we had plans for a guest to join Joe to talk about some legal battles, but as seems to be the norm this time of year, sickness postponed that conversation to a future date. With David taking some much-deserved time off and Kyle in Jamaica on a Vital retreat, this Psychedelics Weekly is a rarity: just Joe, monologuing the news.

It’s probably best to just listen and head to the links to follow along, but some highlights this week are: Prince Harry coming out of the psychedelic closet; Virginia lawmakers proposing the legalization of psilocybin; psychedelics legislation already in plans for nearly a dozen states in 2023; NBC news recognizing the need psychedelic therapists, facilitators, and education; the WHO aiming to rename 5-MeO-DMT to Mebufotenin; and Roland Griffiths creating The Roland R. Griffiths, Ph.D. Professorship Fund to ensure his work continues to be recognized after he passes.  

He also talks about Convergence, and you should know that prices increase on January 16, so don’t wait any longer! Check back next week for more news and, *fingers-crossed* a co-host – hopefully Kyle calling in to tell us all about the retreat!

Links

Cbsnews.com: Prince Harry says he’s used psychedelics to help cope with grief

Npr.org: On Point podcast (“Psychedelics and who should be able to use them” from 1/6)

Psychedelics Today: PT338 – Melissa Lavasani – The Power of Storytelling, The Preservation of Peyote, and “How to Change Your Mind”

Psychedelics Today: PT223 – Daniel Carcillo – Life After Sports

Psychedelicmedicinecoalition.org

Cnn.com: Chasing Life Podcast, with Dr. Sanjay Gupta – What Promise Do Psychedelics Hold As Therapeutics​​

Marijuanamoment.net: Lawmakers Are Already Pursuing Psychedelics Legislation In Nearly A Dozen States For 2023

Virginiamercury.com: Virginia lawmakers propose legalizing medicinal use of psychedelic mushroom compound psilocybin

Westword.com: Drug Record-Sealing Clinic In Wake of Colorado’s New Psychedelics Law

Cityweekly.net: Dr. Strangelove: Accused killer Dr. Robert Weitzel has a troubled career, but plenty of defenders.

Atmanretreat.com

Nbcnews.com: Psychedelic therapies are on the horizon, but who will administer the drugs?

Futurism.com: Startup Trying to test Whether People on DMT Experience a Shared Alien Universe

Dmtx.org

Psychedelics Today: Daniel McQueen – DMTx and Future Psychedelic Technologies

Twitter.com: Psychedelic Alpha: WHO Gives 5-MeO-DMT Generic Name: Mebufotenin

Tim Ferriss Show #646: Brian C. Muraresku with Dr. Mark Plotkin: The Eleusinian Mysteries, Discovering the Divine, The Immortality Key, The Pagan Continuity Hypothesis, Psychedelics, and More

Psychedelics Today: Mark Plotkin – Bio-Cultural Conservation of the Amazon

Psychedelics Today: PTSF 35 (with Brian Muraresku)

Griffithsfund.org

Hopkinspsychedelic.org

UCLA Psychedelic Studies Initiative

UCLA Psychedelic Studies Initiative’s survey: Psilocybin to treat drug addictions

Mixmag.net: New Zealand Authorities Believe 4KG of MDMA Was Flushed Down A Toilet

Psychedelics Today: Convergence

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on January 6, 2023January 6, 2023

Psychedelics Weekly – Psilocybin-Assisted Psychotherapy for I.B.S., NY Aims to Legalize, and B.C.’s Decriminalization Experiment

In this week’s episode, Joe and David meet up to talk about Vital, Convergence, and the latest news: 

-Tryp Therapeutics and Mass General signing a letter of intent for a Phase 2 clinical trial investigating the effects of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy for the treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome – interesting because it further highlights the likely effect of psychedelics on the brain-gut connection and that psychotherapy is involved;

-New York lawmakers pre-filing a bill to legalize DMT, ibogaine, mescaline, psilocybin and psilocyn (and remove them from the state’s banned substances list) for 2023;

-New York’s first cannabis dispensary finally opening on December 29;

-British Columbia responding to their opioid crisis (the latest data reports 14k deaths since 2016) by beginning a Portugal-like decriminalization model, allowing people 18 years and older to carry a combined 2.5 grams of drugs (heroin, fentanyl, cocaine, methamphetamine and even MDMA);

and finally, an interesting but confusing (maybe a follow-up is necessary) article showing that what we’re learning about ketamine could lead towards a better understanding of psychosis and schizophrenia.

Links

Accesswire.com: Tryp Therapeutics and Massachusetts General Hospital Sign Letter of Intent for Clinical Study Investigating the Use of Psilocybin-Assisted Psychotherapy for the Treatment of Patients Suffering From Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)

Psychedelics Today: PT350 – Psilocybin and Accessing the “Off” Switch For Nociplastic Pain, featuring Jim Gilligan

PT283 – Greg McKee – Nociplastic Pain and Psychedelics

PT369 – Chronic Pain and Phantom Limb Pain: Could Psilocybin Be the Answer? Featuring: Timothy Furnish, MD & Joel Castellanos, MD

Lucid.news: Researcher Charles Nichols Studies the Impact of Psychedelic Substances on Inflammation

Marijuanamoment.net: New York Lawmakers File Psychedelics Legalization Bill For 2023

Fox5ny.com: NY lawmakers propose bills to decriminalize, study psychedelics

Nydailynews.com: Crowd swarms first legal NYC marijuana shop on second day; long line to enter East Village store

Housingworks.org

Cheknews.ca: B.C. poised for drug decriminalization experiment, but will it help stem deadly tide?

Wiley.com: The psychotomimetic ketamine disrupts the transfer of late sensory information in the corticothalamic network

Neurosciencenews.com: Ketamine Found to Increase Brain Noise

Sciencedirect.com: Canalization and plasticity in psychopathology

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on December 30, 2022January 2, 2023

Psychedelics Weekly – Psilocybin and Stress Response, the Minnesota Medical Association Endorses Decriminalization, and Scott Wiener Introduces Senate Bill 58

In this week’s episode, Joe and Kyle are together again before Kyle sets off for a 2-month road trip centered around Vital retreats, where we hope he’ll be able to report in from live while in Jamaica. 

They talk about Vital: applications are open for the April 2023 edition and close in February, so if you have questions, check out the website or attend an upcoming Q+A. And Joe and other members of the team will be at MAPS’ conference in Denver this June (use code PT15 at checkout for 15% off), as well as Cannadelic in Miami this February.  

And for the news, they highlight four stories this week: “Psilocybin induces acute and persisting alterations in immune status and the stress response in healthy volunteers,” showing that, even with a small study, long-term stress response was much lower than the placebo group; The Economist highlighting psychedelic medicines as one of the five stories to watch out for in 2023; the Minnesota Medical Association endorsing the decriminalization of drugs with a 219-34 vote, mimicking the Portugal model and saying that there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that criminal penalties for possession deter drug use; and San Francisco Senator Scott Wiener submitting a new version of his previously denied SB-519 (now SB-58) that no longer includes LSD and MDMA – modeling the more natural medicine model that we’ve seen succeed in other states. As Joe says often, we want everything and we want it now, but every step helps, as we’ve seen with recent posts about people not being sent to prison for the rest of their lives.

Links

Convergence

Vitalpsychedelictraining.com

Vital 2023: Informational Session and Q&A

Microdosing Masterclass: Investigate the history, science, and best practices for safe and effective microdosing

Psychedelicscience.org (MAPS conference, use code PT15 for 15% off)

Medrxiv.org: Psilocybin induces acute and persisting alterations in immune status and the stress response in healthy volunteers

Psychopharmacology in Maastricht’s Twitter thread about this study

Springer.com: Effects of psilocybin on hippocampal neurogenesis and extinction of trace fear conditioning

The Economist: The World Ahead 2023: five stories to watch out for

Awaknlifesciences.com

Yahoo.com: Medicine Innovations Group Announces Closing Under Share Subscription Agreement

Marijuanamoment.net: Minnesota Medical Association Endorses Decriminalizing Drugs

Marijuanamoment.net: New Jersey Senate President Files Psilocybin Legalization Bill That Includes Home Grow Option, Unlike Current Marijuana Law

Sfgate.com: ‘Magic mushrooms’ would be decriminalized in California under new bill

Lawenforcementactionpartnership.org

Instagram: ICEERS’ post about Kat Courtney, who was sentenced to 40 years in prison in the USA for ayahuasca

Cannadelic.miami

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on December 23, 2022December 23, 2022

Psychedelics Weekly – Prop 122 and Data Privacy, Ending the Crack/Cocaine Sentencing Disparity, and the High Cost of Psychedelic Therapy

In this week’s episode, Kyle is back on the podcast, joining Joe to discuss three recent articles; two of which pose a lot of questions. 

They first look at Colorado’s Proposition 122, which, now that it has passed, enters into the long and arduous process of being figured out – all while existing in the complicated paradigm of state vs. federal legality. One of the biggest concerns revolves around data collection and privacy: Is the collected data truly anonymous? Since psychedelics will still be federally illegal, how can we trust that the DEA isn’t going to abuse their power? 

Next, they discuss Attorney General Merrick Garland making moves to end the sentencing disparity between offenses involving powder cocaine and crack cocaine: while essentially the same substance, being caught with 28 grams of crack cocaine currently carries the same sentencing as having 500 grams of powder!  

And lastly, they touch on a very interesting article from Lucid News about the value of psychedelic therapy, which gives some staggering data points showing why the black market will always exist: MDMA-assisted therapy sessions likely costing $11,500 (with the MDMA itself costing between $480 and $9,600), Esketamine treatments costing as much as $32,400 a year, and more – all with results that don’t seem to be as long-lasting as many believed they would be. This one deserves more analysis, but Joe and Kyle had limited time for recording this week, so stay tuned for more. For now, enjoy this episode, and Happy Holidays from the Psychedelics Today team!

Links

5280.com: Big Questions Surround the Rollout of Psychedelics in Colorado

Wired.com: Seeking Psychedelics? Check the Data Privacy Clause

Nbcnews.com: AG issues new guidance on ending sentencing disparities for crack versus powder cocaine cases

Psychedelicstoday.com: PT236 – Drugs: Honesty, Responsibility, and Logic, featuring Dr. Carl Hart

Lucid.news: Is the High Cost of Psychedelic Therapy Worth It?

Blossomanalysis.com

Tim.blog: Dennis McKenna — The Depths of Ayahuasca: 500+ Sessions, Fundamentals, Advanced Topics, Science, Churches, Learnings, Warnings, and Beyond (#523)

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on November 18, 2022December 2, 2022

Psychedelics Weekly – Oregon Measure 109: Approaching the Proposed Final Rules

This week’s episode features David Drapkin and Jon Dennis, who you know from Eyes on Oregon and all of the work he’s done in an effort to protect religious freedom under Oregon’s Measure 109.

They discuss opposition and concerns around Colorado Proposition 122 (which officially passed last week with 53% of the vote!) and recent cannabis legalization in three states, then move on to Oregon: what it’s been like being so involved in Measure 109’s rulemaking progress, what people were saying during this week’s final public comment period, whether María Sabina would be able to work under the proposed guidelines, and even the idea of microdosing under this new framework. 

Links

Eyes on Oregon

Psychedelics Today: Religious Practice Under Oregon Measure 109

Navigating Psychedelics For Clinicians and Therapists

Microdose.buzz: Colorado Votes to Legalize Psilocybin Therapy; Allow Personal Use of Psychedelics (Microdose)

Native coalition against Colorado Natural Medicine Health Act (Indian Country Today)

Oregon Psilocybin Business Bans Approved By Voters In Cities And Counties Across The State (Marijuana Moment)

Nearly 70% of Oregon bans psilocybin, but clinics will still open next year (Leafly)

Oregon Psilocybin Services Act (Measure 109) Local Jurisdiction Tracker (Psychedelic Alpha)

Oregon Psilocybin Advisory Board Overview

Eyes on Oregon: Last Call – Proposed Final Rules for Measure 109 (Psychedelics Today webinar replay)

With speeches, stars and a blow-up joint, protesters press Biden on pot (Washington Post)

Most Voters In Two States That Defeated Marijuana Ballot Measures Actually Support Legalization In General, Election Poll Finds (Marijuana Moment)

Psychedelicalex.com

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on November 11, 2022November 18, 2022

Psychedelics Weekly – Wonderland Controversy and Colorado Proposition 122

In April of 2020, the world was locking down at the same time the Black Lives Matter movement was gathering steam, and Joe and Kyle found themselves in new territory, filled with uncertainty and fear while watching conflicts explode everywhere. They felt an immediate need to talk about all that was happening, largely as a way to break through the lockdown malaise and connect with each other, and hopefully, our audience. And so, Solidarity Fridays was born: a different style of podcast that, instead of interviewing a guest about their story, focused on what was most pressing in their world: in the psychedelic space, and in their lives.

Other priorities took over and the series slowly faded away, but today, we’re happy to announce that the spirit of Solidarity Fridays has returned in a new weekly show, aptly titled Psychedelics Weekly.

The show will feature a rotating cast of familiar voices, while introducing new hosts and friends of the show, covering the most important psychedelic news (and our take on it), while giving you all a glimpse into what’s going on in our lives and at Psychedelics Today.

This week features Joe and Kyle, discussing the controversy around Wonderland banning a small list of people from attending, Colorado Proposition 122 passing (at least we think…), and the newest round of Navigating Psychedelics (starting November 29th; reserve your seat now!). 

Links

Colorado Voters Approve Psychedelics Legalization Ballot Initiative (Marijuana Moment)

Proposition 122: Decriminalization and Regulated Access Program for Certain Psychedelic Plants and Fungi Initiative details (Ballotpedia)

Native coalition against Colorado Natural Medicine Health Act (Prop 122 opposition from Indian Country Today)

Prop 122 Opposition from Protecting Colorado Kids

The 2nd Annual Microdose Awards winners (where’s Podcast of the Year?)

Navigating Psychedelics for Clinicians and Therapists (new round begins November 29th!)

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on November 4, 2022November 15, 2022

PT370 – Prohibition, Civil Disobedience, and The Coca Leaf Cafe

In this episode, Joe interviews Dana Larsen: one of Canada’s most well-known advocates for cannabis reform and long-time anti-drug-war activist.

Larsen discusses his path from a high school kid sending letters to Canadian Parliament about cannabis drug policy, to his recent Overgrow Canada stunt (where he gave away 10 million cannabis seeds in order to encourage people to grow plants everywhere), to opening his mushroom dispensary where he sells psilocybin and LSD, to last year; opening The Coca Leaf Cafe: a Vancouver, BC-based store that sells peyote and coca leaf tea (and they’re apparently the only store in the world doing this). As a long-time fighter of the drug war who has clearly made great strides, he talks a lot about prohibition and its many problems; and how, in all of his work, it’s been civil disobedience that has been the most successful. 

He discusses what it’s going to take to establish a recreational mushroom market; differences between US and Canadian reform; his feelings on peyote; his thoughts on new designer drugs; his concerns with current rehab and safe supply systems; and he gives and an oddly fitting analogy between the stereotypical picture of an opiate user and the masturbation panic that spread through Europe for hundreds of years.

Notable Quotes

“I’ve been doing this for over 30 years, and looking back at this time, the one tactic that was the most effective was the civil disobedience. I’ve done a lot of political work, I’ve done lobbying and other things, and there’s a role and a place for that. But for me, I think the most success has come from myself and others openly breaking the law.”

“Large doses of mushrooms can be great, but for a lot of people, they don’t want to be super high. They just want a little bit. And I think that there’s a tendency, if it’s legal, for most people to move towards milder forms of use. When there’s prohibition, a lot of folks stop using, but those that continue to use are pushed towards the most extreme forms of use, which is most harmful for them and for society in general.”

“We talk about harm reduction, and I think that’s important, but the other side of harm reduction is benefit maximization. These substances aren’t just harmful; like with anything, you want to reduce the harms, but there’s positive things about cannabis use and mushroom use and cocaine use and heroin use. …There are a lot of positives about these substances as well as the negatives. Prohibition just makes the positives very hard to manifest and it accentuates the negatives to an absurd degree.”

Links

Danalarsen.com

Mushroomdispensary.com

Cocaleafcafe.com

Potheadbooks.com

Vancouver.ca: Decriminalizing simple possession of illicit drugs in Vancouver

Overgrowcanada.com

NYpost.com: Pot protest slams Biden for ‘self-serving’ and ‘disgusting’ pardon stunt

Mashed.com: Did The Government Really Poison Alcohol During Prohibition?

Psychonautwiki.org: Proscaline

Vicetv.com: Hamilton’s Pharmacopeia: Positive PCP Story

Dana’s Twitter thread about police corruption in Mexico

Getyourdrugstested.com

Psychedelics Today: PT311 – William Leonard Pickard – LSD, Fentanyl, Prison, and the Greatest Gift of All: The Natural Mind

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on October 25, 2022November 11, 2022

PT367 – Colorado Proposition 122 and the Decriminalization of Natural Medicines

In this episode, Joe interviews David Bronner: CEO (Cosmic Engagement Officer) of Dr. Bronner’s, a top-selling natural soap brand, that has, over the years, branched more and more into social (and psychedelic) activism. 

Bronner visits largely to discuss Colorado’s Proposition 122, which they describe as “the most progressive policy yet” and would define natural plants like psilocybin, psilocin, mescaline-producing plants (excluding peyote), ibogaine, and DMT as “natural medicine,” and decriminalize their personal use, possession, growth, and transport for people over 21 years of age. If it passes, the statute would also create a Regulated Natural Medicine Access Program for licensed healing centers to administer these substances in safe, controlled environments. 

He discusses the details of the proposal and its friction points with Decriminalize Nature’s efforts (most recently in their Initiative 61); some of the false narratives driven by opposition to Proposition 122; the ways the psychedelic movement is connecting with traditionally psychedelic-averse conservatives; peyote and the need to focus on sustainability; what happened with California’s Senate Bill 519; research into ibogaine; Biden’s federal prison “pardon”; and more. 

While some say the people of Colorado aren’t ready for Proposition 122, we believe that they are, and we join Bronner in voicing our support for the measure – which could be a massive win for Colorado and the psychedelic movement in general. If you live in Colorado, we urge you to research the measure and think hard about which way you’ll be voting on November 8.

Notable Quotes

“Everyone here really wants to bring the healing power of these medicines and is understandably suspicious of corporate takeover like we’re seeing in big pharma. The way I see it; this regulated program and access is what competes with big pharma.”

“Conservative leanings on this could play in our favor, I don’t know. I mean, maybe not, but a crushing victory in Colorado, man, makes a lot of things possible. If we crush it with a 2/3 majority across a political spectrum in an off-year election in a purple state; that’s just going to send a shockwave to the political establishment and just make a lot of things easier, I think, at both the state and federal level.”

“What is a sustainable source of medicine? What’s not? This whole cognitive liberty/religious liberty [belief]: you need to balance that against ecological sustainability and Indigenous rights and not just say, ‘I have the right to use anything. It doesn’t matter how endangered it is or unsustainable that is.’”

Links

Drbronner.com

IMC.fund

Growmedicine.com

Ballotpedia.org: Colorado Proposition 122, Decriminalization and Regulated Access Program for Certain Psychedelic Plants and Fungi Initiative (2022)

Naturalmedicinecolorado.org

Ballotpedia.org: Denver, Colorado, Initiated Ordinance 301, Psilocybin Mushroom Initiative (May 2019)

Ballotpedia.org: Oregon Measure 109, Psilocybin Mushroom Services Program Initiative (2020)

Ballotpedia.org: Oregon Measure 110, Drug Decriminalization and Addiction Treatment Initiative (2020)

Filtermag.org: Colorado’s Two Psychedelic Ballot Efforts Present Competing Visions

Psychedelics Today: Religious Practice Under Oregon Measure 109

Psychedelic Education Center: Psychedelics and Religious Liberty in the United States

Rollingstone.com: These Mormons Have Found a New Faith – in Magic Mushrooms

Churchofeagleandcondor.org

Psychedelics Today: PT246 – Amber and Marcus Capone of VETS – Foundational Healing and the Brain

Psychedelics Today: PTSF77 – Progress and Context, with Jesse Gould of the Heroic Hearts Project

Filtermag.org: California’s Psychedelic Decrim Bill Was Gutted and Pulled; It Should Be Back in 2023

ICEERS.org: First Ever Clinical Trial with Ibogaine for Opioid Dependency

Reason.com: Biden’s Marijuana Pardons Did Not Free a Single Federal Prisoner or Deliver the Expungement He Promised

SSDP.org: Rally for Cannabis Clemency on October 24th at the White House

Brooklyn Psychedelic Society

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on July 8, 2022October 4, 2022

PT335 – Christopher Dawson & Andrew Galloway – Modernizing Traditional Plant Medicine With Neuroscience and Luxury

In this episode, Joe interviews Christopher Dawson & Andrew Galloway: Co-Founders and CEO and COO, respectively, of Dimensions; a Canadian-based company creating retreats that blend traditional plant ceremonies with neuroscience and a luxurious, five-star environment.

Dawson realized what so many people were starting to learn about psychedelics after attending a 2015 conference in Peru that mixed neuroscientists with traditional healers, but for Galloway, it was direct experience, as he gives credit to plant medicines for helping him to heal from a 6-year addiction to crack cocaine. They each tell their story and how it led to the beginnings of Dimensions, where they worked for a year with a “Dreamlab” team of MDs, psychiatrists, practitioners from different fields, and even a design agency to create different programs for different substances – all with a focus on true set and setting and integrating perfectly with nature. They’re in the middle of a soft launch right now, offering cannabis in a ceremonial, group setting context to friends and families at their Algonquin Highlands location; perfecting everything before opening up to the general public. And once the law catches up with them, they hope to offer psilocybin and other psychedelic-assisted therapy across several new retreat locations. 

They talk about Health Canada and the country’s trajectory towards legal psychedelics; critiques of traditional addiction treatment and the efficacy of 12-step programs; the tension between the psychedelic space and traditional healing space; investing in biotech; the polyvagal theory; how animals deal with trauma (and how we don’t); and the concept of integration: If you’re just taking a pill and not doing the work, are you missing the point entirely?

Notable Quotes

“We’re biased (we’re in the retreat business), but I don’t think that psilocybin, as an example, should be reduced to a pill that you take with your juice in the morning and you no longer take your SSRI because this is your new pill. For us, it’s the psychedelic-assisted therapy that actually maximizes the potential of the psychedelic experience, and that’s the mechanisms through which fundamental, behavioral change can take place. I think the idea that a pill can replace all of that means that you’re kind of missing the point about the whole experience.” -Chris

“I don’t want to slam traditional treatment because it actually did work for me to some degree. …I had a crack-cocaine addiction for six-seven years and ended up in rehab for six months and came back and participated in 12-step programs and remained abstinent. That part worked. The difference for me when I got involved with plant medicine was something else: I got healed. Instead of just abstaining and not using to cope or to manage with whatever I was dealing with, I actually healed through plant medicine.” -Andrew

“Is it a pill or is it the therapeutic process? If you don’t engage in integration, then you’re just taking a pill.” -Chris

“We talked about stigma earlier; it’s changing, and [for] the general public, the stigma around the war on drugs is changing too. I think people have finally figured out that it doesn’t work. No war works. We only declare war on things that we can make money from.” -Andrew

Links

Dimensionsretreats.com

Dimensionsretreats.com: Algonquin Highlands

Psychedelics Today: PT314 – Daniel McQueen, MA – Vital Psychedelic Conversations

Psychedelics Today: Canada’s SAP Expansion Signals a Step Forward for Psychedelics

Dimensionsretreats.com: Dimensions + Queen’s University

Thedesignagency.ca

National Library of Medicine: Psychedelic perceptions: mental health service user attitudes to psilocybin therapy

Somaticmovementcenter.com: What is the Polyvagal Theory?

Psychedelics Today: PT248 – Pierre Bouchard – Somatic Therapy, Trauma, and the Nervous System (more about the polyvagal theory)

Psychedelicmedicinecoalition.org

About Christopher Dawson

Christopher Dawson is the Co-Founder and CEO of Dimensions, a growing collection of retreat destinations combining neuroscientific research with plant ceremony in immersive natural environments. Prior to co-founding Dimensions, Christopher was the founder and CEO of Edgewood Health Network, where he oversaw the largest private network of residential/outpatient treatment providers in Canada and led the merger and acquisition of Canada’s top three treatment centers to create that network.

 

About Andrew Galloway

Andrew Galloway is the Co-Founder and COO of Dimensions, a new paradigm for healing, combining ancient ceremonial plant medicines with modern science in safe, legal, and nurturing natural environments. He leads the organization’s clinical teams and operations for Dimensions Retreats, a new collection of immersive, transformational healing retreats combining neuroscientific research with plant ceremony and luxurious hospitality. Prior to co-founding Dimensions, he was a National Director of Edgewood Health Network; leading 10 outpatient centers. Andrew was the former VP at GreeneStone Muskoka, an international certified alcohol and drug counsellor, and has 14 years of experience working directly for the NHL/NHLPA substance abuse program.

Support the show!

  • Patreon
  • Leave us a review on Facebook or iTunes
  • Share us with your friends
  • Join our Facebook group – Psychedelics Today group – Find the others and create community.

Navigating Psychedelics


Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on June 10, 2022October 4, 2022

PT326 – Dr. Rick Barnett, Psy.D – Addiction, Recovery, and Competency in Psychedelic Therapy

In this episode, David interviews Clinical Psychologist and Founder of the Psychedelic Society of Vermont, Dr. Rick Barnett, PsyD. 

Barnett discusses the importance of building community in psychedelic spaces; psychedelic experiences as preventative medicine, and the differences between (and value within) the sanitized medical model and more ritualistic experiences. He talks about his own personal journey with addiction and recovery and looks at the interrelation between trauma, addiction, trust, and how psychedelics operate as disruptors – with a sense of meaning and purpose.

He discusses many of the current clinical trials happening around psychedelics and addiction; Alcoholics Anonymous and LSD; Vermont’s developing decriminalization bill (Measure H.644); the psychiatric workforce shortage and the potential solution of more prescribing psychologists; and, considering Oregon’s budding psilocybin therapy model, points out that one doesn’t need to be a licensed clinical practitioner with specific schooling to be a good psychedelic facilitator. Could we instead build models that are based largely on competency?

The Psychedelic Society of Vermont is putting on the Psychedelic Science & Spirituality Summit on the summer solstice (June 20-21) in Stowe, VT, with the goal of holding space for both the scientific and spiritual side of psychedelia. The conference is specifically for healthcare professionals, but all others are welcome to virtually attend or come to the summer solstice celebration after the conference. For more info, head to vermontpsychedelic.org.

Notable Quotes

“I had several profound experiences with LSD when I was a kid, and when I crashed and burned on alcohol and wound up in a 12-step rehab (the Hazelden Foundation), I quickly recognized that my experiences with LSD made me extremely receptive to the message that was being put forth to me in a 12-step-oriented rehab program. Concepts like surrender and a connection to spirituality, a connection to open-mindedness, willingness, being honest with oneself, taking one’s inventory – these kinds of concepts that are so common in 12-step programs – they resonated so strongly with me because of my experiences with LSD.”

“We have the ability to instill a sense of trust with our patients, and they can begin to trust themselves, and to trust the therapist, and to review some of these old hurts and really get into it over the course of therapy in a way that’s very healing. So it can happen with therapy, and I don’t think one is necessarily a substitute for the other. I think [psychedelics and therapy] work very well together. Psychedelics are yet another tool, just like therapy is a tool, just like AA is a tool, just like Suboxone and Methadone are tools. They’re all tools, and it’s really important to respect and honor that each one brings something positive, potentially, for an individual.” 

“An AA program, a harm reduction program, a therapy program, a psychedelic program, [a] meditation retreat: All these things provide a nudge, and potentially a very transformative nudge in the direction of like, ‘Okay, and then what?’ What are you doing in your daily life? …That ‘assisted’ part is not just assisted by a therapist. It’s not just assisted by a drug. It’s not just assisted by a shaman or an integration coach. It’s assisted by everything.”

Links

DrRickBarnett.com

Psychedelic Science & Spirituality Summit

Righttotrypsilocybin.com

Psychedelics Today: PT307 – Kathryn L. Tucker, JD – The Right to Try Act and the Battle for Psilocybin Access

Openstates.org: An act relating to decriminalization of a personal use supply of a regulated drug

Psychedelics Today: PT236 – Dr. Carl Hart – Drugs: Honesty, Responsibility, and Logic

Hazelden.org: Hazelden Foundation

Mydecine.com: Mydecine Receives Conditional IRB Approval for Phase 2b Smoking Cessation Study

Pubmed: Long-term follow-up of psilocybin-facilitated smoking cessation

University of Exeter: Ketamine and psychological therapy helped severe alcoholics abstain for longer in trial

Psychedelics Today: Dr. Ben Sessa – Preliminary Results from MDMA Assisted Therapy for Alcohol Use Disorder

Lucid.news: Bill Wilson, LSD and the Secret Psychedelic History of Alcoholics Anonymous

His Linkedin post about trust and being let down

About Dr. Rick Barnett, Psy.D

Dr. Rick Barnett, Psy.D., is the Co-Founder of the Psychedelic Society of Vermont, the Legislative Chair and Past-President of the Vermont Psychological Association, the founder of the non-profit organization, CARTER, Inc., and is a clinical psychologist and addiction specialist in private practice in Stowe, VT. Dr. Barnett has worked as a Clinical Psychologist in nursing homes, hospitals, and outpatient programs, and has trained hundreds of health professionals through workshops on addiction and mental health issues over the past 20 years. He is in long-term recovery of alcohol and substance abuse and is an active advocate for addiction treatment and recovery resources. Dr. Barnett holds a Bachelor’s degree in psychology from Columbia University, a Doctorate and Master’s Degree in Clinical Psychology and a Master’s Degree in Clinical Psychopharmacology. He is a Licensed Alcohol and Drug Counselor and holds certificate in Problematic Sexual Behavior (PSB-S) and Gambling Disorder.

Socials: Twitter / Linkedin 


Support the show!

  • Patreon
  • Leave us a review on Facebook or iTunes
  • Share us with your friends
  • Join our Facebook group – Psychedelics Today group – Find the others and create community.

Navigating Psychedelics

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on June 7, 2022October 4, 2022

PT325 – Philip Wolf – Cannabis: The Early Days of Legality, Elevated Dining, and the Need for Education

In this episode of the podcast, recorded in-person in Joe’s living room, Joe interviews Philip Wolf: Founder of Cultivating Spirits, Co-Founder of the Cannabis Wedding Expo, past guest, and friend whose path in cannabis aligns nicely with that of Joe’s with Psychedelics Today. 

Wolf’s work in cannabis has largely been in the form of “elevated dining,” where participants are treated to an experience similar to what wine aficionados seek out; with dispensary tours, cannabis tasting, and food-pairing. His current project is CashoM: a platform offering education to cannabis consumers, from beginners to connoisseurs, covering everything related to cannabis – from teaching a newbie how to pack a bowl to the science behind terpenes, and everything in between. 

Wolf discusses the free-for-all, wild west early days of recreational cannabis in Breckenridge; similarities between those days and what’s happening in Oregon with psilocybin; cannabis as medicine and the reframing of what “medicine” is; his recent appointment to the Rolling Stone Culture Counsel; and the recent “deep dive into winter” he took by staying at a house alone in Wisconsin for 2 months. 

And he talks about some higher concepts: The importance of sitting in a circle with a group, the need for integrity in all things, embracing uncertainty, and why we need challenging trips. There is no one tool, modality, or programmable set, setting, and dose that will work for everyone every time, but he believes the secret to making this all work is to find commonality between each other. Can we all grow enough to make that link a general love for one another?

Notable Quotes

“Right now, we’re really limiting the potential of cannabis, and limiting how it can actually affect someone’s experience, and how people are connecting with it. And this comes from people trying to create digestible marketing because they feel like that is the route in order to get new consumers on board. But actually, I think, through that, they’re actually doing a really big disservice, because people are just pigeonholing cannabis with sleep or anxiety relief or [to] energize. It’s just really limiting everything in my opinion. …Having a limited understanding of what cannabis can actually do for your life isn’t going to allow people to tap into the true potential of that particular medicine.”

“I think there is a wisdom to the medicine. Like, if you feel like you ate too many mushrooms, maybe you were supposed to eat too many mushrooms. …You get provided a lot of things in your life that can lead to a lot of other things, and we don’t always have the capability of seeing the importance of that.” 

“Hopefully it’s a good reality check for a lot of people to understand how we’re going to come together to get this right. And it’s not my way, it’s not Joe’s way, it’s not your way, it’s not this person’s way, it’s not this company’s way, it’s not MAPS. It’s none of it. All of that together is the only way that this is going to happen.”

“When we’re going through a bad experience, we grow from it. If we were happy all the time – if we have the happy pill, if we have the happy mushrooms all the time – then there’s no point to grow and advance. But if we can push the edge, as we spoke about, then there’s that opportunity for growth.” 

Links

Cashom.org

Cultivatingspirits.com

Rollingstone.com: The Importance of Empowered Cannabis Consumers

Psychedelics Today: Philip Wolf – Terpenes, Social Consumption and the Cannabis Experience

IMDB.com: High Profits

Aspentimes.com: Breckenridge woman featured in CNN’s ‘High Profits’ dies at 26 after car crash

The Ganja Kitchen Revolution: The Bible of Cannabis Cuisine, by Jessica Catalano

Summitdaily.com: Medical marijuana panel discusses benefits of cannabis

Ffungi.org

Psychedelics Today: PT324 – Amanda Reiman, Ph.D., MSW – Web3, NFTs, Cryptocurrencies, and A Deeper Relationship With Plants

Ritual: Power, Healing and Community, by Malidoma Patrice Some

Psychedelics Today: PT311 – William Leonard Pickard – LSD, Fentanyl, Prison, and the Greatest Gift of All: The Natural Mind

Compasspathways.com: COMPASS Pathways announces positive topline results from groundbreaking phase IIb trial of investigational COMP360 psilocybin therapy for treatment-resistant depression

Truenaturehealingarts.com

About Philip Wolf

Philip Wolf is grateful to do the work he was born to do: open the minds of the world to the benefits of cannabis, and showcase them in the form of celebration, ritual, and elevated dining. Since then, he’s founded Cultivating Spirits, co-founded the Cannabis Wedding Expo, co-founded Hispanola Health Partners (501-c3 non-profit) and is currently creating CashoM, a Cannabis Masterclass program for beginners and connoisseurs. His focus: to bridge the gap between mainstream America and cannabis through education, experience and lifestyle. Philip has been featured on CBS Nightly News, NBC, Business Insider, New York Post, Rolling Stone, Forbes, Time Magazine, Bloomberg, Vice, Entrepreneur, and many more. He’s appeared in viral Facebook documentary style videos with over 12 million views, and starred in an episode of the popular television show, “Bong Appetite” on Viceland. Philip was recently honored this year by the Rolling Stone Magazine Culture Council to join its ranks.

Instagram:
Philip Wolf / Cultivating Spirits / CashoM / Hispanola Health Partners  


Support the show!

  • Patreon
  • Leave us a review on Facebook or iTunes
  • Share us with your friends
  • Join our Facebook group – Psychedelics Today group – Find the others and create community.

Navigating Psychedelics

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on June 3, 2022March 1, 2023

The Intertwined Prohibitionist Histories of Psychedelics and Kratom

The history of kratom’s long path to (mostly) legality shows us that if done right, fighting against prohibition can actually lead to wins. But to truly fight these battles, we can’t fall into the trap of psychedelic elitism.

Ever since Westerners first encountered psychedelics, they have been prohibited, demonized, and considered unfit for civilized folk. Beginning with Columbus’s first encounter with psychedelic-snuff-using natives in Hispaniola, this class of psychoactives has always been relegated to the underground. (Ott, 11) While the recent emergence of psychedelic commercialization and medicalization marks our first flirtation with aboveboard operations in nearly 50 years, psychedelic advocates are all too familiar with prohibition after 500 years of psychedelic distrust and drug war assaults. 

The road to our blossoming revival of psychedelic culture has been filled with tragedy and struggle. Even with the decriminalization of some psychedelics in select cities, most Americans cannot trip without the fear of losing their freedom. We are criminalized for possessing a portal to an unordinary state of consciousness. Undoubtedly, psychedelic prohibition has brought with it the tragic ruination of thousands of lives. Passionate advocates, then, have a chip on their shoulder – an urge to close the chapter on the long history of the Western demonization of psychedelics. 

For many, this is a noble and moral goal. Yet in shedding the chains of prohibition, we must ensure that we thoroughly scrub ourselves clean of it. In our desperation to leave our struggle behind, we must not fall into the trap of a prohibitionist mindset. 

Psychedelics are not becoming legal and mainstream because they are “good drugs” in contrast with the rightfully-prohibited “bad drugs.” There is no such distinction, and it was prohibition which constructed the illogical demarcation between “good” and “bad” drugs in the first place. As the Swiss alchemist Paracelsus mused many centuries ago, the difference between a medicine and a poison is the dose – not whether or not it occasions a psychedelic experience.

What is Psychedelic Elitism and Why is it Bad for the Anti-Prohibitionist Movement?

Despite emerging from the same struggle against prohibition that most other “drugs” face, the narrative around psychedelic legalization has often included an attitude which can be termed “psychedelic elitism.” Psychedelic elitism is the belief that psychedelic drugs (psilocybin, LSD, etc.) are harmless and beneficial, and used by responsible, upstanding citizens; whereas other drugs (such as PCP, methamphetamine, or heroin) are bad, inherently dangerous, and only used by the lowest characters in society. As such, psychedelics are seen as wrongfully prohibited, while other drugs are rightfully prohibited. 

Dr. Carl Hart’s 2019 presentation at the Horizon’s Conference in NYC directly touched upon this issue. He warned that any internalization of the prohibitionist mindset would be counterproductive to our overarching goals of creating a more just and equitable society. All drugs, removed from their social context, have potential for both good and bad reactions. For example, in mainstream narratives, psilocybin is used by affluent professionals and underlies the business model for publicly-traded companies, whereas methamphetamine is only used by impoverished individuals without social status. So psilocybin is associated with success and health, while meth is associated with ruin and sickness. This narrative holds sway despite the fact that methamphetamine is legally prescribed under the name Desoxyn, which has helped countless patients live a better life – very much confusing the moralizing mindset which demonizes some drugs but not others.

We were honored to have Dr. Carl Hart on the show last year. Check it out here!

Psychedelic experiences can be freeing, euphoric, problem-solving, pain-reducing, easy going, recreational, creative, therapeutic, medicinal, spiritual, ad infinitum. While these qualities drive our passion for psychedelic advocacy, we should keep in mind that the broader category of psychoactive substances, including non-psychedelic drugs (a category which is largely arbitrary and subjective), can also bear these same positive traits. Therefore, they should be included in our struggle against prohibition.

Any drug, psychedelic or non-psychedelic, can also be indicted in unpleasant experiences as well. It seems, rather clearly, that psychedelic elitism comes from a positive drug experience with what happened to be a psychedelic. With this experience, part of the propagandist veil which obfuscates our understanding of how drugs affect us individually and on a societal level falls away. We become acutely aware that a drug – in this case a psychedelic – can have a positive effect; a profoundly different narrative than the one peddled by prohibitionists. Yet this newfound knowledge of the contradiction is internalized as simply:  “Psychedelics are good.” There is rarely any further research to see if the prohibitionists were lying about all drugs or just psychedelics.

Applications are open for the second edition of Vital, our 12-month training certificate program in psychedelic therapy and integration, beginning in April 2023. Head to Vitalpsychedelictraining.com for more info, or attend a Q+A to have your questions answered.

Anti-prohibitionism

Psychedelics are worth advocating for, but this should never be done at the expense of other substances and their consumers. Removing the risk of imprisonment for psychedelic users but retaining it for other illicit drug users is hypocrisy at its finest. Allowing individuals and organizations to make exorbitant profits with psychedelics while forcing illicit drug merchants into the unregulated underground perpetuates unnecessary user risk while furthering the divide between the wealthy and the poor. 

Prohibition didn’t originate to prevent the so-called “menace of drugs on society.” Rather, it was enacted to broaden the range of authority held by law enforcement. From its origin in the Harrison Act of 1914, prohibition has been about power and control – usually with a racial slant. The Harrison Act was passed to regulate and tax opium and coca imports in the US. This effectively made it impossible for Chinese immigrants to procure opium legally, thus making opium users liable for arrest. Cocaine was described in the press as giving superhuman strength to black men while simultaneously making them belligerent and violent. From the get-go, prohibition has never been about protecting people, but rather about protecting the status of the dominant class.

Selectively opposing psychedelic prohibition may be easier than challenging the entire status quo. Focusing on psychedelics means you don’t have to learn about other drugs and why people choose to take them. And speaking out in favor of psychedelics has become increasingly in vogue. In many places you will be positively received when opening up about your psychedelic drug use. But by including all drugs in the fight against drug prohibition, we can selflessly aid others and reduce overall ignorance of pharmacology while raising awareness of sociocultural inequity.

We should step back and remember why we oppose the prohibition of psychedelics in the first place. If we are committed to fighting for freedom of choice, the reduction of non-violent prison sentences, and the liberty to alter one’s consciousness as one pleases, then complete anti-prohibitionism is necessary. What I hope to convey is that being a psychedelic advocate should be no different than being an anti-prohibitionist. Both fight for freedom, the right to dictate one’s own consciousness, and the end to unnecessary violence instigated by the war on drugs. 

An extremely relevant case study in fighting prohibition (and winning) can be found in the story of the Southeast Asian tree leaf, kratom.

What is Kratom?

Kratom, or Mitragyna speciosa, is the leaf of an evergreen tree that grows from the base of the Himalayas to the Pacific Islands of Southeast Asia. In Thailand, there is written historical evidence of kratom’s use since the mid-17th century, but many believe it has an undocumented history of use dating back thousands of years.

A photo by Soren Shade of kratom trees from Top Tree Herbs’ greenhouse

Kratom also has a therapeutic folklore associated with it. A 350-year-old Buddhist temple in Thailand has a message etched in stone recommending kratom for diarrhea. In the “Hamilton’s Pharmacopeia” episode on kratom, a farmer mentions that he reaches for kratom leaves to help with coughing.

Thailand has the richest history of kratom use among the Southeast Asian countries where kratom trees grow and traditional use centers around the common laborer. Regardless of what kind of manual work they are performing; the scorching heat, unremitant sun, and long days wear on Thai workers. They chewed kratom long before coffee was introduced to the peninsula, with kratom leaves or tea serving the same purpose of energizing them and pushing them through the physical discomfort of hard work.

Kratom use originated as simple plucking and chewing of the tree’s leaves. People pick a leaf from the tree, tear the stem from the leaf, roll it into a quid, insert the quid into their mouth and lightly chew on it. They express the juices from the leaf for a little less than a minute, letting the juices come into contact with the mucus membrane, before the leaf is spat out and discarded. This chewing and spitting act can be repeated multiple times throughout the day as desired.

Another popular way to consume kratom is as a tea. Usually, teas are brewed for social settings or to be sold in the bazaar. Leaves are taken from the tree and added to a pot of water, which is left to simmer over a fire for around three hours. In the marketplace, kratom tea is frequently sold in plastic bags to customers who seek it with the same intent as an American Starbucks patron – for the boost. There are also groups of friends who gather in the evenings to drink a shared cauldron of tea that they make over a fire. At this time of day, the tea isn’t meant to give an energizing kick, but rather to be drunk socially while taking it easy and relaxing. Consuming a larger portion actually provides an effect opposite to the one desired when laboring.

Kratom has a unique response curve depending upon how much is consumed. One or two tea bags or anything under five or six chewed leaves may have an energizing effect, while  stronger tea (or tea consumed in larger quantities) may have an unwinding and sociable effect while comforting the whole body.

For more about kratom, check out Joe’s interview with Clinical Professor at the University of Florida, College of Pharmacy: Oliver Grundmann, Ph.D.

Kratom and Prohibition

Despite the abundance of native ethnopharmacological options, many Thai citizens were regular opium users in the early 20th century. The opium trade was blessed by the Thai government, and a 20% tax was passed onto the consumer. By 1940, it was estimated that between 8%-20% of all tax revenue in Thailand came from opium.

In 1942, however, Thailand declared war on Allied forces and entered World War II. With war came economic hardship, and in 1943, the Thai government noticed that their opium tax revenue had plummeted. Usually, opium taxes were a fairly constant source of revenue for the government, as consumers maintained their use continually to avoid withdrawal symptoms. 

Following an investigation in 1943, the Thai government realized that their former opium taxpayers had switched from state controlled opium to locally-growing kratom after someone had discovered that chewing on kratom or drinking kratom tea allowed them to stop using opium without unpleasant side effects. The word got out and spread like wildfire.

In a special meeting on January 7th, 1943, Police Major General Pin Amornwisaisoradej, a member of the House of Representatives from Lampang, stated “Taxes for opium are high while kratom is currently not being taxed. With the increase of those taxes, people are starting to use kratom instead and this has had a visible impact on our government’s income.”  Later that year, kratom was made illegal, marking its first encounter with prohibition. In the 1970s, the war on kratom escalated, and the law changed to require that all kratom trees in Thailand be chopped down. Thousands of people were imprisoned and had their lives ruined, while many more were negatively impacted in other ways.

This self-guided class investigates the history, science, and best practices for safe and effective microdosing; hosted by Adam Bramlage, founder of Flow State Micro, Dr. James Fadiman, the “father of modern microdosing,” and a dozen expert guest faculty. Enroll today!

Terence McKenna and Kratom

In 1987, Terence McKenna was approached by a magazine called Trip to write a column called “Our Man in Nirvana.” McKenna was to be sent to remote locations around the world to relax and report back on the local culture. The magazine closed its doors shortly after he started writing for the column, but he had been sent to Thailand on the magazine’s dime, and had produced a brief article from his journey. 

Ever the curious adventurer, he sought out kratom while in Thailand, which he had read about in Richard Evans Schultes’ book, The Botany and Chemistry of Hallucinogens. Impressed with the leniency of Thai culture and permittance of drug manufacture and use – especially heroin – Terence was intrigued as to why the kratom tree was illegal.

According to Terence, “We put out the word, and lo and behold, we got samples of this plant – rootstock. And it was very hush-hush. Everyone was either giggling or looking at us with thin, hard expressions as we scored this plant.” He took the rootstock back to Hawaii and made it “available for certified phytochemists and biochemical researchers to determine what this thing is.” Remarkably, this makes McKenna perhaps one of the earliest kratom vendors in the United States.

Still intrigued by the mystery of kratom prohibition, McKenna continued to look into the issue. Finally he heard a theory that registered with him. “What we learned as we made our way towards it was why it’s illegal. It’s illegal because it inhibits and interferes with heroin addiction.” Referencing how Thailand exported up to “one third of the world’s heroin,” he hypothesized that perhaps the reason it was illegal was due to its threats on their legal opioid industry. “So, who knows, you know, if this is true. But say it were true. So that means, you know, that this is, ethnobotanically, one of the great coups of the decade. And it explains, then, why the Thais are of such an ambivalent state of mind about it, because it’s poised like a dagger at the heart of their economic life if it’s real.”

Check out our new self-paced (CE-accredited) foundation course, “Psychedelics: Past, Present, and Future,” with Jerry and Julie Brown!

Kratom Prohibition in the United States

Americans were first introduced to kratom in the aftermath of the Vietnam war, when GIs returning from Southeast Asia brought leaves back with them. While small circles of interest developed, only hardcore nerds like Terence McKenna were speaking publicly about kratom in the 1980s.  

Despite McKenna making it available to “phytochemists and biochemical researchers,” public interest in kratom grew slowly. By 2005, kratom was beginning to develop niche appeal on online bodybuilding forums, and by 2016, the ranks of American kratom consumers were swelling. More and more, people were drawn to kratom by the idea that it may give them energy, help them with an opioid use pattern that they wanted to leave behind, or act as a natural painkiller. The DEA, however, challenged these beliefs when it was announced that they would be scheduling kratom as a controlled substance in August of 2016.

Instantly, passionate kratom consumers jumped into action. Petitions were circulated that drew more than 100,000 signatures. The DEA’s bulletin, the Federal Register, was bombarded with tens of thousands of passionate stories from people recounting how kratom made their lives better. Kratom business leaders joined together to form a lobbying group called the American Kratom Association (AKA). In a short time, dozens of members of Congress, including Bernie Sanders, had written to the DEA expressing their concern that a kratom ban would cause more harm than good.

In this brand new CE-approved series, Kyle, Veronika Gold, and experts in trauma and ketamine-assisted therapy (KAP) explore the ethical and compassionate uses of KAP in the treatment of trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder. Sign up now!

Amidst the public outcry, the DEA backtracked on their plan to schedule kratom. This marked the first instance that anything listed by the DEA to be added to the Controlled Substance Act was overturned: a monumental achievement that cannot be overlooked by those studying the history of prohibition.

The parent agency of the DEA and FDA, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), reviewed the claims put forth by the DEA and concluded that there wasn’t sufficient evidence to make kratom illegal. However, following their receipt of the HHS letter, the FDA maintained for years that their official policy was that kratom was a threat to public health. It took a congressional investigation in 2020 to reveal that the executive branch’s official position on kratom was that it presented no substantiated risks, and that making it illegal would likely cause widespread social harm.

In the years that the FDA knew they were directed to not pursue kratom, they still solicited a number of local municipalities and state governments to prohibit kratom anyway. They ultimately convinced six states to make kratom illegal – Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, Tennessee, Vermont, Wisconsin – driven by an internal, prohibitionist conviction. The AKA responded, and lobbied five states – Nevada, Arizona, Utah, Oklahoma, and Georgia – to pass protections for kratom consumers with a standardized regulatory framework to ensure the quality and safety of the sales. These legal regulations were filling the void that would normally be filled by the FDA, who, instead of focusing on protecting consumers through regulations, chose to pursue total prohibition.

The anti-prohibition trend has caught wind overseas as well. After over 75 years of prohibiting an ancient, traditional, and naturally occurring tree leaf, Thailand announced they would re-legalize kratom in 2020. Since 2021, 12,000 prisoners have been freed from their sentences related to possession or sale of kratom, and the price of a kratom leaf has dropped by 80-90%. In 2021, kratom was estimated to be a $1.3 billion dollar industry, and with an overwhelming majority of the world’s kratom being exported from Indonesia, the Thai government recognized how much money their prohibition was leaving on the table. After such positive change in global kratom acceptance, Thailand’s legalization news, however, was quickly overshadowed.

World Court

In July of 2021, kratom once again narrowly escaped prohibition. After failing to convince enough state governments to ban kratom, the FDA announced that they would be sending an official letter of recommendation to the United Nations, advising them to add kratom to the international list of controlled substances. When it was announced in the Federal Register, the kratom community was once again quick to respond. 

Initially, the AKA sent out a mass newsletter to inform kratom consumers that the UN and World Health Organization (WHO) were in the process of making kratom illegal on behalf of the FDA. They concluded that the FDA was likely frustrated with the slow progress of attempts to push kratom prohibition through individual states, so they changed their strategy and decided to take their prohibitionist mission to the international level. Having failed at the federal level in 2016 and having lost the blessing of the HHS, it was no longer feasible to make kratom federally illegal. 

The United States is constitutionally bound to UN declarations that it signs. Since the US signed onto the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971, Congress is required to make any substance illegal that finds its way onto the UN’s list of controlled substances. This would allow the FDA and the DEA to effectively skirt the need to supply the evidence required to ban a substance in the United States, and render the failure to prohibit kratom domestically null and void.

Kratom advocates submitted over 70,000 comments against the prohibition to the FDA via the Federal Register. The AKA organized dozens of scientists and researchers to present their work on kratom to the WHO. By the time the hearing date came around, kratom advocates were ready for a fight. The strategy at the WHO meeting was to present as much evidence regarding the safety of kratom as possible, and science was on the side of kratom. Point by point, kratom advocates and scientists refuted each false claim made against kratom, proving they were unsubstantiated. On November 18th, 2021, the WHO’s Expert Panel of Drug Dependence concluded that “there is insufficient evidence to recommend a critical review of kratom.”

advertisement for psychedelics today course, Navigating Psychedelics for Clinicians and Therapists. On the right hand side there is a photo of a white woman with short brown hair smiling.
Did you know there’s another version of our classic Navigating Psychedelics course that’s all online and can be taken at your own pace? Check out the Independent Learner edition!

Going Forward

The kratom community and industry is working towards normalizing kratom and cementing its protection on the state level. Each year, leading kratom businesses spend millions of dollars hiring lobbyists to pressure state legislators to pass the Kratom Consumer Protection Act (KCPA), which would function similarly to state cannabis laws to protect it from federal interference (or at least attempt to). 

The KCPA has a distinct focus on health and safety regulations. It recognizes that contamination and adulteration are real and dangerous, and any adverse effects resulting from contamination would be spun by the media and prohibitionists to further harm kratom’s reputation. The strategy, then, is to lean into the robust safety profile of kratom to ensure its longevity. The largest kratom businesses have also banded together to enact quality control measures and perform audits on themselves to prove that they are adhering to food grade cGMP (commercial Good Manufacturing Practice) standards. This is not a cheap or easy process, but the effort is undertaken to show in good faith that the industry is mature and responsible.

Finally, the role of normalizing the use of a substance plays a significant role in the fight against prohibitionists. Generally, getting a majority to oppose prohibition (as 91% of Americans feel towards cannabis) is the goal of all grassroots anti-prohibitionists. As such, there have been a few attempts to personalize kratom, oftentimes through pathos-driven commercials detailing the story of people who can enjoy life again because of kratom. Today, kratom is increasingly being seen as a household object, as products such as kratom tea bags grow in popularity and broaden the consumer demographic.

Another kratom shot from Top Tree Herbs’ greenhouse

What to Learn About Prohibition From Kratom

Kratom has successfully defeated every federal prohibition attempt made against it in the United States. Six states have made it illegal, but even those states are now considering replacing their bans with the regulatory framework laid out in the KCPA. Thailand, the country with the richest history of kratom use, recently re-legalized it, likely due to the undeniable economic benefit kratom exportation would bring to their country. The WHO and UN, normally aligned on drug policy with the US, couldn’t ignore the overwhelming outpour of grassroots support and unanimous scientific consensus on the safety profile of kratom. 

Still, the most impressive feat performed by the kratom community yet was defeating the DEA in 2016. Normally, the DEA has unilateral decision-making power when it comes to prohibiting substances in the United States. That kratom was able to slip their grip suggests that prohibition at large is defeatable. The methods used to defeat kratom prohibition – hiring lobbyists, mobilizing hundreds of thousands of supporters, and convincing Ph.D.s and MDs to testify – should be taken to heart by anyone who finds themselves standing up against prohibition of any sort.

At this very moment, the DEA is attempting to schedule more than half a dozen psychedelic compounds, including DOI and DOC. Together, they have been utilized in over 2,000 peer reviewed scientific publications and have been indispensable to psychedelic research. 4-OH-DiPT, 5-MeO-AMT, 5-MeO-MiPT, 5-MeO-DET, and DiPT are also slated to be scheduled soon, which would prevent further study of their effects. (DiPT, for example, causes novel auditory distortions which have the potential to elucidate the mysteries of auditory neural-processing.) Some journalists and advocates have stepped up to the plate to fight the DEA for their continuation of prohibition. However, a united psychedelic front hasn’t emerged, which kratom advocates have argued as being essential to stopping these bans.

Like psychedelics, kratom has a storied history of use. Both have been devastated by prohibition, but the true test of their merit is shown in their phoenix-like ability to continually inspire consumers to fight for their legality. Use of a substance – any substance – is not justification to imprison someone. Prohibition exponentially raises the possibility of harm that comes with consuming any substance by preventing education, quality control, and normalization. We must expand our scope to include more than psychedelics in our advocacy. Prohibition needs to end, and the clues to victory may just be found in the story of a tropical tea leaf.

A graphic Top Tree Herbs made when fighting the UN
Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on June 3, 2022October 4, 2022

PT324 – Amanda Reiman, Ph.D., MSW – Web3, NFTs, Cryptocurrencies, and A Deeper Relationship With Plants

In this episode of the podcast, Joe interviews cannabis expert and social ethnobotanist, Amanda Reiman, Ph.D., MSW. Reiman is the Founder of Personal Plants; an organization dedicated to promoting a deeper relationship between people and plants, and Co-Founder of Sacred Garden; a Web3 project which advocates for entheogenic plant conservation.

Reiman has over 25 years of experience growing cannabis and is intensely passionate about deepening the relationship between people and their source of healing, which she hopes is with plants they are growing. She talks about her early days of growing cannabis; the pros and cons of pharmaceutical vs. herbal plant models; the rules around cannabis regulation and taxes; the concept of retreat centers soon having liability insurance; how the different consumption patterns of cannabis and psychedelics could lead to vastly different pharmaceutical models; and what she’d like to do to promote a better connection to plants: guided tours of sacred gardens in virtual reality.

This episode swerves into territory often touched on but not fully dissected in the podcast, as they delve into the endless possibilities of cryptocurrencies, NFTs, and other Web3 projects. While the mining of cryptocurrency does present many environmental concerns, Reiman discusses how NFT groups like hers are mitigating these worries by focusing on conservation efforts, and how the benefits of being able to decentralize the internet and return control to the people may far outweigh most concerns. She sees the future bringing on the possibilities of legal defense funds and clinical trials being entirely crowd-funded, and therefore taken out of the hands of venture capitalists and the endlessly corruptible government. 

Notable Quotes

“People who don’t even consume cannabis are finding joy in growing cannabis and giving it to their friends who do consume. So that’s really what Personal Plants is about: it’s taking a step back from that culture of high-level sophistication and bringing it back to the joys of gardening.”

“It becomes about profit margins and it becomes about revenue and I think that’s probably the biggest threat to plant medicine (the way we’ve seen it be a threat to healthcare). The fact that healthcare is a business means that what’s best for the people is never going to be number one, and so if we create a plant medicine system that also upholds those same values, I’m afraid the people will lose.”

“You can sit and listen to someone talk about something, [and] even if it’s freaking fascinating, it’s still not going to be the same as actually physically touching something, smelling something, [and] seeing something come alive in front of you. It just impacts the brain in a different way. So what I would love to do is have guided tours in the virtual reality space of a sacred garden.”

“I don’t think drugs are going back. I don’t think we’re going back. I think it’s too late. I was just looking at the latest Pew research figures yesterday and only 8% of the entire population thinks cannabis should be illegal. So we’re done. And I think now that we’re done with cannabis, it’s tugging on the thread of questioning about other drugs. And when I first started doing reform work, people would say, ‘Oh, you just want to legalize cannabis because you really just want to legalize all drugs.’ And you know what, Joe? I do. I do want to legalize all drugs. And I think we’re getting there.”

Links

Mypersonalplants.com

Sacrdgardn.com

Newfrontierdata.com

Humboldt.edu: Dr. Sue Sisley

Cannabisbusinesstimes.com: Bank of America Closes Cannabis Researcher’s Accounts

Fortune.com: Wells Fargo rejected nearly half of their Black homeowners refinancing applications

Indianexpress.com: Ethereum’s new upgrade is supposed to decrease its energy usage: Here’s how it works

Cointelegraph.com: Banking system consumes two times more energy than Bitcoin: Research

Psychedelicsanonymous.com

Offsetra.com

Cryptopsychedelic.com

Frontiersin.org: Virtual Reality as a Moderator of Psychedelic-Assisted Psychotherapy

Ethereum.org: What are DAOs? (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations)

Chambersforlouisiana.com (Gary Chambers)

About Amanda Reiman, Ph.D., MSW

Amanda Reiman, Ph.D. , MSW, is a social ethnobotanist. She is the Founder of Personal Plants, a platform designed to deepen the relationship between people and flora, Co-Founder of Sacred Garden, a Web3 project focused on entheogenic plant conservation, and the VP of Public Policy Research for New Frontier Data, a cannabis-focused data analytics firm.

An internationally recognized cannabis expert and public health researcher, Dr. Reiman is a leader in the field of cannabis as a substitute for alcohol and other drugs, and has presented her research all over the world. She has written for/been quoted in The Huffington Post, New York Times, Washington Post, Rolling Stone, and Playboy, as well as numerous peer-reviewed academic journals and several textbooks.

Socials:
Amanda Reiman: Twitter / Instagram 
Personal Plants: Twitter / Instagram 
Sacred Garden: Twitter / Instagram / Discord


Support the show!

  • Patreon
  • Leave us a review on Facebook or iTunes
  • Share us with your friends
  • Join our Facebook group – Psychedelics Today group – Find the others and create community.

Navigating Psychedelics

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on May 24, 2022October 19, 2022

Oregon, Measure 109, and Community Access: The Final Vote

On the eve before the final vote, Jon Dennis, Esq. shares his thoughts.

If you don’t know Jon Dennis yet, he’s an activist and attorney leading the charge for affordable community access and religious freedom under Oregon’s Measure 109 program, as well as the co-host of our Eyes on Oregon series. He’s been involved in many of the official Oregon Health Authority (OHA) Subcommittee meetings and has been keeping us up to date with everything going on in Oregon. 

Last week, Jon shared an update on the effort for religious freedom and community access that included official public comments from David Bronner, the Psychedelics Bar Association’s Religious Use Committee, Dr. William Richards of Johns Hopkins, and the Entheogenic Practitioners Council of Oregon. While not our typical blog content, we felt it was important to highlight these statements because they so passionately display how important this is to so many Oregonians and others across the United States – and because rulemakers may be reading.

This week is the week many in the psychedelic community have been working toward and excitedly anticipating, as Wednesday, May 25th is the day the Oregon Psilocybin Advisory Board (OPAB) will make its final vote on whether to recommend allowing a community-use paradigm of psilocybin services that Jon and so many others have been advocating for. 

Check out our self-paced (CE-accredited) foundation course, “Psychedelics: Past, Present, and Future,” with Jerry and Julie Brown!

To hopefully bring even more attention to this landmark event, we thought it’d be helpful to share the comment Jon sent to the OHA, as it perfectly summarizes why his proposed entheogenic practitioners framework is so important.

We invite Oregon rulemakers to read Jon’s succinct overview of the issues in advance of their Wednesday vote. 



“There is a growing social movement that believes access to psychedelics is a fundamental civil and human right that should be denied to no person. Members of this movement consider psychedelic freedom to be the maligned cousin of religious freedom. For some people, they are the same or very closely intertwined.

Pew Research data show that only 49% of people report ever having had a mystical experience in their entire lives, which is defined as a “moment of sudden religious insight or awakening.” Also, 49% of respondents to your Community Interest Survey on psilocybin under M109 said they were interested in psilocybin for spiritual reasons. 

The fastest growing category of religious self-identification in the United States is people who identify as “spiritual but not religious.” For a growing number of people in our society, religious institutions have come to be viewed with distrust, often because they have inflicted religious trauma on people who’ve come in search of healing. When I began talking about the proposed religious use framework under M109, I was initially amazed at the amount of criticism I got on account of it protecting “religions.” People liked the community access model, but they thought they wouldn’t benefit from it because “religion” for them has become obsolete.  

I believe, as many do, that we are undergoing a spiritual crisis. Martin Luther King warned that a society that is addicted to war and ignores its problems of racism and poverty “is approaching spiritual death.” There is growing recognition that we have the analytical and technical solutions required to solve many of the world’s greatest problems but lack the social and political will. King recommended that we become less of a “thing-oriented society” and more of a “person-oriented society.” 

I see these problems as spiritual in nature and believe they might be solvable only through spiritual solutions. 

Our new 12-month certificate program, Vital, is in full-swing and students are loving it. Sign up for the waiting list for the next cohort at vitalpsychedelictraining.com!

Oregon is about to begin a great experiment of introducing legal adult-use psychedelics into mainstream Western society through its safe and legal container of Measure 109. So far as I can tell, nearly everyone who works with psilocybin or other psychedelics in a sincere and personal manner believes that psychedelics have the potential to help us breathe some much-needed spiritual life into society. We believe adoption of an affordable community-access model of psilocybin services to be a moral imperative. 

An expensive program in Oregon creates a new kind of religious or spiritual inequity that I don’t think we are capable of fully comprehending yet, but it clearly exacerbates other types of social problems that already plague us. 

“Affordable access for all people” doesn’t mean that everyone should take psychedelics. I view the question of whether to take psychedelics as a big decision that should be made only after careful consideration of a number of things. One of the best promises of the M109 system, from my perspective, is that people will be required to consider some of these things before they make potentially life-altering decisions, and that people can agree to purchase these potentially-profound and potentially-destabilizing psilocybin experiences only after giving informed consent. The other great M109 promises: Support is available before, during, and after the experience; there will be a lot more oversight and accountability; a lot more access to medical and legal assistance; and people won’t really have to fear going to jail. This framework is a light-years-leap forward in terms of the safeguards of the so-called “unregulated market.” It really is quite brilliant.  

Within the M109 framework, the harms that could be caused by untested, community-grown mushrooms would be practically non-existent in the context of sincere community use and cannot be used as an honest justification for rules that would effectively require communities who work with psilocybin to procure their community sacrament through commercial channels. When regulations drive up costs without serving important government interests, they raise paywalls, deepen inequities, and further racial, gender, class, and other divides. 

Affordable, community-grown mushrooms would decrease paywalls and, contrary to the position announced in your Fiscal and Economic Impact Statement, actually drive more of the unregulated market into the safety of the M109 container. More people will take psilocybin under M109 if its costs are considered by consumers to be justifiable when compared with the unregulated market. 

Moreover, many religious and spiritual communities who work with psilocybin report having a relationship with the living psilocybin organism that can only be described as sacred. Under federal jurisprudence, religious freedom laws require a “compelling government interest” in order for the government to have any say on how a religious community grows, handles, stores, consumes, or discards their psychedelic sacraments. And (assuming arguendo that the government might have a compelling interest here), any time a government deigns to enforce laws that burden free religious exercise, under federal jurisprudence, it must still tread carefully and impair religious freedom only by “the least restrictive means” of doing so. 

In this brand new CE-approved series, Kyle, Veronika Gold, and experts in trauma and ketamine-assisted therapy (KAP) explore the ethical and compassionate uses of KAP in the treatment of trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder. Sign up now!

Sincere religious communities are publicly saying that they intend to operate under Measure 109, and it is only right that the State consider the regulation of these organizations in light of the broad federal protections that now exist under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act – and which were, in fact, enacted in reaction to Oregon’s allowing members of the Native American Church to be fired for practicing their religion, which uses peyote. 

Oregon isn’t a state that generally tries to short-change people on civil liberties issues.  

The ask here is that you permit Oregonians to take and use the non-Western medicine in ways that reflect non-Western paradigms of health and wellness. The truth is: potency-testing is part of a Western paradigm, and psilocybin has always been a non-Western medicine. It is exciting to witness the power of psilocybin beginning to be harnessed by skillful Western medical practitioners, but Western practitioners are relatively new to the psilocybin and the psychedelic scene. It is appropriate for us Westerners to defer to Indigenous voices when their experience surpasses our own, and to incorporate their wisdom and experience into our “Oregon Model.” I believe we can do this if only we make sure these psilocybin regulations aren’t too rigid or too heavy handed.

The entheogenic practitioner framework and manufacturing endorsement work together to do two things:

  1. Honor the religious liberties of sincere religious practitioners who work with psilocybin; and 
  2. Create an affordable community-access model and community container for psilocybin services. 

A one-size-fits-all system would treat churches and other community-owned nonprofit organizations the same way as luxury resorts. This is out of touch with federal religious freedom laws and raises unnecessary paywalls for 520,000 Oregonians who live in poverty. 

I hope you will consider these things when you decide how to balance safety and access. 

Yours in service,

Jon Dennis”

Stay tuned for updates and analysis after Wednesday’s vote, as the coming weeks will bring forth a revamped Eyes on Oregon podcast, as well as a new series exploring Oregon’s emerging psychedelic marketplace through the lens of lawyers. 


Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on May 12, 2022October 19, 2022

Update on the Fight for Religious Liberties in Oregon

A progress update on the Oregon Health Authority, Measure 109, and religious liberty.

It turns out a whole lot of people care about religious and spiritual freedom issues surrounding psilocybin. A few weeks ago, Oregon had two public hearings on its proposed psilocybin rules on products, testing, and facilitator training. The overwhelming majority of the public testimony received was in support of religious freedom, affordable access, and the community container for psilocybin service. The support was so overwhelming during the first meeting that I tried to keep tabs on the second meeting. I counted 31 total comments that were received. 24 of those 31 – or 74%! – voiced support for the adoption of the entheogenic practitioners framework for safely regulating community-based practice. I do not believe a single person testified in opposition to its adoption. 

Additionally, we are starting to receive written comments that people and organizations have submitted to the Oregon Health Authority (OHA).

David Bronner, CEO of Dr. Bronner’s Magic Soaps, has published his comments to OHA about the proposed rules, in which he recommends adopting the proposal in whole and even making some of the provisions around safe, affordable ceremony applicable to the entire M109 program. You can read his statement here.   

The Entheogenic Practitioners Council of Oregon created a petition for people to sign to show support for the Oregon effort. At the time of this writing, the petition has received 517 signatures and many poignant comments. One person who has signed the petition and commented is William Richards, Ph.D., the legendary psychedelic researcher from Johns Hopkins and author of Sacred Knowledge: Psychedelics and Religious Experiences. He wrote: 

Concisely: (1) Psilocybin in mushrooms or as synthesized substance provides access to many different states of human awareness, some powerfully facilitative of psychological and/or spiritual development; (2) The safety and probability of benefit are best ensured when preparation/education is provided in the context of a supportive relationship or community, either in a framework of mental health or of religious care; (3) When wisely integrated into our culture, psilocybin may well significantly decrease human suffering and promote the fuller realization of values such as peace, respect for diversity and compassion; (4) Access to this molecular tool for those who desire it, whether in medical or religious contexts, may be seen as a fundamental human right to explore our own minds. 

advertisement for psychedelics today course, Navigating Psychedelics for Clinicians and Therapists. On the right hand side there is a photo of a white woman with short brown hair smiling.
Did you know there’s another version of our classic Navigating Psychedelics course that’s all online and can be taken at your own pace? Check out the Independent Learner edition!

The Psychedelics Bar Association’s Religious Use Committee has also released a statement, in which it asks OHA to reevaluate its draft rules and accommodate the needs of religious practitioners:

“Currently, no state or federal law protects religious communities or practitioners who utilize psilocybin from being prosecuted by Oregon law enforcement. As charitable non-profit organizations, most if not all of these communities and practitioners lack the resources to hire attorneys to secure their rights. Measure 109 promised to welcome these communities into a legitimate legal framework. However, we believe that some of the proposed rules for implementing Measure 109 would substantially burden such communities and force them to operate illegally while remaining in the shadows.”

It also points out the following: “We note nearly half (49%) of the respondents to your Community Interest Survey indicated that their interest in accessing psilocybin under Measure 109 was for spiritual purposes. For context, the interest in spirituality ranks higher than interest in psilocybin for trauma-related issues (47%), addiction and substance use (17%), end of life psychological distress (10%), or “other” reasons (9%).”

It also offers some legal analysis to show that, based on the language of M109, Oregon has the legal rulemaking authority to protect religious practice. Here’s just one example:

“…Subsection (C) empowers the OHA to regulate the use of psilocybin products and psilocybin services ‘for other purposes’ deemed necessary or appropriate by the authority. The phrase ‘for other purposes’ indicates that the OHA may create rules that achieve purposes that are not explicitly stated in sections 3 to 129 or implied from them. This too means that OHA can create rules for the purposes of accommodating religious practice.”

You can view or download their full statement here:

Psychedelic-Bar-Association-statementDownload

In this brand new CE-approved series, Kyle, Veronika Gold, and experts in trauma and ketamine-assisted therapy (KAP) explore the ethical and compassionate uses of KAP in the treatment of trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder. Sign up now!

The Entheogenic Practitioners Council of Oregon has also released its public comment letter to the Oregon Health Authority.

“Affordable access to psychedelic healing is perhaps a wholly new equity issue that touches on racial, health, and spiritual equity. Equity means affordable access. Lack of affordability reinforces inequity that exists around race, gender, and class lines. We believe access to psychedelics to be a means of promoting spiritual equity, that we not create “spiritual privilege” as a function of socio-economic privilege. Equity also means culturally-sensitive. It must not impose Western medical paradigms on non- Western approaches to psilocybin.“

You can view or download their full statement here:

Entheogenic-Practitioners-Council-of-Oregon-statementDownload

The Oregon Health Authority will be publishing its written summary of the public comments soon. Stay tuned to hear how Oregon responds to the public outcry to protect religious and spiritual communities!

For those who have been following closely, a revised edition of the proposal for the entheogenic practitioners framework can be viewed/downloaded here.

Revised-proposal-Privileges-and-Duties-of-Entheogenic-Practitioners-v.12Download

Please note that we are continually striving to improve upon this document and welcome feedback on how we can make aboveground entheogenic practice safe and affordable for all. 

To learn more about the movement to protect religious freedom and community access under Measure 109, see: Eyes on Oregon, The Entheogenic Practitioner’s Council of Oregon website, or my earlier article that summarized the beginnings of this fight, “Religious Practice Under Oregon Measure 109.” 

Additionally, Eyes on Oregon will be changing shape over the coming month, from a somewhat sporadic web series into a more traditional and more regularly-released podcast. I will be hosting and interviewing various people from the frontlines in Oregon, with Joe joining when he is able. With so much happening, there’s a lot to talk about, and we hope you tune in.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on April 12, 2022October 4, 2022

PT309 – Jon Dennis, Esq. – Oregon’s Measure 109 and the Fight For Religious Liberty

In this episode of the podcast, David interviews lawyer, activist, and co-host of our Eyes on Oregon web series, Jon Dennis, Esq. 

Dennis has been heavily involved in Oregon’s Measure 109: creating the Entheogenic Practitioners Council of Oregon, writing a proposed regulatory framework for religious practice under Measure 109, and presenting to the psilocybin board subcommittees all in an effort to protect religious psilocybin use and ensure paywalls don’t ruin the unique and historic opportunity Oregon has opened up here.

If you weren’t as knowledgeable about Measure 109 as you’d like to be, this podcast serves as a great summary of how we got here and what’s next. Dennis discusses how Measure 109 came about; how it’s gone through a reputational makeover of sorts (and is more about supervised adult-use than therapy); the role of each subcommittee; Measure 110; who defines what counts as religious practice; the complications of requiring specific psilocybin testing; community support models as harm reduction; how it will become harder and harder to make good legal change in an emerging “psychedelic industrial complex,” and how he’s using the travails of María Sabina as an inspiration to make sure people aren’t left behind as Oregon moves forward. 

If you agree with us that religious use should be protected under Measure 109 (and especially if you live in Oregon), please sign his petition by April 20th, send an email by April 21st, or speak up during the comment periods during one of the upcoming subcommittee meetings on April 18th (5-7 PST) or April 21st (10m-noon PST). The board has 9 hours left of meeting time to make decisions on the recommendations of the subcommittees, so the time is now to make sure this is done right.

Notable Quotes

“I think at this point, we all will agree it’s inevitable that psychedelics are about to enter the mainstream, but how they enter the mainstream is important so that they not be delivered directly into the hands of capitalists behind paywalls that keep out millions and millions of people.” 

“The depth of human suffering right now is immense. And if we only wait until Compass Pathways and other companies that are pursuing legalized medical applications of psychedelic compounds [complete their research]; not only is that a long time to wait when people are suffering now [and] hospice patients are dying now, [but] to say that they have to wait through even the three or four or five-year expedited ‘breakthrough therapy’-designation type of process through the FDA – we don’t have time to wait. People are suffering now and we have enough information to not need to be really afraid of psilocybin and other psychedelics.”

“I think over 37 million Americans live in poverty and almost 600,000 Oregonians live in poverty. And to think that we’re just going to leave those people out because of an elevated safety concern; it’s just really hard to kind of square that all together in light of what the actual risks of psilocybin in particular are. …If Oregon decides to create a program – the world’s first regulated psychedelic services program – that prioritizes business interests to the detriment of marginalized people, I think the historical record will bear the stain of scandal and corruption on this.”

Links

Sign the petition here: Support Entheogenic Practitioners in Oregon

Register for “Religious Liberties & Measure 109: A Call to Action” – An Eyes on Oregon special edition webinar on April 17th at 6pm PST

Oregonentheo.com

Psychedelics Today: Religious Practice Under Oregon Measure 109, By Jon Dennis, Esq. (great summary and includes his proposed framework)

Eyes on Oregon, a Psychedelics Today Podcast with Jon Dennis and Joe Moore

DrBronner.com: Natural Medicine Colorado: Combining Regulated and Community Healing Models

Apple podcasts: “Labyrinths: Getting Lost with Amanda Knox” episode 41 – The Fungus Effect Part 4: Sacred Plants (Bia Labate)

CNN.com: Report: Aide says Nixon’s war on drugs targeted blacks, hippies

Radicalmycology.com

WFTV.com: ‘Completely devastating’: Family of man who died after hallucinogenic tea ceremony at Orange County church files lawsuit

Medium.com: “Maria Sabina: Mother of the Holy Children,” by Mustapha Itani

About Jon Dennis, Esq.

Jon Dennis, Esq. is a lawyer and activist in the psychedelics ecosystem and a consultant at the firm, Psychedelics Now. He is the co-host of “Eyes on Oregon,” a podcast by Psychedelics Today exploring the latest developments in Oregon’s legal psilocybin landscape. He serves on the Executive Committee of the Oregon State Bar Practice Section on Cannabis and Psychedelics and is a co-chair of its Psychedelics Subcommittee. He is a member of the Psychedelics Bar Association and sits on its Religious Use Committee.

Jon is the chief architect of the proposed regulatory framework for protecting religious and spiritual communities who operate under Oregon’s new psilocybin program. He has presented to multiple subcommittees of the Oregon Psilocybin Advisory Board in support of religious and spiritual freedoms and a community model for psychedelic services. He is a founding member of the Entheogenic Practitioners Council of Oregon. Jon has taken the North Star Ethics Pledge and is drawn to this work by the conviction that psychedelics possess the potential to accelerate our individual and collective shifts away from self-destructive paradigms. Prior to joining Psychedelics Go, Jon worked as a civil litigator and managed a nonprofit law office giving free legal assistance to people living in poverty. Jon has a BA in Religious Studies from the University of Kansas and a law degree from Lewis & Clark Law school. He lives in Ontario, Oregon.

Socials: Linkedin


Support the show!

  • Patreon
  • Leave us a review on Facebook or iTunes
  • Share us with your friends
  • Join our Facebook group – Psychedelics Today group – Find the others and create community.

Navigating Psychedelics

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on April 5, 2022October 4, 2022

PT307 – Kathryn L. Tucker, JD – The Right to Try Act and the Battle for Psilocybin Access

In this episode of the podcast, Joe interviews Kathryn L. Tucker, JD: Special Counsel at Emerge Law Group, where she Co-Chairs the Psychedelic Practice Group.

Tucker has had a 35-year career in advocacy and protecting rights of terminally ill patients, serving as lead counsel in three landmark federal cases around constitutional rights and dying. Most recently, she was part of the team responsible for enacting Oregon’s groundbreaking Measure 109. 

She discusses the mechanics of how access to psychedelic medicine works under the Right to Try act; how she feels about decriminalization vs. legalization and how it all relates to what she’s seen in the field of death and dying; what she’s excited about in Oregon; and how measures in Colorado could take things even further. 

While synthetic psilocybin is the only “investigational drug” offered under Right to Try, naturally-derived psilocybin and MDMA could be an option sooner than we think – but based on the DEA’s behavior so far, that will only happen if more people join the fight, as it’s been over a year with no answer on how the DEA would be enabling psilocybin access to patients under the Right to Try act. To help push this along, Tucker welcomes donations, but more importantly, she invites activists everywhere to “shine the bright light of public scrutiny” on the insulting inaction of perhaps the government’s most ineffective agency. There’s a clear path here where everyone wins, so please, call your state’s elected officials and demand that they actually do their job. 

Notable Quotes

“Part of what’s been so frustrating, of course, is when we satisfied ourselves as attorneys, that the state and federal right to try laws did in fact apply to psilocybin and that it should be accessible for therapeutic use with patients with advanced illness; when we approached the DEA to inquire how it would enable that access, that inquiry was in January of last year, 2021, so we’re now more than a year later and the DEA is still obstructing access.”

“To absolutely prohibit access, when state and federal law are intended to allow access; that is impermissible. …These dying patients could have immediate, substantial, and sustained relief from debilitating anxiety and depression. That’s what all the studies show, and I’ll say those words again because they’re the words that really caught my attention: immediate, substantial, and sustained relief. And why anyone would obstruct access to that kind of relief for a dying patient is impossible to comprehend.” 

“I would just as soon not need to return to court, although I think our merits arguments are incredibly strong. I’d much rather see the DEA just adopt an attitude of: ‘Everyone can win here. Our interest in diversion protection can be addressed, the patient’s need for relief can be permitted and everyone can declare victory and go home.’”

Links

Emergelawgroup.com

Emergelawgroup.com: Kathryn Tucker Article archive

Emergelawgroup.com: Blog

Thenowaksociety.org: Right to Try Psilocybin Advocacy Fund (where to donate)

Chacruna.net: “Can the Psychedelic Movement Learn from the Movement for End of Life Liberty?” By Kathryn L. Tucker, JD

The Right to Try act

Lucid.news: Terminally Ill Patients Fight for Access to Psilocybin Under Federal “Right to Try” Act

Usonainstitute.org

Oregoncapitalchronicle.com: U.S. Rep. Earl Blumenauer joins other lawmakers in pressing DEA to allow terminally ill to use psilocybin

Northstar.guide (the Northstar Pledge)

Hereandnowstudios.com: We Will Call it PALA

About Kathryn L. Tucker, JD

Kathryn L. Tucker, JD is Special Counsel at Emerge Law Group, where she Co-Chairs the Psychedelic Practice Group. Tucker is a founding member of the Psychedelic Bar Association and serves as Liaison to the Psychedelic Lawyering Task Force within the American Bar Association. Across her 30 year career, Tucker’s work has focused on advocacy to protect and expand the rights of the terminally ill. She served as Executive Director of the End of Life Liberty Project (ELLP), which she founded during her tenure as Executive Director of the Disability Rights Legal Center (DRLC), the nation’s oldest disability rights advocacy organization. Tucker served two decades as Director of Advocacy and Legal Affairs for Compassion & Choices. Prior to that, she practiced law with Perkins Coie. Professor Tucker has held faculty appointments at Loyola/Los Angeles, the University of Washington, Seattle University and Lewis & Clark, Schools of Law, teaching in the area of law, medicine and ethics at the end of life. Tucker served as lead counsel representing patients and physicians in two landmark federal cases decided by the United States Supreme Court, Washington v. Glucksberg and Vacco v. Quill, asserting that mentally competent terminally ill patients have a constitutional right to choose aid in dying. These cases are widely acknowledged to have prompted nationwide attention to improving care of the dying, and to have established a federal constitutional right to aggressive pain management. Tucker played a key role in successfully defending the Oregon Death with Dignity Act from attack by the United States Department of Justice, resulting in the landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court, Oregon v. Gonzales, representing the patient plaintiffs. Tucker was part of the team that succeeded in enacting the nation’s first state law permitting psilocybin therapy (Oregon Measure 109, 2020). She serves as lead counsel representing a palliative care physician and an oncology clinic in the first effort to apply Right to Try laws to psilocybin therapy, AIMS et al v DEA.

Linkedin


Support the show!

  • Patreon
  • Leave us a review on Facebook or iTunes
  • Share us with your friends
  • Join our Facebook group – Psychedelics Today group – Find the others and create community.

Navigating Psychedelics

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on April 1, 2022October 19, 2022

Canada’s SAP Expansion Signals a Step Forward for Psychedelics

Health Canada’s recent SAP revision brings a new opportunity for patients and a clear responsibility for prescribers.

Health Canada’s recent decision to include psychedelic medicines in its Special Access Program (SAP) was met with a lot of fanfare. The SAP amendment brings good news for certain patients – specifically, treatment-resistant patients suffering from serious mental health conditions that impact individuals, families, and communities.

The new federal amendment has the potential to fill a critical gap for patients in need, including those suffering from depression, PTSD, and end-of-life anxiety. Many who suffer from mental health conditions don’t respond fully to current treatments, so there is a significant unmet need for safer and more effective therapies. The change to Health Canada’s SAP now allows physicians, clinics and hospitals to apply for previously restricted drugs for medical use, providing a new option for the patients who need it most.

I applaud the federal government for responding to the grave situation of the patients who aren’t responding to otherwise adequate treatment – and for recognizing the encouraging clinical data around psychedelic-assisted therapy. This SAP revision represents one small but important step on the road to greater access to psychedelic medicine.

Like most opportunities, this one comes with considerable responsibility. Failure to act responsibly could cause harm to individuals and to this evolving area of medicine. However, I believe that the community of experts in psychedelic medicine are ready and willing to support the practitioners who will be administering these therapies to patients.

Our new 12-month certificate program, Vital, begins April 19th. Registration is closed, but sign up for the waitlist for next year’s edition now at vitalpsychedelictraining.com!

What Does the SAP Revision Provide?

Health Canada’s SAP revision adds certain psychedelics, including MDMA and psilocybin, to the list of restricted substances that practitioners can request to treat patients in specific situations. Decisions will be made on a case-by-case basis, and will be reserved for serious treatment-resistant or life-threatening conditions, in instances where other therapies have failed, or are unsuitable or not available in Canada.

The recent amendment reverses regulatory changes made almost a decade ago that prohibited access to restricted drugs (including psychedelics). Historically, practitioners in Canada have been able to apply for unlicensed medications only through Health Canada’s Section 56 exemption – a fairly long and restrictive process. The SAP revision is expected to provide a much quicker review and more rapid access for approved patients.

Obviously, the SAP amendment will not bring broad access to psychedelic medicine in Canada, but ideally will help treatment-resistant patients, and serves as a clear signal that the government is acknowledging the potential of psychedelic medicine as a legitimate treatment option.

Celebrate the Progress, Continue the Push for Approval

To me, the government’s decision to include psychedelics in Canada’s SAP is a key acknowledgement that mental health conditions are being placed on the same footing as physical conditions, and frankly, that’s a shift that’s long overdue. Anyone working in mental health can see that treatment-resistant mental illness is indeed a serious or life-threatening condition, analogous to cancer that hasn’t responded to conventional treatment. But mental health disorders aren’t always viewed with that sense of urgency.

I’ve dedicated a good part of my medical career to raising awareness and advocating for changes in the treatment of mental health issues. I spent more than 30 years as a medical officer and psychiatrist in the Canadian Armed Forces, deploying twice and leading mental health programs in Afghanistan. I served as mental health advisor to the Canadian Forces surgeon general, and led initiatives with Canada and NATO as we explored innovative solutions in mental health. Achieving change in attitudes toward mental health and treatment innovation requires considerable effort and persistence. 

Check out our new self-paced (CE-accredited) foundation course, “Psychedelics: Past, Present, and Future,” with Jerry and Julie Brown!

We’ve seen modest improvement in mental health care over the years. However, I firmly believe we need to do better in this arena. Far superior advances have been made in the treatment of cancer, heart disease, and many other conditions that take an enormous toll on society and represent a significant  medical and economic burden. 

Yet in the field of mental health, so many patients continue to suffer without adequate or effective treatment. We must review the data while being mindful that each file or data point represents a person who is struggling. We must work to develop medicines with better results, realizing that mental health disorders affect not only patients, but their families and loved ones, their careers and communities.

During my time as the Chief of Psychiatry, I have experienced firsthand the enormous impact that trauma can have on soldiers and veterans. From mass graves in Rwanda to the battlefields of Kandahar, it’s difficult to see people who are putting their lives on the line to protect their country return home to treatments that will only work for half of them. 

So the onus is on us to look for better solutions, to refuse to be satisfied with the status quo and to embrace ALL positive steps forward. In Canada, the inclusion of psychedelics in the SAP is one of those steps. That’s progress worth celebrating. 

A growing body of evidence continues to demonstrate that psychedelic-assisted psychotherapies are emerging as a successful treatment option in many indications, from treatment-resistant depression to smoking and alcohol addiction to PTSD, anxiety, and OCD. 

In the area of smoking cessation, Dr. Matthew Johnson and his team at Johns Hopkins are planning new studies to build on his team’s ongoing research, including the first government-funded clinical study in 50 years evaluating a psychedelic for therapeutic use. The team’s earlier study reported that 80% of participants who received psychedelic-assisted therapy remained abstinent from smoking at 6 months and 67% remained abstinent at 12 months. Those encouraging results show strong efficacy, and demonstrate clear progress.

We see positive data in other indications as well, including PTSD. MAPS is currently sponsoring MAPP2, the second of two Phase 3 trials studying MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD. In the first Phase 3 study, 88% of participants with severe PTSD experienced a clinically-significant reduction in PTSD diagnostic scores two months after their third session of MDMA-assisted therapy, compared to 60% of placebo participants. Additionally, 67% of participants in the MDMA group (compared to 32% of participants in the placebo group) no longer met the criteria for PTSD remission two months after the sessions.

When governmental and regulatory agencies endorse the positive early results of new, transformative treatments, we can celebrate this success. And when organizations dedicate funding for continued research in our field, we applaud those decisions. We can use every bit of incremental progress as adrenaline to keep gathering evidence, and to use that evidence as our guide as we expand treatment options and promote best practices in administering them.

Setting Up Providers and Patients for Success

As Canada implements its recent change, the responsibility lies with clinicians and regulatory bodies to be very deliberate and safe in the way we use the SAP program. We must ensure that patient selection is based on science, and principles such as informed consent are followed. 

I encourage doctors and patients considering these new treatment modalities to review the available research and have open, honest conversations with one another to determine if psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy is right for them. These are far from being first-line treatments and we must continue to turn to approved evidence-based treatments first. 

Here’s the government’s process for requesting drugs through the SAP:

To administer psychedelic-assisted therapy under Health Canada’s SAP, healthcare professionals must fill out an application, which will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

The SAP considers a “healthcare professional” someone who:

  • is entitled, under the laws of a province or territory, to treat patients with an unapproved prescription drug
  • practices in that province or territory
  • has prescribing privileges in the respective province

Practitioners who receive approval can then request products from manufacturers that meet governmental requirements.

A few examples of questions asked in the application:

“What specifically about this drug makes it the best choice for your patient(s)?”

“Specify all treatments tried and/or failed…”

A request to provide references/evidence:

A question for a request for a repeat patient:

The final section:

How progressive or cautious will Health Canada be in reviewing and approving requests? That remains to be seen. But as a physician, my advice is clear: The practitioners who seek permission to use these medicines should ensure that they have the necessary training, competence, and confidence to provide these treatments safely and successfully. 

The innovators in our field are scientists, doctors, and advisors offering extensive experience with psychedelic compounds, as well as mental health and addiction disorders. We must step up and support physicians who want to prescribe these treatments, but who might not have experience implementing psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy. We can provide evidence-based research, education on proper protocols, and access to experienced psychedelic integration specialists to answer questions every step of the way. 

My message is simple: Let’s do this right. Let’s do this safely. 

advertisement for psychedelics today course, Navigating Psychedelics for Clinicians and Therapists. On the right hand side there is a photo of a white woman with short brown hair smiling.
Did you know there’s another version of our classic Navigating Psychedelics course that’s all online and can be taken at your own pace? Check out the Independent Learner edition!

The End Goal: Regulatory Approval and Integration into Clinical Practice

The SAP should not be considered an alternative to integrating psychedelic-assisted therapy into existing medical practices. Rather, it provides help for those who qualify for use in exceptional circumstances under the SAP guidelines. It’s a step forward, but it’s not a solution.

Psilocybin and MDMA-based therapies are successful with specific indications and patient profiles. We need to continue gathering data to demonstrate safety and efficacy through clinical trials targeting specific indications. That’s the path to obtain regulatory approval of psychedelics with therapy protocols. Psychedelics must undergo the same rigor as any other medication vying for approval from regulatory bodies. We need to continue the work that will lead to an environment of safe, regulated access to psychedelic therapy in a medical setting. That takes patience, but will pay off in the long run.

Ultimately, the millions of patients afflicted with serious mental illness will benefit most when they have access to more advanced, more effective therapies than those on the market today. We truly see success when medical communities view psychedelic medicine as an accepted and adopted form of treatment within our existing healthcare infrastructure. 

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on March 22, 2022October 4, 2022

PT303 – Adam Bramlage – Cannabis, Microdosing, and Our Evolutionary Connection to Psychedelics

In this episode of the podcast, Joe interviews Adam Bramlage: Founder and CEO of Flow State Micro, a functional mushroom company and microdosing educational platform. 

Bramlage talks about his journey to psychedelics and discovery of microdosing, and how he worries that the troubling issues he saw in the legal cannabis industry are already finding their way into the psychedelic space. He discusses what he experienced when he started microdosing; how he connected with James Fadiman; how he defines microdosing; the concepts of neurogenesis and a gut-brain axis; how more and more professional athletes are using psychedelics to heal brain injuries as well as optimize performance (and how leagues may handle this going forward); concerns over chronic microdosing; and why the goal is always to microdose less over time. 

While we expected to hear about the benefits of microdosing, their conversation also goes deep into its history and our ancestral connection to psychedelics (particularly psilocybin), touching on Hernán Cortés; R. Gordan Wasson banking for the vatican; Christianity, Jesus, and mushrooms; repeated examples of control through the erasure of history; Tim Leary; Al Hubbard; MKUltra; the Tarahumara Indians’ peyote-influenced ultra-running; cave paintings; Whitey Bulger, and more.

Bramlage is a speaker on May 27th’s Microdosing Summit (along with Joe), and just released a new “Microdosing Movement Masterclass” in collaboration with the San Francisco Psychedelic Society, which focuses on our ancestral connection to psychedelics and the potential evolutionary use of microdosing. Use code psychedelicstoday at checkout for 10% off!

Notable Quotes

“I’m a single dad to two kids, and both of those kids, at periods of time in their life, were raised on a cannabis farm. And what I’ll tell you is this: when you normalize these plants and these tools and it’s just like a flower or a squash that my kid sees farmed like the farmer next to me, my kids want nothing to do with cannabis. It is so uncool. It’s the last thing they want to be around. I don’t have any worries about my son or daughter smoking pot. And why? Because we normalized it. And if you look at Portugal and what they’ve done with drugs and the success they’ve had with decrim legalization, supporting substance abuse issues with therapists and programs; this is the future. This is the answer.”

“We have an ancestral and evolutionary connection to these plants and it’s only in the last couple hundred years that they’ve been made illegal and bastardized. …We’re putting five or six year old kids on Adderall (which is methamphetamine), but we’re pointing fingers at a parent who gives their kid 10 milligrams of a mushroom.”

“Psychedelics have an afterglow, or a 48-hour effect, so you don’t need to microdose seven days a week. You can take it on a Monday, take Tuesday off, and you’re still getting benefits. So what I see over time with microdosing is the more people use it, the less they need it. This isn’t a Western medical model of: you’re going to take microdoses five days a week because it regulates your blood pressure and your heart condition. It’s not like that. This is more like: the more people are microdosing over time, the less they need it. …When I’m coaching people or working with clients, the goal is to eventually not microdose.”

Links

Flowstatemicro.com

Psychedelicsocietysf.org: The Microdosing Movement Masterclass

Microdosing Summit: May 27th (International Microdosing Day)

Doubleblindmag.com: “How to Microdose” class 

The Concussion Repair Manual: A Practical Guide to Recovering from Traumatic Brain Injuries, by Dr. Dan Engle

The Broken Spears: The Aztec Account of the Conquest of Mexico, by Miguel Leon-Portilla

The Sacred Mushroom and The Cross, by John M. Allegro

The Psychedelic Gospels: The Secret History of Hallucinogens in Christianity, by Jerry B. Brown, Ph.D., and Julie M. Brown, MA

The Immortality Key: The Secret History of the Religion with No Name, by Brian C. Muraresku

Trippingly.net: Al Hubbard: The Original Captain Trips

Ultrarunninghistory.com: The Tarahumara Ultrarunners

Secret Drugs of Buddhism: Psychedelic Sacraments and the Origins of the Vajrayana, by Mike Crowley

Link.springer.com: Effects of psilocybin on hippocampal neurogenesis and extinction of trace fear conditioning

Gnosticwarrior.com: Whitey Bulger: Crime Boss Said CIA Gave Him LSD in Mind Control Experiment

About Adam Bramlage

Adam Bramlage is Founder/CEO of Flow State Micro, a functional mushroom company and microdosing educational platform focusing on harm reduction and best practices. Bramlage works one-on-one with clients to optimize their microdosing experience. He’s helped hundreds of people, from professional athletes to people suffering from addiction and depression, achieve incredible results through microdosing. Bramlage works closely with psychedelic researcher, pioneer and father of modern microdosing, Dr. James Fadiman. In collaboration with Doubleblind Magazine, Bramlage launched his 14 episode online course “How to Microdose,” which was recently featured in Forbes Magazine as one of the masterclasses of psychedelics, and received an award from Gear Report for Top Ten Wellness Products of 2021. In collaboration with the SF Psychedelic Society, he has recently released his online Microdosing Movement Masterclass, looking at our ancestral and potential evolutionary use of microdosing. He is co-founder of the Microdosing Support Network, the first free online monthly microdosing support group. Prior to his work with mushrooms, he spent more than a decade in the Prop 215 and Prop 64 California cannabis space as a farmer, distributor, and manufacturer. He hopes psychedelics does NOT go the same route as legal cannabis.

Socials: Instagram / Facebook


Support the show!

  • Patreon
  • Leave us a review on Facebook or iTunes
  • Share us with your friends
  • Join our Facebook group – Psychedelics Today group – Find the others and create community.

Navigating Psychedelics

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on February 17, 2022October 19, 2022

Trauma and Vulnerability to Suggestion: Redefining How We Understand Consent

With the power dynamics inevitably involved in psychedelic therapies and underground facilitation, can consent truly be established? And what can we learn from past abuse?

On behalf of all the survivors of psychedelic guide abuse, or abuse under any other non-ordinary states of consciousness such as hypnosis, meditative states, or other forms of induced or spontaneous trance and non-consensual shaktipat, I write this piece to elucidate how consent is not as simple as asking beforehand in a preparation session, or reiterating before the client “goes under/in.”   

We need to begin by defining our terms, and understanding what we mean by consent is the first step in unpacking this issue. 

Consent: permission, choice freely given with full acknowledgement of context, circumstances, possible consequences, and with full agency.

Consent is not only about the event/action/behavior itself in the moment, but the consequences of it, and the context within which those consequences unfold. For example, if a person is abused, psychologically tortured in a session, or touched in a way that triggers past trauma, then the fallout of that – as well as what resources and needs arise in the recovery process – have to be taken into consideration as well. 

If the guides/facilitators, therapists, and other space-holders do not know about spiritual emergence/y as the deepest traumas come to the surface, then they will potentially hospitalize folks, call them crazy, and then de-validate any of the grievances they may bring up about the guide abuse – when in fact, it was them that induced the state of emergency in the first place, and therefore it is their responsibility to have proper resources and support in place for these inevitable openings.

Our new 12-month certificate program, Vital, begins April 19th. Registration is closed, but sign up for the waitlist for next year’s edition now at vitalpsychedelictraining.com!

These questions need to be asked to assess the power dynamics and ability or inability to give consent under certain conditions:

Is it truly possible to give consent if:

  • We are in trauma states (The 4 Fs: Fight, Flight, Freeze, Fawn)?
  • We are under the influence of entheogens or in other non-ordinary states of consciousness?
  • We have a history of violation of consent (rape, assault, abuse)?
  • The guide/facilitator is in an authority position?
  • We are less privileged due to race, gender, socioeconomic status, etc. (power dynamics)

Is consent truly consent if the aforementioned conditions are present?

Methods of Manipulation and Control

Another way to begin to protect ourselves and others from abuse within these vulnerable spaces is to understand more deeply some of the methods of manipulation and control that abusers use to coerce their victims.

These are the tactics that abusers use to prey upon the vulnerability from our trauma – AKA overriding consent. 

  • Playing the victim themselves, to elicit the Fawn Response:
    By saying that they are the ones in need or the vulnerable one, they elicit caring and compassion from their victims, thus creating a false sense of security and intimacy, as well as being seen as innocent.
  • Pointing the finger at the other, saying they are the crazy one; gaslighting:
    They say that someone else is the crazy one to de-validate any grievances or anything that might be heard about them or their work from former clients who were harmed.
  • Repetition of narratives, AKA brainwashing:
    This is an actual technique used by lineages of guides and torturers to break down and break open peoples’ psyches so that they will be receptive to whatever narratives they want to implant.
  • Cues/post-hypnotic suggestions to activate certain feelings, thoughts, and behaviors: Similar to brainwashing, some abusers use cues to manipulate the victim’s actions.
  • Claiming that you are not trying or working hard enough:
    This is the victim-blaming portion of the protocol, where the abuser says if you just let go more, take more, break down your resistance/ego more, then you will be able to heal, creating a gatekeeper effect.
  • Romanticizing the pain and suffering they cause as for for our benefit:
    They will say things like, “This is for your healing” or “This is your warrior training” or “The universe/ancestors want you to do this.”

It’s like the opposite of false memory implantation – using actual memories and vulnerabilities against their victims to take control and exert power over them. They know where it hurts and how to take advantage of those wounds for their own benefit. And how do they know the vulnerabilities? Because they are your therapists too! They know all of your wounds, trauma, and history because you have come in good faith to them for healing, and instead, these vulnerabilities are used against you.

This perspective – the veil lifting and seeing things as they are, Shadow and all – may seem bleak or hopeless, but in fact, it is the opposite. It is the opportunity to create safer, more effective psychedelic therapies, facilitators, and guides, which can allow us all to feel like this renaissance is truly an evolution of consciousness, and not the Wild West; its reckless charlatans and gurus leaving wreckage in their wake as they burn though the souls of their victims.  

How Do We Persevere?

So what are the implications here? How do we vet and refine our discernment to weed out the psychopathic and sadistic? Is it even possible to ask for consent or to properly give it under these circumstances? Is that the end of the story? So consent isn’t truly possible in these cases?

Of course not, no. What this means is that we need trauma-informed guides, facilitators, and space-holders, who are well-versed in spiritual emergence/y, and who are as close as possible to the same level of privilege as their clients; which means we need more guides of color, more access to training, more BIPOC representation in the media and at conferences, and more financially-accessible and ethically-held medicine spaces.

Check out Michelle and Kyle’s course for understanding and supporting spiritual emergence, “Awakening Healers.”

And we need to check power and privilege, and understand trauma history and how to work ethically with trauma survivors. We need to implement peer-support in medicine guiding/facilitation and not hierarchy systems, which lends itself to overt or covert power-dynamics and the abuses that manifest from that. Also, we need to create accountability structures though independent bodies that are not beholden to economic, legal, or political pressures, which can protect the survivors from incriminating themselves when reporting abuse. There are many organizations that are often driven by agendas for funding and research, and have silenced concerns for decades. Survivors are through being silenced, and are now part of the solution for creating safer, more effective protocols and standards. Let their voices be heard, and help to create a safer, more ethical psychedelic movement.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on February 3, 2022November 18, 2022

Religious Practice Under Oregon Measure 109

Jon Dennis, Esq. looks closely at what Oregon’s Measure 109 really says, and provides a possible framework for the fair treatment of religious-use sacrament.

Oregon’s Psilocybin Services Act, aka Measure 109, is currently undergoing a reputational makeover. Although primarily advertised to voters as “psilocybin therapy,” clinical use of psilocybin is only one of the many modalities of psilocybin services that may soon be permitted in Oregon. Nearly all of the media reporting on M109 have echoed the messaging of the M109 electoral campaign, creating a narrative that Oregon voted to legalize “psilocybin therapy.” But now that people are beginning to write and speak about M109 in a more careful and nuanced way, many are surprised to find out that the psilocybin law passed in Oregon allows people to take psilocybin for virtually any reason.

If there is still any doubt about whether M109 is a “therapy” program, Tom Eckert, one of the chief co-petitioners of Measure 109 and now the chair of the Oregon Psilocybin Advisory Board (“OPAB”) (as well as a practicing therapist), said in a recent interview that “The idea [of M109] is to create safe space under the facilitation of licensed professionals to explore [the psilocybin] experience for personal benefit.” According to Eckert, taking psilocybin under M109 is “about your consciousness and using psilocybin however you really want to, whether it’s creative, spiritually, or for a therapeutic benefit.” 

This means, of course, that psilocybin may be used pursuant to religious or spiritual exercise. It means that psilocybin churches might soon become commonplace in Oregon.

The intersection of M109 and religious liberties is an important and complex topic that so far has received very little attention during the meetings of OPAB and its 5 subcommittees. Religious exploration is already a large part of this so-called “psychedelic renaissance,” and all signs point to religious use of psychedelics becoming more prevalent over time. Because the “Oregon model” of psychedelic services has become one of the leading models in psychedelic policy reform, it is paramount we build religious protections into the model.

In response to public comment, the Oregon Health Authority (“OHA”) recently published the following statement:  

Q: Can the psilocybin services be offered within a ceremonial or religious context? 

A: Yes, if psilocybin services take place at a licensed service center and is otherwise compliant with statute and rule requirements. 

In other words, OHA intends to allow the religious use of psilocybin if performed in accordance with Oregon’s regulatory framework for psilocybin. The preceding sentence constitutes pretty much everything we know so far about how Oregon intends to address religious practice under the measure. This is particularly concerning in light of the fact that OPAB has many complex issues to still resolve, and it must issue its final recommendations by June 30 – meaning there are only 15 hours of full OPAB meeting time remaining. Time is running out for Oregon to create thoughtful and nuanced policy on this matter of great importance.

Fortunately, serious conversations about religious practice are about to begin. The February 2 meeting of the Equity Subcommittee and the February 3 meeting of the Licensing Subcommittee and the Equity Subcommittee will address religious use. 

Our new 12-month certificate program, Vital, begins April 19th. Registration is closed, but sign up for the waitlist for next year’s edition now at vitalpsychedelictraining.com!

What is Essential to a Religious-Use Framework?

When considering what a religious-use framework might look like under M109, I identify six elements that are essential:

  1. It must permit a broad range of religious practices and ceremonies without unnecessary interference from the government. Protections should accommodate practices and beliefs ranging from traditional Indigenous practices to contemporary Western, Eastern, and neo-shamanic religions that incorporate psilocybin into their practices;
  2. It must create a pathway for religious practice that is affordable to marginalized communities;
  3. The regulations should allow special rules around the growing, storing, handling, and testing of psilocybin mushrooms that reflect the view common in many entheogenic communities that the mushrooms themselves are sacred objects worthy of reverential treatment;
  4. The regulations must provide meaningful oversight of and accountability for religious practitioners, particularly in:
    1. Screening new members;
    2. Disclosing risks/obtaining informed consent;
    3. Preventing abuse; and
    4. Ensuring that religious practice is conducted in a safe manner;
  5. Given the Oregon constitution’s protection of both the religious and the non-religious*, the regulations must not give preferences to “religious” over “non-religious” organizations or individuals. Accordingly, the criteria for who may operate within the “religious framework” should be framed in terms of sincere practice relating to one’s deeply-held values, beliefs, and convictions, rather than affiliation with a religious organization;
  6. It should be simple enough to administer that it does not cause a substantial burden on OHA. 

With these considerations in mind, I have taken the liberty of drafting a proposed model regulatory framework for how religious practice could be protected under Measure 109. My proposed framework may be found here:

Privileges-and-Duties-of-Entheogenic-Practitioners (DRAFT-v.8)Download

I am actively seeking stakeholder feedback. Please email me with questions or comments. To execute this project well means compiling and assembling a wide range of stakeholder input, so please do reach out.

advertisement-for-psychedelics-today-course-on-psychedelics-and-religious-liberty-in-the-united-states
Join us for our FREE course on religious exemption for legal psychedelic use in the US, Psychedelics and Religious Liberty in the United States.

One of the fundamental assumptions underlying the model is that if religious-use privileges are only affordable to a small subset of the population, it might actually be better to not grant special religious privileges at all. Perhaps the most iniquitous aspect of M109 is that access to psilocybin will be unaffordable to a lot of people. Luckily, as we will see, religious use privileges can be structured in a manner that creates new pathways to affordable access.

Several key features of this framework may be aided by some explanation.

Peer-Support Assistance

Measure 109 requires that all psilocybin be purchased, possessed, and consumed “under the supervision of a …facilitator” (Section 57 (2)). The measure does not otherwise describe what that supervision should look like, which leaves open many possibilities.

Currently it appears that Oregon is poised to require that the majority of assistance given to clients must be provided by paid facilitators, who are prohibited from taking psilocybin while serving as a facilitator. If this is the case, even if Oregon adopts liberal rules that require lower amounts of paid facilitation, I estimate that a “cheap” group session, offered by a nonprofit, will not be available for less than $500 per person, including the costs of psilocybin. This is inequitable. We can do much better.

Luckily, Indigenous and other religious and spiritual communities have substantial history and experience using plant medicines as sacraments in ceremony. They provide clear proof that ceremony can be safely conducted without the need for paid facilitators who abstain from fully participating in the ceremony. Accordingly, religious communities who operate under M109 should have the option to provide their own peer-support assistance through community members that have been certified by their community as being qualified and capable to provide that assistance.

Reasonable minds could disagree about how much the state should regulate that certification. Regulation could be enacted to encourage the slow and sustainable growth of these organizations and to ensure that the clients who provide peer-support assistance are familiar with and oriented to the community in which they intend to serve. Successful implementation of this system will require relationship-building within each community, and the regulations could require that a client be involved with a community for a period of time (which could be defined by a minimum number of ceremonies attended) before they begin providing peer-support assistance. Or the regulations could simply trust the community to responsibly manage itself, particularly in light of the fact that its licensure could be lost if it behaves irresponsibly. 

advertisement for psychedelics today course, Navigating Psychedelics for Clinicians and Therapists. On the right hand side there is a photo of a white woman with short brown hair smiling.
Did you know there’s another version of our classic Navigating Psychedelics course that’s all online and can be taken at your own pace? Check out the Independent Learner edition!

The freedom to exercise one’s religion means little if paywalls keep most people out. However, if  peer-support assistance is allowed, it could avoid having to pay unneeded facilitators to “supervise” ceremonies. The number of facilitators that are needed to safely supervise a ceremony may vary by community, but well-organized communities could conceivably conduct ceremonies safely with only one facilitator present. By reducing the number of facilitators that must be on hand for a ceremony, we drastically reduce the cost of the ceremony.

Additionally, many entheogenic religions do not permit people into their ceremonial space who have not consumed at least some amount of their sacrament. The idea in some communities is that the presence of people who are on a different vibrational wavelength (i.e., who have not partaken of the sacrament) fundamentally prevents participants from receiving certain religious benefits. Facilitators are prohibited from taking psilocybin while serving as a facilitator, so allowing facilitators to supervise from outside the ceremonial space is the only option if this view is to be respected. This could be safely done if peer-support assistance were permitted by clients who are participating in the ceremony. This permits a higher degree of self-governance and self-reliance, which is healthy.

This peer-support assistance model was inspired in part by the practices of the Church of the Holy Light of the Queen (“CHLQ”). CHLQ is the Santo Diame church who successfully sued the federal government for the right to use Daime (which some people call ayahuasca) in their religious practices.** In their 25 years of practice, it is my understanding that CHLQ has never had a safety situation which they were not able to safely manage internally. For people interested in learning more about that, I interviewed Padhrino Jonathan Goldman, the spiritual leader of CHLQ, on Episode No. 6 of Eyes on Oregon.



Religious Manufacturing Privileges

The religious manufacturing privileges contemplated by the framework are severalfold:

1) Religious communities are granted permission to grow mushrooms in a less-regulated (i.e., far less expensive) manner than is required of standard manufacturers;

2) Religious growers may grow the species of mushrooms using techniques and substrates that are consistent with their beliefs and convictions, provided that products are safe;

3) Testing of religious products is not required, unless indicated by a client’s adverse medical reaction;

4) Religious products may not be delivered to a service center that is not a religious service center; and

5) Religious growers are under a duty to provide safe products and avoid creating nuisances and other environmental hazards.

The policy considerations behind the proposed religious manufacturing privileges are two-fold: 1) it gives communities the option to offer very low-cost products (mushrooms are famously cheap to grow); and 2) it creates space for Oregon plant medicine communities who believe that the mushrooms themselves are sacred and must be handled with reverence.

Product safety can be maintained without the need for expensive laboratories. Unlicensed, unregulated mushroom growers – many of whom grow in their basements or closets using improvised laboratory equipment – currently create the bulk of consumer psilocybin products. This matters because it serves as a counterpoint to the concern that “under-regulated” manufacturing operations pose a threat to public health or safety. In truth, reports of adverse reactions to unsafe psilocybin products are exceedingly rare, particularly in light of the amount of mushrooms being eaten nowadays.

While the idea of permitting a religious or spiritual community to have homegrown sacramental mushrooms might make some people uncomfortable, it’s worth remembering that you can buy myceliated grow kits for gourmet mushrooms virtually everywhere, and society allows that practice without question. Moreover, the practice of a religious or spiritual community handling its own sacrament in accordance with their beliefs and convictions is a practice that predates Oregon statehood.

Psychedelics, Religion, and the DEA’s Quest for Soul

Relaxed Testing Requirements

Oregon is required by M109 to consider the costs of testing to the client when deciding its testing rules, and testing may not be more onerous than is reasonably necessary for health and safety (Section 96 (7)). Moreover, testing standards must be different for different “varieties of psilocybin products” (Section 96 (1)(d)), which could presumably include mushrooms grown for use in religious ceremony. Relaxed testing rules for religious products will help the state achieve its statutory mandate of striving for an affordable system, while also respecting practitioner beliefs. While this could create greater imprecision in dosing, this is the current state of things in our existing unregulated market, and people safely manage that imprecision. 

Affordability

In addition to providing meaningful autonomy of religious practice, the combination of peer-support assistance and less-regulated religious manufacturing and testing starts to get us close to an affordable system. If all three are adopted, a lower and more satisfying price point begins to emerge. The costs for services may even be as low as the combination of one facilitator’s time that is spread across multiple clients (or which may be donated by volunteer facilitators), low-cost products sold by a nonprofit manufacturer, and overhead costs of running a nonprofit service center.

To drive costs lower still, OHA could adopt a progressive fee structure that permits nonprofit service centers and manufacturers to pay a little less than their “fair share” of the program’s fees. Additionally, onsite manufacturing centers could possibly create a direct manufacturer-to-client sales pipeline that might allow entheogenic service centers to avoid the application of that pesky tax rule, 280E (which disallows tax deductions or credits attributable to businesses that “traffick” controlled substances). This appears to be allowed under M109, as sales by manufacturers must be either “to or on a premises” licensed as a manufacturer or service center (Sections 53 (1)(a) and (2)(a), and Section 57). 

With all of these cost-savings measures in place, it is foreseeable that a psilocybin ceremony under M109 could cost well under $50 per participant. That’s still too expensive. But it’s considerably better. 

advertisement for the psychedelics today course Imagination as Revelation: Psychedelic Experience in the light of Jungian Psychology featuring a colorful ink blot symmetrical shape in the middle with mirroring photos of Carl Jungian, an old white man with receding white hair.
Check out our course on depth psychology and how it relates to psychedelics, Imagination as Revelation: The Psychedelic Experience in the Light of Jungian Psychology

Reciprocal Exchange Program

Participation in reciprocal exchange programs should be required of all who engage with the M109 program, from clients to testing laboratories. Involvement with a reciprocal exchange program is important because the programs help minimize the harmful impacts that extraction of cultural and natural resources have on the Indigenous plant medicine communities who have stewarded plant medicines for centuries or longer. It also helps ensure that Indigenous knowledge and wisdom do not become lost or forgotten.

The proposed model framework requires entheogenic practitioners to have an unspecified level of involvement in a reciprocal exchange program, and an annual public report of that involvement. This doesn’t punish bad actors for negligible involvement, but it provides social incentives for people who can demonstrate meaningful participation.

Discipline of Entheogenic Practitioners

Because this framework gives entheogenic practitioners a considerable set of privileges, it also creates a reciprocal set of duties to use those privileges safely and responsibly. To achieve this, the proposed framework borrows language from the Oregon law that protects the religious use of peyote. In order for religious use of peyote to be protected in Oregon, the use must be done “in a manner that is not dangerous to the health of the user or others who are in the proximity of the user (ORS 475.752(4)).” Oregon should adopt the same standard for psilocybin religions who operate under the measure.

Ultimately, if a religious practitioner engages in conduct that is unsafe or irresponsible, the practitioner risks losing their special religious privileges, as well as their general psilocybin licensing. Given the significant financial and personal investment that will go into opening any psilocybin business in Oregon, this provides powerful incentives to operate within the bounds of the regulatory framework.  

Conclusion

In conclusion, if we think of M109 not in terms of “therapy” vs. “not therapy,” but rather (as Tom Eckert put it), a “safe space under the facilitation of licensed professionals to explore [the psilocybin] experience for personal benefit,” it appears the best way for Oregon to reduce the most harm to its people is to invite all beneficial use of psilocybin to come and operate within the relative safety of the M109 container. This includes religious use.

The model framework proposed herein would create a type of partnership or alliance between religious practitioners and OHA. In exchange for paying licensing fees and submitting to administrative oversight, religious communities who use psilocybin gain mechanisms of accountability*** and the freedom to practice with substantially less fear of criminal repercussions. However, in order for entheogenic practitioners to accept Oregon’s invitation, the M109 religious container must not be unduly restrictive in what it allows, and it must be affordable. If these interests can be balanced, psychedelic religious practice could soon find its way out of the shadows of the underground and into the full light of day.

The following is my presentation from the February 3 Oregon Psilocybin Licensing Subcommittee Meeting. Bob Otis of the Sacred Garden Community also presents.


*See, e.g., Meltebeke v. Bureau of Lab. & Indus., 322 Or at 147. (Oregon’s constitutional religious protections “extend[] to religious believers and nonbelievers alike.”) This also avoids giving nonreligious clients a financial incentive to seek religious services from a religious provider, which is important. For more information about the inappropriateness of confusing religious and non-religious containers of psychedelic use, see Matthew Johnson’s article entitled “Consciousness, Religion, and Gurus: Pitfalls of Psychedelic Medicine.”

**It’s worth noting that Oregon regulatory agencies have already granted religious exemptions to religious organizations that use controlled substances. See the Oregon Board of Pharmacy’s 2008 letter to CHLQ.

***The need for greater mechanisms of accountability in psychedelic communities is described in horrifying detail in a new podcast series called Cover Story, which is produced by a collaboration of New York Magazine and Psymposia.

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on February 1, 2022October 4, 2022

PT289 – Payton Nyquvest – Shifting the Mindset on Pain, Psychedelics, and Accessibility

In this episode of the podcast, Joe sits down with Co-Founder and CEO of Numinus, Payton Nyquvest, this time for a full episode (you may remember that he had a brief segment in Solidarity Friday #86).  

Nyquvest tells the story of how ayahuasca became the cure for his chronic pain, and discusses pain in general and how we deal with it: how people so often fall into a box where their diagnosis becomes their identity, and how so much of healthcare is about alleviating the symptoms but never getting to the root cause.

He talks about how Numinus came about; how Health Canada’s Special Access Program could be huge towards more legalization; his concerns with the rush to ketamine and virtual therapy; patents and Compass Pathways; the importance of a safe container and community; and the need for a shift in how we view psychedelics and self work, from something we view as a last ditch resort to something we treat more as regular preventative tune-ups or check-ins. 

Numinus is working with MAPS in their Phase 3 MDMA for PTSD study, and due to a license amendment by Health Canada that now allows them to produce a product from natural fungi, they have just produced what may be the first legal psilocybin mushroom since the 1970s.

Notable Quotes

“[I] saw this possibility [that] someone, through shifting their mental health and mental state, could greatly become a better version of themselves. And so, in my mid-to-late teens, became very, very passionate about mental health and my own mental health, and the intersection of mental health [and] physical health, and the recognition that you can’t compartmentalize the two. They’re all part of the same thing.”

“If you look at AA for example, there’s not a city on the planet I think that you could go to where you don’t find an AA community. And while certainly all these communities have their strengths and weaknesses, it really shows that with a really, really strong community, you can really help facilitate a lot of healing. …While the psychedelic experience is important, the integration and ongoing support and community is, I would argue, as important or more so.”

“I encourage everybody to read the results from the MAPS Phase 3 work, which is probably, I would argue, the most astounding clinical data we have on psychedelics for treatment-resistant PTSD, which, for anybody who doesn’t know; treatment-resistant PTSD is– this is a population of people who have tried every other treatment and have failed. Over 80% of people who went through the MDMA protocol saw a significant reduction in their symptoms and 67% actually no longer met the PTSD criteria after three treatments. That’s a cure for treatment-resistant PTSD, which is just an astounding thing to be able to say.”

Links

Numinus.com

Psychedelics Today: PTSF86 – Ayahuasca, Chronic Pain, and Legal Psilocybin, with Payton Nyquvest of Numinus

Psychedelics Today: PT259 – Dr. Devon Christie and Will Siu, MD, DPhil – The Mind-Body Connection, MDMA, and Chronic Pain

Numinus.com Numinus and MAPS Public Benefit Corporation announce collaboration agreement to seek approval of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for PTSD single-arm, open-label trial

Psilocybinalpha.com: Numinus Wellness Commends Health Canada on Special Access Programme Amendments to Restore Potential Access to Psychedelic Medicines

Compasspathways.com: COMPASS Pathways announces positive topline results from groundbreaking phase IIb trial of investigational COMP360 psilocybin therapy for treatment-resistant depression

Maps.org: MAPS’ Phase 3 Trial of MDMA-Assisted Therapy for PTSD Achieves Successful Results for Patients with Severe, Chronic PTSD

Yahoo.com: Goldman Sachs asks in biotech research report: ‘Is curing patients a sustainable business model?’

The End of Alzheimer’s: The First Program to Prevent and Reverse Cognitive Decline, by Dale Bredesen

”Eyes on Oregon” YouTube Playlist

Wavepaths.com

Psychedelicmedicinecoalition.org

About Payton Nyquvest

Payton Nyquvest is the Founder, Chair & Chief Executive Officer of Numinus, a company that empowers people to heal and be well through the development and delivery of innovative mental health care and access to safe, evidence-based psychedelic-assisted therapies. He has a deep understanding of the psychedelic industry from its infancy, driven by life-saving personal experiences with multiple therapy modalities. Additionally, Payton has deep business leadership experience, particularly in the finance sector, and is a recognized innovator and visionary in mental health care. At Numinus, he guides teams leading strategy, innovation, research and clinic network expansion, and supports the marketing and capital markets functions. He is responsible for raising more than $70 million for Numinus in the past year, and is quoted widely in media such as CTV, Forbes and the New York Times. In addition, he brings more than 15 years working in finance, investment and retail banking with some of Canada’s leading independent investment firms, including Jordan Capital Markets, Canaccord Financial and Mackie Research Capital. In these and other roles, he has raised more than $100 million for a variety of small cap companies.

Instagram: @paytonnyquvest  /  @numinusinc
Twitter: @paytonnyquvest  / @NuminusWellness
Linkedin: PaytonNyquvest / NuminusWellness
Facebook: NuminusWellness


Support the show!

  • Patreon
  • Leave us a review on Facebook or iTunes
  • Share us with your friends
  • Join our Facebook group – Psychedelics Today group – Find the others and create community.

Navigating Psychedelics

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on January 25, 2022October 4, 2022

PT287 – Josh Hardman – Psychedelic Stocks, Data Privacy, and Drug Development

In this episode of the podcast, Joe interviews Josh Hardman, the Founder and Editor of Psilocybin Alpha, a news website and weekly newsletter covering the psychedelic space with a focus on emerging companies and drug development.

Hardman discusses how the juxtaposition of the studies coming out of Imperial College London and the way hippie culture intersected with various political movements made him want to create Psilocybin Alpha. He talks about his early anonymous days and how the 2020 US election jumpstarted the site, especially due to the passing of Oregon’s Measure 109 and people suddenly showing a lot of interest in psychedelic stocks. 

And they talk about a lot more, as this podcast is very topic-to-topic conversational in the way you’d imagine a podcast between two people neck deep in psychedelic happenings may be: why the UK is so conservative when it comes to drug policy; Brexit; cryptocurrency, decentralized finance (DeFi), and decentralized health (“De-health”?); overuse of Sonoran desert toads and over-harvesting of iboga (why aren’t LSD and psilocybin good enough?); data collection and data privacy; patent thicketing; integration as a new recurring-revenue model; psychedelics and VR; investor obsession with derivatives and analogs; and 2022 seeing the likely consolidation of many for-profit companies in the psychedelic space.

Notable Quotes

“The point at which it went from just being kind of a side project to me to being ‘I should work on this full time’ was the November 2020 elections in the US. I remember I sat here up to like 5am in the UK, watching the results to see measure 109 in Oregon (obviously) and the DC ballot initiative to decriminalize. I think that was the point, to me, where I saw not just traffic to the website go up thousands of percent overnight, but also the types of people that were reading Psilocybin Alpha went from weed investors and crypto investors to therapists and people who were seeking therapy, emailing me. Hundreds of emails the next day saying, ‘I want to get involved in this. I’ve been working in psychiatry or psychotherapy for 30 years and I want to understand this new modality.’”

“Why are people depressed? I think a lot of people are depressed because something acute happened to them or because maybe they do need to go inside and work some stuff out internally, but, me being a student of sociology and political economy, I’m more inclined to think a lot of people are depressed because of their material situation: their job or their home life, economic realities in America, lack of health insurance. These things are all external. So I have some concern with how much we can really solve whilst in a system that makes people so upset and miserable.”

“The reason psychedelic companies are so disruptive to the healthcare system is because something like Prozac is chronically dosed. It’s like almost a recurring revenue model. It’s a subscription model. And obviously psychedelics can potentially not cure someone but put them into remission (at least clinically) in two or three sessions. So you could say that if a company is able to capture the integration part of the treatment arc as well, that’s where they start getting their recurring revenue.”

“I think people are concerned about investing in another psilocybin company. So if you can take a derivative, an analog, or a new chemical entity entirely (even if it’s very similar to psilocybin); to the investor or to the untrained eye, it’s new. It’s novel, and it’s going to get a patent, so therefore it must have some value. I think that might be a big story in 2022, when we start realizing that a lot of these supposedly new chemical entities either start failing in preclinical work or in Phase 1 work or they’re just not that remarkably different.”  

Links

Psilocybinalpha.com

Psilocybinalpha.com: Psychedelics 2021: A Year in Review

Thedailybeast.com: When the LSD King Timothy Leary Hid in Africa with the Black Panthers

Psychedelicspotlight.com: GH Research Is Taking Psychedelic 5-MeO-DMT ‘Toad Venom’ Public

Harvard.edu: Washington Psilocybin Bill Would Legalize Supported Adult Use

Psychedelics Today: PTSF72 – Breaking Down SB-519, with MAPS’ Ismail L. Ali

Psychedelics Today: Eyes on Oregon YouTube playlist

Smallpharma.com: Small Pharma granted fast-track designation from UK regulator for DMT-assisted therapy for Major Depressive Disorder

Facebook: The Purple Shop

Diasporapsychedelicsociety.org

Psychedelics Today: PT268 – Hamilton Morris – PCP, 5-MeO-DMT, and The Synthesis of New Psychedelics

Hamilton’s Pharmacopeia: The Psychedelic Toad

Uproxx.com: Why DIY Magic Mushroom Growers Are Gathering In An Uncle Ben’s Rice Subreddit

What Technology Wants, by Kevin Kelly (Joe called it “What Technology Does”)

Benzinga.com: Is DeFi Dangerous? Elizabeth Warren Thinks So

Bbc.com: China declares all crypto-currency transactions illegal

Psychedelics Today: PT244 – Mark Haberstroh – Mushrooms, Retreat Centers, and Safety (the person who has been to more retreats than anyone Joe knows)

Psychedelics Today: PT277 – Ryan Zurrer – Venture Capital, Reciprocity, and the Regenerative Financing Vine

Finance.yahoo.com: Goldman Sachs asks in biotech research report: ‘Is curing patients a sustainable business model?’

Imdb.com: The Big Short

Sweatco.in (Sweatcoin)

Microdosevr.com

About Josh Hardman

Founder and Editor of Psilocybin Alpha, an online resource and weekly newsletter covering the psychedelics space with a focus on drug development efforts.

Instagram: @psilocybinalpha
Twitter: @Josh__Hardman
Twitter: @PsilocybinAlpha
Linkedin: Joshhardmanuk


Support the show!

  • Patreon
  • Leave us a review on Facebook or iTunes
  • Share us with your friends
  • Join our Facebook group – Psychedelics Today group – Find the others and create community.

Navigating Psychedelics

Psychedelics Today Mug
Posted on January 21, 2022October 4, 2022

PT286 – Joe Tafur, MD – Vital Psychedelic Conversations

In this episode of the podcast, Kyle sits down with Joe Tafur, MD, for the first episode in our new weekly series, “Vital Psychedelic Conversations.” 

Vital is the name of our new 12-month certificate program launching in April, and each episode of Vital Psychedelic Conversations will feature one of the teachers we’ve been honored to be able to include in the program. While the official announcement with all the important details is coming next week, we’re pretty pumped about Vital and wanted to start this new series today!

Joe Tafur, MD, is a family physician and author who was trained in ayahuasca curanderismo at the Nihue Rao Centro Espiritual in Peru. He also is a co-founder of the Church of the Eagle and the Condor, which is currently pursuing legal protection for ceremonial ayahuasca use. 

He discusses the frustrating application process for the church; the idea of the substance only being a part of the experience; how a truly transpersonal moment seems to make people start asking about the sacred; the scientific community’s struggles with the transpersonal; soul retrieval; the interconnectedness of all things; and he makes an argument for allowing religious tokens in therapeutic containers. And he talks about what we can learn from Indigenous tradition and their holistic and health-focused mindset, connection to nature, relationship with substances, and embrace of spirituality. 

Through the Church of the Eagle and the Condor, Tafur is running a webinar series to speak to and learn from Indigenous elders called “Wisdom of the Elders.” The first is next week, January 27th, and features Diné Elder Josie Begay-James.

Notable Quotes

“People are with this kind of direction: they’re partying, they’re having a great experience, maybe making some big memories, maybe they are shifting, some people are growing, maybe not. But then, on this other side, you have this high percentage of people really turning around decades-old mental health issues. So that’s a big, big difference. So what’s going on in those sessions? And what’s going on around those sessions? The focus has been the substance, the substance, the substance, the substance. They think they can sell it, whatever they want to do with it. But that other meat of what’s happening with people – there’s a lot of mysterious elements in that space.”

“The ones who are doing the psychotherapy with ketamine, I find, over and over again, that they become very curious about the sacred. …Those people want to know about people that have experience with this, from that perspective (from a spiritual perspective), because you can tell them: ‘These molecules did this and these neural patterns did that,’ but they’re not satisfied. It doesn’t answer the questions that they’re seeking, about: ‘What do I do with that?’”

“Why does it have to be separate? Why would it be separate? It’s not separate, I don’t think, in sports. I don’t think they try to get people to dissociate from their intuition and their feeling. I think they encourage it strongly. …They’ll say, ‘He’s possessed!’ They’ll say a person is ‘inspired.’ Similarly with music; you wouldn’t have that ‘I’m not going to try to feel into my soul while I’m on stage.’ It’s actually the opposite, is the discussion quite often. Isn’t that true? Isn’t that what sells tickets all over the world? Isn’t that what distinguishes the big ticket sellers in general, that they’re able to tap into something that is transpersonal?”

“We have to deal with the transpersonal, not only for the sake of expanding ourselves and to be better people or to grow, but it’s a matter of health. That’s the reason.” 

Links

DrJoeTafur.com

The Fellowship of the River: A Medical Doctor’s Exploration into Traditional Amazonian Plant Medicine, by Joseph Tafur, MD

Modernspirit.org

Churchofeagleandcondor.org

January 27th: First episode of the Church of the Eagle and the Condor’s “Wisdom of the Elders” Series: An Evening with Diné Elder Josie Begay-James

Frontiersin.org: The Shipibo Ceremonial Use of Ayahuasca to Promote Well-Being: An Observational Study

Psychedelics Today: PT229 – Dr. Matthew Johnson – What is Consciousness?

About Joe Tafur, MD

Joe Tafur, MD, is a Colombian-American family physician originally from Phoenix, Arizona. After completing his family medicine training at UCLA, Dr. Tafur spent two years in academic research at the UCSD Department of Psychiatry in a lab focused on mind-body medicine. After his research fellowship, over a period of six years, he lived and worked in the Peruvian Amazon at the traditional healing center Nihue Rao Centro Espiritual. There he worked closely with master Shipibo healer Ricardo Amaringo and trained in ayahuasca curanderismo. In his book, The Fellowship of the River: A Medical Doctor’s Exploration into Traditional Amazonian Plant Medicine, through a series of stories, Dr. Tafur shares his unique experience and integrative medical theories. After the release of his book in 2017, Dr. Tafur has been spending more time in the U.S. and with his spiritual community in Arizona, has co-founded the Church of the Eagle and the Condor (CEC). This spiritual community is dedicated to promoting the spiritual unity of all people with the Creator through the practice of traditional Indigenous spirituality and sacred ceremonies. The CEC is currently pursuing legal protection for their practice of sacred Ayahuasca ceremony. Dr. Tafur is also a co-founder of Modern Spirit, a nonprofit dedicated to demonstrating the value of spiritual healing in modern healthcare. Among their projects is the Modern Spirit Epigenetics Project, an epigenetic analysis of the impact of MAPS MDMA-assisted psychotherapy. Their first results have now been submitted for publication. He is currently a fellow at the University of Arizona’s Center for Integrative Medicine. Additionally, he is involved the Ocotillo Center for Integrative Medicine in Phoenix, Arizona. To learn more about his work you can also visit Drjoetafur.com.


Support the show!

  • Patreon
  • Leave us a review on Facebook or iTunes
  • Share us with your friends
  • Join our Facebook group – Psychedelics Today group – Find the others and create community.

Navigating Psychedelics

Psychedelics Today Mug

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Next page

Keeping Tabs

A microdose of all things psychedelic news, all in one place. Get bi-weekly updates, education, and events straight to your inbox.

We won’t share your information. Unsubscribe at any time.

pt_logo_white (1)

Psychedelics Today is the planetary leader in psychedelic media, storytelling, and education.

Menu
  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Events
  • About
  • Press
  • Become a Navigator
  • Contact
Subscribe to our newsletter
Visit Our Other Sites
  • Education Center
  • Vital
  • Shop
  • Navigators
Subscribe to our Podcast
© Psychedelics Today. All rights reserved. Privacy | Terms & Conditions